.org/rpms/qt6-qtwebengine/blob/rawhide/f/qtwebengine-blink-dlopen-h264.patch
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt6-qtwebengine/blob/rawhide/f/qtwebengine-webrtc-dlopen-h264.patch
(We do not have these in qt5-qtwebengine, only in qt6-qtwebengine.)
Kevin Kofler
___
y with the one
from RPM Fusion? (In principle, both should support H.264 decoding, the one
from Fedora through dlopened OpenH264 with a downstream Fedora patch, the
one from RPM Fusion through the built-in decoder in FFmpeg.)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmf
Cisco
arrangement.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
e
proper list of supported codecs to the websites? I doubt it. The list has
always been hardcoded at compile time (picked from one of two manually
hardcoded lists depending on the "use_proprietary_codecs" compilation
option) in Chromium.
nd mock do the same
> thing?
As I understand it, RPM Fusion has its own Fedora mirrors which can be
slightly out of date at times.
> Anyway, sorry about that. I'll remember to check koji in the future to
> confirm.
Thanks.
Kevin Kofler
time based on the "proprietary_codecs" compile-time configuration flag and
hence just swapping out FFmpeg is not sufficient to fully support the
patent-encumbered codecs.
> Can we properly obsoletes it instead ?
No, we cannot.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpm
ired.
Compatibility libraries are the kind of packages that needs to persist
basically forever. And again, nobody forces you to use Qt 3 or Qt 3
applications. Retiring Qt 3 would also not get those applications magically
ported to Qt 5 or 6, th
Oh, so, AFTER I resend this by e-mail, the message I had sent through Gmane
actually goes through. Seems to just have been delayed rather than eaten.
Sorry for the double post.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion
uld NOT be retired!
Unmaintained packages will get retired eventually anyway.
Removing packages is always a disservice to users and should only be done if
absolutely necessary.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-dev
uld NOT be retired!
Unmaintained packages will get retired eventually anyway.
Removing packages is always a disservice to users and should only be done if
absolutely necessary.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-dev
tty useless in the current
state, the benefits will become visible only in the long term (but
eventually they will, just not now).
See also Christian F.K. Schaller's blog post:
https://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2022/05/11/why-is-the-open-source-driver-release-from-nvidia-so-important-for-linux/
Ke
maintenance burden of
any kind, so I do not see a good reason not to carry this patch.
Judging from my experience with how Chromium development works, I doubt they
will ever change their code to work the way the FFmpeg developers want, they
will just stop supporting unbundling FFmpeg altogether.
but I would have to
backport it to the version (Chromium 87) used in Qt5WebEngine.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--- End Message ---
age is ready? Or is bundled
even entirely preferred over using the compat package?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.r
--- Begin Message ---
Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Rebuilding now:
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=523888
>
> I had actually done the release bump the previous weekend (Sat Jan 29
> 2022), but I was unable to do the rebuild because there
ide compose and
hence libvpx was not updated in the RPM Fusion buildroot. Now it is.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers
sounds like the annobin package needs to be rebuilt by Rocky. (As a
workaround, you could remove -fplugin=annobin from the compiler flags.)
In any cases, such issues need to be reported to the rebuild that has them.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion
--- Begin Message ---
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> CentOS has moved the content to vault, so I've found a more suitable
> mirror until we migrate to rhel/Stream kind of repos.
Why not use Alma or Rocky?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers m
--- Begin Message ---
Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 17:50, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Do you have any idea how we can resolve the issue or should I just go
>> back to building the package on x86_64 only?
>
> Take a look at the Telegram D
:
Status code: 500 for
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/34/Everything/aarch64/os/Packages/f/flex-2.6.4-7.fc34.aarch64.rpm
(IP: 192.168.182.1)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers
)
Should I report this to fedora-infrastructure? Or is this not from the real
dl.fedoraproject.org (but from some local proxy or mirror at RPM Fusion)?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
stack-clash-protection -
std=gnu++1y -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wextra -D_REENTRANT -Wno-unused-parameter
-Wno-unused-variable -Wno-deprecated-declarations -c
/builddir/build/BUILD/qtwebengine-everywhere-
src-5.15.8/src/core/content_browser_client_qt.cpp -o
obj
the package on x86_64 only?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--- End Message ---
h module, so you
need to replace only that module and not the entire library.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion
eed to do a review
> and maintenance of it
Those cards are well-supported by the Nouveau driver by now, aren't they?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rp
IRC. It's not an either-or.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--- End Message ---
upstream source, import it to the lookaside cache).
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--- End Message ---
since the license has been ruled free by both the FSF and the Fedora
Project, I no longer see a valid reason for RPM Fusion to decide any
differently.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.
llow the forward-merging
model though. So it is not something "no project" would do as you originally
claimed. :-)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
engl/OpenGL/ in that line) should fix it, because then it will
look for an OpenGL pkg-config module instead, hopefully not find one
(because pkg-config is case-sensitive), and then use the "-lGL -lGLU" flags
instead.
The second argument of test_library is only used 1. as t
Leigh Scott wrote:
>> What about adding that as nonfree package?
>
> That doesn't make any difference.
Well, most nonfree packages are binary blobs to begin with.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusio
(I think this Fedora rule of having to announce every license change even in
cases like this makes no sense whatsoever. But RPM Fusion is only following
Fedora rules here, so it would need to be discussed in Fedora.)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-d
?fedora} > 31 conditional
actually implementing the change.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
lease branch,
then there will be Qt 6.0).
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
I am NOT arguing that merging from older to newer branches makes sense in a
dist-git context (in fact, I'd argue that it does not, because changes
should be built for Rawhide first and dist-git requires them to be pushed to
master to be built for Rawhide), but:
FeRD wrote:
> If you were
is redistributable.
A Requires on an external package is not acceptable.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
actually built with a 64-bit compiler by default.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
d/or for us individual packagers sorted out. I realize that we are
all very busy. I am, too (which is why I am not yet promising to look into
the infrastructure scripts).
That said, thanks for moving the F31 package on to the proper tag!
Kind regards
ates back to updates-testing.
In this case, Leigh moved it from f31-free-updates to f31-free, so it should
be where it belongs now, thanks!
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubsc
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I have submitted http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=358046 .
The build succeeded on Tuesday:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=12008
and went out to the updates-testing repo.
Now, I accidentally moved it to f31-free-updates, which was not a g
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I really hope someone can deal with this rebuild.
I have submitted http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=358046 .
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Would this be a known issue please, and is there a fix/workaround we can
> help test?
It is known: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5384 –
qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld needs a rebuild.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpm
FeRD wrote:
> On cursory inspection of the API docs I also don't see any obvious reason
> why it would need mjpegtools, but I admit I didn't look very hard.
It is the other way round: mjpegtools needs SDL_gfx, not the opposite.
Kevin
The Fedora Koji
definitely doesn't allow that.)
I have moved it now, what happens next? I guess somebody needs to run the
push script? So it isn't that self-service after all, is it?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfu
went stable
on Sunday at 03:09:13 UTC.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
er, which has reverse engineered RAR uncompression support
as its main feature, is in Fedora and uses gnustep-base. (It was originally
developed for macOS and ported to GNUstep.)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-d
the Copr for Rawhide and have that option enabled,
it actually does automatically support new Fedora releases as they happen.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send
table repo's are OK IMO
I trust a Copr shipping Free Software (anything else would be in violation
of the Copr usage guidelines!) way more than any proprietary software vendor
(who can hide any arbitrary misfeatures in their proprietary code).
t to a snapshot.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
patent-encumbered, and
which cannot be dlopened that easily. Those would still only be addable by
recompiling FFmpeg. So the dlopening is entirely useless because RPM Fusion
would have to replace FFmpeg anyway. In addition, it also adds dlopening for
libraries that are no longer patent-encumbered, such
library ABI somewhere), it would have to be checked.
I am not convinced that having such an FFmpeg build in Fedora would be an
improvement over the status quo.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.r
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> A trimmed naive dnf search brought me this :
Looks like only the packages showing up with .src in your list are actually
from RPM Fusion, the .x86_64 and i686 ones are actually already in Fedora.
Kevin Kof
/EPEL/FAQ#Is_it_possible_to_get_a_package_only_into_EPEL_and_not_Fedora.3F
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/HVFU2GAEUOUE4KYHLJKPFDUDGU3WKCW6/
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-d
.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Github with the kickstart:
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-kickstarts
I see the following:
> @firefox
> chromium (with chromium-libs-media-freeworld)
> qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld
How many browsers are you going to ship?
t; history.
Yes, I am subscribed, with mail delivery disabled. (I use KNode and Gmane
(NNTPS) to read the mails.)
I am sending this message with HyperKitty as a workaround.
Can this please be fixed?
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers ma
Hi,
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> For this specific issue, I (one?) can probably find the option to
> raise the koji task timeout.
Is the increased timeout implemented now? My second build attempt also
failed with a timeout, so I'll only resubmit it if the timeout has been
increased.
penSUSE does that in their OBS, but Koji does not support it.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
ving 4 GiB would surely help.
More is not all that useful on 32-bit though.)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
urity update, the security fixes are also in
5.9.3 that is already out in all supported releases (and even in F25, I got
it through just before the EOL). But 5.10.1 or 5.9.4 builds will surely be
needed soon for security.
Kevin Kofler
_
version
(because otherwise, qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld would have to include its own
copy of the huge data files).
The only other solution would be for RPM Fusion to get faster 32-bit ARM
builders, but it doesn't look like that is going to happen any time soon,
unfortunately.
F25 update will not miss
the EOL).
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
en
these things only if a file is actually missing, not if the certificate
has expired.
* The linked Fedora wiki page no longer contains any mention of certificates
because Fedora switched to Kerberos for authentication.
We really need better error messages in rfpkg.
Kevin Kofler
_
ficate), and most upstreams do not sign their
releases at all. So why are you singling out VLC in particular? This is just
how things are in the real world, not much we as downstream can do about it.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailin
so no
support for using only OpenH264, decoding always uses FFmpeg.)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
nH264, so shipping OpenH264
should not expose RPM Fusion to any additional liabilities.)
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
e of clean packaging and uncluttered menus.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
s by default.
Fedora even ships a package that regularly phones home to its own servers to
verify whether any given network is actually connected to the Internet:
NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora.
Kevin Kofler
ecific branches? I cannot see an interface for that in
the web interface.
I would like to retire the phantom el* branches of freetype-freeworld that I
never requested nor used.
Kevin Kofler
ind that really confusing.
And the --with and --without switches cannot be used in Koji anyway, so you
may as well hardcode the options in the specfile using %global.
Kevin Kofler
no rebuild of dependencies should
| be required"
but don't ask me where it comes from.
Kevin Kofler
r the new version is a horrible idea, it will
lead to symbol conflicts (in applications accidentally transitively linking
both versions) and a waste of space. I would just upgrade the existing
package to the new version.
Kevin Kofler
ion .
Sorry, but the naming is misleading there (at least for us non-native
English speakers – I cannot comment on how it sound to a US American). The
Fedora Packaging "Guidelines" are actually not just informative guidelines,
but policies that, for the most part, have to be followed st
tribution.
There is a proposal that would change this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/398
(by introducing Debian-style + and ~ suffixes in Version), but it has not
been approved yet. So you cannot use it at this time.
Kevin Kofler
ICANN roots, which are widely recognized as the "official"
ones.
Kevin Kofler
e same cert for all *.rpmfusion.org subdomains
(unless there are more than 100), but of course you don't have to.
Kevin Kofler
ggers the weak dependency only if both firefox and vlc are
installed). They should already be safe in Supplements/Enhances.
Kevin Kofler
ould know about
Fedora. So why should Fedora carry the weak dependencies on RPM Fusion
packages?
Kevin Kofler
ably find more if you search all .cc files for the string. So
either you patch all these usages in the Fedora Chromium package to look up
the flag from libmedia at runtime, or there is no way around recompiling the
whole Chromium.
Kevin Kofler
tead. You would also likely be touching
several code places related to codec support.
A less invasive approach would simply try to initialize
media::MimeUtil::allow_proprietary_codecs_ to a runtime-detected value.
Kevin Kofler
ed at all (without recompiling the entire Chromium). And
anyway, you are also going to run into issue 3 (the hardcoded codec lists)
if you don't recompile the whole Chromium.
Kevin Kofler
ion, because it is not compliant with the
expected architecture support of the distribution.
If you want to enable the ASM, you will need to patch it to fix it to
properly runtime-detect also SSE 1 and MMX.
Kevin Kofler
doraproject.org/cgit/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine.git/tree/qtwebengine-opensource-src-5.7.0-no-sse2.patch
(The Chromium packaging should also use such a patch, but currently
doesn't. Send your complaints about that to spot. :-) )
Kevin Kofler
ackage is a package of upstream Chromium without
Samsung's changes.
Kevin Kofler
the package distributed for use. Steve
If this is all your own code (and not some external non-free and/or patent-
encumbered dependency), I would strongly recommend you to pick a license
acceptable for Fedora for your work, so that it can go into Fedora proper
rather than into RPM Fusion.
Kevin Kofler
F21 branch to be able to do any work on the F22
version. The package ought to track the version of Freetype in Fedora. I
cannot do this with one devel branch for 3 (!) different releases (F21, F22,
Rawhide/F23).
Why can we not have CVS branches for F21 and F22?
Kevin Kofler
Hi,
rpm.livna.org has been broken for several days now. Does anybody know what's
up there? If Livna is not coming back, where should we get libdvdcss from
now?
Kevin Kofler
-free/ into Fedora instead.
Kevin Kofler
// substring gmbh/tw 14.9.04
// modified bootstrap code 0x052 to support FreeDOS
so it looks like this doesn't actually come from the FreeDOS project, but is
a derivative work of the proprietary hexdump.
Kevin Kofler
one release late!
Kevin Kofler
solarflow99 wrote:
BTW, I see a lot of F21 packages. How are they getting released then?
They are built from the devel branch, which is still in pre-branch state
(targeting the F21 release).
Kevin Kofler
as a last resort).
Kevin Kofler
around. The package will have to be patched to find the
headers at their new location.
Kevin Kofler
the shared library.
Kevin Kofler
with the
system FFmpeg anyway, why not make it the default?
Kevin Kofler
when I patch
around that there's another problem with qrc (QT resource files) not
getting generated in time. Some kind of dependency problem I think.
I can help you resolve that, but I need to see what exactly is going wrong
(e.g., the offending build.log).
Kevin Kofler
can tell, it has been relicensed by the copyright holder, so
there should be nothing preventing it from entering Fedora anymore. But only
git master, or version 0.15 and higher when released, can be imported into
Fedora, NOT 0.14.x or older.
Kevin Kofler
.
Kevin Kofler
Alec Leamas wrote:
Long story short: I agree (longer explanation in ticket). That said, we
need a fpc decision.
And if FPC doesn't feel competent, they should say so so we can re-file the
ticket with FESCo (or they could just forward it to FESCo directly).
Kevin Kofler
-desktop. It used to be optional in
kde-desktop in Fedora before it was moved.
(I don't think I can edit comps directly in RPM Fusion as I can in Fedora,
can I? Allowing that and documenting it would remove that burden from the
admins.)
Kevin Kofler
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
