. For more details see this blog post:
http://benmabey.com/2013/09/11/databasecleaner-and-email-spec-need-new-homes.html
Thanks!
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
manager. Any ides how I can handle this?
time_on_site.should match(/^00:[0-5][0-9]$/)
Best regards
Mattias
Hey Mattias,
Very peculiar. Could you produce the smallest possible script to reproduce
this?
Thanks,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
with you about an opportunity with an industry
leading Irish technology company.*Generous salary with excellent
benefits package and bonus included*
Please contact me for more information:
kenneth.orei...@sabeo.com
This is a list for rspec issues, not recruiter spam. Thanks.
Ben
. Could you
post a gist of the spec and the controller action?
Regards,
Ben
I've opened a question on StackOverflow too:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12799617/unexpected-rspec-should-receive-behaviour
many thanks,
enricostn
--
· Enrico Stano
·
· twitter @enricostano
· skype
On 9 October 2012 13:56, enrico stano enrico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ben,
you could find more info browsing this Gist
https://gist.github.com/3848429#file_user_controller_spec.rb
I've added it to my StackOverflow question too.
Thank you for your time!
ennrico
CanCan is finding your
what's happening
thank you!
You can set the number of times an expectation should be met or the order
in which they're executed:
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/docs/message-expectations/receive-counts
Regards,
Ben
2012/10/9 Andy Lindeman alinde...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 9
/rspec-mocks/issues/133
--
best,
deepak
w: https://gist.github.com/deepak
Did you read the discussion from the issue?
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/133
It makes a strong case as to why at_least(0) makes no sense.
Cheers,
Ben
___
rspec
what specifically I should be testing.
Any guidance would be greatly appreicated.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
a single Location, and since
it's run within a block it's delayed until the spec is run, rather than at
load time.)
Ben
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:19 PM, S Ahmed sahmed1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to use factory for a test case, but the model I am creating via
the factory depends
binding.pry above that line, and then
run it, and then poke around in the repl and see if you've got the right
context. You did make the request to get that page, right?
Ben
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:04 PM, S Ahmed sahmed1...@gmail.com wrote:
My html looks like:
select id=account_car_type name
On 12/11/10 2:03 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 10 Dec 2010, at 16:21, Ben Mabey wrote:
On 12/10/10 8:56 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm writing some tests for file upload code. The files are binary, images
mostly. I'm futzing around a bit, trying to figure out how to assert
Cyclic redundancy check (crc)
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Dec 2010, at 15:56, Matt Wynne m...@mattwynne.net wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm writing some tests for file upload code. The files are binary, images
mostly. I'm futzing around a bit, trying to figure out how to assert that the
uploaded
. It won't tell you what
is different.. just that they aren't identical which is what I think you
want. So... something like:
Digest::MD5.hexdigest(File.read(uploaded_file_path)).should ==
Digest::MD5.hexdigest(File.read(path_to_expected_file))
-Ben
Thanks for all the replies and the help.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:08 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
On Oct 19, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Oscar Del Ben wrote:
I'm having some troubles understanding how to test a couple of things
I'm having some troubles understanding how to test a couple of things.
Usually, if I'm having trouble testing something, it means that my design
could probably be improved or changed, but in these cases I think I'm doing
the right thing.
Here's the first scenario:
class Foo
def initialize
' at the top of the spec like so:
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/blob/master/spec/rspec/core_spec.rb#L1
By following this convention you will only have to specify the spec on
the command line.
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users
* 2
end
end
require 'ostruct'
describe MyModule do
def new_object(hash)
OpenStruct.new(hash).extend(MyModule)
end
describe #double do
it doubles the num var do
new_object(:num = 2).double.should == 4
end
end
end
HTH,
Ben
think it should work.)
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
it would take some significant changes to support this; but it doesn't
seem to be a terribly esoteric use case.
Thanks for any suggestions.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
?
If it's the former, you can test it by creating a test double for the
block, and asserting that it's passed to the collaborator
The later. The block gets created by the code under test, so I can't create
a double for it.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing
if you want to
see an in-depth example.
In general, for simple CLIs aruba is probably the way to go though.
This example group is probably best if you want/need to use mocking more
to avoid expensive operations.
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing
(pulled into a
separate class because I couldn't work out how to test it).
describe TeamCalendar do
before do
@mock_website = stub(the website).as_null_object
@builder = TeamBuilder.new(@mock_website).member(Ben)
@hronline = TeamCalendar.new(@mock_website,Ben)
end
it should
Slightly flummoxed on this one.
Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in 'ChartEventsController handling
GET /chart_events should find all chart_events given a value'
expected: ([:all, {:conditions=[value LIKE ?, %chart_event%]}])
got: ([:all, {:conditions=[value LIKE ?, %chart_event%]}])
being sorted.
Many thanks
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
for inspection.
If that doesn't suit your needs you will have to decorate 'it' on
ExampleGroup.
-Ben
On Apr 29, 7:31 pm, Pat Maddox mailingli...@patmaddox.com wrote:
Could you share a bit more about what you are actually trying to achieve?
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Ryan S wrote
Rick
Many thanks - I think the idea of breaking out the actual file writing
from the code generation is a great one. I don't need to test File I/O
- I think I can assume that that works just fine...
Many thanks for your help
Ben
___
rspec-users
Ben Lovell wrote:
On 16 April 2010 15:59, Ben Lovell benjamin.lov...@gmail.com wrote:
Try:
post 'whatever', {}, {'rack.session' = {:something='value'}}
To put things through the session with rack test/sinatra.
Sent from my iPhone
Hmm, hold up, that isn't what you asked for :)
You
to see if I am in the
Test environment and generate a different file, but putting code into
my model to pass tests doesn't seem a very, well, sensible thing to
do.
Anyone been there, done that?
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http
Try:
post 'whatever', {}, {'rack.session' = {:something='value'}}
To put things through the session with rack test/sinatra.
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Apr 2010, at 15:20, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Nicholas Wieland wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at
On 16 April 2010 15:59, Ben Lovell benjamin.lov...@gmail.com wrote:
Try:
post 'whatever', {}, {'rack.session' = {:something='value'}}
To put things through the session with rack test/sinatra.
Sent from my iPhone
Hmm, hold up, that isn't what you asked for :)
You have to remember
= true,
:id = 1)
)
]
And lo - it all works! Hurrah. So if anyone else is as much as an
idiot as me (unlikely, but you never know) that is what you do.
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org
/spec:5
)
Any help v much appreciated ...
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
: #{reflection.primary_key_name} =
\#{record.#{reflection.name}.send(:owner_quoted_id)}
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Ben Fyvie
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
. If it does I could add support to DatabaseCleaner so you can
select which AR DB connections you want to clean.
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
the app fails because it doesn't load test unit.
So my question is where can I put this code so that it will always be
included when running rspec?
Thanks!
Ben Fyvie
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org
very cool with a lot of potential. Just like Ioke's docs it embeds the
specs as part of the documentation with the option to view the source.
Here is the example from the projects home page:
http://lsegal.github.com/yard-spec-plugin/String.html#pig_latin-instance_method
-Ben
).
Has anyone solved this problem to get lightning fast specs on JRuby just
like we can with MRI and Spork?
Thanks,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Try
gem install cucumber-rails
In a recent release the generators were split from the main project.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Jan 2010, at 06:38, Onno van der Straaten onno.van.der.straa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to RSpec and Cucumber and I'm following the RSpec book.
I have
are suggesting, I think this would be great! Not
only does it add the functionality we are looking for but the method names
are self documenting and much easier to understand what functionality to
expect from each one.
Ben Fyvie
_
From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:rspec
in advance!
Ben Fyvie
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
) + /support/**/*.rb].sort.each {|f| require f}
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
have any initial thoughts about why this would
be happening.
Hmm.. I can't think of why this would happen either. Tim Harper is a
textmate user so if you post this question to the spork mailing list he
could probably help you. (Spork ML:
http://groups.google.com/group/sporkgem)
-Ben
Jake Benilov wrote:
Hello Ben,
Hi Jake,
I hope you don't mind but I am copying this response to the rspec-users
list in case any one else is able to shed more light on it.
I have a bit of a newbie question regarding fakefs; I want to test Rake
tasks using fakefs and rspec
. If you are finding you want to write Then I should
see.. And I should see.. And I should see., etc that is an indication
that a view spec *may* be helpful in that situation.
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http
matches?(email)
@email = email
@actual_sender = (email.from || []).first
@actual_sender.eql? @expected_email_addresses
end
On the email you are testing can you call 'from' on it and see what it
returns?
-Ben
___
rspec-users
6.
Cheers,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Ed Howland wrote:
Sorry for the cross post, but does anyone know of a list dedicated to
just BDD? Seems like all the discussion is happening over on
rspec-users, some on the tdd list.
My interest is in the abstract concept of behavior driven
design/development, as expressed by Dave Astels and
. So, you could say:
require 'rubygems'
require 'spec'
require 'spec/expectations'
42.should == 42
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
end
end
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
in that file.
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
/liangzan/email-spec/tree/master
I plan on merging the above into email spec soon.
Even if you are not using email-spec then the above libs would be helpful.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman
will be appreciated.
Please post the failing spec and your spec_helper.rb. Without those it
is hard for us to diagnose the problem.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
additional rake tasks to help with
this:
rake cucumber # Alias for cucumber:ok
rake cucumber:all # Run all features
rake cucumber:ok # Run features that should pass
rake cucumber:wip # Run features that are being worked on
-Ben
___
rspec-users
the the options already have a
convention. For the sake of consistently I would rather see them be
specified using options. Does anyone else have a preference or argument
for using env vars?
BTW, thanks for doing this. :)
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
://groups.google.com/group/cukes
Thanks,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Rick DeNatale wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Ben Mabeyb...@benmabey.com wrote:
You can, IMO, use a mock like a stub and a stub like a
mock.. Take this for example:
describe #some_method do
it delegates to some_obejct do
some_object = stub('some object', :some_method = foo
tests.
(And even then you can never test everything...)
Thats my current take on things at least... HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Thanks David and Ben for the comprehensive replies! I really appreciate it :)
These wikipedia articles helped me to understand on the more conceptual level:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_stub
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mock_object
So, if I understand
Ben Mabey wrote:
Nathan Benes wrote:
I'm fairly new to cucumber and rspec but so far am falling in love with
both. I've read up on several different articles concerning these
testing tools including the 'beta' BDD rspec/cucumber book.
I saw this thread here: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic
), however that is aliased from #stub! which is used most often.
This is all from memory so I could be wrong but that is the general gist of it.
HTH,
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
that it is *the*
way of doing things. This is what the book recommends IIRC so you are
understanding it.
-Ben
Thanks
Chris
On Jul 21, 9:25 am, internetchris ch...@silhouettesolutions.net
wrote:
Ben that worked perfectly I appreciate the help.
Stephen, I appreciate the encouragement, it feels daunting
that the controller can set it to @account and save it.
To see some examples of RSpec controller specs you can use a generator to
general rspec scaffolding... like so:
./script/generate rspec_scaffold Account
HTH,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
this feature check out the examples in
this cucumber feature for it:
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/blob/1420b6f02f5fe2ba97286d895b8215617f80d4a6/features/matchers/define_matcher_with_user_customizable_message.feature
Thanks for the release.
-Ben
* result.should be_nil, expected result
, are you using the
autospec command that comes with RSpec?
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
work.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
is:
http://rubular.com/
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
. Meaning, assuming the stub
is in the before block, you can change the expectation to:
Comment.should_receive(:find).with(123) # this will still return
@comment
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org
definition)
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
integration test (or Cucumber scenario).
Since the majority of views are very simple then verifying them just
in Cucumber is good enough, IMO.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Jesse Crockett wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 8:32 AM, Jesse Crockett wrote:
When I use integrate_views, can I write view spec in what would
otherwise be isolated controller spec?
Correct, by default RSpec's controller specs will not render the
view. This allows
')
Note this is gmail code and untested :)
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
do this in spec/spec_helper.rb:
Dir[File.dirname(__FILE__) + /support/**/*.rb].each {|f| require f}
What would folks think if that was included in the generated
spec_helper in spec-rails?
Just as I said there was no written convention... :)
I like it. +1
-Ben
to soon is how to test
code that runs as a BackgrounDRb worker.
I came up with solutions for all of this (except for the BDRb stuff),
but I'm not entirely sure of their quality. They certainly feel
hackish, but I can't put my finger on why. I suspect David Chelimsky
or Ben Mabey or Aslak or any
can use instance variables to pass values to the shared examples,
though, right?
At your own risk, yes, of course :)
If you do go down that route, I recommend method calls instead of
instance variables. That way it will yell out you when you forget to
define one. :)
-Ben
cheers
the value of such specs... but that
is the macro approach.
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
suggest filing a bug on their tracker, wherever it may lie.
Scott
Spork uses github issues. Also, FYI, spork has it's own mailing list:
http://groups.google.com/group/sporkgem
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http
Stephen Eley wrote:
Ben and Rick,
Thanks very much to both of you for the encouraging responses. Your
reply, Ben, came just in time as I was starting to wonder if I had
made a complete and irrevocable ass of myself.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Ben Mabeyb...@benmabey.com wrote
gotta run, but
I those were some of the thoughts I had.
Thanks,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Whatever
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
posts:
http://groups.google.com/group/cukes
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hi,
For some reason, no matter what, my entire cucumber suite is ran after
every auto test. Is there a way to make auto test ignore cucumber all
together?
Thanks for your help.
Ben Johnson
Binary Logic
W: www.binarylogic.com
E: bjohn...@binarylogic.com
1430 Broadway
7th Floor - NECO
Ben Johnson wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, no matter what, my entire cucumber suite is ran after
every auto test. Is there a way to make auto test ignore cucumber all
together?
Thanks for your help.
Hi Ben,
The default behaviour is for it to not run the features at all. In fact
Cucumber
the same behaviour with autotest-mac. My
scenarios won't run unless I specify AUTOFEATURE=true first.
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
.
Smita.
Hi Smita. Please use the new Cucumber google group for new threads
about Cucumber:
http://groups.google.com/group/cukes
When was the decision made to split off the cucumber group?
Scott
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/2009-May/014502.html
-Ben
Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Ben Mabey b...@benmabey.com wrote:
Spork seems to have the same problem that I have with spec_server: it
doesn't reload classes I change. So if I'm doing TDD between a model and
its
spec, it doesn't help.
///ark
I have the same
Scott Taylor wrote:
On May 26, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Ben Mabey b...@benmabey.com
mailto:b...@benmabey.com wrote:
Well, so Spork was really created with testing in mind. It is
more general purpose than spec_server though. You can
Scott Taylor wrote:
On May 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Scott Taylor wrote:
On May 26, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Ben Mabey b...@benmabey.com
mailto:b...@benmabey.com wrote:
Well, so Spork was really created with testing in mind
Scott Taylor wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
Scott Taylor wrote:
Ben Johnson wrote:
Did anyone ever figure out the factory_girl / machinist issues? I
am having the same problems and can figure out how to fix it for
the life of me. The first run works fine, then afterwards I get a
bunch
Scott Taylor wrote:
Ben Johnson wrote:
Did anyone ever figure out the factory_girl / machinist issues? I am
having the same problems and can figure out how to fix it for the
life of me. The first run works fine, then afterwards I get a bunch
of these errors:
No blueprint for class Venue
can see how having separate dirs can be
helpful as well, but in general I kinda like the crazy profile stuff. :)
FWIW,
Ben
I followed the instructions on
http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/setting-up-selenium
and created 2 profiles: default and selenium. It works, but not if I
cute Cuke, _without_ rocking the boat!
How do I actually use real, pre-existing Rails fixtures, the same as
the unit tests use? For familiarity?
http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/fixtures
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users
the
setting in test.rb.
Thanks,
Todd
Try changing the Rails.configuration.cache_classes setting at the
appropriate times...
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
-in-after-block#ticket-330-11
I think this should cover your use case... WDYT?
-Ben
On May 15, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Luke Melia wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 3:36 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Thanks for doing that. I have one more favour to ask: Can you show me
an example of a StepDefinition that would
) test/unit tests.
Suggestions?
RSpec now ships with an autospec command that acts as a wrapper.. are
you using it?
-Ben
Thanks...
dwh
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec
Ben Mabey wrote:
Luke Melia wrote:
Any further thoughts on this, Aslak? I'd prefer to go with a solution
in line with the future direction of Cucumber if possible.
Cheers,
Luke
Have you seen what Matt added recently?
https://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/330-gracefully
and run features like this:
RAILS_ENV=test rake features
However, setting the RAILS_ENV is easy to forget, so I don't recommend
relying on this.
-Ben
The versions are (most recent of the following):
bmabey-email_spec (0.1.3)
cucumber (0.3.5, 0.3.2, 0.3.0)
rspec (1.2.6, 1.2.4)
rspec-rails
/bla/ do
# don't remember the API, but you get the idea
@browser.goto_strict('/bla') # raises on 500 errors
end
Aslak
I have something similar to this in my fork of webrat. I will push my stuff
up today at some point.
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing
that would be hella nice. Although, I realise this would be pretty difficult
to achieve. That said, there certainly are times when you _need_ to see the
whole HTML.
Ben L
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman
thought of?
cheers,
Matt Wynne
http://beta.songkick.com
http://blog.mattwynne.net
Have you tried catching the error in an After block and opening up the
page? Aslak added that functionality:
https://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/272-pick-up-failure-on-after-hook
-Ben
== 'baz'.
Does that help or am I missing something about your question?
-Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo