Hi Michael,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:09 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
it would be good if you contributed a feature to Sage 3.4.1 to check
the release tour at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4.1
and edit what is there already in case it can be improved or add
Hi,
I just discovered:
http://code.google.com/apis/o3d/
watch the video there. I think this is awesome -- I hope sooner or
later all major browsers implement something like this, then it could
be used for all kinds of 3d interaction in the notebook.
Ondrej
On Thursday 23 April 2009, mabshoff wrote:
Hello,
while there should be a quick 3.4.2 to mop up patches from trac before
the big 4.0 jump today we had a planning session during the UW status
meeting about the goals for Sage 4.0. The result is at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/plan/sage-4.0
2009/4/22 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Apr 22, 12:52 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
To override this in Firefox on Linux, I put
#content.ticket { width: 100% !important; }
Hmm, that seems to be a worthwhile change to me since these days most
people should
Hi,
It seems that multivariate polynomial quotient rings are not in Sage
yet. Is someone working to fill this gap? or should I rely on Singular
or Magma interface? or should I attempt to implement my own toyish
one? Give me an advice. Thank you.
Kwankyu
On Apr 23, 1:22 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
On Thursday 23 April 2009, mabshoff wrote:
Hello,
Hi Martin,
while there should be a quick 3.4.2 to mop up patches from trac before
the big 4.0 jump today we had a planning session during the UW status
meeting
On Apr 23, 1:04 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I just discovered:
http://code.google.com/apis/o3d/
watch the video there. I think this is awesome -- I hope sooner or
later all major browsers implement something like this, then it could
be used for all kinds of 3d
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:29 AM, Kwankyu wrote:
Hi,
It seems that multivariate polynomial quotient rings are not in Sage
yet. Is someone working to fill this gap? or should I rely on Singular
or Magma interface? or should I attempt to implement my own toyish
one? Give me an advice. Thank you.
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I just discovered:
http://code.google.com/apis/o3d/
watch the video there. I think this is awesome -- I hope sooner or
later all major browsers implement something like this, then it could
be used for all kinds of 3d interaction in
Hi Robert,
Thank you. I just found examples in the reference using multivariate
quotient rings.
May I ask a similar question about hermite normal form of matrices
over univariate polynomial ring? ^^
Kwankyu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
2009/4/22 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Apr 22, 12:54 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On an upgrade from 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (intel) I get the following
doctest errors:
Thanks for the build report.
The following tests failed:
sage -t
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:51 AM, Kwankyu wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thank you. I just found examples in the reference using multivariate
quotient rings.
May I ask a similar question about hermite normal form of matrices
over univariate polynomial ring? ^^
Don't think it's implemented yet, but you
Hi folks,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:09 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
it would be good if you contributed a feature to Sage 3.4.1 to check
the release tour at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4.1
and edit what is there already in case it can be improved or add
2009/4/23 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com:
2009/4/22 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Apr 22, 12:54 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On an upgrade from 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (intel) I get the following
doctest errors:
Thanks for the build report.
Thanks Michael,
I was really referring to multiprocessing, since their APIs are not
the same and pyprocessing isn't supported anymore. Multiprocessing is
maintained to be fully compatible with the 2.6 module to help with
forward compatibility.
So I guess the answer to my question is that
Hello,
this seems to be more than jmol...
O3D is an open-source web API for creating rich, interactive 3D
applications in the browser. This API is shared at an early stage as
part of a conversation with the broader developer community about
establishing an open web standard for 3D graphics.
Hi Michael,
probably you did. But just to be sure: did you really do tests with
the singular spkg I put a while ago at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/weberg/spkg/
?
There are quite some changes in it (ask me if you have specific
questions), one or the other of which might possibly
mabshoff wrote:
Hello,
while there should be a quick 3.4.2 to mop up patches from trac before
the big 4.0 jump today we had a planning session during the UW status
meeting about the goals for Sage 4.0. The result is at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/plan/sage-4.0
It still needs a little
The latest RC of MPIR 1.1.1 should fix this issue.
Bill.
On 23 Apr, 01:43, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Marshall. I think I have a fix for this. But I've started a thread
on the MPIR development list for this:
I'd like to add as a goal that Sage 4.0 works with versions of its
dependencies available from the relevant upstreams.
For context, I would very much like to be able to package Sage 4.0 for
Debian once it comes out, since I find the current state of having Sage
3.0.5 from last July to be
+1 from me as a good goal for 4.0. But I don't have a whole lot of
experience with dealing with spkgs, and I'll be working on improving
p-adics, so I probably won't be helping much.
David
2009/4/23 Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu
I'd like to add as a goal that Sage 4.0 works with versions of its
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
We managed to get one gsoc project that does the assumptions right, so
it may happen anyways over the summer, in fact I very much hope so.
How does assumptions affect this? If that's so
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
+1 from me as a good goal for 4.0. But I don't have a whole lot of
experience with dealing with spkgs, and I'll be working on improving
p-adics, so I probably won't be helping much.
David
2009/4/23 Tim Abbott
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
We managed to get one gsoc project that does the assumptions right, so
it may happen anyways over the summer, in
2009/4/23 Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu:
I'd like to add as a goal that Sage 4.0 works with versions of its
dependencies available from the relevant upstreams.
For context, I would very much like to be able to package Sage 4.0 for
Debian once it comes out, since I find the current state of
On Apr 23, 2009, at 4:07 PM, William Stein wrote:
Could you explain how assumptions are so important? Could you
particularly address how they can (1) be so critically important, and
yet (2) ginac doesn't have them. Incidentaly, to me they are
particularly important in symbolic
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:09 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
it would be good if you contributed a feature to Sage 3.4.1 to check
the release tour at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4.1
and edit what is there already in case it can
On Apr 23, 4:36 am, Flavio Coelho fccoe...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Michael,
Hi Flávio,
I was really referring to multiprocessing, since their APIs are not
the same and pyprocessing isn't supported anymore. Multiprocessing is
maintained to be fully compatible with the 2.6 module to help
On Apr 23, 5:51 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Georg,
probably you did. But just to be sure: did you really do tests with
the singular spkg I put a while ago at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/weberg/spkg/
?
I will take it for a spin. I am
Tim Abbott wrote:
The first is upgrading CVS/SVN versions of dependencies to actual
releases. I notice the Sage currently has an SVN version of jqueryui, an
SVN version of matplotlib, and an SVN version of ghmm (to be fair, ghmm
hasn't released is ages, so I don't blame Sage for that
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2009, at 4:07 PM, William Stein wrote:
Could you explain how assumptions are so important? Could you
We already discussed this many times on this list, just search the
archives. Without good assumptions, you
On Apr 23, 6:23 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello,
SNIP
Hi Michael,
Hi David,
As Sage on Solaris needs a custom tool chain, could a script be provided
that builds that tool chain from a full (but fresh) installation of the
latest version of
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 6:23 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello,
SNIP
Hi Michael,
Hi David,
As Sage on Solaris needs a custom tool chain, could a script be provided
that builds that
On Apr 23, 12:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi,
+1 from me as a good goal for 4.0. But I don't have a whole lot of
experience with dealing with spkgs, and I'll be working on improving
p-adics, so I
On Apr 23, 1:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I think for the near term we should provide a binary tarball of your
toolchain.
I just tried dumping it on a completely different sparc box, and it works
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:58 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi,
+1 from me as a good goal for 4.0. But I don't have a whole lot of
On Apr 23, 2:04 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:58 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I doubt this will ever happen. Soon for example we plan to switch to
the svn version of pari which absolutely changes lots of things in
Sage in
On Apr 23, 5:51 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Georg,
probably you did. But just to be sure: did you really do tests with
the singular spkg I put a while ago at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/weberg/spkg/
?
Your spkg + sage -b to rebuild the
i have some questions and suggestion on the RestructuredText. I am a
ReST-newbie and so maybe these things have been discussed before.
* In one of my files i have a line power_series = series. This
produces the full docstring of series to appear twice in the
documentation, once under series
chris wuthrich wrote:
i have some questions and suggestion on the RestructuredText. I am a
ReST-newbie and so maybe these things have been discussed before.
* In one of my files i have a line power_series = series. This
produces the full docstring of series to appear twice in the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
chris wuthrich wrote:
i have some questions and suggestion on the RestructuredText. I am a
ReST-newbie and so maybe these things have been discussed before.
* In one of my files i have a line power_series =
William Stein wrote:
On a different note, can we change the background color of examples? In
my opinion, that green is just a bit too strong.
It's not green, it is grey, and I also really don't like it either.
It's definitely a light green for me in firefox on ubuntu (it's color
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Anyone know where the CSS file is? The color is set in a default.css
file, but the only default.css files I see are in _static directories,
which sounds like they are automatically generated somehow.
It comes
Carl Witty wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Anyone know where the CSS file is? The color is set in a default.css
file, but the only default.css files I see are in _static directories,
which sounds like they are automatically generated
On Apr 23, 9:34 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Carl Witty wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Anyone know where the CSS file is? The color is set in a default.css
file, but the only default.css files I see are in
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
would it make sense to have a small sage-source debian package which
depends on the (few) build tools required to build debian and which
upon installation downloads sage, compiles it, and places it in a
(debian specific) standard place in the
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, William Stein wrote:
What do people think about this proposal?
-1 from me as a goal for 4.0, since we already have a very daunting
challenge to accomplish the current goals for 4.0 in the timeframe we
have set, unless of course you are volunteering to do all of the
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, mabshoff wrote:
Another thing: In 3.4.1 we downgraded GAP to 4.4.10 from 4.4.12 that
was upgraded in Sage 3.3 due to a significant number of bugs and
issues in GAP 4.4.12. How would you deal with something like that in
the packaged version of Sage? The whole point about
On Apr 23, 10:34 pm, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Tim,
Another thing: In 3.4.1 we downgraded GAP to 4.4.10 from 4.4.12 that
was upgraded in Sage 3.3 due to a significant number of bugs and
issues in GAP 4.4.12. How would you deal with
49 matches
Mail list logo
