Hi Anne,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:49:38PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
I recently asked Nicolas whether it is easy to amend the Iwahori Hecke
algebra code to mod out by further relations? For example to impose
T_i T_{i+1} T_i = 0 or something like this. He suggested to discuss this
Dear Jason,
Dear Nicolas,
I am currently experiencing a small conflict in the sage-combinat
tree. See below for the content of the reject file.
Sébastien
sla...@pol:~/sage-4.3/devel/sage-combinat$ hg qpop -a
aucun patch appliqué
sla...@pol:~/sage-4.3/devel/sage-combinat$ hg qselect
no active
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:08:13PM +0100, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
I am currently experiencing a small conflict in the sage-combinat
tree. See below for the content of the reject file.
Please try again after a sage -combinat qselect. The iwahori hecke
patch and a couple others are already guarded
Hi,
Given the recent discussion on adding generic group features, it was
way time for someone to go one step further: to enable extension types
to inherit code from categories, so that we could at last start to
systematically put generic code in the categories instead of the old
abstract
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
Well, it seems sage-devel approves, so term = coeff * monomial it is.
Adjugé, vendu!
Thanks for handling this.
I've spent today preparing a patch to do this, and I think I've done it.
I have to run now, but tomorrow I'll put up a
Hi,
I've posted the slides for my Sage talk for the AMS meeting here:
http://www.wstein.org/talks/2010-01-14-ams/
I'm cross-posting this to sage-nt, since the talk(s) are oriented
toward number theory.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of
I tried a 64-bit build of Sage on a Sun Blade 2000 SPARC workstation running
Solaris 10. I don't know if linbox is only looking for GMP in /usr and
/usr/local, which is semi-implied below. But for whatever reason, it decides it
can't find a suitable GMP.
checking size of int... 4
checking
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:27:53AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried a 64-bit build of Sage on a Sun Blade 2000 SPARC workstation
running Solaris 10. I don't know if linbox is only looking for GMP in
/usr and /usr/local, which is semi-implied below. But for whatever
reason, it decides
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
Seriously though, the best combination of location, hours and wifi
I've found is Seattle's Best Coffee in Borders Books in the Westfield
San Francisco Centre. Open until 10 PM, with free wifi.
845
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:27:53 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried a 64-bit build of Sage on a Sun Blade 2000 SPARC workstation
running Solaris 10. I don't know if linbox is only looking for GMP in /usr
and /usr/local, which is semi-implied below. But for whatever reason, it
decides it can't find
The spkg-install passes the argument --with-gmp=$SAGE_LOCAL to
configure, so there's no pb with the library location.
It has to do with something deeper. I'd also like to read the section of
config.log showing the failure.
Clément
François Bissey a écrit :
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:27:53 Dr.
Hey all,
Just wanted to mention that I'm pretty sure I've managed to stomp that
pesky OSX 10.6 bug (the Abort trap one). I'll mention more details
on the ticket (#7095), but the long and the short of it is that we
were having issues where we were confusing which system libraries were
getting
Wow. Thank you so much.
--
D. M. Monarres
dmmonar...@gmail.com
On Jan 14, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Just wanted to mention that I'm pretty sure I've managed to stomp that
pesky OSX 10.6 bug (the Abort trap one). I'll mention more details
on the ticket
Hello everybody
I have had to write a function for something which may be called
multivariate polynomial fitting.
Let's say you have a polynomial in several variables (ex 2) of degree
(ex 2). It has the following shape : a x^2 + b xy + c y^2 + d
The trouble is that you can evaluate it but
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody
I have had to write a function for something which may be called
multivariate polynomial fitting.
Let's say you have a polynomial in several variables (ex 2) of degree
(ex 2). It has the
In #7928 due to the fact that the default python waring filter
displays warnings only once a comment on this behaviour is added and
that's it.
I would like to reinitiate a discussion on this, arguing that Sage
should define its own warning classes.
Use case for example:
I have definied a = [-3,
I guess your algorithm is over the reals?
Does your algorithm work over QQ?
I only used the algorithm over QQ. I think it would work pretty well
on other fields, but there I do not know the theorems about uniqueness
of the results.. :-)
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:49:55AM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
I think I agree with this last sentiment. Why not have a
SetOfCliquesOfGraph object returned by G.cliques(), which is then
further interrogated? Ie, cliques = G.cliques();
cliques.max_clique(), etc. This worked well with
Dear developers,
I tried to build sage by simply typing make on the following machine :
Intel Xeon 64 bits, 8 core, 32Gb RAM
Linux : Fedora 12
(more details below)
I tried to build sage-4.3 and sage-4.2.1. Both ends with the failing
of the compilation of PARI.
However, I installed the binary
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net
wrote:
Seriously though, the best combination of location, hours and wifi
I've found is Seattle's Best Coffee in Borders
If true, double thanks indeed. This is what has kept me from
upgrading and having access to Quicktime X.
- kcrisman
On Jan 14, 5:44 am, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. Thank you so much.
--
D. M. Monarres
dmmonar...@gmail.com
On Jan 14, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Craig Citro
On Jan 14, 2:38 am, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Just wanted to mention that I'm pretty sure I've managed to stomp that
pesky OSX 10.6 bug (the Abort trap one). I'll mention more details
on the ticket (#7095), but the long and the short of it is that we
were having issues
Hi,
The live CD works well on my laptop and is really
intuitive/simple/quick to use !
We would distribute some live-CDs during the Sage education days in
Marseille. But we need to enhance few features. Is the procedure to
rebuild the live cd is written anywhere? Can somebody help on the
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade 2000. I've
installed Sage on that several times before without issue. But this time I get
an error.
This is a bit annoying, as I really did believe that 4.3.1 would build on
Solaris 10 SPARC without any problems, after the
François Bissey wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:27:53 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried a 64-bit build of Sage on a Sun Blade 2000 SPARC workstation
running Solaris 10. I don't know if linbox is only looking for GMP in /usr
and /usr/local, which is semi-implied below. But for whatever reason, it
There are two problems I see.
1) The invalid option -64 is passed to the compiler (I think this is
being ignored anyway).
2) It links against libgmpxx, which it fails to find. It is not clear
to me why. It should be in sage/local/lib along with libgmp.
Bill.
On Jan 14, 4:29 pm, Dr. David
Bill Hart wrote:
There are two problems I see.
1) The invalid option -64 is passed to the compiler (I think this is
being ignored anyway).
2) It links against libgmpxx, which it fails to find. It is not clear
to me why. It should be in sage/local/lib along with libgmp.
Bill.
I believe the
These seem related to #7910... Any thoughts?
centos32:
{{{
mpn/.libs/add_n.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [libmpir.la] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/wstein/farm/sage-4.3.1.alpha3/spkg/
build/mpir-1.2.2.p0/src'
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
I'm almost there:
Finished building ATLAS core
The Makefile generated in ATLAS for building shared libraries
assumes the linker is the GNU linker, which it not true in
your setup. (It is generally considered better to use the
Sun linker in /usr/ccs/bin
These failures still appear when building mpir-1.2.2 instead of
mpir-1.2.2.p0
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
There are two problems I see.
1) The invalid option -64 is passed to the compiler (I think this is
being ignored anyway).
2) It links against libgmpxx, which it fails to find. It is not clear
to me why. It should be in sage/local/lib along with libgmp.
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
There are two problems I see.
1) The invalid option -64 is passed to the compiler (I think this is
being ignored anyway).
2) It links against libgmpxx, which it fails to find. It is not clear
to me why. It should be in
+1
Cheers,
Georg
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
On 14-Jan-10, at 1:36 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
+1
+1! Such factorizations also have applications to congruences
concerning Bell and Uppuluri-Carpenter combinatorial numbers.
Nick
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Jaap Spies wrote:
Building of linbox on Open Solaris 06/2009 in VirtualBox ends with:
--
Libraries have been installed in:
/export/home/jaap/Downloads/sage-4.3.1.alpha2/local/lib
[...]
linbox-sage.C: At global scope:
I submitted a patch which I believe is very simple and should not break
anything, but it could not be merged into sage-4.3.1.rc0 because it breaks the
Singular installation on Sage. (It was marked as fixed, then changed to 'needs
work' as it fails.)
Can anyone spot what is wrong with it?
Robert Miller wrote:
These seem related to #7910... Any thoughts?
When you say they seem to be related to #7910, what makes you think that?
I realise there is a mix of 32 and 64-bit objects in those list of error
messages, but I think the reasons for #7910 are pretty well understood - Flint
I can't see any connection myself.
Just idle speculation by a non-expert ;)
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
These seem related to #7910... Any thoughts?
When you say they seem to be related to #7910, what makes you think that?
I realise there is a mix of 32 and 64-bit objects in those list of error
messages, but I think the reasons for #7910 are pretty
Hi sage people at AMS meeting,
annoyingly something has come up so I can't meet at Borders tonight.
Sorry, William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
Great!
I never (or only after a lng time, and out of pure frustration and
cluelessness) would have looked into that direction (i.e. symbol
versioning), where the problem seems to stem from.
Good catch!!!
Cheers,
Georg
On 14 Jan., 11:38, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I submitted a patch which I believe is very simple and should not
break anything, but it could not be merged into sage-4.3.1.rc0 because
it breaks the Singular installation on Sage. (It was marked as fixed,
then changed to 'needs work' as it fails.)
Can anyone spot
Hi,
Given the recent discussion on adding generic group features, it was
way time for someone to go one step further: to enable extension types
to inherit code from categories, so that we could at last start to
systematically put generic code in the categories instead of the old
abstract
Tim Daly wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I submitted a patch which I believe is very simple and should not
break anything, but it could not be merged into sage-4.3.1.rc0 because
it breaks the Singular installation on Sage. (It was marked as fixed,
then changed to 'needs work' as it fails.)
Clement Pernet wrote:
config.log says:
ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libgmpxx.so.3: open failed: No such file or
directory
could you ls
export/home/drkirkby/gcc64/sage-4.3.1.alpha2/local/lib/libgmpxx* and
check that the symlink to the shared lib is ok?
Or is there a way I can access to that
I actually went to that ticket a bit ago, but didn't see any patch
attached. I'll certainly review this during Sage days if no one else
beats me to it.
- Robert
On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi,
Given the recent discussion on adding generic group features,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
And yes, this mail is also a request for testing ;)
[not all mirrors are in sync, so use the metalinks from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ ]
H
Here in Guatemala, were internet can be really slow
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade 2000.
I've installed Sage on that several times before without issue. But this
time I get an error.
This is a bit annoying, as I really did believe that 4.3.1 would build
on Solaris 10 SPARC without any
Hi folks,
I got the following weirdness from a bug report on Facebook. The
report references this worksheet:
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1362/
[mv...@mod sage-4.3.1.alpha2]$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.1.alpha2, Release
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Hector Villafuerte hecto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
And yes, this mail is also a request for testing ;)
[not all mirrors are in sync, so use the metalinks from
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
The build on 't2' has now failed at the same point. This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7932
I got exactly the same problem with my build attempt of Sage
4.3.1.alpha2 on t2.math.
--
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
The build on 't2' has now failed at the same point. This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7932
I got exactly the same problem with my build attempt of Sage
Robert thinks this might be his fault, but I'm personally not confident editing
this code. Anyone else fell able to?
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
sage: y = expand(K.det()); y
a*d*e*h - a*d*f*g - b*c*e*h + b*c*f*g
sage: simplify(y)
-a*d*f*g + a*d*h*e + b*c*f*g - b*c*h*e
To me, these look like the same expressions, just one has variables
sorted differently (h e?) and different term orders. What is the
issue?
Nick
--
To post to
Hi folks,
I was recently asked some beginner-type questions relating to Sage
development. Just so that the responses are recorded somewhere, I have
put together a rough wiki page [1] on development FAQ. The page is
linked from the main wiki page [2], where you can find the link under
the section
Nick Alexander wrote:
sage: y = expand(K.det()); y
a*d*e*h - a*d*f*g - b*c*e*h + b*c*f*g
sage: simplify(y)
-a*d*f*g + a*d*h*e + b*c*f*g - b*c*h*e
To me, these look like the same expressions, just one has variables
sorted differently (h e?) and different term orders. What is the issue?
I
Hi Nick,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
To me, these look like the same expressions, just one has variables sorted
differently (h e?) and different term orders. What is the issue?
Something like the following is OK:
[mv...@mod
I'm not going to be available until early next week, so it sounds like
someone else will get to it before me.
I'm excited to see it though!
David
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
I actually went to that ticket a bit ago, but didn't see any
Yeah, this is wacky. I can tell you why it's happening, though someone
who's ever used Maxima before should really think about the right fix.
Here's the issue: in sage.calculus.calculus, there's an instance of
Maxima that gets created and passed the argument 'load(simplify_sum)'.
This causes the
We miss you. Much graph editing was done with Rado's new editor in
alpha2!
On Jan 14, 6:01 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sage people at AMS meeting,
annoyingly something has come up so I can't meet at Borders tonight.
Sorry, William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of
On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade
2000. I've installed Sage on that several times before without
issue. But this time I get an error.
This is a bit annoying, as I really did believe
On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade
2000. I've installed Sage on that several times before without
issue. But this time I get an
On Jan 15, 12:14 am, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, this is wacky. I can tell you why it's happening, though someone
who's ever used Maxima before should really think about the right fix.
Here's the issue: in sage.calculus.calculus, there's an instance of
Maxima that gets
It seems clear that in Maxima, something you directly or indirectly
loaded, set those names to values.
Maybe because d1, d2, , were used for the labels automatically
generated for display lines.
You can find all such values by maxima(values).
RJF
--
To post to this group, send an email
On Jan 15, 6:14 am, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, this is wacky. I can tell you why it's happening, though someone
who's ever used Maxima before should really think about the right fix.
Here's the issue: in sage.calculus.calculus, there's an instance of
Maxima that gets
Actually, I think it is, even though I agree it shouldn't be. For example:
[boxen ~] $ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3, Release Date: 2009-12-24 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.
66 matches
Mail list logo
