_
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-impleme
_
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
for the receiver of the retransmitted
BYE to respond?
Should it respond with OK, CALL_OR_DIALOG_NOT_FOUND or SERVER_FAILURE
( due to the fact that the in-dialog BYE has been sent with a
previously seen cseq number) ?
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing
the SIP stack do with the invite Server Transaction?
Should it be automatically deleted after the Dialog times out?
Thanks
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu
Hello,
Is ti a requirement that subsequent in-dialog requests preserve From
header parameters from the dialog forming INVITE ?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Regards,
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip
://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
with it. Those that try to copulate with it should seek a more
fulfilling love life.
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
2010/10/12 M. Ranganathan mra...@gmail.com:
But let me ask
you a question: Do you know XMPP protocol? There are hundreds of
*good* XMPP implementations available in internet licensed as free
software, and most
-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip
a professional grade SIP stack, not the toy stacks
that you can download on the Internet).
There are a handful of very good SIP Stacks that one can download on
the Internet. What exactly is a toy stack ? Is it a stack that is used in
SIP toys?
--
M. Ranganathan
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Paul Kyzivat pkyzi...@cisco.com wrote:
M. Ranganathan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Paul Kyzivat pkyzi...@cisco.com wrote:
M. Ranganathan wrote:
Hello,
I am implementing a B2BUA ITSP bridge that bridges a PBX with an ITSP.
In one of the call
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Paul Kyzivat pkyzi...@cisco.com wrote:
M. Ranganathan wrote:
Hello,
I am implementing a B2BUA ITSP bridge that bridges a PBX with an ITSP.
In one of the call flows, I get a REFER from the PBX which I have to
convert to an INVITE. The INVITE could take
, Dale R (Dale)
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:50 PM
To: M. Ranganathan
Cc: sip-implementors
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] How long can a Dialog be in Early state.
From: M. Ranganathan [mra...@gmail.com]
Does a 100 provisional response put the UAC
was unclear.
Regards
Sunil Verma
ESN: 877-5050
Ph: +919731245000
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of M.
Ranganathan
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 1:57 AM
To: sip-implementors
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:12 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
dwor...@avaya.com wrote:
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of M. Ranganathan
[mra...@gmail.com]
Consider
) not being shown within
figure 5, the following is a link to Jonathan's answer.
http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=706
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of M. Ranganathan
Sent: Monday
fork expiration time can be.
It would seem useful to make this a mandatory header for a dialog
forming INVITE and yet it is not. Just wondering why.
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https
@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors
TLS.
I have no idea why this is the case.
Thanks!
Charles
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
( and send BYE if
it does not)
4. Something else ( write to your congressman about it and protest perhaps ? )
Which one would be the right action (OK 4 is not a serious choice) ?
Thanks
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Neel Neelakantan
bala_neelakan...@quintum.com wrote:
See below.
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of M.
Ranganathan
Sent: Wednesday, January 13
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip
in route set? Is it even possible for that route set to
change?
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
patch.
The question I have is what is the UAS supposed to do when the inbound
request does NOT have an rport parameter? Is it legal ( or illegal )
to attach an rport parameter in the response when the request does not have it?
Thank you for your answer.
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
Hello,
Once a dialog transitions to Confirmed state, what happens to its
state when a re-INVITE is issued for that Dialog ?
Thanks
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
2009/2/24 M. Ranganathan mra...@gmail.com:
Features are implementable as User Agents. There is no need for a BACK
TO BACK User Agent to implement most features.
Ok, perhaps you could provice a proxy solution to replace
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
2009/2/24 M. Ranganathan mra...@gmail.com:
Using a B2BUA where you should be using a proxy is needless
complication and just bad engineering.
http://www.sipfoundry.org
I don't understand the reason of this link.
You
/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
at the examples in src/examples before posting.
Ranga
Thanks in advance,
Regard's
Parasuraman Kumarasami
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M
@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu
-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip
in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
indicated by
the Contact header ( which is of course the wrong location).
I am behind a Symmetric NAT. Should I ignore the contact header for
the OK and and send the ACK t back to the remote location ( IP address
and port ) from where the OK came?
Thanks
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
Please ignore question - problem resolved. Sorry for the noise.
Ranga
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:35 PM, M. Ranganathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have the following behavior from an ITSP :
1. I send it a re INVITE with Contact header Contact:sip:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:5080
2
hindsight and tighten up the grammar.
Oh incidentally, you can produce awfully formatted legal c++ syntax
too but nobody would suggest we tighten up c++ grammar and make it
more like python for reasons of readability. What is done is done.
Ranga
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors
://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
-implementors
--
M. Ranganathan
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
No... but uncle google (or your favorite search engine) may have the answer.
Ashok jain wrote:
Dear All
Could some tell me where I can find source
code for SIP that I can modify using Linux. I need it
to perform the basic operations.
Thanks
Ashok
51 matches
Mail list logo