Re: [sipx-users] disconnect phantom calls?

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > If I call gets dropped (I have seen this happen on softclients and hard > phones).  gets dropped 'bad'. (not exactly sure the state) > but in diagnostic, active calls, I see calls there for 4 hours, that I know > were dropped. I think th

Re: [sipx-users] repo file update

That worked for me too. Thanks Geoff On Aug 12, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Geoff Brozny wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:31:45 -0700, Charles wrote: > I deleted the repo, then did a wget to acquire the new repo. > > This is the new repo it downloaded: > > [sipXecs] > name=sipXecs build service for CentO

Re: [sipx-users] repo file update

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:31:45 -0700, Charles wrote: > I deleted the repo, then did a wget to acquire the new repo. > > This is the new repo it downloaded: > > [sipXecs] > name=sipXecs build service for CentOS $releasever - $basearch > baseurl=http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentO

[sipx-users] bridged line appearance

Are there any issues with having a mixed firmware environment with Polycom and running BLA? I just started up BLA for the first time and can't seem to get any presence or BLA to work at the moment. I have 650s that are running 3.2.3/4.2.2 and 601s that are running 3.1.6/4.1.4. Presence used t

Re: [sipx-users] disconnect phantom calls?

Its a cdr issue. Restart call resolver. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: h

[sipx-users] disconnect phantom calls?

If I call gets dropped (I have seen this happen on softclients and hard phones). gets dropped 'bad'. (not exactly sure the state) but in diagnostic, active calls, I see calls there for 4 hours, that I know were dropped. packet traces show nothing happening (no audio either day, no session pac

Re: [sipx-users] back to basics: remotes, proxy or not?

ALL phones, or just remotes? On 8/12/10 6:52 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: Er... The phones need a proxy to call out, so which phones are you referring -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Inte

Re: [sipx-users] back to basics: remotes, proxy or not?

Er... The phones need a proxy to call out, so which phones are you referring to? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.

[sipx-users] back to basics: remotes, proxy or not?

i have read so much, old, new wiki's that I forget. if I am NOT doing presense, NOT doing BLF (no operator watching) is there ANY REASON at all to set up the per account, or per line proxy on LOCAL phones? any reason on REMOTES? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN:

Re: [sipx-users] repo file update

Yum clean all Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.

Re: [sipx-users] 4.2.1 hasn't changed recently, has it?

I think it was just copied at that time to the repo. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract

[sipx-users] repo file update

I deleted the repo, then did a wget to acquire the new repo. This is the new repo it downloaded: [sipXecs] name=sipXecs build service for CentOS $releasever - $basearch baseurl=http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_$releasever/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 I then go to the GUI to upda

Re: [sipx-users] help with repo

Change your repo to this Remove what is there Wget the one you nned from Download.sipfoundry.org Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.

[sipx-users] help with repo

I also got failures to the latest upgrade and need a bit of direction with the repo file. This is what I switched it to: [sipxecs-stable] name=SIPfoundry sipXecs pbx - latest stable version baseurl=http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/ #baseurl=http://sipxecs.sipfoundry

Re: [sipx-users] when java cpu pegged at 100%...

Except sipxproc isn't capitalized. Damn outlook. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh M. Patten Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 2:05 PM To: Michael Scheidell; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users Subject: Re: [sipx-users] w

Re: [sipx-users] when java cpu pegged at 100%...

>From the linux shell, run: Sipxproc -r ConfigServer This will restart just the config server. It will not cause any calls to drop. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 1:10 PM

[sipx-users] when java cpu pegged at 100%...

What should I restart? and will that affect calls? (yes, its an intermentent thing, hard to replicate, but many people have seen it) you do LOTS of configurations and Java seems to start having garbage (string/free memory) collection problems. sipxconfig? at org.mortbay.util.ThreadedServ

Re: [sipx-users] Customising an Install

>>> On 8/12/2010 at 10:26 AM, in message <4c640484.2030...@secnap.com>, Michael > does linux support a lightweight 'jail' like *BSD? > in a bsd jail, it LOOKS exactly like virtualization (from the individual > application). 'root' isn't root, its a chroot, and the processes in the > 'jail' are is

Re: [sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Re: [sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

Thanks Tony. I compared a standard call with the TFN and the From Headers are the same. Anyhow, this morning I tested a couple of calls to some TFNs and guess what? They are "automajically" now working and going through. Me thinks Voxitas is reading this thread.. I did a siptrace again on a T

Re: [sipx-users] Customising an Install

On 8/12/10 10:12 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: You might find it easier to rewrite it. A custom build would be necessary as well as tweaking and going through the entire codebase to change locations and links. Its a big job because it was written to be directly linked to the OS as a standalone system

Re: [sipx-users] Customising an Install

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > you referring to filling up the hard disk?  Large files are put in > /var/sipxpbx so if you put that on it's own partition, you should be > good.  You thinking about something else? sorry, brain not working yet, 2 dirs to partition /var/

Re: [sipx-users] Customising an Install

You might find it easier to rewrite it. A custom build would be necessary as well as tweaking and going through the entire codebase to change locations and links. Its a big job because it was written to be directly linked to the OS as a standalone system. I have looked at this from a couple of di

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

Thanks, i will try this way later today and will post results. On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 07:20 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > When it suits your schedule, removing and re-creating the gateway might be > prudent. It will interrupt remote registrations and call via trunks so > timing would be important.

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

I just tried this and the problem still appear. What i cannot understand is why in one of the frames in trace there is set Expiry header to 120. This does not look correct to me. What is your opinion for this? In registration from different phone/softphone i don't see such header Expiry: 120. I se

[sipx-users] Customising an Install

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <50342> Message-ID: Let me start by saying im not a linux system admin, but have been asked to find out if it is possible to install sipxecs with

Re: [sipx-users] dial by name - messed up?

I'm Running 3-1-3-c [cid:image001.png@01CB39F7.D83CF510] Nathaniel Watkins IT Director Garrett County Government 203 South 4th Street, Room 210 Oakland, MD 21550 Telephone: 301-334-5001 Fax: 301-334-5021 E-mail: nwatk...@garrettcounty.org From: sipx-users-boun

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

When it suits your schedule, removing and re-creating the gateway might be prudent. It will interrupt remote registrations and call via trunks so timing would be important. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

Well, I would try 1800 or 3600. Surely under 600 is really too brief. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 H

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

I already did this step. Only sipximbot was pending for update and it is up to date some hours ago. On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 06:50 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > I'd make sure there are no more updates in that repo first. > > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.843

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

>From web interface i don't have 600s as an option. I have these: 30 60 120 180 360 1800 3600 I'm not able to set the phone to 600 right now, because i access it remotely, but i will ask my boss to check if it is possible to set to 600 directly on the phone little bit later. On Thu, 2010-08-12

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

I'd make sure there are no more updates in that repo first. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Co

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

I just tested with the other trunk (telsome) and caller id is shown and is ok. It looks that this is an issue only with voicetrading. On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 06:08 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > Does it work for any user at all (callerid)? > > I am running 4.2.1 and don't have that problem. I tried

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

No, it is not working for any users. I tried some minutes ago with default caller id set in trunk, but the caller id is not showed again. I was using sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/LatestStable, but today i saw that the url is changed and changed it already in my repo too. We have this prob

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

Can you set it for 600? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdep

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

Yes, it is set to 360 now. On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 05:59 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > Did you change the registration interval in the phone? > > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Teleph

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

Does it work for any user at all (callerid)? I am running 4.2.1 and don't have that problem. I tried with both counterpath and polycom phones. I tried with both voip.ms and bandwidth.com. Are you using a repo at download.sipfoundry.org? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephon

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

Did you change the registration interval in the phone? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contrac

Re: [sipx-users] Registration expiration and registration problems.

We updated the phone to the the latest version but we sill have the same problem. Did you have time to look at the trace? On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:35 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > There is an even newer one. Such is the case with snom, whether good > or bad... > > http://wiki.snom.com/Snom_m9/D

[sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

Hi, on 4.2.1 we have several users that have set specific Caller IDs for their users. The Caller IDs are NOT blocked. In trunk settings we have not set Default Caller IDs and in advanced settings of trunks we have unchecked this option: "User part of INVITE SIP URI is a phone number". We have unc