Hi Sergio,
alas that's not possible that way. If you search for CENTURY BANCORP,
INC., then Solr will be totally happy to find all these terms in "NEW
CENTURY BANCORP, INC." and return it with a high score.
But you can prepare your data at index time. Make it a multivalued field
of type string
Hi Sushant,
while this is true in general, it won't hold here. If you split your
index, searching on each splitted shard might be a bit faster, but
you'll increase search time much more because Solr needs to send your
search queries to all shards and then combine the results. So instead of
having
help you better when you pass the full query string (if you're
able to fetch it).
-Michael
Am 09.01.2018 um 16:38 schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
> First, you might want to index, but what Solr is executing here is a
> search request.
>
> Second, you're querying for a dynamic field
First, you might want to index, but what Solr is executing here is a
search request.
Second, you're querying for a dynamic field "*" which is not defined in
your schema. This is quite obvious, the exception says right this.
So whatever is sending the query (some client, it seems) is doing the
Am 22.12.2017 um 11:57 schrieb Selvam Raman:
> 1) how can i disable leading wildcard search
Do it on the client side. Just don't allow leading asterisks or question
marks in your query term.
> 2) why leading wildcard search takes so much of time to give the response.
>
Because Lucene can't
Am 16.12.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Georgios Petasis:
> Even if the DateRangeField field can store a range of dates, doesn't
> Solr understand that I have used single timestamps?
No. It could theoretically, but sorting just isn't implemented in
DateRangeField.
> I have even stored the dates.
> My
Solr does not analyze queries with wildcards in it. So, with ch*p-seq,
it will search for terms that start with ch and end with p-seq. Since
your indexer has analyzed all tokens before, only chip and seq are in
the index.
See
Hi Georgios,
DateRangeField is a kind of SpatialField which is not sortable at all.
For sorting, use a DatePointField instead. It's not deprecated; the
deprecated class is TrieDateField.
Best,
Michael
Am 15.12.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Georgios Petasis:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a field of type
While you're generally right, in this case it might make sense to stick
to a primitive type.
I see "unixtime" as a technical information, probably from
System.currentTimeMillis(). As long as it's not used as a "real world"
date but only for sorting based on latest updates, or chosing which
Do you find your configs in the Solr admin panel, in the Cloud --> Tree
folder?
-Michael
Am 28.09.2017 um 04:50 schrieb Gunalan V:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please let me know where can I find the uploaded configset from
> SOLR into zookeeper ensemble ?
>
> In docs it says they will "/configs/"
I'd rather say you didn't quote the URL when sending it using curl.
Bash accepts the ampersand as a request to execute curl including the
URL up to CREATE in background - that's why the error is included within
the next output, followed by "Exit" - and then tries to execute the
following part of
Arrgh, forget my question. I just see that newExactQuery() simply
triggers newRangeQuery() like you already do.
-Michael
Am 26.09.2017 um 13:29 schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I don't know why there aren't any results. But just out of curiosity,
> why don't you use the b
Hi Markus,
I don't know why there aren't any results. But just out of curiosity,
why don't you use the better choice IntPoint.newExectQuery(String,int)?
What happens if you use that?
-Michael
Am 26.09.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Markus Jelsma:
> Hello,
>
> I have a QParser impl. that transforms
Hi Shamik,
funny enough, we had a similar issue with our old legacy application
that still used plain Lucene code in a JBoss container.
Same, there were no specific queries or updates causing this, the
performance just broke completely without unusual usage. GC was raising
up to 99% or so.
What is the field type? Which Analyzers are configured?
How do you split at "~"? (You have to do it by yourself, or configure
some tokenizer for that.)
What do you get when you don't filter your facets?
What do you mean with "it is not working"? What is your result now?
-Michael
Am 15.09.2017
Am 13.09.2017 um 04:04 schrieb Derek Poh:
> Hi Michael
>
> "Then continue using binary search depending on the returned score
> values."
>
> May I know what do you mean by using binary search?
An example algorithm is in Java method java.util.Arrays::binarySearch.
Or more detailed:
So you're looking for a solution to validate the result output.
You have two ways:
1. Assuming you're sorting by the default "score" sort option:
Find the result you're looking for by setting the fq filter clause
accordingly, and add "score" the the fl field list.
Then do the normal unfiltered
Maybe I don't understand your problem, but why don't you just filter by
"supplier information"?
-Michael
Am 11.09.2017 um 04:12 schrieb Derek Poh:
> Hi
>
> I have a collection of productdocument.
> Each productdocument has supplier information in it.
>
> I need to check if a supplier's products
Hi Patrick,
can you attach the query you're sending to Solr and one example result?
Or more specific, what are your hl.* parameters?
-Michael
Am 07.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Patrick Fallert:
>
> Hey Guys,
> i´ve got a problem with my Solr Highlighter..
> When I search for a word, i get some
Why would you need to start Solr as root? You should definitely not do
this, there's no reason for that.
And even if you *really* want this: What's so bad about the -force option?
-Michael
Am 06.09.2017 um 07:26 schrieb Kasim Jinwala:
> Dear team,
> I am using solr 5.0 last 1 year,
Hi Moritz,
did you stop your local Solr sever before? Copying data from a running
instance may cause headaches.
If yes, what happens if you copy everything again? It seems that your
copy operations wasn't successful.
Best,
Michael
Am 22.06.2017 um 14:37 schrieb Moritz Munte:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
Hi Arun,
your question is too generic. What do you mean with nlp search? What do
you expect to happen?
The short answer is: No, there is no such parser because the individual
requirements will vary a lot.
-Michael
Am 14.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb aruninfo100:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to configure
Make sure to have a whitespace are the OR operator.
The parenthesises should be around the OR query, not including the "fq:"
-- this should be outside the parenthesises (which are not necessary at
all).
What exactly are you expecting?
-Michael
Am 24.04.2017 um 12:59 schrieb VJ:
> Hi All,
>
> I
Hi Ganesh,
you might want to use something like this:
fq=access_control:(g1 g2 g5 g99 ...)
Then it's only one fq filter per request. Internally it's like an OR condition,
but in a more condensed form. I already have used this with up to 500 values
without larger performance degradation (but
First of all, from what I can see, this won't do what you're expecting.
Multiple fq conditions are always combined using AND, so if a user is
member of 100 groups, but the document is accessible to only 99 of them,
then the user won't find it.
Or in other words, if you add a user to some
This may be related to SOLR-10130.
Am 20.02.2017 um 14:06 schrieb ~$alpha`:
> Issues with solr settings while migrating from solr 4.0 to solr6.0.
>
> Issue Faced: My CPU consumption goes to unacceptable levels. ie. load on
> solr4.0 is between 6 to 10 while the load on solr 6 reaches 100 and
It's not possible to do such thing in one request with faceting only.
The problem is that you need a fixed filter on every item when the facet
algorithm is iterating over it; you can't look into future elements to
find out which ones the top 10 will be.
So either you stick with two queries (which
set
> of the itemNo from the 1st query.
>
> There's definitely more than the 10, but we just need the top 10 in this
> case. As the top 10 itemNo may change, so we have to get the returned
> result set of the itemNo each time we want to do the JSON Facet.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
So basically you want faceting only on the returned result set?
I doubt that this is possible without additional queries. The issue is
that faceting and result collecting is done within one iteration, so
when some document (actually the document's internal id) is fetched as a
possible result
y 2017 at 14:44 Michael Kuhlmann <k...@solr.info> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wow, running 36 cores with only half a gigabyte of heap memory is
>> *really* optimistic!
>>
>> I'd raise the heap size to some gigabytes at least and see how it's
>> workin
Wow, running 36 cores with only half a gigabyte of heap memory is
*really* optimistic!
I'd raise the heap size to some gigabytes at least and see how it's
working then.
-Michael
Am 14.02.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Leon STRINGER:
> Further background on the environment:
>
> There are 36 cores, with a
Then I don't understand your problem. Solr already does exactly what you
want.
Maybe the problem is different: I assume that there never was a value of
"1" in the index, leading to your confusion.
Solr returns all fields as facet result where there was some value at
some time as long as the the
For the suggester, the field must be indexed. It's not necessary to have
it stored.
Best,
Michael
Am 22.12.2016 um 11:24 schrieb Furkan KAMACI:
> Hi Emir,
>
> As far as I know, it should be enough to be stored=true for a suggestion
> field? Should it be both indexed and stored?
>
> Kind Regards,
Yes, and we're doing such things at my company. However we most often do
things you shouldn't do; this is one of these.
Solr needs to load data quite fast, otherwise you'll be having a
performance killer. It's often recommended to use an SSD instead of a
normal hard disk; a network share would be
Hi Prasanna,
there's no such filter out-of-the-box. It's similar to the mm parameter
in (e)dismax parser, but this only works for full text searches on the
same fields.
So you have to build the query on your own using all possible permutations:
fq=(code1: AND code2:) OR (code1: AND
s
> been closed and is available in 6.2.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Michael Kuhlmann <k...@solr.info> wrote:
>
>> This is a nice reading though, but that solution depends on the
>> precondition that you'll already know your synonyms at index time.
>&
Hi Midas,
>
> I suggest this interesting reading:
>
> https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/07/12/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Michael Kuhlmann <k...@solr.info> wrote:
>
It's not working out of the box, sorry.
We're using this plugin:
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms#getting-started
It's working nicely, but can lead to OOME when you add many synonyms
with multiple terms. And I'm not sure whether it#s still working with
Solr 6.0.
-Michael
Am
Hi syegorius,
are you sure that there's no synonym "planet,world" defined?
-Michael
Am 02.08.2016 um 15:57 schrieb syegorius:
> I have 4 records index by Solr:
>
> 1 hello planet dear friends
> 2 hello world dear friends
> 3 nothing
> 4 just friends
>
> I'm searching with this query:
>
>
On 08.08.2012 20:56, Bing Hua wrote:
Not quite understand but I'd explain the problem I had. The response would
contain only fields and a list of field values that match the query.
Essentially it's querying for field values rather than documents. The
underlying use case would be, when typing in
On 07.08.2012 21:43, Jason Axelson wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to connect to SOLR over a socket file as is possible
with mysql? I've looked around and I get the feeling that I may be
mi-understanding part of SOLR's architecture.
Any pointers are welcome.
Thanks,
Jason
Hi Jason,
not that I
On 02.08.2012 01:52, Anand Henry wrote:
Hi,
In SOLR 3.4, while doing a geo-spatial search, is there a way to retrieve
the distance of each document from the specified location?
Not that I know of.
What we did was to read and parse the location field on client side and
calculate the distance
On 01.08.2012 13:58, jayakeerthi s wrote:
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
Simply don't search for it, then it's not searchable.
Or do I simply don't understand your question? As long as Dismax
On 01.08.2012 15:40, Jack Krupansky wrote:
The indexed and stored field attributes are independent, so you can
define a facet field as stored but not indexed (stored=true
indexed=false), so that the field can be faceted but not indexed.
?
A field must be indexed to be used for faceting.
It's not necessary to do this. You can simply be happy about the fact
that all digits are ordered strictly in unicode, so you can use a range
query:
(f)q={!frange l=0 u=\: incl=true incu=false}title
This finds all documents where any token from the title field starts
with a digit, so if you
Set the swapiness to 0 to avoid memory pages being swapped to disk too
early.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swappiness
-Kuli
Am 11.06.2012 10:38, schrieb Li Li:
I have roughly read the codes of RAMDirectory. it use a list of 1024
byte arrays and many overheads.
But as far as I know, using
You cannot guarantee this when you're running out of RAM. You'd have a
problem then anyway.
Why are you caring that much? Did you yet have performance issues? 1GB
should load really fast, and both auto warming and OS cache should help
a lot as well. With such an index, you usually don't need
Hi Laurent,
alas there is currently no such option. The time limit is handled by an
internal TimeLimitingCollector, which is used inside SolrIndexSearcher.
Since the using method only returns the DocList and doesn't have access
to the QueryResult, it won't be easy to return this information
Am 08.06.2012 11:55, schrieb Laurent Vaills:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the details that helped me to take a deeper look in the source
code. I noticed that each time a TimeExceededException is caught the method
setPartialResults(true) is called...which seems to be what I'm looking for.
I have to
Am 07.06.2012 09:55, schrieb sheethal shreedhar:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=fruitversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
I get
HTTP ERROR 400
Problem accessing /solr/select/. Reason:
undefined field text
Look at your schema.xml. You'll find a line like this:
Hi Wenca,
I'm a bit late. but maybe you're still interested.
There's no such functionality in standard Solr. With sorting, this is
not possible, because sort functions only rank each single document,
they know nothing about the position of the others. And query elevation
is similar, you'll
There is no hard limit for the maximum nunmber of documents per update.
It's only memory dependent. The smaller each document, and the more
memory Solr can acquire, the more documents can you send in one update.
However, I wouldn't pish it too jard anyway. If you can send, say, 100
documents
pish it too jard - sounds funny. :)
I meant push it too hard.
Am 24.05.2012 11:46, schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
There is no hard limit for the maximum nunmber of documents per update.
It's only memory dependent. The smaller each document, and the more
memory Solr can acquire, the more documents
, no problem, I will check it
and re-generate it.
Is it bad to create a file with 5M doc ?
Le 24/05/2012 11:46, Michael Kuhlmann a écrit :
There is no hard limit for the maximum nunmber of documents per update.
It's only memory dependent. The smaller each document, and the more
memory Solr can
Am 21.05.2012 12:07, schrieb Tolga:
Hi,
I am getting this error:
[doc=null] missing required field: id
[...]
I've got this entry in schema.xml: field name=id type=string
stored=true indexed=true/
What to do?
Simply make sure that every document you're sending to Solr contains
this id
Am 21.05.2012 12:40, schrieb Tolga:
How do I verify it exists? I've been crawling the same site and it
wasn't giving an error on Thursday.
It depends on what you're doing.
Are you using nutch?
-Kuli
Am 14.05.2012 05:56, schrieb arjit:
Thanks Erick for the reply.
I have 6 cores which doesn't contain duplicated data. every core has some
unique data. What I thought was when I read it would read parallel 6 cores
and join the result and return the query. And this would be efficient then
reading
Am 14.05.2012 13:22, schrieb Sami Siren:
Sharding is (nearly) always slower than using one big index with sufficient
hardware resources. Only use sharding when your index is too huge to fit
into one single machine.
If you're not constrained by CPU or IO, in other words have plenty of
CPU cores
Am 14.05.2012 16:18, schrieb Otis Gospodnetic:
Hi Kuli,
In a client engagement, I did see this (N shards on 1 beefy box with lots of
RAM and CPU cores) be faster than 1 big index.
I want to believe you, but I also want to understand. Can you explain
why? And did this only happen for single
Am 10.05.2012 22:27, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
It's possible to see what terms are indexed for a field of
document that
stored=false?
One way is to use http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
Another approach is this:
- Query for exactly this document, e.g. by using the unique field
-
Am 11.05.2012 15:48, schrieb Anderson vasconcelos:
Hi
Analysing the solr server in glassfish with Jconsole, the Heap Memory Usage
don't use more than 4 GB. But, when was executed the TOP comand, the free
memory in Operating system is only 200 MB. The physical memory is only 10GB.
Why machine
Am 10.05.2012 14:33, schrieb Bruno Mannina:
like that:
field name=inventor-countryCH/field
field name=inventor-countryFR/field
but in this case Ioose the link between inventor and its country?
Of course, you need to index the two inventors into two distinct documents.
Did you mark those
I don't know the details of your schema, but I would create fields like
name, country, street etc., and a field named role, which contains
values like inventor, applicant, etc.
How would you do it otherwise? Create only four documents, each fierld
containing 80 mio. values?
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 08.05.2012 23:23, schrieb Lance Norskog:
Lucene does not support more 2^32 unique documents, so you need to
partition.
Just a small note:
I doubt that Solr supports more than 2^31 unique documents, as most
other Java applications that use int values.
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 08.05.2012 04:13, schrieb Jeff Schmidt:
Francois:
Check out DataStax Enterprise 2.0, Solr integrated with Cassandra:
http://www.datastax.com/docs/datastax_enterprise2.0/search/index
And, Solbase, Solr integrated with HBase: https://github.com/Photobucket/Solbase
I'm sure there are others,
Am 26.04.2012 00:57, schrieb Joe:
Hi,
I'm using the solrj API to query my SOLR 3.6 index. I have multiple text
fields, which I would like to weight differently. From what I've read, I
should be able to do this using the dismax or edismax query types. I've
tried the following:
SolrQuery query =
Am 26.04.2012 16:17, schrieb pprabhcisco123:
The use case is to create a core for each customer as well as partner .
Since its very difficult to create cores statically in solr.xml file for all
4500 customers , is there any way to create the cores dynamically or on the
fly.
Yes there is.
Am 25.04.2012 15:57, schrieb stockii:
is it not fucking possible to import DIH !?!?!? WTF!
It is fucking possible, you just need to either point your goddamn
classpath to the data import handler jar in the contrib folders, or you
have to add the appropriate contrib folder into the lib dir
Am 23.03.2012 10:29, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
I'm looking at the following. I want
to (1) map some query fields to
some other query fields and add some things to FL, and then
(2)
rescore.
I can see how to do it as a RequestHandler that makes a
parser to get
the fields, or I could see making a
Am 23.03.2012 11:17, schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
Adding an own SearchComponent after the regular QueryComponent (or
better as a last-element) is goof ...
Of course, I meant good, not goof! ;)
Greetings,
Kuli
Hi Ramdev,
add() is a blocking call. Otherwise it had to start an own background
thread which is not what a library like Solrj should do (how many
threads at most? At which priority? Which thread group? How long keep
them pooled?)
And, additionally, you might want to know whether the
Am 16.03.2012 15:05, schrieb stockii:
i have 8 cores ;-)
i thought that replication is defined in solrconfig.xml and this file is
only load on startup and i cannot change master to slave and slave to master
without restarting the servlet-container ?!?!?!
No, you can reload the whole core at
Am 16.03.2012 16:42, schrieb Mike Austin:
It seems that the biggest real-world advantage is the ability to control
core creation and replacement with no downtime. The negative would be the
isolation however the are still somewhat isolated. What other benefits and
common real-world situations
I had the same problem, without auto-commit.
I never really found out what exactly the reason was, but I think it was
because commits were triggered before a previous commit had the chance
to finish.
We now commit after every minute or 1000 (quite large) documents,
whatever comes first. And
Am 14.03.2012 11:43, schrieb Finotti Simone:
I was wondering: is it possible to sort a Solr result-set on a non-stored value?
Yes, it is. It must be indexed, indeed.
-Kuli
Ah, good to know! Thank you!
I already had Jetty under suspicion, but we had this failure quite often
in October and November, when the bug was not yet reported.
-Kuli
Am 14.03.2012 12:08, schrieb Colin Howe:
After some more digging around I discovered that there was a bug reported
in jetty
Hi!
On 14.02.2012 13:09, PeterKerk wrote:
I want to sort my results on the facetnames (not by their number of results).
From the example you gave, I'd assume you don't want to sort by facet
names but by facet values.
Simply add facet.sort=index to your request; see
I'd suggest that you check which documents *exactly* are missing in Solr
index. Or find at least one that's missing, and try to figure out how
this document differs from the other ones that can be found in Solr.
Maybe we can then find out what exact problem there is.
Greetings,
-Kuli
On
I don't know much about Tika, but this seems to be a bug in PDFBox.
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-797
Yoz might also have a look at this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7489206/error-while-parsing-binary-files-mostly-pdf
At least that's what I found when I googled the
Hi rzao!
I think this is the problem:
On 02.02.2012 13:59, rzoao wrote:
UpdateRequest req = new UpdateRequest();
req.setAction(AbstractUpdateRequest.ACTION.COMMIT, false,
false);
Hi Jonty,
no, not really. When we first had such problems, we really thought that
the number of open files is the problem, so we implemented an algorithm
that performed an optimize from time to time to force a segment merge.
Due to some misconfiguration, this ran too often. With the result
Does the random sort function help you here?
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html
However, you will get some very old listings then, if it's okay for you.
-Kuli
Am 12.01.2012 14:38, schrieb Alexandre Rocco:
Erick,
This document already has a field
Am 07.12.2011 14:26, schrieb Finotti Simone:
That's the scenario:
I have an XML that maps words W to URLs; when a search request is issued by my
web client, a query will be issued to my Solr application. If, after stemming,
the query matches any in W, the client must be redirected to the
Am 07.12.2011 15:09, schrieb Finotti Simone:
I got your and Michael's point. Indeed, I'm not very skilled in web devolpment
so there may be something that I'm missing. Anyway, Endeca does something like
this:
1. accept a query
2. does the stemming;
3. check if the result of the step 2.
Hi Alan,
Solr can do this fast and easy, but I wonder if a simple key-value-store
won't fit better for your suits.
Do you really only need to query be chart_id, or do you also need to
query by time range?
In either case, as long as your data fits into an in-memory database, I
would
Am 05.12.2011 14:28, schrieb Per Steffensen:
Hi
Reading http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication I notice the
pollInterval (guess it should have been pullInterval) on the slaves.
That indicate to me that indexed information is not really pushed from
master to slave(s) on events defined by
Hi Mark,
I'm sure you can manage this using function queries somehow, but this is
rather complicated, esp. if you both want to return the price and sort
on it.
I'd rather update the index as soon as a campaign starts or ends. At
least that's how we did it when I worked for online shops.
Am 29.11.2011 15:20, schrieb Erick Erickson:
Hmmm, I tried this in straight Java, no Solr/Lucene involved and the
behavior I'm seeing is that no example works if it has more than
one whitespace character after the hyphen, including your failure
example.
I haven't lived inside regexes for long
Am 17.11.2011 11:53, schrieb sbarriba:
The 'params' logging pointer was what I needed. So for reference its not a
good idea to use a 'wget' command directly in a crontab.
I was using:
wget http://localhost/solr/myfeed?command=full-importrows=5000clean=false
:))
I think the shell handled the
Am 16.11.2011 17:11, schrieb Travis Low:
If I can't solve this problem then we'll basically have to write our own
PHP Solr client, which would royally suck.
Oh, if you really can't get the library work, no problem - there are
several PHP clients out there that don't need a PECL installation.
Am 17.11.2011 08:46, schrieb Kashif Khan:
Please advise how we can reindex SOLR with having fields stored=false. we
can not reindex data from the beginning just want to read and write indexes
from the SOLRJ only. Please advise a solution. I know we can do it using
lucene classes using
Am 14.11.2011 21:50, schrieb alx...@aim.com:
Hello,
I use solr3.4 and nutch 1.3. In request handler we have
str name=mm2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%/str
As fas as I know this means that for two word phrase search match must be 100%.
However, I noticed that in most cases documents with both words are
I don't know much about nutch, but it looks like there's simply a commit
missing at the end.
Try to send a commit, e.g by executing
curl http://host:port/solr/core/update -H Content-Type: text/xml
--data-binary 'commit /'
-Kuli
Am 15.11.2011 09:11, schrieb Armin Schleicher:
hi there,
Hi,
Am 15.11.2011 10:25, schrieb rajini maski:
fieldType name=long class=solr.TrieLongField precisionStep=0
omitNorms=true positionIncrementGap=0/
[...]
fieldType name=tlong class=solr.TrieLongField precisionStep=8
omitNorms=true positionIncrementGap=0/
[...]
field
Am 14.11.2011 09:33, schrieb rajini maski:
query :
http://localhost:8091/Group/select?/indent=onq=studyid:120sort=studyidasc,groupid
asc,subjectid ascstart=0rows=10
Is it a copy-and-paste error, or did you realls sort on studyidasc?
I don't think you have a field studyidasc, and Solr
Am 08.11.2011 23:38, schrieb Cam Bazz:
How can I store a 2d point and index it to a field type that is
latlontype, if I am using solrj?
Simply use a String field. The format is $latitude,$longitude.
-Kuli
Hi,
this is not exactly true. In Solr, you can't have the wildcard operator
on both sides of the operator.
However, you can tokenize your fields and simply query for Solr. This
is what's Solr made for. :)
-Kuli
Am 01.11.2011 13:24, schrieb François Schiettecatte:
Arshad
Actually it is
Am 01.11.2011 16:06, schrieb Erick Erickson:
NGrams are often used in Solr for this case, but they will also add to
your index size.
It might be worthwhile to look closely at your user requirements
before going ahead
and supporting this functionality
Best
Erick
My opinion. Wildcards are
Am 28.10.2011 11:16, schrieb Robert Brown:
Is there no way to return the total number of docs as part of a search?
No, it isn't. Usually this information is of absolutely no value to the
end user.
A workaround would be to add some field to the schema that has the same
value for every document,
Am 26.10.2011 18:29, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
For inserting, I do use a Collection of SolrInputDocuments. The delete
process grabs values from idx_delete, does a query like the above (the
part that's slow in Java), then if any documents are found, issues a
deleteByQuery with the same string.
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
