database from 7.7.1 to 8.7.0
Hi Jim
Thanks for getting back to me.
I checked the schema.xml that we are using and it has the line you mentioned:
And this is the only reference (apart from within a comment) for _root_ In the
schema.xml. Does your schema.xml have further references to _root_
When we upgraded from 7.x to 8.x, I ran into an issue similar to yours: when
updating an existing document in the index, the document would be duplicated
instead of replaced as expected. The solution was to add a "_root_" field to
schema.xml like this:
It appeared that when a feature was
' directory in solr-7.3.1. Coping from 8.5.1 may well be my
problem.
I will check and see if I can find a 7.3.1 example directory to copy from.
I will report back.
Regards,
Jim
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:22 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> You need the entire config directory for a start, not j
by: Illegal pattern component: pp
I have done a search for an error message containing: "Illegal pattern
component: pp" but I did not find anything useful.
Can anyone help explain what this error message means and/or what needs to
be done to fix this problem?
Jim A.
I cleared the Firefox cache and restarted and things are working ok now.
Jim
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:44 PM Jim Anderson
wrote:
> @Jan
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried opera instead of firefox and it worked.
> I will try cleaner the cache on firefox, restart it and see
@Jan
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried opera instead of firefox and it worked.
I will try cleaner the cache on firefox, restart it and see if it works
there.
Jim
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:28 PM Jim Anderson
wrote:
> An update.
>
> I started over by removing my Solr 7.3.1 ins
straight out
of the box.
Jim
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:07 PM Jim Anderson
wrote:
> >>> Did you install Solr with the installer script
>
> I was not aware that there is an install script. I will look for it, but
> if you can point me to it, that will help
>
> >>
the admin UI shows that error
I cannot go to the "Logging" tab. When the admin UI comes up, it shows the
error message and hangs with the cursor spinning.
Thanks for the input. Again, if you can provide the install script, that
will likely help. I'm going to go back and start with instal
your logs for more information
I look in my .../solr/server/logs directory and cannot find and meaningful
errors or warnings.
Should I be looking elsewhere?
Jim A.
and then clear and
reinstall solr 8.5.1 and start over again with a clean slate.
Regards,
Jim
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:25 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I’m not talking about how much memory your machine has,
> the critical bit it’s how much heap space is allocated to the
> JVM to run
with Solr 8.5.1, but 1.17 has not been released for download.
Consequently, I used nutch 1.16. I'm not sure that will make a difference,
but I am suspicious.
Jim
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 9:18 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I’d look for an OutOfMemory problem before going too much fart
that the program
ran to completion, so I am guessing that at least one other thread is being
created and that that thread is crashing.
Regards,
Jim
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:52 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/5/2020 4:24 PM, Jim Anderson wrote:
> > I am running my first solrj program and it is
hat I have created a core, create a collection from
it so that I can truly pass a collection name to the query function?
Jim A.
Markus,
Thank for your replies. I will review them and experiment more and see if I
can get everything working.
Jim
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:36 PM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello, see inline.
>
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Jim Anderson
> > Sent:
d?
6) Solr will pass back the list of documents it has located. I have not
really looked at this issue yet, but it would be nice to have an example of
this.
Jim
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:12 PM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been building precisely that for over ten years now.
rch
engine. This demo is intended to show a 'proof of concept' of the web
application to a small audience.]
2) Document the process of building the demo and customizing it using the
java API so that others can more easily build their own web base search
engine.
Jim Anderson
⌚https://world.craigslist.org/d/search/?q=Robert-Pattinson/Discuss.asp?
Prospect / 29411
Dickson Anna31.12.2019 2:16:48
14 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.0.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.0.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted
11 February 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
24 September 2018, Apache Solr™ 7.5.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.5.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
Correction. The solution below did not quite get what we need.
I need the stats reports for the range.
I'll keep digging on this one
On Friday, May 11, 2018 10:59:45 AM PDT, Jim Freeby
<jamesfre...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
I found a solution.
If I us
f.someDate.facet.range.end=2018-04-30T00:00:00Z
f.someDate.facet.range.gap=+1MONTH
facet.pivot={!stats=piv1 range=r1}category
Please let me know if there's a better way to achieve this.
Cheers,
Jim
On Friday, May 11, 2018 09:23:39 AM PDT, Jim Freeby
<jamesfre...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
-6352] Let Stats Hang off of Range Facets - ASF JIRA
|
|
|
Thanks,
Jim
,
importDate)=true={!stats=piv1 }status
I hope this helps someone else :) Also, let me know if there's a better way to
do this.
Cheers,
Jim
On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 03:27:10 PM PDT, Jim Freeby
<jamesfre...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
All,
We have a dateImported
with something like:
rows=0=true={!tag=piv1
percentiles='50'}price=true={!stats=piv1 }status
I have not found a way to calculate the median dateImported. The mean works,
but we need median.
Any help would be appreciated?
Cheers,
Jim
15 January 2018, Apache Solr™ 7.2.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.2.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
27 April 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.5.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.5.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
27 April 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.5.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.5.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted
27 April 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.5.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.5.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted
27 March 2017, Apache Solr 6.5.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.5.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted
by a bug introduced
into the Javadocs tool shipped with that update. The workaround was too
late for this Lucene release. Of course, you can use the binary artifacts.
See the Solr CHANGES.txt files included with the release for a full list of
details.
Thanks,
Jim Ferenczi
other stored fields that are not
relevant to the query.
What is the best way to accomplish this? It would be convenient to be able to
modify fl in the QParser.
Also, note that the index is not sharded.
Thanks!
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednes
Anyone??
From: Beale, Jim (US-KOP) [mailto:jim.be...@hibu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Modifying fl in QParser
Hi,
Is it possible to modify the SolrParam, fl, to append selected dynamic fields,
while rewriting a query in QParser.parse
Hi,
Is it possible to modify the SolrParam, fl, to append selected dynamic fields,
while rewriting a query in QParser.parse()?
Thanks in advance!
Jim Beale
Senior Lead Developer
2201 Renaissance Boulevard, King of Prussia, PA, 19406
Mobile: 610-220-3067
[cid:image001.png@01CD6E5F.BE5E6C20
I see this occasionally. I¹ve wondered if it¹s related to SOLR-4161.
This error also correlates with a sudden growth in memory usage within the
VM. Usually, this memory growth does not clear up on its own.
I¹m using Solr 4.10.4.
On 6/26/16, 9:11 PM, "jarpondy"
Hi, I have question regarding collection configurations stored Zoo Keeper with
solrCloud.
All collection configurations are stored at Zoo Keeper. What happens if you
want to restart all Zoo Keeper instances? Does the Zoo Keeper persists data on
disk and can restore all configurations from disk?
4.3).
2015-11-02 13:47 GMT+01:00 Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com>:
> The problem is with the same query as phrase. q="network se*".
>
> The last . is fullstops for the sentence and the query is q=field:"network
> se*"
>
> Best,
> Modassar
&
are doing.
Jim
2015-11-02 10:38 GMT+01:00 Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com>:
> Just to add one more point that one external Zookeeper instance is also
> running on this particular machine.
>
> Regards,
> Modassar
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Modassar At
jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com>:
> 12 shards with 28GB for the heap and 90GB for each index means that you
> need at least 336GB for the heap (assuming you're using all of it which may
> be easily the case considering the way the GC is handling memory) and ~=
> 1TO for th
is
killing your performance.
2015-11-02 11:55 GMT+01:00 Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks Jim for your response.
>
> The remaining size after you removed the heap usage should be reserved for
> the index (not only the other system activities).
> I am not able t
sed on the frequency of the words for instance).
2015-11-02 13:36 GMT+01:00 jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> *I am not able to get the above point. So when I start Solr with 28g RAM,
> for all the activities related to Solr it should not go beyond 28g. And the
>
in others.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Cheers,
Jim
In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
than fq. The question is why?
Are you sure that the query result cache is disabled ?
2015-06-24 13:28 GMT+02:00 Esther Goldbraich estherg...@il.ibm.com:
Hi,
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries
option such as ALL that would
just create a replica on all nodes regardless of size.
I'm guessing this is intentional, but curious about the reasoning.
Thanks!
Jim
Thanks as always for the great answers!
Jim
On 6/19/15, 11:57 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim:
This is by design. There's no way to tell Solr to find all the cores
available and put one replica on each. In fact, you're explicitly
telling it to create one and only one
. What's the expected next step?
This is Solr 5.1.
Thanks!
Jim Musil
are also connected to a
zookeeper ensemble. Part of the core definition is to set the configSet
to use. This configSet is uploaded to zookeeper separately. This
effectively creates a Collection.
Is this method no long supported in 5.x?
Thanks!
Jim Musil
. These nodes are also connected to
a
zookeeper ensemble. Part of the core definition is to set the configSet
to use. This configSet is uploaded to zookeeper separately. This
effectively creates a Collection.
Is this method no long supported in 5.x?
Thanks!
Jim Musil
definition is to set the configSet to use. This
configSet is uploaded to zookeeper separately. This effectively creates a
Collection.
Is this method no long supported in 5.x?
Thanks!
Jim Musil
, will it automatically
upload these named config sets to zookeeper?
Thanks!
Jim Musil
I'm trying to use zkcli.sh to upload configurations to zookeeper and solr 5.1.
It's throwing an error because it references webapps/solr.war which no longer
exists.
Do I have to build my own solr.war in order to use zkcli.sh?
Please forgive me if I'm missing something here.
Jim Musil
Then you just have to remove the group.sort especially if your group limit
is set to 1.
Le 19 mars 2015 16:57, kumarraj rajitpro2...@gmail.com a écrit :
*if the number of documents in one group is more than one then you cannot
ensure that this document reflects the main sort
Is there a way
(query({!v='storeName_string:203'})),1,0))
desc,inStock_boolean
desc,geodist() asc*
Cheers,
Jim
2015-03-18 7:28 GMT+01:00 kumarraj rajitpro2...@gmail.com:
Hi Jim,
Yes, you are right.. that document is having price 499.99,
But i want to consider the first record in the group as part
reflects the main sort. Try for instance group.sort=pricecommon_double
asc (main sort inverse order) and you'll see that the sort inside each
group is always applied after the main sort. This is the only way to meet
the expectations ;).
Cheers,
Jim
2015-03-17 9:48 GMT+01:00 kumarraj rajitpro2
!
Jim
We set them as extra parameters sent to to the servlet (jetty or tomcat).
eg java -Dsolr.lock.type=native -jar start.jar
Jim
On 2/3/15, 11:58 AM, O. Olson olson_...@yahoo.it wrote:
I'm sorry if this is a basic question, but I am curious where, or at
least,
how can we set the parameters
You don't have to use SolrJ. It's just a web request to a url, so just
issue the request in Java and parse the JSON response.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7467568/parsing-json-from-url
SolrJ does make it simpler, however.
Jim
On 2/2/15, 12:57 PM, mathewvino vinojmat...@hotmail.com wrote
throwing the error?
Are all the updates coming from one machine?
Is there some other bottleneck in your network (like a load balancer) that
is limiting connections?
Good luck,
Jim Musil
On 2/2/15, 5:29 AM, nkgupta nitinkumargu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 8 node solr cloud cluster connected
:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PatternTo
kenizerFactory
Apologies if I¹m not understanding your use case.
Thanks,
Jim
On 2/2/15, 3:56 AM, Nivedita nivedita.pa...@tcs.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to tokenize query like CHQ PAID-INWARD TRAN-HDFC LTD in such a
way
Yes, I’m trying to pin down exactly what conditions cause the bug to
appear. It seems as though it’s only when using the query function.
Jim
On 1/27/15, 12:44 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great, thanks Jim. Your patch worked and the sorting solution
meets the goal, although
Here’s the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7046
Jim
On 1/27/15, 12:44 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great, thanks Jim. Your patch worked and the sorting solution
meets the goal, although group.limit seems like it could cut various
results out of the middle
Here’s the issue:
On 1/27/15, 12:44 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great, thanks Jim. Your patch worked and the sorting solution
meets the goal, although group.limit seems like it could cut various
results out of the middle of the result set. I will play around with it
and see
for a Jira issue and open if I can¹t find one.
Jim Musil
On 1/26/15, 6:34 PM, Ryan Josal r...@josal.com wrote:
I have an index of products, and these products have a category which we
can say for now is a good approximation of its location in the store. I'm
investigating altering the ordering
When using group.main=true, the results are not mixed as you expect:
If true, the result of the last field grouping command is used as the
main result list in the response, using group.format=simple”
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
Jim
On 1/27/15, 9:22 AM, Ryan Josal rjo
be a function as well.
Jim Musil
On 1/27/15, 10:14 AM, Jim.Musil jim.mu...@target.com wrote:
When using group.main=true, the results are not mixed as you expect:
If true, the result of the last field grouping command is used as the
main result list in the response, using group.format=simple”
https
://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PatternRe
placeCharFilterFactory
If you have control over the input, then I always find it better to just
transform it prior to sending it into solr.
Jim
On 1/25/15, 11:35 PM, Ahmed Adel ahmed.a...@badrit.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a way
of refinements.
Jim
2014-10-01 10:24 GMT+02:00 Charlie Hull char...@flax.co.uk:
On 30/09/2014 22:25, Erick Erickson wrote:
Just from a 20,000 ft. view, using the filterCache this way seems...odd.
+1 for using a different cache, but that's being quite unfamiliar with the
code.
Here's a quick update
Hi,
Something like ?:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Term+Vector+Component
And just to show some impressive search functionality of the wiki: ;)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dosearchsite.action?where=solrspaceSearch=truequeryString=document+vectors
Cheers,
Jim
2014
, otherwise the count will be incorrect. If you are using SolrCloud
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud, consider using custom hashing*
Cheers,
Jim
2014-08-21 21:44 GMT+02:00 Bryan Bende bbe...@gmail.com:
Is there any known issue with using group.ngroups in a distributed Solr
using version 4.8.1
which is rarely the case.
Regards,
Jim
2014-07-28 16:13 GMT+02:00 Per Steffensen st...@designware.dk:
Yes I found that one, along with SOLR-3950. Well at least it seems like
the support is there in Lucene. I will figure out myself how to make it
work via Solr, the way I need it to work. My
by
Manuel, but still, I think that it could speed up every queries (not only
deep paging queries like in the patch proposed in Manuel's ticket).
Jim
2014-06-01 14:06 GMT+09:00 William Bell billnb...@gmail.com:
Why not just submit a JIRA issue - and add your patch so that we can all
benefit
, then how does it detect changes in the
number of nodes and the status of the nodes?
Thanks!
Jim M.
. This does not seem to
be working. I have a configuration uploaded to zookeeper with a name. I want to
share that configuration between two cores, but it is only linking to the one
with the same exact name.
This parameter is marked at “Tentative” for 4.6. What is the status?
Thanks!
Jim
that the idea we implemented is not new but I haven’t seen any
Jira about it. Should we create one (I mean does it have a chance to be
included in future release of Solr or does anybody already working on this)
?
Cheers,
Jim
Shawn-
Thanks much. Icon ideas have been recorded.
-Jim
On 5/11/2014 10:39 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/10/2014 6:35 PM, Jim Martin wrote:
Please add me the ContributorsGroup; I've got some Solr icons I'd
like to suggest to the community. Perhaps down the road I can contribute
more. I'm
Greetings-
Please add me the ContributorsGroup; I've got some Solr icons I'd
like to suggest to the community. Perhaps down the road I can contribute
more. I'm the team lead at Overstock.Com for search, and Solr is the
foundation of what we do.
Username: JamesMartin
Thanks,
-Jim
informations here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4740
Thanks,
Jim
2014-03-21 6:56 GMT+01:00 Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org:
On 3/20/2014 6:54 PM, Harish Agarwal wrote:
I'm transitioning my index from a 3.x version to 4.6. I'm running a
large
heap (20G), primarily
)
at
org.apache.solr.schema.AbstractSpatialFieldType.createFields(AbstractSpatialFieldType.java:118)
spatial4j 0.3 is looking for something like POINT but Solr is converting my
lat,long to Pt(x=-72.544123,y=41.85).
Version mismatch?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Jim Beale
From: Smiley, David W
is going into
the index yet. I’ll have to wait for it to finish. (
Does that code seem correct? I want to avoid the deprecated API but so far I
haven’t found any alternatives which work.
Thanks,
Jim Beale
From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:07 PM
Hi David,
It's taken me ages to get back to this.
Thanks for your help! I guess I overly complicated the indexing of spatial
fields in Solr. I should have known that Solr would just do the right thing! :)
Thanks,
Jim
From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: Monday, January 13
.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jim
The information contained in this email message, including any attachments, is
intended solely for use by the individual or entity named above and may be
confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you must
Thanks Chris. I think you've hit the nail on the head.
I understand your concern about prioritizing content simply by content type,
and generally I'd agree with you. However, our situation is a bit unusual.
We don't use our Wiki feature as true wikis. We publish only authoritative
content to
Thanks all. Yes, we can differentiate between content types by URL.
Everything else being equal, Wiki posts should always be returned higher
than blog posts, and blog posts should always be returned higher than forum
posts.
Within forum posts, we want to rank Verified answered and Suggested
We have a Telligent based community with Solr as the search engine. We want
to prioritize search returns from within the community by the type of
content: Wiki articles as most relevant, then blog posts, then Verified
answer and Suggested answer forum posts, then remaining forum posts. We have
even care about replication. Why can't I specify a core
that is non-sharded, non-replicated and have the exact same core on all five of
my boxes?
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: michael.boom [mailto:my_sky...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 7:14 AM
To: solr-user
replication handler isn't defined errors in the logs, and the
added core fails to do anything.
It seems like such a simple task: create 1 sharded and 1 unsharded core.
But nothing I've tried so far works. Why can't numShards be a property of the
core???
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message
it be to implement this? Is it compatible with the architecture
of Solr 5?
Thanks,
Jim Beale
The information contained in this email message, including any attachments, is
intended solely for use by the individual or entity named above and may be
confidential. If the reader of this message
boxes.
Can I then copy a pre-existing LCN index into the data/index directory and have
it replicate to the other boxes?
Thanks!
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 11:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
field take a look at the frange query parser
which has post filter support:
To filter out document with a field value less than 5:
fq={!frange l=5 cache=false cost=200}field(myField)
Cheers,
Jim
2013/10/9 Rohit Harchandani rhar...@gmail.com
yes i get that. actually i should have explained in more
by changing one or more of
the parameters.
But, regardless, I think the whole experiment verifies your thinking that the
request was too big!
Thanks again!! :)
Jim Beale
Lead Developer
hibu.com
2201 Renaissance Boulevard, King of Prussia, PA, 19406
Office: 610-879-3864
Mobile: 610-220-3067
is happening but I'm hoping that
someone has a better suggestion.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Jim Beale
hibu.com
2201 Renaissance Boulevard, King of Prussia, PA, 19406
Office: 610-879-3864
Mobile: 610-220-3067
The information contained in this email message, including any
We have a simple SolrCloud setup (4.1) running with a single shard and
multiple replicas across 3 servers, and it's working fine except once in a
while,
the leader logs this error. We fine-tuned GC among other things and everything
is lightning fast. However, we still receive this SEVERE error a
with a couple other words before or after the matched words. At least,
the regex will have an easier job to do.
It is simply a workaround before a formal solution can be found. I will post
more information after I dig deeper in the issue.
Jim
From: Erick Erickson
Many thanks. the problem was solved with your help~~~
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757494p2762692.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
hi all,
I used ubuntu 10.10 ,I'm trying to get solr 1.4up andrunning,with no
success. i have fllowed this
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1532230 to run my solr,
but there has error as:
HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files
for more detailed
hi all,
I used ubuntu 10.10 ,I'm trying to get solr 1.4up andrunning,with no
success. i have fllowed this
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1532230 to run my solr,
but there has error as:
HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files
for more detailed
i need help
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757494p2761679.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks . I'll check it. but i don't know how to get the right solr
configuration
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757493p2761753.html
Sent from the Solr
I open it buy Firefox,and find the mistake. when correct the mistake. There
still has the error as:
HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files
for more detailed information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to
continue after configuration errors, change:
.
The advice is much appreciated,
Jim
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo