semantics indicate not searching on text_t even though
highlighting is enabled.
Is this correct behavior? it produces unwanted highlight results.
I would expect Solr to know what fields are participating in the query and
only highlight
those that are involved in the result set.
Thanks,
Darren
Hi Juan,
Setting that parameter produces the same extraneous results. Here is
my query:
{!lucene q.op=OR df=text_t} kind_s:doc AND (( field_t:[* TO *] ))
Clearly, the default field (text_t) is not being searched by this query
and highlighting it would be semantically incongruent
=OR df=text_t} kind_s:doc AND (( field_t:[* TO *] ))
Clearly, the default field (text_t) is not being searched by this
query and highlighting it would be semantically incongruent with the
query.
Is it a bug?
Darren
On 01/02/2012 04:39 PM, Juan Grande wrote:
Hi Darren,
This is the expected
that this problem is bigger than just the q=* search.
I think my solution when this error is thrown is going to be to bump the
size of the maxBooleanClause and retry the query. Failing that, I'll have to
retry the query with highlighting off.
I suspect this will go away if you use the correct
This may be the impetus for Hoss creating SOLR-2996.
I suspect this will go away if you use the correct
match-all-docs syntax, i.e. q=*:* rather than q=*
Hoss' suggestion in 2996 is to do the right thing with
q=*, but for now you need to use the right syntax.
But I'm not sure what highlighting
read so far, I'm
fairly certain that this problem is bigger than just the q=* search.
I think my solution when this error is thrown is going to be to bump the
size of the maxBooleanClause and retry the query. Failing that, I'll
have to retry the query with highlighting off.
I suspect
: I am new to solr/xml/xslt, and trying to figure out how to display
: search query fields highlighted in html. I can enable the highlighting
: in the query, and I think I get the correct xml response back (See
: below: I search using 'Contents' and the highlighting is shown with
: strong
This question has come up a few times, but I've yet to see a good solution.
Basically, if I have highlighting turned on and do a query for q=*, I
get an error that maxBooleanClauses has been exceeded. Granted, this is
a silly query, but a user might do something similar. My expectation
Le 21/12/2011 23:49, Koji Sekiguchi a écrit :
(11/12/21 22:28), Tanguy Moal wrote:
Dear all,
[...]
I tried using both legacy highlighter and FVH but the same issue occurs.
The issue only triggers when relying on hl.q.
Thank you very much for any help,
--
Tanguy
Tanguy,
Thank you for
Dear all,
I'm try to get highlighting working, and I'm almost done, but that's not
perfect yet...
Basically my documents have a title and a description.
I have two kind of text fields :
text :
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
(11/12/21 22:28), Tanguy Moal wrote:
Dear all,
I'm try to get highlighting working, and I'm almost done, but that's not
perfect yet...
Basically my documents have a title and a description.
I have two kind of text fields :
text :
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap
No respinse !! Bumping it up
*Pranav Prakash*
temet nosce
Twitter http://twitter.com/pranavprakash | Blog http://blog.myblive.com |
Google http://www.google.com/profiles/pranny
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 14:11, Pranav Prakash pra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Group,
I would like to have highlighting
with highlighting.
Some unwanted terms which are not part of the search are getting highlighted.
This issue has come up after using the latest Solr4.0 trunk, earlier the search
and highlighting was working fine. Looks like some issue with
SynonymFilterFactory.
-Shyam
-Original Message-
From
behavior with highlighting which was not seen earlier.
When a search query for example generate test pattern is passed in the
results et obtained the first few results shows the highlighting properly but
in the later results we see terms which were not part of the search like
Question, Answer
I am new to solr/xml/xslt, and trying to figure out how to display search query
fields highlighted in html. I can enable the highlighting in the query, and I
think I get the correct xml response back (See below: I search using 'Contents'
and the highlighting is shown with strong and /strong
idea here is that whatever parses your response has to
match the id field in the doc tag with the proper element from
the lstname=highlighting element and mix-n-match them.
Hope that helps
Erick
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Bent Jensen bentjen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how
Hi there,
when highlighting a field with this definition:
fieldType name=name class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Max nas...@gmail.com wrote:
The end offset remains 11 even after folding and transforming æ to
ae, which seems wrong to me.
End offsets refer to the *original text* so this is correct.
What is wrong, is EdgeNGramsFilter. See how it turns that 11 to a 12?
I
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Max nas...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like there is some weird stuff going on when folding the
string, it can be seen in the analysis view, too:
http://i.imgur.com/6B2Uh.png
I created a bug here, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3642
Thanks for
Robert, thank you for creating the issue in JIRA.
However, I need ngrams on that field – is there an alternative to the
EdgeNGramFilterFactory ?
Thanks!
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Max nas...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems
I am trying to figure out how to display search query fields highlighted in
html. I can enable the highlighting in the query, and I think I get the correct
response back (See below: I search using 'Contents' and the highlighting is
shown with strong and /strong. However, I can't figure out
Hi
We recently upgraded our Solr to the latest 4.0 trunk and we are seeing a weird
behavior with highlighting which was not seen earlier.
When a search query for example generate test pattern is passed in the
results et obtained the first few results shows the highlighting properly
Hi Group,
I would like to have highlighting for search and I have the fields indexed
with the following schema (Solr 3.4)
fieldType name=text_commongrams class=solr.TextField
analyzer
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class
took of out of the stops words for the query analyser and it now
matches front-of-house but I know there's better matches stored as
front of house (without the hyphens) that are ranked much lower.
Is there any quick way to have the highlighting applied to the entire
phrase that was searched
I am having a similar issue with OffsetExceptions during highlighting.
In all of the explanations and bug reports I'm reading there is a
mention this is all the result of a problem with HTMLStripCharFilter.
But my analysis chains don't (that I'm aware of) make use of
HTMLStripCharFilter, so can
},
{
lily.id:UUID.d92b405d-f41e-4c85-9014-1b89a986ec42,
rangefld:5783},
{
lily.id:UUID.102adde5-cbff-4ca6-acb1-426bb14fb579,
rangefld:5753}]
},
highlighting:{
UUID.c5f00cd3-343a-47c1-ab16-ace104b2540f:{},
UUID.ed69ece0-1b24-4829-afb6-22eb242939f2
and output is
{
responseHeader:{
status:0,
QTime:4,
params:{
hl.highlightMultiTerm:true,
fl:lily.id,rangefld,
indent:on,
hl.useFastVectorHighlighter:false,
q:rangefld:[5000 TO
6000],
hl.fl:*,rangefld,
I don't think hl.fl parameter
Tried below url and got the same output. Any other suggestion .
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=rangefld:[5000%20TO%206000]fl=lily.id,rangefldhl=onrows=5wt=jsonindent=onhl.fl=rangefldhl.highlightMultiTerm=truehl.usePhraseHighlighter=truehl.useFastVectorHighlighter=false
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011
Any other Suggestion. as these
suggestions are not working.
Could it be that you are using FastVectorHighlighter? What happens when you add
hl.useFastVectorHighlighter=false to your search URL?
Highlighting is dependent on the size of the
data being fed through the highlighter. Unless you have
termVectors offsets positions enabled, the text
must be re-analyzed, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase?highlight=%28termvector%29%7C%28retrieve%29%7C%28contents%29
Hello,
I want to have result of a range query with highlighted Result.
e.g. i have this query
http://localhsot:8983/solr/select?q=field1:[5000%20TO%206000]fl=field2hl=onrows=5wt=jsonindent=onhl.fl=field3
is not giving any result in hightliting.
Please suggest how can i get the result?
--
I want to have result of a range query with highlighted
Result.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.highlightMultiTerm
Hi Ahmet,
I passed hl.highlightMultiTerm=true in request ,* but still field1 is not
coming in hightlighting.*
http://localhsot:8983/solr/select?q=field1:[5000%20TO%206000]fl=field2hl=onrows=5wt=jsonindent=onhl.fl=field3hl.highlightMultiTerm=true
I am using solr 3.1.
is i need to install the
I passed hl.highlightMultiTerm=true in request ,* but
still field1 is not
coming in hightlighting.*
http://localhsot:8983/solr/select?q=field1:[5000%20TO%206000]fl=field2hl=onrows=5wt=jsonindent=onhl.fl=field3hl.highlightMultiTerm=true
As wiki says If the SpanScorer is also being used...
oh sorry forgot to tell you that i added hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true this
also , but still no result is coming .
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
I passed hl.highlightMultiTerm=true in request ,* but
still field1 is not
coming in hightlighting.*
oh sorry forgot to tell you that i
added hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true this
also , but still no result is coming .
Did you specify field1 in hl.fl parameter?
Plus you need you mark field1 as indexed=true and stored=true to enable
highlighting.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
in hl.fl parameter?
Plus you need you mark field1 as indexed=true and stored=true to
enable highlighting.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
--
Thanks Regards
Rahul Mehta
hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true this
also , but still no result is coming .
Did you specify field1 in hl.fl parameter?
Plus you need you mark field1 as indexed=true and stored=true to
enable highlighting.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
--
Thanks Regards
Rahul Mehta
Hi,
It is observed that highlighting of search results is taking too much time
especially for highlighting terms for archived files like *.gz, *.tar, *.zip.
What could be the reason behind it ? Is it because these files are unzipped and
then highlighted from the index during display time
Solr 3.3.0
I have a field/type indexed as below.
For a particular document the content of this field is
'FreeBSD,Perl,Linux,Unix,SQL,MySQL,Exim,Postgresql,Apache,Exim'
Using eDismax, mm=1
When I query for...
+perl +(apache sql) +(linux unix)
Strangely, the highlighting is being returned
Hello!!!
I have a trouble with Solr highlighting. I have any document with next
fields- TYPE, DBID and others. When i do next request -
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standardq=TYPE:
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standardq=TYPE:cm:contentindent=onhl=truehl.fl
(11/11/22 22:30), VladislavLysov wrote:
Hello!!!
I have a trouble with Solr highlighting. I have any document with next
fields- TYPE, DBID and others. When i do next request -
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standardq=TYPE:
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standardq
/0.1}label.__:{en}label1;':
Encountered } } at line 1, column 54. Was expecting one of: TO ...
RANGEEX_QUOTED ... RANGEEX_GOOP ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-highlighting-isn-t-work-tp3527701p3530016.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hi, have you found the solution to your highlighting apostrophe problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-apostrophe-tp731155p3515139.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I found out the solution!
I needed to also add an EdgeNGramFilterFactory to the fields that are the
source of the copyField.
That got the highlighting working again.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-with-a-default-copy-field
Hi,
Been wrestling with a question on highlighting (or not) - perhaps
someone can help?
The question is this:
Is it possible, using highlighting or perhaps another more suited
component, to return words/tokens from a stored field based on a
regular expression's capture groups?
What I was kind
!
But now I would like to insert an EdgeNGramFilterFactory on that field, so
that I can instead do q=sas without the wildcard.
When I do that, I get the match but no highlights.
Is there something different that I need to do to get highlighting?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066
Hi Edwin, Chris
it´s an old bug. I have big problems too with OffsetExceptions when i use
Highlighting, or Carrot.
It looks like a problem with HTMLStripCharFilter.
Patch doesn´t work.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2208
Regards
Vadim
2011/11/11 Edwin Steiner edwin.stei
Hi,
Highlighting is not working for wildcard searches when TermVectors
(hl.useFastVectorHighlighter) is enabled.
I wanted to use FastVectorHighlighter to improve the performance of search
results but when hl.useFastVectorHighlighter is enabled highlighting does not
work in case of wildcard
I just entered a bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2891
Thanks regards, Edwin
On Nov 7, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: finally I want to use Solr highlighting. But there seems to be a problem
: if I combine the char filter and the compound word filter
: finally I want to use Solr highlighting. But there seems to be a problem
: if I combine the char filter and the compound word filter in combination
: with highlighting (an
: org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.InvalidTokenOffsetsException is
: raised).
Definitely sounds like a bug somwhere
the
solr.DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory to find words which are part of
compound words (e.g. revision in totalrevision). And finally I want to use Solr
highlighting. But there seems to be a problem if I combine the char filter and
the compound word filter in combination with highlighting
Try this with debugQuery=on. I suspect you're not getting the query you
think you are and I'd straighten that out before worrying about highlighting.
Usually, for instance, AND should be capitalized to be an operator.
So try with debugQuery=on and see what happens. The highlighter, I
believe
the
solr.DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory to find words which are part of
compound words (e.g. revision in totalrevision). And finally I want to use Solr
highlighting. But there seems to be a problem if I combine the char filter and
the compound word filter in combination with highlighting
I have situation where I need to highlight matching phrases in text field
where as query is against string field. Its not highlighting now, may be
because in text field they are all terms and hence not a match for phrase.
How do i do it? With hl.alternateField, it identifies those things
This is definitely an interesting case that i don't think anyone ever
really considered before. It seems like a strong argument in favor of
adding an hl.q param that the HighlightingComponent would use as an
override for whatever the QueryComponent thinks the highlighting query
should
(the size of the token is configurable).
If you're not using that my second guess is that the term is being truncated
somehow.
If you could provide some more info about this case it would be better
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:49 AM, docmattman mattpale...@live.com wrote:
I have highlighting
, someone else built the
system and now I'm in charge of getting it running correctly.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-misses-some-characters-tp3439778p3440995.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/Highlighting-misses-some-characters-tp3439778p3440995.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Dirceu Vieira Júnior
---
+47 9753 2473
dirceuvjr.blogspot.com
twitter.com/dirceuvjr
I have highlighting on in query. If I do a search for Apple, it will
highlight Appl. If I do a search for deleted it will highlight delet,
agreed will highlight agre. How can I get it to highlight the full term
that I'm searching for and not leave off certain letters?
I'm pretty new to Solr
?
Jan I've looked into this, and I believe the slowness of Highlighter
doesn't have to do with constructing the snippets as much as with the
analysis that is required to find the locations of matching terms in the
document text, so I think your problem is basically the same as
highlighting
tokens that really contribute to the search match.
You might also be interested in LUCENE-2878 (which is still under development
on a branch though). It aims to provide first-class access to payloads and
positions during scoring, and this will be very useful for complex
highlighting tasks
for the
highlight query to extract terms from for highlighting.
With a request like this...
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?defType=dismaxq=solrhl=truefl=namehl.fl=namebq=server
...DismaxQParser is the default query parser, and because of how it
is designed to work (and designed to be used
are two searches that yield identical results but different
highlighting behaviors:
http://localhost:8080/solr/biblio/select/?q=johnrows=20start=0indent=yesqf=author^100qt=dismaxbq=author%3Asmith^1000fl=scorehl=truehl.fl=*
http://localhost:8080/solr/biblio/select/?q=%28%28_query_%3A%22{!dismax
, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(11/09/14 15:54), Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here
is
an issue with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from
with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from the highlighting list:
arr name=Contents
str
Within the fleet of 27 floatinglt;emrigslt;/em (semisubmersibles and
drillships) are 21 deepwaterlt;emdrillinglt;/**em
/str
/arr
/lst
Why did solr
Hello list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here is
an issue with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from the highlighting list:
arr name=Contents
str
Within the fleet of 27 floating lt;emrigslt;/em
list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here is
an issue with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from the highlighting list:
arr name=Contents
str
Within the fleet of 27 floatinglt;emrigslt;/em
(11/09/14 15:54), Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here is
an issue with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from the highlighting list:
arr name=Contents
str
Within the fleet
We did something like that for one particular project.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-do-sorting-on-no-of-highlighting-in-solr-tp3319983p3320688.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.,
handle: 8142,
},
]
},
highlighting: {
8252: {
description: [
and emelegant/em design was finely crafted in Japan.
]
},
8142: {
description: [
This emelegant/em
: *What I want:* to change the output by embedding the highlighting properties
: into the response properties, such that the response part looks like:
Work along the lines of making this a generally available feature is
already in progress on the trunk as part of the psuedo fields work
(SOLR
-set round diamonds making it perfect for her to
wear to work or the night out.,
handle: 8142,
},
]
},
highlighting: {
8252: {
description: [
and emelegant/em design was finely crafted in Japan
: I am new to solr. Am facing an issue wherein the highlighting of the
: searchresults for matches is not working when I have set a unique field
: as:
:
: uniqueKeyid/uniqueKey
:
: If this is commented then highlighting starts working. I need to have a
: unique field. Could someone please
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Invalid-Date-String-for-highlighting-any-date-field-match-tp3255469p3255469.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I am new to solr. Am facing an issue wherein the highlighting of the
searchresults for matches is not working when I have set a unique field as:
uniqueKeyid/uniqueKey
If this is commented then highlighting starts working. I need to have a unique
field. Could someone please explain
stemming, and what I can see is that a lot
of
tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange part, since I
don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming again.
Consider that the highlighter needs to match terms from the query with
terms from the document, just like search
Hi,
I combined a spatial distance search with a fulltext search as described
in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#geodist_-_The_distance_function .
I'm using solr 3.3 and that works fine.
BUT, I want to use highlighting of fulltext query words but that does
not work.
Before solr
-_The_distance_function .
I'm using solr 3.3 and that works fine.
BUT, I want to use highlighting of fulltext query words but that does
not work.
Before solr 3.3, I used solr 1.4 with Spatial Search plugin from Jteam
and that works fine also with highlighting.
After refactoring because of API change I
highlighting of fulltext query words but that does
not work.
Before solr 3.3, I used solr 1.4 with Spatial Search plugin from Jteam
and that works fine also with highlighting.
After refactoring because of API change I miss the highlighting feature.
Is that a known issue? Or what is my mistake/ I
Ralf,
Highlighting (and search relevancy -- the score) is performed on the user query
which must be in the q parameter. In your case, I see you placed your
geospatial query there and you put your user query into a filter query fq.
You have them reversed.
You stated that the returning
Hi David,
So that As a temporary workaround for older Solr versions, it's
possible to obtain distances by using geodist or geofilt as the only
scoring part of the main query
and Highlighting do not fit together, right?
Ok, than I have to calculate the distance by my own.
Thank you very much
I think 4.0 supports fl=geodist()
On 8/1/11 3:47 PM, Ralf Musick ra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi David,
So that As a temporary workaround for older Solr versions, it's
possible to obtain distances by using geodist or geofilt as the only
scoring part of the main query
and Highlighting do not fit together
Hi,
Thanks for the answer!
I am doing some logging about stemming, and what I can see is that a lot of
tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange part, since I
don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming again.
Anyway my docments are not really large, just a few
Hi, I'm setting hl.fragsize = 10 in all my highlighting fragmenters but I'm
still getting snippets being returned with 10 characters (I think I'm
getting the full text back). I also tried specifying hl.fragsize in the
querystring, but the same thing happens. Any idea why fragsize is not
getting
I am doing some logging about stemming, and what I can see
is that a lot of
tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange
part, since I
don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming
again.
Highlighting do re-analyze the text being highlighted.
Anyway my docments
Hi, I'm setting hl.fragsize = 10 in
all my highlighting fragmenters but I'm
still getting snippets being returned with 10
characters (I think I'm
getting the full text back). I also tried specifying
hl.fragsize in the
querystring, but the same thing happens. Any idea why
fragsize
On 7/30/2011 3:46 AM, Orosz György wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the answer!
I am doing some logging about stemming, and what I can see is that a lot of
tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange part, since I
don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming again.
Consider
@@@hl@@@/str
str name=hl.simple.post@@@endhl@@@/str
str name=fqtype:(Task)/str
str name=hlon/str
str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=rows30/str
/lst
/lst
lst name=highlighting
...
str
@@@hl@@@some s@@@endhl@@@uper long piece of text. long interesting stuff and
text gofish found
/str
/arr
parameters used. Both defaults defined in
solrconfig.xml and the ones in URL.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreQueryParameters#echoParams
--- On Sat, 7/30/11, Frank Chiu frank.c...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Frank Chiu frank.c...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: fragsize for highlighting
To: Ahmet Arslan iori
I ended up removing the EdgeNGramFilterFactory and the highlighting seems to
work okay. Thanks for your help, echoParams is useful.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
I suspected that you set fragsize twice, but from what you paste thats not
the case. e.g
Dear all,
I am quite new about using Solr, but would like to ask your help.
I am developing an application which should be able to highlight the results
of a query. For this I am using regex fragmenter:
highlighting
fragmenter name=regex
class=org.apache.solr.highlight.RegexFragmenter
lst
document that is analyzed by the
regular Highlighter using maxDocCharsToAnalyze (and maybe this applies
to FVH? not sure)
Using RegexFragmenter is also probably slower than something like
SimpleFragmenter.
There is work to implement faster highlighting for Solr/Lucene, but it
depends on some
hi
when u highlight and get back snippet fragments , can you over write the
default hl.regex.pattern through url .
can some quote an example url of that sort ?
what if i make pass hl.slop=0 will this stop considering regex pattern at
all ?
--
-JAME
text field?
If so, you should probably be able to hack up FastVectorHighlighter to do
what you want.
-Mike
On 06/29/2011 02:22 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
I have a schema with a text field and a text_phonetic field and would like
to perform highlighting on them in such a way that the tokens
FastVectorHighlighter to do what
you want.
-Mike
On 06/29/2011 02:22 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
I have a schema with a text field and a text_phonetic field and would like
to perform highlighting on them in such a way that the tokens that match are
combined. What would be a reasonable way
Hi,
I need help in figuring out the right configuration to perform highlighting
in Solr. I can retrieve the matching documents plus the highlighted
matches.
I've done another tool called DTSearch where it would return the offset
positions of the field value to highlight. I've tried a few
I have a schema with a text field and a text_phonetic field and would like
to perform highlighting on them in such a way that the tokens that match are
combined. What would be a reasonable way to accomplish this?
to perform highlighting on them in such a way that the tokens that match are
combined. What would be a reasonable way to accomplish this?
-highlighting-tp480339p3113824.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
601 - 700 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
