At 10:01 AM 7/15/2003 -0400, Gaurav Hariani wrote:
I've been (almost) spam free for almost a month since I
installed spamassassin. But today I received spam that had a -ve score.
I don't know much about spamassassin, so could someone explain how this
happened and what can I do to catch this sort of
At 05:08 PM 7/15/2003 +0100, Huw Jenkins wrote:
Hi there list,
I'm fairly new to SA so forgive my ignorance. I've installed
SpamAssasssin and it works very nicely. I've got my threshold set pretty
high as we're an ISP and I don't want and False Negatives. I've noticed that
certain pension spam
At 12:37 PM 7/14/2003 -0700, Matt Thoene wrote:
Huh? One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. What kind of spam
is getting through?
I think what happened is a few of the more "clever" spammers got his
address as a result of them mining addresses out of dice.com.
Of course, the original em
At 03:42 PM 7/14/2003 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
I've attached the message I'm playing with right now (as a zip because
SourceForge rejected it the first time); here's the rule
that's failing to trigger:
uri SPAM_SITE_11/(domainsforpeople|pandabearperks)\.com/i
describe SPAM_SITE_11 Body
At 01:19 PM 7/12/2003 -0700, I Am Jesus @sent wrote:
I suggest something like the original comments followed by:
#score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.8
#score RCVD_IN_DUL 0.8
#score RCVD_IN_DUL_FH 0.8
#score RCVD_IN_RBL 1.8
#score RCVD_IN_RSS 1.8
Flipping back to your original post...
I *think* what yo
At 11:37 AM 7/14/2003 -0600, Eric wrote:
I setup the local.cf in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf with the
line required_hits 1.00
for testing purposes... however after killing spamd and restarting the
spam hits say 5.0 is the required_hits cutoff
my score changes in local cf are worki
At 07:38 PM 7/13/2003 -0400, Mike Leone wrote:
> And who will pay for the software?
No one - you use one of the free anti-virus scanners.
agreed, clamav is free and work fine for this...
However a better question would be "who will pay for the hardware
upgrades".. Seeing as the server that runs
At 03:14 PM 7/12/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
Just some fun related.
http://www.comics.com/comics/dilbert/archive/images/dilbert2003071742312.gif
Heh, Dilbert isn't the only cartoon with a spam theme for the day:
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030712
I found it quite amusing that 2 of
At 12:22 PM 7/12/03 +1000, Leo Huang wrote:
Spamassassin adds the report in the body. How can I remove it?
I tried to use "report_header 1", but it doesn't work.
In 2.5x the "report_header" option no longer exist.. use "report_safe 2"
instead.
Check the man page for Mail::SpamAssassin::
At 12:56 PM 7/11/2003 -0500, Genchev, Sergei wrote:
I use bayes tests and do not use network tests with SA 2.55. Thing that
puzzles me is the default scores for my situation.
Is there any reason that BAYES_80 score (5.3) is bigger then BAYES_90 score
(4.027) and even BAYES_99 score (5.2)? BAYES_1
Summary: Known bug in your version, fixed in 2.54 and newer.
No, the Asian fonts have nothing to do with it. The reason for your false
negative is that you're using 2.53, which is very well known to be easily
abused by spammers.
The REFERENCES and IN_REP_TO rules both have very large negative s
At 04:44 PM 7/11/2003 +0400, dawnshade wrote:
In this case: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - not real address. How i can tell to
Spamassassin don't doing this
It's not spamassassin that's doing it, spamassassin itself can't even try
to do this. Exim however can do things like this, and it's Exim that needs
At 12:07 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, John P Verel wrote:
dns_available test: server1.ltd, etc.
Can someone clarify how to set this up?
It's actualy .tld, not ltd..
In general what you do is instead of "server1.tld" specify some domain that
you want SA to perform a MX record lookup for via dns.
So in y
At 12:57 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, VonEssen, John wrote:
I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
servers I work on.
The email is definitely spam and it tests positive for a few RBL, but
not enough to raise its score significantly. The one I got the other day
only scored 2.9
At 02:47 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, Wendell Smith wrote:
Can I feed sa-learn ONE file that contains a large number of emails?
It should work if it's in mbox format and you tell sa-learn to use that
format. The alternative is to use a tool to split it out into many files in
a single directory and use the
At 11:53 AM 7/10/2003 -0300, German Staltari wrote:
Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been scored with 0.8
points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
Thanks
German
This kind of spam is admittedly very well suited to bayes, as someone else
already noted, but there are rules
At 09:25 AM 7/10/2003 +0200, Timothée HESPEL wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if we can use sa-learn --spam on tagged spam, or just
on non-detected spam.
Thanks
Timothée HESPEL
In general, sa-learn should be fed a nice balanced diet of all kinds of
spam, tagged and otherwise.
However feeding i
At 04:42 PM 7/9/2003 -0800, Chris Ochap wrote:
I know I saw the option for spamassassin/spamd to stop scanning once the
appropriate users score has been reached, but I cannot find it again. I
have spamd/spamc running on qmail/vpopmail/maildrop with per user
configs. I don't see it in perldoc Mail
At 10:46 AM 7/10/2003 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>0.5 (Severe),
Egads,
> 1.5 (High),
Ouch,
> 4.0 (Medium),
Oww.
These three settings are going to give you false positives galore.
4.0 isn't all that bad.. according to STATISTICS.txt 4.0 should give you
0.44% FP rate in v 2.54, which is a
At 10:06 PM 7/9/2003 +0200, Xavier wrote:
Since a server crash (not spamd related), I've very bad performance! Only
local mail is processed: more than 30" to check a mail! (was < 1" before)
Any idea? Is there maybe some corrupted DB?
30 seconds is a very magic number.. that's how long SA waits fo
At 08:58 AM 7/9/2003 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
I think I am under a DOS attack on port 25. I have received 2172 smtp packets
from the same location yesterday. Due to this activity I have set my firewall
to reject all incoming packets from Japan. I notified [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and
At 06:58 AM 7/9/2003 -0700, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
Jul 9 06:46:55 alpha13 spamd[3206]: identified spam (14.0/5.0) for
rlfrank:501 in 32.3 seconds, 1836 bytes.
This is on a pretty standard installation with razor2, pyzor and dcc active.
Sounds/looks like one or more of your RBL checks are timing
At 12:16 PM 7/9/2003 +0200, Aldo Mari wrote:
but even if the score of spam is high (I see it in propertis of mail that
is arrived X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=101.4 required=7.5)...the subject
of mail is NOT modified by *SPAM*
WHY??
How are you calling SA? are you using a direct call in
At 08:16 AM 7/9/2003 -0400, Bill wrote:
Not sure how to filter this one. It only got a score of 0.1
Perhaps looking at the message headers might provide some better clues?
Body rules aren't the strongest rules in the SA ruleset.
---
This SF.Ne
At 12:51 PM 7/9/03 +0800, Michael P. Carel wrote:
thanks for the reply. What I also observed was, when a user used to send an
email using pine mailer, which has a group addressbook,
and used to send email to all that goup(which has a large list of email
addresses) by including it all to CC: the se
At 01:16 PM 7/9/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> hi to all,
>
> I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having
> spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred
> of
> emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon.
>
> Any idea why? Please help us
At 11:22 AM 7/8/2003 -0400, VonEssen, John wrote:
In 50_scores.cf there are different formats of scores:
score SCORE_NAME 0.0 3.017 0.0 2.635
or
score SCORE_NAME 1.0
What is the difference and what do the extra fields mean? I would like
to change the weighting of some dcc and rbl scores.
It's i
At 12:48 AM 7/8/2003 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
I just got a spam which scored 13.80 but had a -4.8 point AWL adjustment. I
don't understand how it could have been whitelisted because it is obviously
porn spam. It even rates a BAYES_70. How is it possible that it was
whitelisted?
This is a ver
At 10:54 AM 7/7/03 -0700, Ben Johansen wrote:
if I go into account options
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/spamassassin-talk
and give it my email address and click "Email My Password to Me"
I never receive it. At first I thought it may be blocked by my mail
server but checked the logs a
At 04:11 AM 7/3/2003 +0200, Andrea Riela wrote:
Hi folks,
I've problem with spamassassin 2.5x and local.cf on OpenBSD 3.3.
I would see X-Spam-Report in the headers, but I can't.
Report_header 1 doesn't work.
Why? How could I see that?
report_header is no longer a valid snort option. Read the curre
At 11:42 AM 7/2/03 +0400, Andrew A. Vasilyev wrote:
One can see which is more reader-friendly :-))
True, but I'd argue the old format is useless, regardless of readability.
It doesn't list the names of the rules, just the descriptions, making the
information it provides very limited in value. (
At 02:45 AM 7/2/03 +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
Hi,
There's been several comments on these, but I wanted to give some concrete
examples from real spam in my mailbox. Yes, all three of these are very
common spam messages.
# describe PREST_NON_ACCREDITED 'Prestigious Non-Accredited Universities'
ba
At 02:41 PM 7/1/03 +0100, Adam T. Bowen wrote:
in the man pages it says that whitelist_from only checks:
Resent-From
if available, otherwise
Envelope-Sender
Resent-Sender
X-Envelope-From
From
Have things changed?
From the 2.53 source code:
if (defined
At 02:34 AM 7/2/2003 +1000, Leo Huang wrote:
Hello,
I want to call spamc in the Sendmail, so the messages won't be re-scanned if
it is delivered to multiple users.
How to call SA in the sendmail?
Use spamass-milter or a similar milter plugin to sendmail that calls SA.
At 03:01 AM 7/1/2003 +0100, R.W. wrote:
It's purely idle curiosity, but why are there so many default score
entries of 0.001 ?
During development they tend to assign 0.001 to new rules so that they are
run and can be tested without any significant impact on normal mail.
Eventualy when they GA the
At 12:04 PM 7/1/03 +0100, Adam T. Bowen wrote:
We have received some email this morning with the From and To
headers like:
From: "" <>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it is getting a USER_IN_WHITELIST -100 score. The whitelist rule
causing this is:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from
At 03:26 PM 6/30/2003 -0600, Mike Mills wrote:
I'm having trouble running spamassassin to find out why a spam was not
caught. I've tried invoking as follows:
/usr/bin/spamassassin -D spam
or
~/sausr/bin/spamassassin -D spam
where spam is the message exported to a file. In both cases the proces
At 07:41 PM 6/30/2003 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
A dsjenwine problem.
A what? Is this supposed to be the dutch spelling of genuine, not present
anywhere within the visibility of even google?
:)
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-b
At 09:29 AM 6/30/2003 +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
Look at the message I've saved in
ftp://stat.ethz.ch/U/maechler/spam-mail/please
1) why there's no check on the obvious spam subject
Subject: PLEASE READ! Important Support Information and FAQs
2) I give small positive scores to the LINES
At 03:18 PM 6/30/2003 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of which I thought it should match on mails which contain a file
attachment like "test.zip":
Content-Type: application/zip; name="test.zip";
But the test doesn't match. What could have went wrong? Is "full" the
wrong test method?
Based on th
At 03:22 PM 6/30/2003 +0100, Darren Coleman wrote:
It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be
engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email.
i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in tags to lower their score - SA should ignore it.
The p
At 12:17 PM 6/29/03 -0700, Spam Sucks wrote:
Anyone know what Spamassassin is testing to trip the BUGGY_CGI sensor?
Is there a web site that lists the tests of each of the default
settings? I could only find lists of the default scores and descriptions
(even on the spamassasin.org site).
The messag
At 11:28 AM 6/28/2003 +1000, Brad wrote:
A quick search on Google found that there are several GUI front-ends and
wizards for the Windows version of Spamassassin, which would streamline the
installation considerably. Are there any such GUI environments for Linux? Or
are we still confined to arcane
At 03:42 PM 6/27/2003 -0700, Marvin Raab wrote:
I'm running SA 2.51 on Linux 7.3 with perl 5.6.1
I tried
body [EMAIL PROTECTED] /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
describe [EMAIL PROTECTED] searches for above phrase in body
score [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.0
The test is never executed.
Also fails to execute:
/[EMA
At 04:57 PM 6/27/2003 -0600, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
I've been exchanging mail with an actual employee of AOL, and his messages
are always tagged as spam because they fail the FORGED_MUA_AOL filter.
Obviously, he's a little upset about this! Is there something he could be
doing differently, or
At 10:40 PM 6/27/2003 +0100, Martin Radford wrote:
They could do this. On the other hand, there's some computational
cost in generating the PGP signature, which is going to slow down the
spam run. Alternatively, if they use the same message body for all
messages (and hence the same signature) the
At 03:23 PM 6/27/2003 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
I checked sarc.com but nothing on it. I heard this on a car board I am on.
Any truth?
Yes, some spammers are in fact using trojan horses to create "spam
zombies".. similar to how DDoS flooders will install trojans to use your
machine to flood t
At 09:00 AM 6/27/2003 -0600, Ken Gordon wrote:
Using SA 2.55, a message with
Subject: DealBook: New York Community Bancorp to Buy Roslyn Bancorp for
$1.6 Billion
was tagged as spam partly because it failed the SUBJ_HAS_SPACES test.
(headers below).
Is the test properly specified?
20_head_tests
At 12:55 PM 6/27/03 +0200, Holger Glaess wrote:
please help
some users got mails with this score but i dident allow user_prefs or
whitelists
(only a central config where only root have access.)
USER_IN_WHITELIST (-100.0 points)From: address is in the user's white-list
i have no idea to change
At 11:27 AM 6/27/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
Shouldn't it be possible to simply check for the presence of spamassassin
markup before calling it a second time ??
No, because that's easily abused by spammers.. all they have to do is add a
spamassassin markup to the header that says "not spam" an
At 04:57 PM 6/26/2003 -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Under the terms of the GPL, that would constitute a modified version
(even without changing any rules), so there are some additional terms
that would need to be followed. The Artistic license is generally less
restrictive, if more difficult to und
At 04:30 PM 6/26/2003 -0500, Richard Humphrey wrote:
I just set up MailScanner to run w SA/Sendmail and obviuously something
isnt configured correctly. Notice the 2 conflicting scores. I want
Mailscanner to do virus scanning and let SA take care of the spam. I
thought I had this set in the conf fil
At 04:29 PM 6/26/2003 -0500, Charles Mount wrote:
Does anyone have a good way of blocking mail from anonymous mailers like
http://manicmail.net ?
It may not be commercial email but it is certainly unwanted.
FYI -- I use Sendmail-Switch with an access database and use the MimeDefang
milter to pass
At 12:50 PM 6/26/2003 -0700, Ian Searle wrote:
We are considering using a subset and derivative of the Spamassasin
rules in a commercial product (WatchGuard's WFS-Spamscreen). My
understanding of the license is that we need to attribute the rules we
use to the Spamassasin development team in our p
At 09:48 AM 6/26/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
What really worries me is the growing number of messages between 4.5 and
5. Many of these already have a Bayes score of 90+.
Agreed, this is why rule development for SA always has been, and always
will be, an arms race.
Spammers are aware of SpamAssas
At 08:51 AM 6/26/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
That PGP sig buried in HTML sticks out like a sore thumb.
Even better, if you check my post from 6/14, most of these have a PGP
signature block, but are without a "begin pgp signed message" block..
Try this meta rule pair for a starter. I can't guara
At 09:37 PM 6/25/03 -0400, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
For some reason, I am unable to connect to `calcite.rhyolite.com' via
HTTP. Is there a way to fetch the DCC tarball via FTP? Is there an
alternate site?
Thanks!
Scott
From the rhyolite.com dcc web-page:
"The DCC source and documentation is avail
At 04:43 AM 6/26/03 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
How does one add more points according to message size?
Maybe I must check for a Lines: header, then what?
Anyway, say I want to add 2 points per 100 KB.
i.e. $message_size/5
I don't think you can do this with a simple rule, but if you dig out an o
At 08:51 AM 6/25/2003 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Now THIS is a scary thing to see in /var/log/mail:
Jun 25 08:49:49 jezebel spamd[28618]: Attempt to free non-existent shared
string during global destruction.
I half expected a computer named Joshua to ask me if I'd like to play a game.
What
At 09:44 PM 6/23/2003 -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
MK> This is an oft-requested item, but AFAIK it is simply impossible.
It should be possible...
Not with outlook :)
It is theoreticaly possible with the right mailsystem, but Outlook just
isn't such a tool.
It _might_ be possible for them to d
At 05:05 PM 6/23/03 -0400, John McGivern wrote:
Hi!
I did the make/ make install for SA 2.53 and everything looks fine at that
point.
I then do the test "spamassassin -t [PATH TO]sample-nonspam.txt OR
sample-spam.txt and nothing happens - forever.
I have another live computer running SA 2.31
At 12:39 PM 6/23/2003 -0400, Bill wrote:
I was wondering how to set up a spam address that would accept forwarded
messages from users and feed them into SA for learning as spam. Is there an
easy way to do this? Is SA smart enough to know not to blacklist the sender
of the forwarded message and to o
At 11:07 AM 6/23/2003 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
OK, I've had some problems tagging this repetitive spam. I'm using SA 2.43
(quiet you!) :)
I'm getting excellent results! But this one has got me goofy. It simply
skips some of my rules!! I'm not sure why. In the header you can see it
hits MY_D
At 11:07 AM 6/23/2003 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
I'm getting excellent results! But this one has got me goofy. It simply
skips some of my rules!! I'm not sure why. In the header you can see it
hits MY_DSL which is a header rule. But I have a specific rawbody rule for
"Stop Mailings here" and a
At 06:23 PM 6/23/03 +0400, Maxim Berlin wrote:
Thanks for answer, but i am still confused.
Two passes: sendmail input(1)->majordomo->sendmail output(2), am i
correct?
(1) should not tag message, because sender is in whitelist_from.
Is it? Are you SURE that the sender that appeared in the headers pr
At 09:52 AM 6/23/03 -0400, Bob Young wrote:
Hello,
Could you tell me if spamm assassin is supported with eudora 5.2 under
redhat 6.2.
Um, is eudora supported under redhat 6.2?
Or do you have a RedHat 6.2 mailserver that eudora pops from?
In general what MUA you use is more-or-less irrelevant if
At 01:41 PM 6/23/03 +0400, Maxim Berlin wrote:
so, i've -98.1 hits, and no X-Spam-Flag: YES, but subject was
rewritten. Is that a bug, or i do not understand something?
This kind of general behavior usually happens when a message gets run
through SA twice. The first run tags it, but the second one
At 05:54 PM 6/23/03 +1000, Clement wrote:
Do you know if I have missed anything?
Do you have Net::DNS installed?
Try spamassassin -tD
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hostin
At 03:14 PM 6/23/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
I've suggested before on the list that predefined whitelists for places
like amazon.com should be much less than -100, just -10, or perhaps even
-5. Enough to offset any "spamminess" that might otherwise bump them over
over the threshold, but not s
At 12:15 PM 6/23/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 00:41 23/06/03 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
Hi,
got this nice baby:
Greetings, Bernd
[snip]
Just wondering, how exactly does posting a copy of that message to this
list help anyone ?
a) There is no indication of what version of SpamAssassin proce
At 08:30 PM 6/21/03 -0400, Gordon Cormack wrote:
Auto-learn and auto-whitelist use different scoring criteria from those
used in spamassassin's spam filtering.
The bayes auto-learning does not use "it's own" scoring mechanism, it uses
scoreset 0. This is the score the email would get by the main S
At 03:30 PM 6/21/03 +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
Hi,
A bit OT here - I've posted to the net-dns list, but I feel I'm more likely
to get a response here!
I'm trying to use Net::DNS with spamassassin without success so far.
I've grabbed Net-DNS-0.38 and installed it, but when I run the test
suite I get t
At 03:21 PM 6/21/03 -0700, Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote:
I'm just wondering if anyone knows how the razor checks work.
The reason I ask is that I have spamassassin running twice on all messages -
once in a milter and once from the glocal procmail file. I have started to
notice messages that h
At 04:30 PM 6/20/2003 -0500, Roger wrote:
In invoking SA via amavisd-new I don't believe there's anything on amavis'
end thats needs to be changed. Below is a copy of my local.cf - from
looking over the man page this would appear to be enough to rewrite the
subject header - but messages w/ hits
At 08:44 PM 6/20/2003 +0100, you wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:04:26PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> What version of SA are you using? Works fine on my copy of 2.54..
2.55
Here's the start of my ~.spamassassin/user_prefs - looks alright to me!
# SpamAssassin user preferences fi
At 05:00 PM 6/20/2003 +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
I've got in my SA user_prefs file 'dcc_path /usr/local/bin', which is where
dccproc lives, but I'm getting:
'Failed to parse line in spamassassin configuration: skipping dcc_path
/usr/local/bin'
What version of SA are you using? Works fine on my copy
At 05:54 PM 6/20/2003 +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
I've now installed Net:DNS, and put 'dns_available test' in my user_prefs.
I've not seen any sign of it working in my maillog yet (I've got the -D
option for spamd), how can I tell if it's working, please?
The fastest way is to fire up the plain command-
At 07:11 PM 6/19/2003 +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
Hi,
Looks like I've got DCC working with SA OK - with Razor, another piece of
the jigsaw! Any recommendations as to what remote anti-spam service I should
add next?
Well, if you've got DCC and razor going, there's only 2 other possible
optional pieces
At 09:36 PM 6/19/2003 +0200, TeamHost Limited wrote:
getting closer on this one ;-)
> What database? the bayes database? Why bother?
In order to have one one database which needs work on but several servers
/ ISPs to use it.
Why should there be xxx databases to work on?? I think it is easier to
ha
At 08:51 PM 6/19/2003 +0200, TeamHost Limited wrote:
Hi Matt,
thanks for the information.
Is it possible to have mailservers share SA database?
What database? the bayes database? Why bother?
Is it possible with SA to
- set an address to send all possible spam to?
No, SA never sees the delivery e
At 12:55 PM 6/19/2003 +0200, TeamHost Limited wrote:
Hello list.
Is it possible to use spamassassin before it reaches the server??
We would like to implement it on a firewall system which is set in front
of our servers.
Would this be possible?
Has anyone done that yet?
What is needed?
No, this is
At 02:59 PM 6/18/2003 -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com
[209.11.17.108])
by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id
h5IJZO0q028359
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed 18 Jun 2003 12:35:24 -0700
"unys-2.n
At 06:44 PM 6/18/2003 -0400, Steve Fulton wrote:
Hi all,
I recently installed SA on a mail server, only applying globally right now
-- no individual user configurations. I've discovered that when I add
"whitelist_from ..." entries to the local.cf file, SA let's spam in that
is marked above the
At 01:47 PM 6/18/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:19:53AM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
It sees your entries correctly.
> spamassassin -D, against a test message and I get the following errors:
>
> debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> RCVD
At 09:51 AM 6/18/2003 -0500, Oleg Aronov wrote:
Hello,
I have question and hope that somebody will help me. Please...
So, few days ago I installed and configured SpamAssassin on
Linux. The SA
is works fine, but he is catching only about 20% of spam emails. I believe
that I should
At 10:06 AM 6/18/2003 -0400, Mike Wagner wrote:
I have a RedHat 9 box with sendmail and spamassassin running. I installed
both from the redhat cd and have done no additional configuration, other
than setting up procmail to feed to spamc. Spamassassin works great, it
detects spam and marks it as s
At 05:56 PM 6/17/03 -0500, Link, Pete wrote:
If I understand the process correctly, Spamassassin fires up the
Razor checks and assigns a score.
My question: How does one increase the default score?
edit your local.cf or user_prefs and add:
score RAZOR2_CHECK 4.0
or whatever other
At 04:32 PM 6/17/03 -0500, Oleg Aronov wrote:
Hello,
I just installed and configured SpamAssassin (with amavisd-new and
Postfix). And it's working, but I want to create few more rules by myself
which I want to use, but unfortunately I have no idea how I can do it. Hope
somebody will help m
At 12:32 PM 6/17/2003 -0500, Fogle, Don - OPS System Administrator wrote:
I have a Redhat 7.3 system running Postfix, Spamassassin 2.55 and
Amavisd-new that filters mail and relays it on to an Exchange server. I
have noticed that obvious spam is not being caught and is being relayed
on. One of t
At 08:51 PM 6/13/03 -0700, you wrote:
Anyone have a nice rule that will catch the attached? It got negative
scores with fake In-Reply-To, Approved-By, and X-Authentication-Warning
lines. Also, note the faked PGP signature with random words following
it. Sure is a lot of trouble to go through just t
At 08:31 PM 6/13/03 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
You don't need to subscribe to send mail to this list? Isn't that
nonsense?
Read the archives.. this list is an open list, and it always has been..
This gets discussed at least once every 3 months, usually whenever a spam
message gets posted and some
If you are getting spam messages that have been tagged by spamassassin, and
would rather get your spam messages un-tagged, contact your ISP and ask
them to disable the product for your account.
I strongly suspect this is what your are experiencing, but you weren't
specific about what emails you
At 10:24 PM 6/12/03 -0400, Jose M.Herrera wrote:
What is the difference to put in procmailrc, "| spamassassin", "| spamd"
or "|spamc"
Well you never first off you absolutely never | spamd in procmailrc...
That's just not a valid option. spamd and spamc are a pair and are used
together not s
At 05:51 PM 6/12/2003 +0100, Peter Campion-Bye wrote:
> http://www.mailshield.com/products/mailshield/server/whats_new.html
At the bottom of the page in the above link is the line:
Note: SpamAssassin is a trademark of Deersoft, Inc
Putting www.deersoft.com into a browser takes you to the McAfee
At 04:35 PM 6/11/03 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to black list send4fun.com. I am using spamd and was reading
the man page for spamassassin and am wondering if I have the syntax right
to add this domain to the blacklist.
spamassassin -r -W send4fun.com
Would that be correct? And whe
At 05:08 PM 6/11/2003 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
I don't have any information about this either, only a thought. If I
contributed code to an open source project like SA, I'm contributing it
under the conditions of whatever licensing scheme(s) the project already
utilizes.
Yes, this is the case fo
At 04:02 PM 6/11/2003 -0400, David Yang wrote:
Hi there,
How can correctly start deamon spamd ?
My first question is how are you starting it now, and what is sending it
SIGTERMs?
Really you should start one and only one spamd process, from a system
startup script.
It looks like you're winding
SA should correctly interpret the times, using the specified RFC compliant
timezone indication. (I *think* this is done by normalizing all the times
to -000 before comparison)
Could you post an example set of Received: headers and Date: header?
At 03:06 PM 6/11/2003 -0400, Louis Bohm wrote:
How
At 01:23 PM 6/11/2003 -0400, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
Of course it's legal.
If they've made any changes to SA, they're obligated to release them to
anybody who buys the product (NOT necessarily to have them publically
available on a web/FTP site; that's just usually the route people take.)
If they'
At 01:24 PM 6/11/03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
However looking at the syntax in the answer to Q1.13, I dont know how
to add such a rule?
At the risk of being self promoting, I've got a rule writing guide. It
might be a bit of overkill, but should cover what you need.
http://mywebpages.co
901 - 1000 of 1262 matches
Mail list logo
