Hi, sorry for the late answer, but I'm in GMT+1 ;-)
A Dimecres 23 Octubre 2002 04:01, Craig R. McClanahan va escriure:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Antoni Reus wrote:
> > [snip]
> > As you could expect I would like to see this in 1.1 controlled by the
> > xhtml attribute!!
>
> This result has two prere
For what it's worth, most version of Netscape 4 and previous don't
understand the XML shortcut of using to open and close a tag in one
go.
E.g. works, doesn't.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper@;tumbleweed.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 23:44
To:
But it will understand . At least 4.7 does. Basically, it
grabs everything between < and > and tries to grok it as parameters.
It thinks the / is a parameter that it doesn't understand. If you
put it as then br/ is a bad tag name.
-Paul
Matt Read wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, most version o
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute for
the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, I think
the tags should produce it every time. Many people do not use the
tag so it doesn't make sense to require that to use xhtml.
David
Fro
+1.
--- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need
> the xhtml attribute for
> the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and
> older browsers, I think
> the tags should produce it every time. Many people
> do not use the
> tag so it d
In my experience XHTML does not work in older browsers, specifically Netscape
4.x and I would be very concerned if an upgrade to Struts 1.1 gave me no choice
in using XHTML.
Matt.
Quoting David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribut
@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute for
the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, I think
the tags should produce it e
-Original Message-
From: Matt Read [mailto:mread@;spotd.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
In my experience XHTML does not work in older browsers, specifically Netscape
4.x and I would be very concerned if an
tp://www.chikli.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Read [mailto:mread@;spotd.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:33 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
>
> In my experience XHTML does not work in older b
technology) :-).
David
From: Matt Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:58:44 -0400 (EDT)
I don't agree I'
Matt, have you tried as was suggested yesterday or the day
before? Someone made note that would not work, but would
work. The reason is that the browser will try to interpret everything
between < and > as a tag. The space makes it think that the slash is an
unknown attribute instead of pa
0:59 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
>
> I don't agree I'm afraid. I'm also fairly aware of the difference
> between CSS
> and XHTML. Try this in Netscape 4.x and then in IE 4-6.
>
> Line 1Line2
>
> Matt.
>
>
kli Consulting LLC
- http://www.chikli.com
-Original Message-
From: Matt Read [mailto:mread@;spotd.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and
I don't agree I'm afraid. I'm also fairly aware of the difference between
: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
Matt, have you tried as was suggested yesterday or the day
before? Someone made note that would not work, but would
work. The reason is that the browser will try to interpret everything
between < and > as a tag. The space ma
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:24:08 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
> XML compliant HTML
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
>
> Struts does not output any tags. Use ...
>
> [snip]
See the XHTML s
or IE which both support this grammar. Many other people use Opera
which also supports this.
Dave
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@;apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:03 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
>
> >
nt: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
>
> AFAIK, the only change is the closing / added to struts input
> tags. All
> browsers support this for reasons mentioned previously.
>
> I guess I just don
velopers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
Matt, have you tried as was suggested yesterday or the day
before? Someone made note that would not work, but would
work. The reason is that the browser will try to interpret everything
between < and > as a tag. The space makes it thi
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and
You have apparently missed
1. other discussions
2. commits
3. bugzilla comments about XHTML
> Try this in Netscape 4.x and then in IE 4-6.
>
> Line 1Line2
>
Try it this way:
Line 1Line2
^^^
notice
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:19:57 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
> AFAIK, the only
Matt Read wrote:
Sorry that I keep using the tag as an example because I agree it's not
a particularly good, although it does demonstrate my point. I see a problem
not with the tag in particular as obviously Struts taglibs don't
generate them, but that to be absolutely certain that there aren't
I agree with Craig (not that it matters, a
veto is a veto =:0).
We've always supported specifications
rather than specific client technologies.
Since this is not the markup specified by
HTML 4.01, I don't see how we can make it
the default. In practice, browsers may
ignore the slash as an u
ilto:craigmcc@;apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:19:57 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers
backwards compatibility but do understand that others
are. So, I think the solution suggested above is a decent compromise.
Comments?
David
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Develop
sing current User-Agents now, so let
> me upgrade my site to
> XHTML1.0" They can do it at a flip of a switch.
>
> Does anyone think this is
> ridiculous/feasible/useful? Is this overkill?
>
>
> ---
> - Nayan Hajratwala
> - Chikli Consulting LLC
> - http://www
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:54:14 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
> If we're not
Hi,
A Dimarts 22 Octubre 2002 19:46, Martin Cooper va escriure:
> > I'd rather *not* make this kind of a potentially backwards
> > incompatible
> > change immediately before a release (unless you make it
> > conditional on the
> > "xhtml" attribute of the tag being true). The
> > problem is
Whatever the decision, once it's made it should go into the roadmap
document just so there's a record of it
> -Original Message-
> From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Antoni Reus wrote:
> [snip]
> As you could expect I would like to see this in 1.1 controlled by the xhtml
> attribute!!
>
This result has two prerequisites:
* The developers have to agree to it (I'm personally +0, which
means I'm OK with it but *I* am not going to do th
asily implement xhtml 1.0. Will JavaServer Faces handle xhtml?
Should we even bother with doing this in Struts?
Dave
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:37:42 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and
>
> Well I've bee
33 matches
Mail list logo
