Hi, sorry for the late answer, but I'm in GMT+1 ;-)
A Dimecres 23 Octubre 2002 04:01, Craig R. McClanahan va escriure:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Antoni Reus wrote:
[snip]
As you could expect I would like to see this in 1.1 controlled by the
xhtml attribute!!
This result has two
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute for
the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, I think
the tags should produce it every time. Many people do not use the
html:html tag so it doesn't make sense to require that to use xhtml.
David
+1.
--- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need
the xhtml attribute for
the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and
older browsers, I think
the tags should produce it every time. Many people
do not use the
html:html tag so it
In my experience XHTML does not work in older browsers, specifically Netscape
4.x and I would be very concerned if an upgrade to Struts 1.1 gave me no choice
in using XHTML.
Matt.
Quoting David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute for
the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, I think
the tags should produce it every time. Many people do not use
, October 22, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
In my experience XHTML does not work in older browsers, specifically
Netscape
4.x and I would be very concerned if an upgrade to Struts 1.1 gave me no
choice
in using XHTML.
Matt.
Quoting
Matt, have you tried br / as was suggested yesterday or the day
before? Someone made note that br/ would not work, but br / would
work. The reason is that the browser will try to interpret everything
between and as a tag. The space makes it think that the slash is an
unknown attribute
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
Matt, have you tried br / as was suggested yesterday or the day
before? Someone made note that br/ would not work, but br / would
work. The reason is that the browser will try to interpret everything
between and as a tag
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:24:08 -0600
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
Struts does not output any br/ tags. Use br /...
[snip]
See the XHTML spec's Compatibility
which both support this grammar. Many other people use Opera
which also supports this.
Dave
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
Date: Tue, 22 Oct
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc;apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:24:08 -0600
From
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
AFAIK, the only change is the closing / added to struts input
tags. All
browsers support this for reasons mentioned previously.
I guess I just don't see how this is a serious change and how
existing apps
behavior
: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
Matt, have you tried br / as was suggested yesterday or the day
before? Someone made note that br/ would not work, but br / would
work. The reason is that the browser will try to interpret everything
between and as a tag. The space makes it think
Developers List
Subject: RE: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
You have apparently missed
1. other discussions
2. commits
3. bugzilla comments about XHTML
Try this in Netscape 4.x and then in IE 4-6.
htmlbodyLine 1br/Line2/body/html
Try it this way:
htmlbodyLine 1br /Line2/body/html
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:19:57 -0600
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
AFAIK, the only change is the closing / added to struts
Matt Read wrote:
Sorry that I keep using the br tag as an example because I agree it's not
a particularly good, although it does demonstrate my point. I see a problem
not with the br tag in particular as obviously Struts taglibs don't
generate them, but that to be absolutely certain that there
I agree with Craig (not that it matters, a
veto is a veto =:0).
We've always supported specifications
rather than specific client technologies.
Since this is not the markup specified by
HTML 4.01, I don't see how we can make it
the default. In practice, browsers may
ignore the slash as an
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:19:57 -0600
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML
Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan
[mailto:craigmcc;apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:19:57 -0600
From: David Graham
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:54:14 -0600
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
If we're not doing xhtml in 1.1 then we'll need
Hi,
A Dimarts 22 Octubre 2002 19:46, Martin Cooper va escriure:
I'd rather *not* make this kind of a potentially backwards
incompatible
change immediately before a release (unless you make it
conditional on the
xhtml attribute of the html:html tag being true). The
problem is
Whatever the decision, once it's made it should go into the roadmap
document just so there's a record of it
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:17 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Antoni Reus wrote:
[snip]
As you could expect I would like to see this in 1.1 controlled by the xhtml
attribute!!
This result has two prerequisites:
* The developers have to agree to it (I'm personally +0, which
means I'm OK with it but *I* am not going to do the
. Will JavaServer Faces handle xhtml?
Should we even bother with doing this in Struts?
Dave
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
Date: Tue, 22
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:37:42 -0600
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html
Well I've been wrong before and I'm obviously wrong now
For what it's worth, most version of Netscape 4 and previous don't
understand the XML shortcut of using tag / to open and close a tag in one
go.
E.g. br/br works, br/ doesn't.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper;tumbleweed.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21,
But it will understand br /. At least 4.7 does. Basically, it
grabs everything between and and tries to grok it as parameters.
It thinks the / is a parameter that it doesn't understand. If you
put it as br/ then br/ is a bad tag name.
-Paul
Matt Read wrote:
For what it's worth, most
28 matches
Mail list logo
