Consider it under the ASL =:0)
http://apache.org/LICENSE
My favorite motto is by Devo: "Duty now for the future."
Mainguy, Mike wrote:
Ted, I may adopt the last line of this email to be my signature as it
accurately reflects my experience with IT.
<>
Please let me know how much you intend to ch
Ted, I may adopt the last line of this email to be my signature as it
accurately reflects my experience with IT.
<>
Please let me know how much you intend to charge in royalties, or, if you
are not the proper copyright holder, please lend me his/her name...
This message and its contents (to in
Robert Leland wrote:
I am strongly in favor of moving to maven now, and will help where I
can.
My only concern is that we continue to view Struts 1.x as being
evolutionary mode. If we have a consensus on this point, then we should
all be careful that we do nothing that will break the build or p
David Graham wrote:
I was under the impression that the blue/grey l&f was the new Jakarta
standard that sites would be moving to. Maybe it's just the default Maven
l&f that no one ever bothered to customize. Both the Maven and Forrest
l&f are fine with me; I'm just a big fan of consistency so if
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Joe Germuska wrote:
> One big gain from going to Maven is that it makes the barrier to
> working with the code very low. Long-time committers may not
> remember so well, but it takes a fair bit of configuration to get a
> Struts build working. Meanwhile, Maven downloads all
> Visually, I'm not a huge fan of either system's default L&F, but I don't
> dislike either of them enough to vote -1 on that basis. My
> understanding
> is that there is some room for customization with either, though, if we
> wanted to expend the effort to manage our own L&F.
>
> The argument f
I don't actually care, and, lacking a basis of comparison, I don't
even know if what we have now is broken. Will Maven or Forrest be
less work? If so, great. Personally, I don't care about the "look
and feel" issues. It looks the way it looks. I just want to know if
it will make better use of o
Ted Husted wrote:
Joe Germuska wrote:
It will be some mildly tedious work to move the current doc to xdocs,
but nothing too bad, and if they are valid xhtml, it will be much
easier.
The documentation is all XML now. Steve was just tweaking the XLS.
There's a bit of HTML/XHTML in the sample a
Joe Germuska wrote:
It will be some mildly tedious work to move the current doc to xdocs,
but nothing too bad, and if they are valid xhtml, it will be much easier.
The documentation is all XML now. Steve was just tweaking the XLS.
There's a bit of HTML/XHTML in the sample applications, but that's
Robert Leland wrote:
Joe:
Thanks, I was hoping you would chime in ! It looks like you used maven
for your site, and I prefer your color scheme over the standard...
Which is here, if anyone was wondering:
http://demo.jgsullivan.com/struts/
-T.
--
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Or, to put it another way, using Maven as a
build system will give us a website/docs publishing system for free.
Well, last I knew, TANSTAAFL. =:)
It's nice that Maven has a build system, so long as it's a build system
that fits our needs. Likewise, it's nice that Mav
At 14:53 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
Thanks, I was hoping you would chime in ! It looks like you used
maven for your site,
and I prefer your color scheme over the standard...
You can set a lot of stuff in project.properties -- it should be in
a source distribution for jgs-struts, or I'll
ze the L&F I'll be happy.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: September 6, 2003 11:13 AM
> To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Struts web site [was: Re: Conversion of web site docs to
>
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 14:23 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
We can always start a struts-2 web site and tweak it until we like
what we have,
or until it works, which ever comes first ! I also wouldn't want to
maintain a seperate
look and feel except to move the blasted [powered by Maven
At 14:23 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
We can always start a struts-2 web site and tweak it until we like
what we have,
or until it works, which ever comes first ! I also wouldn't want to
maintain a seperate
look and feel except to move the blasted [powered by Maven] icon
to the bottom
anta.org
678.910.8017
AIM:jmitchtx
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 2:16 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Struts web site [was: Re: Conversion of web site
> docs to XHTML]
>
ubject: Re: Struts web site [was: Re: Conversion of web site docs to
XHTML]
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Leland wrote:
> Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
> system we are moving to ?
Don already put the Struts SourceForge site on Fo
Robert Leland wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site
documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move over to Maven or forrest.
I have been working on Mavenizing items as I can.
Instead of doing the stylesheets maybe yo
ubject: Re: Struts web site [was: Re: Conversion of web site docs to
> XHTML]
>
>
> --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Leland wrote:
> > > Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
> > > system we are moving to ?
&
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Leland wrote:
> > Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
> > system we are moving to ?
>
> Don already put the Struts SourceForge site on Forrest, so I would lean
> in that direction.
Does Forrest require that look and fe
Robert Leland wrote:
> Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
> system we are moving to ?
Don already put the Struts SourceForge site on Forrest, so I would lean
in that direction.
http://struts.sourceforge.net/
http://xml.apache.org/forrest/
-Ted.
--
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: September 5, 2003 10:43 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Struts web site [was: Re: Conversion of web site docs to XHTML]
>
>
> Steve Raeburn wrote:
>
> >I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site
> documentation
&g
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move over to Maven or forrest.
I have been working on Mavenizing items as I can.
Instead of doing the stylesheets maybe your efforts
could be dir
23 matches
Mail list logo
