Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Solved.

2004-02-13 Thread Steve Hill
:21 PM Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Since no-one has said anything about an error in the struts-examples app here, then I assume it's something in your setup that you or your colleagues have done. Did you do anything during install apart from set JAVA_HOME, CATALINA_HOME, PATH? Do you

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

2004-02-11 Thread Adam Hardy
: Samyukta Akunuru [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:31 PM Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Did you add the jasper compiler jars (jasper.jar, jasper-compiler.jar,jasper-runtime.jar) -Original Message- From: Steve

RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

2004-02-10 Thread Durham David Contr 805 CSPTS/SCE
Is anyone here successfully using Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? I am. java.lang.IllegalStateException: zip file closed errors with any I seem to recall getting this error when I had a corrupted jar in the lib. I'm not positive though. Dave

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

2004-02-10 Thread Adam Hardy
On 02/10/2004 07:38 PM Steve Hill wrote: Is anyone here successfully using Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? I am getting java.lang.IllegalStateException: zip file closed errors with any struts-using code and am wondering if this is a bug and I should go back to an earlier version of one or the other.

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

2004-02-10 Thread Steve Hill
I had sent a previous message to this list with a complete error listing, but I'll clarify. I downloaded and installed a new installation of Tomcat 5.0.18. I then downloaded and installed a new installation of struts 1.1, copying the documentation and example application war files into Tomcat's

RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

2004-02-10 Thread Samyukta Akunuru
Did you add the jasper compiler jars (jasper.jar, jasper-compiler.jar,jasper-runtime.jar) -Original Message- From: Steve Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 5:24 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? I had sent

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

2004-02-10 Thread Steve Hill
Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:31 PM Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Did you add the jasper compiler jars (jasper.jar, jasper-compiler.jar,jasper-runtime.jar) -Original Message- From: Steve Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-21 Thread Adam Hardy
] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 Marino, Hmm, I didn't know what all those plugin's were for thanks for the explanation but I configure the tiles and ssl plugin as described but I still get the same error. I can

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-21 Thread Adam Hardy
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 Marino, Hmm, I didn't know what all those plugin's were for thanks for the explanation but I configure the tiles and ssl plugin as described but I still get the same error. I can only seem to make it work as Adam has

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-21 Thread Marino A. Jonsson
Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 Marino, Hmm, I didn't know what all those plugin's were for thanks for the explanation but I configure the tiles and ssl plugin

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-20 Thread Adam Hardy
Hi Greg, I'm using the same setup as you, except I use the straight org.apache.struts.action.SecurePlugIn and it works. Haven't seen that exception before. Adam On 01/19/2004 09:06 PM Greg Hess wrote: Hi All, I am having difficulty integrating the sslext11 plug-in with Struts 1.1 using

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-20 Thread Marino A. Jonsson
That makes sense ... SecureTilesPlugin actually extends TilesPlugin so you're trying to initialize the same plugin twice ;) cheers, Marinó Greg Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All, I am having difficulty integrating the sslext11 plug-in with Struts 1.1 using

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-20 Thread Marino A. Jonsson
Moreover, the StrutsTilesPlugin overloads the initRequestProcessorClass(ModuleConfig config) of the TilesPlugin and sets the processorClass attribute of the controller to SecureTilesRequestProcessor ... so there's no need to specify the controller explicitly. cheers, Marinó Marino A. Jonsson

RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-20 Thread Greg Hess
, 2004 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 Moreover, the StrutsTilesPlugin overloads the initRequestProcessorClass(ModuleConfig config) of the TilesPlugin and sets the processorClass attribute of the controller to SecureTilesRequestProcessor ... so

RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-20 Thread Greg Hess
] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 Marino, Hmm, I didn’t know what all those plugin's were for thanks for the explanation but I configure the tiles and ssl plugin as described but I still get the same error

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

2004-01-20 Thread Marino A. Jonsson
of received a ClassNotFoundException, strange that no error resulted. All the best, Greg -Original Message- From: Greg Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 Marino, Hmm, I

Re: Struts 1.1 and iPlanet iws 6.05

2004-01-12 Thread James Mitchell
You should upgrade to 6.1 if you can. It uses Tomcat under the covers. All will work fine once you do that. James - Original Message - From: Fowler, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:22 PM Subject: Struts 1.1 and iPlanet iws 6.05

RE: struts 1.1 validation of indexed properties

2003-11-26 Thread Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC
Look here for an example: http://home.earthlink.net/~dwinterfeldt/revision.html update 9/25/2001. Works like a champ. -- Voytek Jarnot Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari? -Original Message- From: Andreas Wuest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: struts 1.1 validation problem / question

2003-11-16 Thread Andreas Wuest
Hi Victor, thanks for you reply. the lookupdispatchaction does not really solve my problem, since handling the different actions is not the problem. the problems is the validation of the input fields for the different action. i need different validations depending on the value of the userAction

Re: struts 1.1 validation problem / question

2003-11-16 Thread Phil
Hi Andreas, i think the best way is to write your own validate() method in your action form. There you can easily check the value of the userAction attribute and depending on that the other attributes. example: public ActionErrors validate(ActionMapping mapping, HttpServletRequest request) {

Re: struts 1.1 and multiple applications

2003-10-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Scott Tiger wrote: We have one struts application working on a weblogic server 5.1 service pack 13. I have put all the struts and apache libraries(struts.jar and commo**.jar, xerces.jar etc ) in the server class path. They are not in the web-inf/lib directory. This is not a supported

RE: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread David G. Friedman
: 08/14/03 01:04 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases? Take a look at Hibernate http://hibernate.bluemars.net/, I found the documentation to be much better than OJB and it was much easier get productive quickly

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Ted Husted
Graham Stark wrote: Could someone explain all this to me? Obviously, I can configure connection pools manually outside of the Struts framework, but I assume there are advantages in doing so in a Struts-centric way if you can, andthe DBCP implementation looks quite nice, if I could only get

Re: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread e
From the article at link below Direct Requests to JSPs To take the full advantage of sub-application support, Struts 1.1 stipulates the requirement that all requests must flow through the controller servlet, i.e. the ActionServlet. Effectively, this means all JSPs must be fronted by

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Erik Price
Reinhard wrote: Ted wrote: If you are starting from scratch, then I would strongly recommend *not* using the datasource manager. The datasource manager was a Good Thing three years ago, but, at this point, has outlived its usefulness in most environments. I'm a bit upset. Any advice on what

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread Adam Levine
' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: struts 1.1 question Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:02:13 -0400 A good starting point for all you antidisestablishmentarianist that don't want to front your JSPs might be the use of the ForwardAction and global-forwards. That just forwards to a view page without writing

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Adam Hardy
Ted, are you talking about not using org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory ? Reinhard wrote: Ted wrote: If you are starting from scratch, then I would strongly recommend *not* using the datasource manager. The datasource manager was a Good Thing three years ago, but, at this point,

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread Bailey, Shane C.
A good starting point for all you antidisestablishmentarianist that don't want to front your JSPs might be the use of the ForwardAction and global-forwards. That just forwards to a view page without writing a new class. This way, when you are ready to do the right thing, you can change some of

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Reinhard
Ted wrote: If you are starting from scratch, then I would strongly recommend *not* using the datasource manager. The datasource manager was a Good Thing three years ago, but, at this point, has outlived its usefulness in most environments. I'm a bit upset. Any advice on what better to use?

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Graham Stark
Thank you all: that's been very helpful. Graham If you need a connection in your servlet layer then defining a data source in web xml is a more reliable alternative. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jndi-datasource- examples-howto.html What ted was saying was that

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Reinhard
meanwhile 2 steps done. I gave ojb a try, but as I was fascinated by the white paper, I got disappointed from the implementation and the support. So I stay with ibatis db-layer, stable a very well documented. The support is very fast and profund, so what do I need soap bubbles. cheers and bye

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread Bailey, Shane C.
Yup. It really isn't so bad. A lot of pages of what? You need a lot of pages even without Struts if your site has a lot of content. You don't have any extra JSP pages because of it but it makes you Struts config file a little longer than if you didn't have to map all your JSPs. But then

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Reinhard
Thanks Erik, Ted already gave a very short advice, but with your words, the sun is shining again ;-) Erik wrote: The DataSource management system used in your container. Tomcat for instance, has its own place to specify this Ok, I declared my datasources in server.xml (I'm using tomcat 5).

RE: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Raeburn
Subject: Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases? meanwhile 2 steps done. I gave ojb a try, but as I was fascinated by the white paper, I got disappointed from the implementation and the support. So I stay with ibatis db-layer, stable a very well documented. The support

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Mark Lowe
If you need a connection in your servlet layer then defining a data source in web xml is a more reliable alternative. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jndi-datasource- examples-howto.html What ted was saying was that ideally you shouldn't be doing this (including my

Re: Struts 1.1 Modules and application resources

2003-08-14 Thread Sgarlata Matt
I had the same problem in my project. Originally we employed option #1, but eventually found that to be unmanageable. I would warn you that option #2 does not work with all struts components, because some of them (the validator if I recall correctly) look only at the default resource bundle for

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Ted Husted
+1 Steve Raeburn wrote: Take a look at Hibernate http://hibernate.bluemars.net/, I found the documentation to be much better than OJB and it was much easier get productive quickly. Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

2003-08-14 Thread Erik Price
Reinhard wrote: Thanks Erik, Ted already gave a very short advice, but with your words, the sun is shining again ;-) Erik wrote: The DataSource management system used in your container. Tomcat for instance, has its own place to specify this Ok, I declared my datasources in server.xml

Re: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread Adam Levine
Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with actions. From: e [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: struts

RE: Struts 1.1 Modules and application resources

2003-08-14 Thread Chen, Gin
While I haven't tried it yet. Have you looked into writing a custom MessageResourcesConfig or PropertyMessageResourcesFactory? You can easily pass one into your config http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/configuration.html#resources_conf ig From there you can implement your own

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread Bailey, Shane C.
scared but if you were in the middle of the forest and night started falling... You'd start fronting those darn JSPs :-) -Original Message- From: Adam Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: struts 1.1 question

Re: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-14 Thread David Graham
--- Adam Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with actions. Keep in mind that it's as simple as: action path=/something forward=/jsp/something.jsp / to front

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-12 Thread Bailey, Shane C.
, 2003 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with actions. From: e [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-12 Thread Bradley Handy
Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question --- Adam Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with actions. Keep in mind that it's as simple as: action path=/something forward

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-12 Thread David Graham
: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:53 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question --- Adam Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all

RE: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-11 Thread e
I guess it just seems like extra work that doesn't yield obvious benefits, not unlike having to do all those getters/setters in 1.0, but I guess if I had to choose between the two, I'd choose this. I guess I'm also partial to the familiar file extensions like .jsp..do never did it for me,

Re: struts 1.1 question

2003-08-11 Thread Thomas CORNET
In fact, you have to front JSPs only if you're using modules, because requests have to go through struts controller to know which module they belong. If you're not planning to use modules, I think you can keep your struts-config file the way it is. And as tiles and modules are independant, the

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

2003-08-04 Thread yau-pang . lee
?)still get the errors. YPL -Original Message- From: Cindy.Gramann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:23 PM To: struts-user Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390 We're using Xerces 1.2. Also, we ran into classloader problems with commons

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

2003-08-01 Thread Gramann, Cindy
I've been able to get Struts working with the Websphere 4.01 plugin on z/OS (recently upgraded from OS/390). We are using JSP 1.1 and Servlet 2.2. The only changes that I needed to make after running the Struts example .war file through wartowebapp were to extract the dtd's under

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

2003-08-01 Thread yau-pang . lee
me and give me permission to the directory). BTW, which xml parser are you using? YPL -Original Message- From: Cindy.Gramann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:00 AM To: struts-user Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390 I've been able

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

2003-08-01 Thread Gramann, Cindy
through an admin for all my changes. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390 Thks for the info Cindy, I'm trying to check

Re: Struts 1.1 and Tiles

2003-07-30 Thread Siva
I feel you need to specify the tiles processor in the struts-config. Please add the following line in your struts-config.xml file controller processorClass = org.apache.struts.tiles.TilesRequestProcessor/ Siva Oliver Reflé wrote: Hi fellows, At the moment I am working on tiles. But I have

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

2003-07-25 Thread Siva
Dea rVinit, Please use the propert dtd version corresponds to 1.1 (you can specify the dtd available in SUN site.) I feel the peoblem is because of improper dtd reference.. Siva Vinit Sharma wrote: Hello I'm migrating from Struts 1.0 to Struts 1.1. My old struts-config.xml file does not

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

2003-07-25 Thread Vinit Sharma
Hello I'm using the DTD version as provided by Struts site for Struts 1.1. It is as follows: !DOCTYPE struts-config PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//DTD Struts Configuration 1.1//EN http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_1.dtd; Is there anything wrong with that??

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

2003-07-25 Thread Siva
Dear Vinit, I feel the set-property should be used with DynaActionForm. and the set property will be meaningless with your own action form. please make sure why you are using this set-property here. Siva Vinit Sharma wrote: Hello I'm using the DTD version as provided by Struts site for

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

2003-07-25 Thread Vinit Sharma
Hello Siva We can use set-property as a nested element to form-bean. This was working fine with Struts 1.0.2. The problem arised while I'm migrating to Struts 1.1 What I dont know is that whether we can use such a nested element with Struts 1.1 ?? You have any such info. Vinit Siva [EMAIL

RE: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

2003-07-22 Thread Yansheng Lin
Not enough info. Please post your date validation field in validator.xml. -Original Message- From: Guillaume Cormier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 21, 2003 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war I am not able to

Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

2003-07-22 Thread Guillaume Cormier
I don't understand want you mean validation.xml (not validator.xml) is include in the package struts-validator.war Please, verify that the date field is valid only if you enter a date like 'dd-MM-' (22-07-2002). I think that there is a bug with the i18n validator because the date is

RE: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

2003-07-22 Thread Yansheng Lin
- -Original Message- From: Guillaume Cormier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 22, 2003 3:50 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war I don't understand want you mean validation.xml (not validator.xml) is include

Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

2003-07-22 Thread Guillaume Cormier
Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war I don't understand want you mean validation.xml (not validator.xml) is include in the package struts-validator.war Please, verify that the date field is valid only if you enter a date like 'dd-MM-

Re: Struts 1.1 prepareStatement woes

2003-07-21 Thread Siva
Dear Joel, You are using some struts API in your class which was implementes (not abstract) in RC2 and become abstract in 1.1 final release. AbstractMethodError will happen only in these scenario. Siva Joel Hainley wrote: I have been trying to get this working for a few hours and am going to

Re: Struts 1.1 - struts-config_1_1.dtd not found

2003-07-11 Thread ville . kaseva
I've seen it, still looking for solution. I get the error when trying to move my web app to the service providers server. Same app works fine with my tomcat 4.1.x Struts 1.1b2. I checked struts.jar and there is struts-config_1_1.dtd. Ville Did any one face this problem before? I'm trying

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

2003-07-11 Thread James Mitchell
On Friday 11 July 2003 14:40, Goel Shalab wrote: Hello Everyone I was wondering if there was a way for downloading the HTML as a package for User and Developer Guides for Struts 1.1. Yes, the binary comes with struts-documentation.war, which is the complete documentation that used for the

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

2003-07-11 Thread Ted Husted
James Mitchell wrote: Something is in the works for PDF, but I'm not sure of the status. If you need it for MS Word, that's not going to happen any time soon. It's all in XML, so something that can do XML to PDF and be called from Ant could be made part of the build process. -Ted. -- Ted

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

2003-07-11 Thread Goel Shalab
Hello Ted, If it can become part of the build process.. it will be great.. and highly appreciated. -Shalab At 02:51 PM 7/11/2003 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: James Mitchell wrote: Something is in the works for PDF, but I'm not sure of the status. If you need it for MS Word, that's not going to

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

2003-07-11 Thread James Mitchell
On Friday 11 July 2003 14:51, Ted Husted wrote: James Mitchell wrote: Something is in the works for PDF, but I'm not sure of the status. If you need it for MS Word, that's not going to happen any time soon. It's all in XML, so something that can do XML to PDF and be called from Ant could

Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread David Graham
--- Hohlen, John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm encountering a serialization error due to Plug-In objects, in my case, the org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn not being serializable. An array of plug-ins are stored in application scope in the ActionServlet.initModulePlugIns() method.

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Hohlen, John C
- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:47 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable --- Hohlen, John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm encountering a serialization error due to Plug-In objects, in my case

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread David Graham
Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:47 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable --- Hohlen, John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm encountering a serialization error due to Plug

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable --- Hohlen, John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's exactly my problem. I have a distributable application using Struts 1.1. Struts is storing an object in the ServletContext that is not serializable. What

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: My personal opinion is that app servers which require ServletContext attributes to be Serializable are broken, because the servlet spec only requires this for *session* attributes. That being said, we probably need to address this reality,

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Hohlen, John C
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:34 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable --- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) From: David Graham

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Hohlen, John C wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:04:31 -0500 From: Hohlen, John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Hohlen, John C
To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Hohlen, John C wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:04:31 -0500 From: Hohlen, John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts

Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Erik Price
Hohlen, John C wrote: Craig: I added a comment to the Bugzilla report with a link to the thread. Thanks for the idea. Do you or anyone else know if WebLogic 6.1 requires that servlet context attributes to be serializable? How can I figure that out? Not trying to be sarcastic at all,

Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Erik Price wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:14:57 -0400 From: Erik Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable

2003-07-10 Thread Hohlen, John C
if all servlet context attributes are must be serializable? -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:29 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? PlugIn Objects Not Serializable On Thu

RE: struts 1.1 tutorial

2003-07-07 Thread NYIMI Jose (BMB)
Try http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/resources/tutorials.html José. -Original Message- From: Jagannayakam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 10:37 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: struts 1.1 tutorial Is there any struts1.1 based tutorial .

Re: Struts 1.1 Api

2003-07-07 Thread Mark Lowe
If you've a struts-documentation.war file in your distribution then install on your container and look at that or http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/api/index.html On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 02:05 PM, Jagannayakam wrote: Hi , From where can I get struts 1.1 API Regards, Jagan.

RE: Struts 1.1 Api

2003-07-07 Thread Gandle, Panchasheel
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/api/index.html Panchasheel -Original Message- From: Jagannayakam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:06 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: Struts 1.1 Api Hi , From where can I get struts 1.1 API Regards,

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Raeburn
Works for me with both Long and long properties. The exception message doesn't seem to be anything to do with this. Often it's a sympton that the ActionServlet has not initialised properly. Check your logs for other error messages that may have prevented ActionServlet from loading. Steve

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

2003-06-30 Thread David Jiao
My initial guess was not because of the bean:write. But then I found out the error only happens when I use the bean:write for a long type. I checked the log file and the only message there are the same as listed on the page. I am sure that it's the bean:write problem or has something to do with

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Raeburn
List Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem My initial guess was not because of the bean:write. But then I found out the error only happens when I use the bean:write for a long type. I checked the log file and the only message there are the same as listed on the page. I am sure

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

2003-06-30 Thread Karr, David
Have we seen your web.xml and struts-config.xml file yet? -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:01 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem Could you post the code that's causing

RE: Struts 1.1 RC1 - Error while invoking struts-validator web app in Tomcat 3.2.4

2003-06-12 Thread Pingili, Madhupal
Hi Oswin, I had downloaded the latest nightly build at that point of time. In future, you will have better chance of getting reply from struts-user list instead of sending emails to individually. Reddy -Original Message- From: Oswin Ondarza [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: Struts 1.1 on z/OS with WebSphere Application Server 4.0

2003-06-04 Thread Rob Leland
Markus Holzem wrote: Does anyone have experiences with Struts running on an IBM mainframe? I'm particularly interested in WebSphere 4.0 (z/OS, *not* z/Linux). I've tried to find anything in the archive, but I only found references on WebSphere running on Wintel, Linux or Solaris. Since WebSphere

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread jay
-Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 1, 2003 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After that, people will have a chance to test their apps with it and we'll incorporate

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Andrew Hill
a read. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 2 June 2003 22:44 To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 OK, let's look at it another way. If Struts 1.1 is ready for prime time, why don't the authors trust it enough

Re: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Ted Husted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, my question was, why do they think the code isn't good enough for a release? Now it seems that Struts 1.1 is ready, some other component isn't ready. If that's the case, can that component be removed, then added in a 1.2 release? If it's another jar, it's

Re: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread David Graham
Meanwhile, most of the Struts committers are using the Release Candidate in production. We do trust it in our own companies. I am using Struts 1.1 RC1 in production with no problems. The 1.1 release problems are well known and this discussion has been rehashed over and over again. We can only

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Andrew Hill
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Meanwhile, most of the Struts committers are using the Release Candidate in production. We do trust it in our own companies. I am using Struts 1.1 RC1 in production with no problems. The 1.1 release problems are well known and this discussion has been

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Steve Raeburn
The release hasn't been made because there is a *known* outstanding issue. If that issues affects you then you should either not use the latest version or find a work-around. The beautiful thing is that you know what the issue is and you get to make an *informed* choice. Now it seems that Struts

Re: struts 1.1 rc with tomcat 4?

2003-06-03 Thread Paul Thomas
On 02/06/2003 14:07 Kristine Weissbarth wrote: hi, I'm relatively new at struts and I'm currently working with 1.0.2 version. But as I want to make use of the easier validation coming with the newer versions (1.1 rc) I would like to update. My problem is that every time when I installed the newer

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Micael
ready and that the Struts release is planned to be real soon now ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 1, 2003 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Zsolt Koppany
? Zsolt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Graham Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2003 01:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After that, people will have a chance to test their apps

Re: Struts 1.1

2003-06-03 Thread Ted Husted
Of David Graham Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2003 01:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After that, people will have a chance to test their apps with it and we'll incorporate any show stopping bug fixes. Struts 1.1 final is not far off after

Re: Struts 1.1

2003-06-02 Thread David Graham
Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After that, people will have a chance to test their apps with it and we'll incorporate any show stopping bug fixes. Struts 1.1 final is not far off after that :-). David I'm not going to ask when Struts 1.1 will be released because I know the

Re: Struts 1.1

2003-06-02 Thread Rob Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, my question is, what exactly are we waiting for for the Struts 1.1 release? What can we do to get it there as soon as possible? We'd be willing to put some time into it to get it released. Using it in our production applications is out of the question though. I

RE: Struts 1.1

2003-06-02 Thread Steve Raeburn
: Struts 1.1 Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After that, people will have a chance to test their apps with it and we'll incorporate any show stopping bug fixes. Struts 1.1 final is not far off after that :-). David I'm not going to ask when Struts 1.1 will be released because I

  1   2   3   >