hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr takes 3-5 secs,
with proxy, dell.fr takes 20+ or more)
running latest stable version in a vmware virtual machine with nice
hardware.
thanks
mcq
Simply bypass this website from squid..make your squid to do not cache any
content of this site...
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, mayak chunder-qwern
ma...@australsat.comwrote:
hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 17:38, mayak chunder-qwern ma...@australsat.com wrote:
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr takes 3-5 secs,
with proxy, dell.fr takes 20+ or more)
Are you using Squid for caching?
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 10:33 +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
On 01/10/09 08:38, mayak chunder-qwern wrote:
hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr takes 3-5 secs,
with proxy, dell.fr takes 20+
I assume you're retyping the config rather than giving us
grep -v ^# squid.conf
you sure the cache size 1500 is 1500MB and not 1500KB? is it using
sufficient disk space? if the disk cache is too small it'll be pointless
having it.
also, have you turned logging level up too far, if you log
Why are captive portal accounts automatically deleted when they expire?
To my mind, it would be more useful if they were left in place, expired,
so that to re-enable them for the admin person was an easy task of just
choosing a new expiry date.
As it is, when we have a user pay again for their
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 14:02 +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
I assume you're retyping the config rather than giving us
grep -v ^# squid.conf
you sure the cache size 1500 is 1500MB and not 1500KB? is it using
sufficient disk space? if the disk cache is too small it'll be pointless
having it.
mayak chunder-qwern wrote:
hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr takes 3-5 secs,
with proxy, dell.fr takes 20+ or more)
running latest stable version in a vmware virtual machine with nice
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
mayak chunder-qwern wrote:
hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr takes 3-5 secs,
with proxy, dell.fr takes 20+ or more)
My
I'm trying to figure out how to make my ftp service pass the PCI
security compliance (we take credit cards, so need the compliance). I
have pfSense 1.2.2 running the ftp proxy to my internal box, which is
a FreeBSD 7.2 server running the stock ftpd.
A probe from the outside looks like this:
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 08:18 -0600, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
mayak chunder-qwern wrote:
hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to make my ftp service pass the PCI
security compliance (we take credit cards, so need the compliance). I
have pfSense 1.2.2 running the ftp proxy to my internal box, which is
a FreeBSD 7.2 server
Vick Khera wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to make my ftp service pass the PCI
security compliance (we take credit cards, so need the compliance). I
have pfSense 1.2.2 running the ftp proxy to my internal box, which is
a FreeBSD 7.2 server running the stock ftpd.
A probe from the outside
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
There's quite a bit of irony in using FTP yet wanting to be PCI compliant.
I suppose to some extent. However, it is the ideal tool for the job
of collecting large data files from arbitrary customers who do not
have their
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
I do not believe pftpx has setting this. I would disable ftp-helper on WAN
and use NAT port-forwarding top you FreeBSD ftp-server (I use pfSense in
this way).
How portable is this to various ftp clients? I've done
It works fine if you set everything up properly, but since many
clients will use passive mode by default to get through NAT, you will
need to forward a port range for passive mode use and configure your
FTP server to use that port range.
Unfortunately, as far as I know there's no (easy,
Hi
I personally think that FTP could never pass the pci criteria as the
transmission has no encryption and the anonymous does not comply
anyway. (you always need that user authentication so as to log who
tried/ succeeded etc)
So sftp is perhaps your best alternative . Maybe you play with
I apologize top posting on my previous message. I was on the run with
a mobile device.
Regards,
Nikos
Walking with Zimbra mobile
...using iPhone
Zaharioudakis Nikos
+30 694 720 40 63
-
To unsubscribe,
Vick Khera wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
I do not believe pftpx has setting this. I would disable ftp-helper on WAN
and use NAT port-forwarding top you FreeBSD ftp-server (I use pfSense in
this way).
How portable is this to various
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5 different Vista laptops that cannot get a DHCP address unless
I modify the registry and disable a broadcast setting. Does anybody
have a solution to this that would prevent me from having to touch
each workstation?
Is there a way to load balance a range of ports with one rule? For example, I
have a 100 port passive FTP range defined. Do I have to create 100 load
balancer rules?
1.2.3
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
Sr. Systems Administrator - Atlas Networks, LLC
office: 206.577.3078 | suncadia:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
Is there a way to load balance a range of ports with one rule? For example,
I have a 100 port passive FTP range defined. Do I have to create 100 load
balancer rules?
1.2.3
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
Curtis LaMasters wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5 different Vista laptops that cannot get a DHCP address unless
I modify the registry and disable a broadcast setting. Does anybody
have a solution to this that would prevent me from having
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5 different Vista laptops that cannot get a DHCP address unless
I modify the registry and disable a broadcast setting. Does anybody
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
Is there a way to load balance a range of ports with one rule?
Same way you load balance one port. Create a rule that specifies the range.
-
To
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5 different Vista laptops that cannot get a DHCP address unless
I modify the registry and disable a broadcast
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5 different Vista laptops that cannot get a
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 2:58 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balanced Passive FTP?
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
Is
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 2:58 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balanced Passive FTP?
On Thu,
On 9/22/09 8:07 PM, Morgan Reed wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:26, Luke Jaegerad...@pvpa.org wrote:
Are there any known issues with quad NIC cards on a pfSense box?
Should be fine, your average (decent) quad NIC is a PCI(express)
bridge on a card with what essentially amounts to
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 4:24 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balanced Passive FTP?
Oh, for inbound load balancing, I thought you meant outbound. No, no
way to do that for a
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
In one situation we had a HP procurve switch installed. We had tons of
complaints that vista would not work but XP would. We replaced it with a
Cisco 2950 and the complaints stopped. I have no idea why that would
cause it to work. I have just come to believe
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5 different Vista laptops that cannot get a
Tim Dickson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
I'm wondering if a patch was added to windows update at some point to
fix the problem. Is your Vista totally updated?
Just this week I've had my hands on several fully patched Vista machines
(including my laptop) as well as two other laptops -- one with Vista
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces\{GUID}
DhcpConnForceBroadcastFlag=dword:
On my laptop this is set to 1, and it still works for me. I've even
plugged directly into my
Hey,
I've not had this problem before - I have a PFSense firewall with a lot of 1:1
NATs. For almost every outbound connection, the traffic seems to originate
from the correct IP. For example, if I SSH from behind the firewall to a
server outside of the firewall, and then use 'last', I see
38 matches
Mail list logo
