In 1.2.3 I had very good results adding the following lines to
/boot/loader.conf while using the squid package in transparent mode:
hint.apic.0.disabled=1
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768
kern.maxfiles=65536
kern.maxfilesperproc=32768
net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535
So far in 2.0 I have not seen
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Are you using squid? Usually the nmbclusters only helped in that case.
As for the others, it's hard to say. You should try them individually
and see which one actually makes the difference.
Yeah, I'm running squid in
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Ryan L. Rodrigue
radiote...@aaremail.com wrote:
1. Broadvox is set to go out of a certain ISP that we have on interface
opt1. I don't see anywhere in the setting to specify this.
Create a pass rule on the internal interface, selecting OPT1 as the gateway.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ryan radiote...@aaremail.com wrote:
So The freswitch binds to the lan interface by default?
Oh, right. Sorry. I forgot one of the reasons I moved my freeswitch
install from pfsense to a LAN host is because one of the limitations
in 1.2.3 was not being able to
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Cinaed Simson cinaed.sim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - suppose the office LAN has one open outbound port - say IMAP on
port 143.
I go home and configure my Linux desktop to run a SSH server on port 143.
Now I return to the office and attempt to connect to my
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Tim Dickson
tdick...@aubergeresorts.com wrote:
Then only allow to the SSH servers you know/want? You can go either way...
block all and allow only certain IPs
Or allow all, and block certain IPs
A whitelist will work if he knows the IPs that he wants to
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Victor Pasten vpas...@connected.cl wrote:
Hi Guys, recently I've installed a asterisk server (in my lan, behind pfsense
1.2.3-release), everything it's ok, except for some remote sip extentions
(polycom device, and x-lite softphone) that periodically are
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
F6 PXE
boot: F1
(spinner starts and immediately locks)
Have you played with the HDD settings in the BIOS? Sometimes changing
from CHS mode to LBA will do the trick.
db
Is the 2.0 installer aware of 4k sector discs, and does it align its
partitions accordingly?
I realize better SSD controllers have minimized the effects of
partition boundary misalignment, but I still prefer to introduce as
little entropy as possible. Call me teutonic.
db
Paul,
I understand your post up to this point:
if the switch's port are set so that connected devices can't cause them
to flip from untagged to tagged mode (in cisco speak from access to
trunk - switchport nonegotiate
I'm looking at the help file for my switch, and thinking this section
is
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Johan Hendriks
j.hendr...@schavemaker.com wrote:
does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
as of Freebsd 8.1 it is.
read the following:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/relnotes-detailed.html#DISKS
Very interesting. I see this in the latest build log for 2.0:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
it's a simple fat finger to drop that traffic into your LAN.
That's poetry.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Yes, I'm testing with the latest 2.0 BETA3.
The latest is BETA4.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands,
I've been running the 2.0 betas for a few months and I'm quite happy
with it. Some network and hardware upgrades present me with a few
questions, and maybe I'm overthinking it, but I thought I would ask
the opinion of the wise ones.
I'm running mlppp and it works beautifully. For the last 2-3
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Bart Grefte b...@ravenslair.nl wrote:
Its very hard to
find serial cable these days in comparison to DVI or VGA cables
Do you have access to a couple Cisco DB-9/RJ-45 console cables (the
nice baby-blue ones)? By clipping the RJ-45 end of one of these, then
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo
ujj...@simplesignal.com wrote:
There a zcat dd command to install on linux In the wiki
Was your target device also your Linux boot device? Or was it another,
such as a spare hard drive or compact flash card?
db
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo
ujj...@simplesignal.com wrote:
No linux commands are working like ls, etc...only pwd cd
pfctl -d to shut it down is also not working... I am at the console now to
chk this bad boy out
pfsense is designed to be operated from the web UI. Try
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
There might have been a math bug that meant you went 1 period forward
instead of backwards.
Except the monthly graph shows a gap from the previous week when
looking at the current month. Screenshot in the forum:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:06 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
July 23: Same thing, package will neither function nor delete. I see
this at the bottom of the page when trying to remove the package, even
after doing a /etc/rc.conf_mount_rw on the command line:
I just updated
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Updated again, but I didn't bump the version this time. Try it in about
5 minutes.
Hm. I tried the reinstall button but now the package is in limbo.
pfsense thinks it's installed, but there's no longer a menu for it.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Laurentiu STEFAN
laurentiu.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to install the PF Sense and I want to use the rest of the HDD space
for a FTP server or a SAMBA server.
I think the closest you're going to come to this is through virtual
machines, and obviously you
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Laurentiu STEFAN
laurentiu.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
It's OKa to use an IBM Pentium MMX 200MHZ, 64MB Ram, 3GB SCSI, 3X LAN for
pfSense (Mask, firewall load balancing whith 10 PC behind)?
That CPU should be good for ~15mbps throughput if you're not loading
it with
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
I committed a fix and updated the package. It should be up shortly.
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '(' in
/usr/local/www/status_rrd_summary.php on line 38
That's version 1.1
db
Since updating to the July 4 snapshot (and July 5 snapshot) yesterday,
when I try to access my pfsense web UI via its DynDNS name I just get
a message Potential DNS rebind attack detected, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_rebinding; and the page title shows
as 501. This happens in Chrome and
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea what's going on here?
I see a thread is already active in the forum. I'll recall this post
in favour of that thread.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,26434.msg137878.html#new
db
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Give it a try and see if it's still accurate.
Some observations:
1. Using the June 23 nanobsd snapshot, RRD Summary reported ~330GB of
traffic from June 1 to June 30. On July 3 it reported over 700GB of
traffic from the 1st.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Guillaume Lederrey
guillaume.leder...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a minor problem with my new installation of pfSense 2 :
Please check your setup against the instructions here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,20917.0.html
Obviously you will have to adjust
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
But why would I look in the upgrade directory on the download site when I
had downloaded the nanobsd version from the nanobsd directory? There are no
upgrade images in the nanobsd directory, you have to go into the
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos
math...@eternamente.info wrote:
vnstat does that. but not for past time (before it is installed).
Anybody know if vnstat is compact flash friendly? I'm using the
nanobsd image since burning out one CF already, and this vnstat sounds
handy.
db
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Intruiging, I have a Soekris net5501 from one of the first series. It always
fails to cold boot when it's been off for an hour or so. All the LEDs on the
front of the Soekris stay lit.
Then I pull the plug and reinsert after 10
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
Putty strictly does SSH and telnet, you can't do PPTP using it. You
can do SSH port forwards if you just need to access specific port(s)
reachable from the firewall.
You could perhaps tunnel a PPTP connection through
I'm running the 2.0 nanobsd image. This release is coming together nicely.
One problem I've had with multiple builds from May as well as June 4
is that on a cold boot pfsense fails to find the root partition. I've
never had the same problem on a reboot, even on a firmware update, I
think. On a
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Tiago tpi...@scenario.ind.br wrote:
How can I block some sites through the IP address?
For instance: I need to block www.hotmail.com only for IP 172.16.0.54
Any site can be blocked by IP address in the firewall. For example,
create a block rule on LAN with
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
I tried to enable the ssh server. I can find sshd running with ps, but
don't seem to find it with netstat and can not connect to it.
I am not that familar with the FreeBSD command line to help more, but
can anyone point
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:18 PM, justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote:
How does one go by blocking facebook twitter and youtube also how does
one autoblock malicous sites
opendns is one way.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Squid_Package_Tuning
Also
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7186.msg59302.html#msg59302
db
-
To
Is there a tutorial on the traffic shaper in 2.0? I read the related
FAQ or wiki page (now I forget which), I ran the wizard and found the
results not only confusing, but inconsistent with my responses, and I
have scoured the forums.
I don't understand why there is a floating interface, which is
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Gary Buckmaster g...@s4f.com wrote:
When you have a moment, would you power cycle the 1u device in our rack
labeled tyr.fp.s4f.com? Thank you.
I feel like an idiot, but I'm standing here looking at our rack, and
for the life of me can't see a label that even
Are you using squid as transparent? If so you have to override the GUI
anti-lockout rule. Be sure to make alternate arrangements to get into
the GUI, or you'll lock yourself out.
db
On 4/27/10, Chris Flugstad ch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
I block an ip in the fw rules on lan and wan, and then
The Available Packages page for 2.0 beta x86_64 full snapshot from
Friday shows no packages, with the warning Unable to communicate with
www.pfsense.com. Please verify DNS and interface configuration, and
that pfSense has functional Internet connectivity. My DNS works. I
don't see anything related
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
It's probably looking for a package file that doesn't exist. Did this
ever work before?
It's the first time I've tried PFS on 64-bit.
I'm not sure if there are any 64-bit packages setup in the repo yet.
That's possible, and
Did you power-cycle the modem?
db
On 4/17/10, Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Hopefully somebody can help me with how to diagnose this problem.
I recently switched to Comcast, and I have been running great with
them for a few weeks.
They supplied me with a Ubee cablemodem,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that will work fine. It looks like you'll probably want to trunk
different VLANs to each one, but that should be doable with any
managed switch.
You could also do this with a single pfsense box If you can move a
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Jason Stuart jason.stu...@cornell.edu wrote:
I am running pfsense 1.2.3 as a full install on a Dell 1U server. I
am having some issues with interface errors on the WAN input. I have
reviewed the switch logs that the interface is connected to and have
not seen
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:
Guys,
What would I need to transport WAN LAN over one network cable ?
I was thinking about setting up two VLAN's (but since my cablemodem
isn't VLAN aware, I guess this setup isn't the right way to go ?)
Basically, I
I decided to update from 1.2.3 to 2.0 Beta 1. Instead of updating in
place, I took advantage of the opportunity to update to a newer hard
drive at the same time, leaving my 1.2.3 install intact.
This is for a net5501, so I put the new hdd in another machine and
booted from the PFS live CD and
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Hiren Joshi j...@moonfruit.com wrote:
I'm using the packet capture bit in pfsense. Is there a way of doing
this via the shell (I'm new to BSD, more of a Linux person) and leaving
it running (filtered by hostname) for a few hours/days? This way I can
dump it all
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Hiren Joshi j...@moonfruit.com wrote:
On second thoughts, I'll take that back. It looks like the front end is
matching all hosts with that IP, now I'm stumped...
I don't understand. You have several remote hosts with the same IP
address and same host name?
db
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Brent Clark brentgclarkl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that the same as from (Under Network Address Translation (NAT) ):
http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=40Itemid=43
1:1 NAT for individual IPs or entire subnets.
Effectively similar, but
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Chris Bagnall li...@minotaur.cc wrote:
Has there been any progress since then, and are there any plans to make this
an official feature in 2.0? Is anyone interested in adding full support (i.e.
GUI integration), and if so, what sort of bounty would it take?
I have a single ADSL connection that is mlppp capable. I'm running
pfsense 1.2.3-Release on a net5501+Intel Pro/1000 GT (4 * 10/100 + 1 *
100/1000). I would like to eventually add more ADSL connections for
loadbalancing, which is simple enough to set up when using NAT.
However, I would like to
I would like to know if somebody can tell me an advantange, other than
raw throughput, of a router with multiple interfaces when compared
with a router using few physical interfaces but vlans in their place.
I cannot come up with one.
db
I'm considering a setup with multiwan where more than one WAN
connection would require pppoe. This does not appear to be possible in
1.2.3, as my OPT interfaces only give static and dhcp options. Am
I doing something wrong? Is this something that will be supported in
the future? Or am I laughably
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
This depends on how much you trust your switches, and more so, how
much you trust your admins. It's usually easier to inadvertently
configure something on the wrong VLAN than it is to plug something
into the wrong
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Seth Mos seth@xs4all.nl wrote:
Do the RRD graphs not provide you with this information?
Silly me. It's all right there. Thanks.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
What would it take to get counters on the interface page to not roll
over at 4GB? Is that something that will just happen when PFS moves to
a 64-bit platform? If so, is that a change that will happen with 2.0?
What is the best solution in the interim? I'm looking at the darkstat
package and
Greetings,
I have an ADSL modem that is not currently in use, but will be soon.
When said modem is connected directly by cable to pfsense's WAN, and
the appropriate address/netmask assigned statically to the WAN
(192.168.1.0/24), I can reach the modem's web interface at its
assigned address
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
You probably don't have a gateway configured on the OPT interface, so
it's being treated as a LAN/internal interface, and the traffic isn't
being NATed.
If the modem is on the same subnet as the interface I don't
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:55 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
The modem doesn't know how to get to your LAN subnet so you need to
NAT
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:
Might it be, that these options should be possible to add to pfSense.
I can add options 66 67 (boot-server boot-filename)... but option 60
would be the name which should be set to (PXEClient)
I guess that would be the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Keenan Tims kt...@gotroot.ca wrote:
I have an ALIX 2d3 running a full install of 1.2.3-RC2 on some industrial
CF. When it's passing very little traffic (~150pps, ~600kbps) I'm seeing an
average of about 15% CPU usage.
That doesn't look out of line to me. I
I've been happily using 1.2.3-RC1 for many months now on a Soekris
net5501 and a 100GB 2.5 SATA drive. I like the idea of an embedded
system on a CF card, but that's not possible or advisable for me as
I'm running the squid and freeswitch packages.
I was wondering however, if it would be
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
(cold-reset resiliency,
The moment you have a drive mounted rw, you lose this. :-)
Well you lose it on the rw partitions, but if the core system is
mounted to RAM from a read-only filesystem, then at least the core
system has
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Manny A. Wise mannyw...@gmail.com wrote:
My needs were exactly like yoursFreeSwitch and Squid...
I am pretty good with hardware, but terrible with software... :(
My software background is a lot more linux than BSD, but a person can learn ;)
Some cursory
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
On 12/11/2009 12:22 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote:
can you do overlay file systems on freeBSD, so that the base OS and
config is read-only and you overlay a read-write file system at a very
late stage in booting IF that overlay is
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Nathaniel Simch de Morais
nathanielmor...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, i can make any changes in squid, but in the tab Cache management
just don't save. I put all info about cache i want and when i click save
the screen returns to default.
Does anyone seen this?
I
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ron García-Vidal r...@millburncorp.com wrote:
Since I've never worked extensively with Cisco, can someone give me a few
salient points to throw at him. I already used the cost argument, he wants
more.
The support for PFSense is top notch. Between the mailing
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Pete Boyd petes-li...@thegoldenear.org wrote:
What does it have to do with the operating system? if the computer is
powered off then the operating system doesn't come into play. Are you
confusing this with wake from standby?
No, your computer will not wake from
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Pete Boyd petes-li...@thegoldenear.org wrote:
If this is so, is it the default in Windows XP Pro? because all workstations
we have that have a WOL setting in the BIOS, successfully do WOL, without us
changing anything in Windows from a fresh install.
I believe
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Gabriel - IP Guys
gabr...@impactteachers.com wrote:
Pfsense is the only setup that has complained about this setup, and if it
drops packets because of it, I’ve got a real problem, and I’ll have to go
back to a previous working setup without pfsense.
I did
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Ron Lemon r...@maplewood.com wrote:
Sounds good to me. Where do I find the host file?
/etc/hosts
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Dominic vamp...@vortex.co.za wrote:
However my query is, is there any way I could automate this failover? ie:
automate
the routing changes or similar? My goal is to automate the failover as
transparently
as possible.
I think this document applies equally to
I support you. Stick to your guns, no matter what!
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
I'm using the chromium browser on Ubuntu and when I try to view
PFSense's traffic graphs I don't see the graph, just a box with the
following error:
This page contains the following errors:
error on line 2 at column 1: Document is empty
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Anil Garg garg_art2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a pfsense with two 10/100 PCI cards (acting as LAN WAN router).
I have a 4 port (quad) 10/100 PCI (ZNYX ZX374) card.
If I were to add this card into the box and then add those ports and bridge
them with each other
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Anil Garg garg_art2...@yahoo.com wrote:
David
I am not very technical. My server room is far away from my internet
connection at my home. So there is only one cable going from the internet to
server room. I am still reading about VLAN so that I understand its
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
mayak chunder-qwern wrote:
hi all,
any reason (or what can i look at) to see why squid transparent proxying
is heavily slowing web access ... (w/out proxy, dell.fr takes 3-5 secs,
with proxy, dell.fr takes 20+ or more)
My
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Dominik Schipsdomi...@s235.de wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ask how to backup pfSense the correct way?
There is a backup package you can install that allows you to back up
directories that you specify.
db
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like this is related to that OPT interface not having the
gateway specified on it. That interface is however working and sending
traffic out to my ISP's gateway.
At the risk of looking like the N00b that I am,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
The route for that OPT1 interface is showing up it is em2.
$ netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
default67.38.60.77UGS
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.uswrote:
FWIW - I have not been able to get these to work in PFSense -at all-.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106019
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106018
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM, David Burgessapt@gmail.com wrote:
I have entered the ISP's gateway (They actually have two due to us
using multiple subnets) and when I do, pfsense can only ping that
address.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Chris Kleeschulte
chris.kleeschu...@it.libertydistribution.com wrote:
I also know that Microsoft claims this is a problem in Vista, but all my
hosts are XP and the flag seems to be set there too.
I believe xp SP3 did this. For sure it created vista-like
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.uswrote:
Looks like it was 1.2.1 when I tried:
http://www.mail-archive.com/support@pfsense.com/msg15181.html
I think the newer intel chipsets are supported in FBSD 7.x, or PFS 1.2.3.
Don't anybody run buy one on my
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Joseph L.
Casalejcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Argh, that means I have to close my browser:) I always have so much open
like Nagios etc in other tabs...
You could use a different browser for pfsense. It's an inconvenience,
but probably more convenient than
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Joseph L.
Casalejcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Can ff be setup to do this?
In Windows FF3.5
ToolsClear Recent HistoryDetailsActive Logins
I believe that should do it.
db
-
To unsubscribe,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Kevin Kimanikevinkim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Am experiencing trouble with my Pfsense firewall by it not being able
to relay mail to the internal mail server. One person can be able to
send mail outside the organization but receiving mail is still an
issue.
http://www.mail-archive.com/support@pfsense.com/msg05025.html
After about 4 months on pfsense I'm now seeing this message in the
console, Warning: no access to tty (Inappropriate ioctl for device).
Thus no job control in this shell. The above-linked thread is over
three years old now, do we have
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Jim Pingleli...@pingle.org wrote:
IIRC it was due to something trying to mute the video console while it
is really using serial. It is fixed (mostly?) on the 1.2.3-RC2 nanobsd
snapshots, and doesn't seem to happen on 2.0 either.
I'm using 1.2.3-RC1 on a
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jim Pingleli...@pingle.org wrote:
You should probably be running one of the more recent nanobsd snapshots
anyhow, they can use all the testing they can get. :-)
I didn't look at those because I'm running the FreeSwitch package. The
blog post
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Jeremy Bennettjbenn...@obtusion.com wrote:
When I install siproxd, everything looks good, however when I go to my
services page and press the play/start button, PFsense reports that
siproxd has been started, but when the page refreshes, the status still
shows
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh yeah, sorry, forgot to mention.
The NIC is the same one: Dual Intel PCI-X.
Have you ruled out your switches as bottleneck?
db
-
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Curtis
LaMasterscurtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Scott. I know what top posting is...I just don't know why you
think I did. I hit reply, type my message and go forth. Didn't think
it needed to be any harder than that.
It can be a lot harder than that.
Yes.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Curtis
LaMasterscurtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
This is top posting apparently.
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:34 PM, iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:33
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Curtis
LaMasterscurtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
And this is bottom posting. Correct?
Well, I don't think it's top-posting or bottom-posting if you delete
all prior content.
-
To unsubscribe,
The current is an example of top-posting, in response to your
top-post. I don't think you've bottom-posted in this thread yet.
db
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Curtis
LaMasterscurtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
To which one?
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Curtis
LaMasterscurtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
How about now? Bottom posting?
Bingo.
Ha ha. Now Scott's saying no and I'm saying yes. In my view, you
bottom-posted, although you could refine it further by trimming the
quoted text to which you're replying.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.uswrote:
Hello Paul,
I've considered that, but in this instance, it's not an option. I agree
that limiting exposure is a good first step, but I think brute force
protection regardless of source address could be a
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Ron Lemon r...@maplewood.com wrote:
I have a pfSense box with a WAN link that goes to the internet. This is
where all the web surfing and e-mail comes and goes from.
I have a second WAN link (OPT1) that goes to a pubic semi-private network
and I need to
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Tim Nelsontnel...@fudnet.net wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Tim Nelsontnel...@fudnet.net wrote:
Hello fellow pfSensers! I've been quietly annoyed
101 - 200 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
