is one method better than the other for connecting to pfsense firewalls
together, between OpenVPN and IPSec? just curious, as ive been using
the OpenVPN more and more lately for site-site connections.
thanks,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
freebsd08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dfwlp.com
et traffic). tips or
stories of caveats to watch out for, would be greatly appreciated, or
anything i can use to begin my learning of how the queueing works.
cheers,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
freebsd08 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ex.html
>
> If you have another GPL Linux Gui for OpenVPN I would gladly try it.
>
> Giuseppe
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:30 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re:
-2.1-0.19.rc4.fc7
knetworkmanager-openvpn-0.2-0.7.fc8
cheers,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
freebsd08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dfwlp.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
have enough
IPs for all the connecting clients.
thanks,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the man page for shutdown (since it wont be on
your pfsense box)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=shutdown&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE&format=html
if you just want to know how long since last reboot... type 'uptime'.
cheers,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does bandwidthd cause any significant performance hit? special situations,
yes, no, maybe?
thanks,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
ernel and pulled INET6 out, so ill test how that operates
right now (without doing any switch or pfsense reboots).
thanks,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uot; site as well... so i have seen
it on a mac i guess.
anyway, thats where i stand for now. i guess it wouldnt be any trouble to
rebuild my kernels without the INET6, if that would help.
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.d
reinstall/config reload?
thanks,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if i am site A, and i have an ipsec vpn to site B and site C. right now, i
can ping from A-B, and from A-C (and vice versa). is there anyway to set up
to allow site B to ping site C, without setting up a tunnel between them (ie,
to pass thru site A?
just curious,
--
Jonathan Horne
http
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:24:10 -0400
"Vaughn L. Reid III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll post the config file a little later today, when I get to my test
> box. In the mean time, I want to make it clear that subnet 2 is not
> directly connected to the pfsense box.
>
> Currently, the pfsense b
i use the freebsd port net/wakeonlan. i wake up my extra workstation, my dev
vmware server, and my backup server with a cron job every morning.
55 7 * * * root/usr/local/bin/wakeonlan -i
192.168.125.127 00:20:ed:35:dc:61 00:07:e9:18:79:e9 00:30:48:21:fd:ea
> /
i previously had 2 sites, both with pfsense firewalls.
site a - 192.168.125.0/26
site b - 192.168.125.64/26
i recently did away with site a, and since those ips were no longer in use, i
decided to change my site b from a /26 to a /25. so i started with the
pfsense box. it ip was previously 19
does a doc exist, that described how to use openvpn to create a static tunnel
between two pfsense boxes?
thanks,
jonathan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
last night, a site i admin for got slashdotted. the site owner wants to
put in another business cable line, but the ISP is unable to bond them
into a single double speed connection.
our firewall is pfsense 1.0.1. could we use pfsense's load blancing
features to balance inbound httpd connetions a
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 22:20, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> after i tweaked openvpn today, WOL has stopped working. it was prevously
> working perfectly on all my computers. i could wake them up no problems.
>
> the change i made today on my pfsense box, was to set the openv
after i tweaked openvpn today, WOL has stopped working. it was prevously
working perfectly on all my computers. i could wake them up no problems.
the change i made today on my pfsense box, was to set the openvpn subnet to
192.168.125.112/28. all my hosts on my lan are 192.168.125.64/26, and a
> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately
> On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, so its
>> time
>> > to throw mine into the mix too.
>> >
>>
i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, so its time
to throw mine into the mix too.
i have 2 sites, with an ipsec tunnel between them. site 1 is
192.168.125.0/26 and site 2 is 192.168.125.64/26. both sites are just a
simple single pfsense box (no carp or redundants or anyt
> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, so its
>> time
>> to throw mine into the mix too.
>>
>> i have 2 sites, with an ipsec tunnel between them. site 1 is
>> 192.168.125
On Friday 22 September 2006 12:39, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Who out there actually uses OpenVPN and it works for them?
>
> Please either respond here and describe your setup or reply privately to
> me.
>
> We have a influx of OpenVPN problem reports and I am starting to
> wonder if it works correctly
i would have to agree with robs recommendation, it will truly be the least
amount of headache.
and with bind 9, you can have dns views, that respond with corresponding
1.1.1.x address to outside hosts, and respond with 192.168.2.x to inside
hosts (but all to the same example.com domain namespac
25 matches
Mail list logo
