ram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a
bridge mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for
management. If that is the case, I could
This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode,
you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that is
the case, I could change the IP of UT to something in the private range and
see if your issues clear up. What is your internet connection. I am
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge
mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that
is the case, I could change the IP of UT to something in the private
Support] PF and UT not working
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode,
you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that is the
case, I could change the IP
: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:37 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a
bridge mode, you shouldn't need
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:44 PM, ram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
As RB would say... I'm not contributing to the answer, but helping to
give understanding to the problem...
Untangle, while in bridged mode still
the NAT (a bit more work, and ram may not know how to set it up).
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: sai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:12 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working
how is your network setup?
1 PC ---switch
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:42 AM, sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how is your network setup?
1 PC ---switch UT ---pfsense
or
2 PC ---switch ---pfsense UT
I would suggest trying 2 since you just want the CP on pfsense
UT recomends always to be between user and Firewall,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
As RB would say... I'm not contributing to the answer, but helping to
give understanding to the problem...
Untangle, while in bridged mode still really needs its own IP since one
of its primary features is to send
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Tim Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree... and also try completely removing the Untangle box from the
network to see if the problem clears up.
Hi
thanks all the people support.
let me clarify as the people asking why iam using both the product
simple
simple reason, UT does not have capitive portal.
So you're just wanting to use the captive portal on pfSense? What
services on the UT are you using?
Fact of captive portal which is MAC based, and UT is a b-router so passing
it's own MAC. See the m0n0wall and pfsense mail lists for support on
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
simple reason, UT does not have capitive portal.
So you're just wanting to use the captive portal on pfSense? What
services on the UT are you using?
iam using all the Services of UT, iam using PF for authentication and DHCP
Does Untangle have the ability to do a TCP dump? I could enable that in the
inside interface and then the outside interface on UT, compare the two and
see what you come up with. It may be worthwhile to do this on the external
side of pf as well. If UT's bridge mode is truly bridge, then you
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:22 AM, ram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iam using all the Services of UT, iam using PF for authentication and DHCP
Server
Since you seem either uninterested or incapable of telling us anything
other than I have object foo with all the knobs turned on and most
of us
Mr RB
I belive you do not have Idea what exactly UT Does
UT claims that they have webfilter, IDS, Firewall, SPAM protection lot more
you can refer their features, ( iam yet to test)
so iam not comparing the any products here, so iam not going to do marketing
call
since i have situation where
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Curtis LaMasters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Untangle have the ability to do a TCP dump? I could enable that in the
inside interface and then the outside interface on UT, compare the two and
see what you come up with. It may be worthwhile to do this on the
how is your network setup?
1 PC ---switch UT ---pfsense
or
2 PC ---switch ---pfsense UT
I would suggest trying 2 since you just want the CP on pfsense
sai
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Curtis LaMasters
any one have idea, where iam doing wrong ?
Perhaps if you made it a little more clear why you're using two
firewall products in-line of each other and what role they're each
expected to play. There's likely some unexpected interplay between
the two, particularly with the effective MITM a
@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working
any one have idea, where iam doing wrong ?
Perhaps if you made it a little more clear why you're using two
firewall products in-line of each other and what role they're each
expected to play. There's likely some unexpected interplay
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is likely that they are doing as I do... Use pfSense for firewall and
VPN, while using Untangle for strictly filtering purposes (web, mail,
etc) and not firewalling.
The conjecture is appreciated, but unless you're
]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 3:41 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Tim Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It sounds like google.com http://google.com/ is not resolving
when you have captive portal enabled
: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:38:54 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working
ram,
This is a bit of a shot in the dark, but try turning off services in
Untangle... until they are all off. It may be that one of them (like the
Intrusion Detection module
Hi
I have installed Untangle and PF together in the network
the flow looks like below
users-crosscableeth0(untangle-bridgemode)-eth1(croscable)eth1---PF---eth0--Internet
above setup works fine , with out any issue
but when i enable capitive portal
iam not able to access the login
Message -
From: ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:19:04 AM GMT -06:00 Guadalajara / Mexico City /
Monterrey
Subject: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working
Hi
I have installed Untangle and PF together in the network
the flow looks like below
24 matches
Mail list logo
