Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

ram wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that is the case, I co

RE: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

TED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:37 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode, yo

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for m

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge > mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that > is the case, I could change the IP of UT to something in the priva

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that is the case, I could change the IP of UT to something in the private range and see if your issues clear up. What is your internet connection. I am go

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:44 PM, ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> As RB would say... I'm not contributing to the answer, but helping to >> give understanding to the problem... >> >> Untangle, while in bridged m

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > As RB would say... I'm not contributing to the answer, but helping to > give understanding to the problem... > > Untangle, while in bridged mode still really needs its own IP since one > of its primary features is to s

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:42 AM, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how is your network setup? > > <1> PC ---switch UT ---pfsense > > or > > <2> PC ---switch ---pfsense UT > > I would suggest trying <2> since you just want the CP on pfsense > UT recomends always to be between user and

RE: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

y pfSense to do the NAT (a bit more work, and ram may not know how to set it up). - Jason -Original Message- From: sai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:12 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working how is your network setup? &

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

how is your network setup? <1> PC ---switch UT ---pfsense or <2> PC ---switch ---pfsense UT I would suggest trying <2> since you just want the CP on pfsense sai On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Curtis La

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Curtis LaMasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does Untangle have the ability to do a TCP dump? I could enable that in the > inside interface and then the outside interface on UT, compare the two and > see what you come up with. It may be worthwhile to do this on

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

Mr RB I belive you do not have Idea what exactly UT Does UT claims that they have webfilter, IDS, Firewall, SPAM protection lot more you can refer their features, ( iam yet to test) so iam not comparing the any products here, so iam not going to do marketing call since i have situation where

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:22 AM, ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > iam using all the Services of UT, iam using PF for authentication and DHCP > Server Since you seem either uninterested or incapable of telling us anything other than "I have object foo with all the knobs turned on" and most of us pr

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

Does Untangle have the ability to do a TCP dump? I could enable that in the inside interface and then the outside interface on UT, compare the two and see what you come up with. It may be worthwhile to do this on the external side of pf as well. If UT's bridge mode is truly bridge, then you shou

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > simple reason, UT does not have capitive portal. > > So you're just wanting to use the captive portal on pfSense? What > services on the UT are you using? > iam using all the Services of UT, iam using PF for authentication and D

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

> simple reason, UT does not have capitive portal. So you're just wanting to use the captive portal on pfSense? What services on the UT are you using? > Fact of captive portal which is MAC based, and UT is a b-router so passing > it's own MAC. See the m0n0wall and pfsense mail lists for support

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Tim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree... and also try completely removing the Untangle box from the > network to see if the problem clears up. > Hi thanks all the people support. let me clarify as the people asking why iam using both the product simpl

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

fsense.com Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:38:54 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working ram, This is a bit of a shot in the dark, but try turning off services in Untangle... until they are all off. It may be that one of them (like the Intrusion Dete

RE: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

ECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 3:41 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Tim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It sounds like google.com <http://google.com/> is not resolving when you ha

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is likely that they are doing as I do... Use pfSense for firewall and > VPN, while using Untangle for strictly filtering purposes (web, mail, > etc) and not firewalling. The conjecture is appreciated, but unless yo

RE: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working > any one have idea, where iam doing wrong ? Perhaps if you made it a little more clear why you're using two firewall products in-line of each other and what role they're each expected to play. There's likely some un

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

> any one have idea, where iam doing wrong ? Perhaps if you made it a little more clear why you're using two firewall products in-line of each other and what role they're each expected to play. There's likely some unexpected interplay between the two, particularly with the effective MITM a captiv

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Tim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds like google.com is not resolving when you have captive portal > enabled. Make sure you have the DNS servers that are assigned to your users > in the list of allowed outbound IPs in captive portal. > Hi thanks for

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

It sounds like google.com is not resolving when you have captive portal enabled. Make sure you have the DNS servers that are assigned to your users in the list of allowed outbound IPs in captive portal. Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 - Original Mes