On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:00:39 +0100, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
>
>
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>
> > hawker schrieb:
>
> >> So in SM 2.0 and before the sidebar search displayed the search results
> >> in both the browser window and below the search input.
> >
> > Unfortunately that
On 7/28/2011 8:58 PM, WLS wrote:
John Mckenzie wrote:
I think that I have just about had it with SM2.2. It did not save or
what ever my passwords and tabbed browsing sucks donkeys. i am going
nuts using this atrocious browser.
John
Try 2.4a2.
Really I would never recommend an alpha for a u
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
> hawker schrieb:
>> So in SM 2.0 and before the sidebar search displayed the search results
>> in both the browser window and below the search input.
>
> Unfortunately that's not possible in this way with the
> new search mec
John Mckenzie wrote:
I think that I have just about had it with SM2.2. It did not save or
what ever my passwords and tabbed browsing sucks donkeys. i am going
nuts using this atrocious browser.
John
Try 2.4a2.
--
Using SeaMonkey 2.4a2 on openSUSE 11.3 Linux
__
hawker wrote:
That said 2.2 has had the most regression bugs,
lost features and new bugs of any version I have seen since before 1.0.
I hope this new "rapid" release is not causing SM quality to suffer and
this is just a bad build that we will get past. What is the feeling of
the development team
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
> This is unfortunate, but OTOH the older mechanism couldn't
> support the OpenSearch standard all other browser support,
At the risk of sounding confrontational (which is not my intent)
"doing what all other browsers do" is not, I suggest, why most
of
On 11-07-28 1:30 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Just out of ornery curiosity, why is it so many folks who regularly (and
preferentially?) attend the newsgroup version of this list get so bent
out of shape over those of us who, for whatever reason, prefer and use
the mail method of message delivery for t
I think that I have just about had it with SM2.2. It did not save or
what ever my passwords and tabbed browsing sucks donkeys. i am going
nuts using this atrocious browser.
John
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 7/28/11 9:43 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> David E. Ross schrieb:
>> That is sometimes called "lemming behavior", which might be appropriate
>> in this case. After all, the legend is that lemmings follow each other
>> off a cliff, into the ocean, and to their deaths.
>
> You mean Firefox will die
On 7/28/2011 12:50 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
hawker schrieb:
So in SM 2.0 and before the sidebar search displayed the search results
in both the browser window and below the search input.
Unfortunately that's not possible in this way with the new search
mechanism we switched to in 2.1 and later
hawker wrote:
As a side note: I hate to complain here. I find most of the complaining here to
be unwarranted. To read this forum when SM went from 1.x to 2.0 the sky was
falling. Most of the "show stoppers" I hear were issues I never saw, or felt
were not a big deal. So most of the gloom and doo
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
S. Beaulieu wrote:
if you simply deleted his address from the reply field (rather than
editing it to deobfuscate it), it would be less work for you and nicer
to him (or anyone else).
Already incorporated into my "standard working practice
TheFunnySide schrieb:
First up, this is probably an exceptionally stupid question and for
that I apologise. I'm new to Seamonkey Composer however and I just
can't understand why I'm having trouble adding say© in HTML
source view and getting it to STAY when I hit 'Save'. When I do save
the docu
Robert Kaiser wrote:
> hawker schrieb:
>> So in SM 2.0 and before the sidebar search displayed the search results
>> in both the browser window and below the search input.
>
> Unfortunately that's not possible in this way with the
> new search mechanism we switched to in 2.1 and later.
> This
hawker schrieb:
So in SM 2.0 and before the sidebar search displayed the search results
in both the browser window and below the search input.
Unfortunately that's not possible in this way with the new search
mechanism we switched to in 2.1 and later. This is unfortunate, but OTOH
the older m
On 7/28/2011 12:42 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
hawker schrieb:
I often RMB over a link to "open in a new tab" this brings up a small
window with a few options, of which open in new tab or open in new
window are options.
Since 2.2 I often get a huge full screen list of options (fills up my
1920 x 1
hawker schrieb:
I often RMB over a link to "open in a new tab" this brings up a small
window with a few options, of which open in new tab or open in new
window are options.
Since 2.2 I often get a huge full screen list of options (fills up my
1920 x 1200 monitor) of which these are two of the op
David E. Ross schrieb:
That is sometimes called "lemming behavior", which might be appropriate
in this case. After all, the legend is that lemmings follow each other
off a cliff, into the ocean, and to their deaths.
You mean Firefox will die just as Chrome has and SeaMonkey has before?
Robert
I often RMB over a link to "open in a new tab" this brings up a small
window with a few options, of which open in new tab or open in new
window are options.
Since 2.2 I often get a huge full screen list of options (fills up my
1920 x 1200 monitor) of which these are two of the options. It is h
TheFunnySide wrote:
First up, this is probably an exceptionally stupid question and for
that I apologise. I'm new to Seamonkey Composer however and I just
can't understand why I'm having trouble adding say© in HTML
source view and getting it to STAY when I hit 'Save'. When I do save
the docume
On 7/28/11 1:34 AM, get-funky.dig wrote [in part]:
> This curmudgeon is displeased and wary of the FF camp. As a user
> since Mosaic, it's difficult to find the proper description so I'll
> settle to say, I find it insulting to read of FF Update schedules
> should mirror that of Google-Chrome while
hawker wrote:
As a side note: I hate to complain here. I find most of the
complaining here to be unwarranted. To read this forum when SM went
from 1.x to 2.0 the sky was falling. Most of the "show stoppers" I
hear were issues I never saw, or felt were not a big deal. So most
of the gloom and
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Justin, to get the auto-update from 2.0.14 to 2.2, is it just a case of
Help->Check for updates and then apply the update found??
I'm not Justin, but yes, that should just be it. And you should even get
an offer automatically within a day or two if you don'
So in SM 2.0 and before the sidebar search displayed the search results
in both the browser window and below the search input. This was great if
I wanted to try different search results and not have to either use the
back button or open in new tab/window.
2.2 lost this functionality and the op
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
[Sent off-list to keep the list noise level down].
Oops, sorry list : somehow I forgot to delete the list address.
No, Philip, I asked the question on the NG/List, so the reply should
have been to the NG/list
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
[Sent off-list to keep the list noise level down].
Oops, sorry list : somehow I forgot to delete the list address.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.
MCBastos schrieb:
My general advice would be to get rid of Norton. Well, get rid of
anything by Symantec.
Their solutions are about as bad as any of the large "security" suites
that make everything crash or not work that isn't to its taste. AVG
might be slightly worse than Norton/Symantec the
Daniel wrote:
Hey, Philip, is there a particular reason why you use the mail list?? Is it
just that you were unaware that you could get all these posts any other way??
If it's just because you don't know how, askthere are any number of people
here that could advise you how to get to the
get-funky.dig schrieb:
I'm afraid it concerns me to see "TODO" as a changelog: 2.2 to 2.3 Upgrade data.
That's because we're all volunteers and Jens didn't have time yet to
write up everything that has been changed. If you want things to be done
more professionally or faster, please offer you
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
S. Beaulieu wrote:
if you simply deleted his address from the reply field (rather than
editing it to deobfuscate it), it would be less work for you and nicer
to him (or anyone else).
Already incorporated into my "standard working practice" for
this list
First up, this is probably an exceptionally stupid question and for
that I apologise. I'm new to Seamonkey Composer however and I just
can't understand why I'm having trouble adding say © in HTML
source view and getting it to STAY when I hit 'Save'. When I do save
the document, it reverts in the
31 matches
Mail list logo
