Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:06:20 +0200, Alex Beauroy wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on >> the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in >> discussing and reporting problems as well as

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Jim S schrieb: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:06:20 +0200, Alex Beauroy wrote: Hi there, Is this the Seamonkey that will allow Lightning for calendar??? Best Regards @lex Not when I tried. Very few add-ons fit. Yes the Lightning nightly(!)-versions are working in SM2.0 since beta2 (including RC1).

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

A Williams wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups distribution list. Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as I had intended :( Robert Kaiser Hmmm, could that not be considered a bug?

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Alex Beauroy wrote: Is this the Seamonkey that will allow Lightning for calendar??? Yes, but right now you need to use a nightly version of Lightning or wait for their upcoming beta. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonke

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Robert Kaiser wrote: Alex Beauroy wrote: Is this the Seamonkey that will allow Lightning for calendar??? Yes, but right now you need to use a nightly version of Lightning or wait for their upcoming beta. Robert Kaiser Wonderful!!! I'll have a good day then Best Regards @lex ___

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Robert Kaiser wrote: A Williams wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups distribution list. Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as I had intended :( Robert Kaiser Hmmm, could that not

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Bob Fleischer wrote: Well, I found that the visible difference between my production profile and the virgin test profile is that I had "allow cookies for the originating website only" on the production system (the one that failed). I confirmed that setting this on the virgin system caused that si

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

On 10/13/2009 01:08 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Bob Fleischer wrote: >> Well, I found that the visible difference between my production profile >> and the virgin test profile is that I had "allow cookies for the >> originating website only" on the production system (the one that >> failed). I confir

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

bug.cgi?id=349680#c13 where it was determined that the cookie settings weren't quite working as advertised. (crossposts removed) So, was 1.1 broken, but 2.0 less broken? Or what? (The chat at the bugzilla link seems to indicate that blocking third-party cookies is an unsolvable problem,

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

A Williams wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups distribution list. Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as I had intended :( Robert Kaiser Hmmm, could that not be considered a bug? I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Robert Kaiser wrote: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

David E. Ross wrote: On 10/10/2009 9:41 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. Full news

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

With patience akin to a cat's, Robert Kaiser, on 10/10/2009 9:41 AM typed: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. Full

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1

On 10/15/2009 10:43 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > A Williams wrote: >> Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote: Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups distribution list. >>> Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as >>> I had inten

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

Webdude wrote: I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? You need to use a nightly from tomorrow or later, those work in RC1 and later. Robert Kaiser ___ support

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Webdude wrote: > I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to > install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? I guess you mean Lightning and I too have tried to install the newest nightly in RC1 without success. --

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

On 10/15/2009 04:48 PM, Jim S wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Webdude wrote: > >> I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to >> install it to RC1, it breaks everything. Any ideas? > > I guess you mean Lightning and I too h

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:15:06 -0700, NoOp wrote: > On 10/15/2009 04:48 PM, Jim S wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Webdude wrote: >> >>> I had lighting running in Seamonkey 2.0 Beta, however when I try to >>> install it to RC1, it breaks everythi

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

Jim S wrote: Just done that. It installs, but still says incompatible with SM2 Yes, that's known. Please use a nightly from today (will come up soon) or later. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org htt

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

p.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/linux-xpi/> lightning.xpi 16-Oct-2009 05:24 1.1M Works in both (linux) 2.0pre (current nightly) and 2.0 (rc1). I reset 'extensions.checkCompatibility' to 'true' on both before tesing. Th

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

up soon) >> or later. >> >> Robert Kaiser > > <http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/linux-xpi/> > lightning.xpi 16-Oct-2009 05:24 1.1M > > Works in both (linux) 2.0pre (current nightly) and 2

Alarming message in SM 2.0 beta

Hi, I'm currently running SM2.0 beta (rolled back from SM2.0 RC1 due to many problems). While downloading a file, a message just popped up saying an Add-on was causing problems and was blocked, it points to this article https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Thing is, I've nev

SM 2.0 b2 Enter Master Password

SM 2.0 requires me to enter the Master Password each time SM mail or browser is started. Isn't it possible to save and remember this Master Password on SM? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:25:24 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Jim S wrote: >> Just done that. >> It installs, but still says incompatible with SM2 > > Yes, that's known. Please use a nightly from today (will come up soon) > or later. > > Robert Kaiser I have it installed, but I can only see the r

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

Jim S wrote: On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:25:24 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: Jim S wrote: Just done that. It installs, but still says incompatible with SM2 Yes, that's known. Please use a nightly from today (will come up soon) or later. Robert Kaiser I have it installed, but I can only see the r

Re: Lighting in Seamonkey 2.0 RC1

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:07:59 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Jim S wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:25:24 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: >> >>> Jim S wrote: Just done that. It installs, but still says incompatible with SM2 >>> >>> Yes, that's known. Please use a nightly from today (will come

Is gloda enabled in SM 2.0?

Sorry if this info is self-evident but I looked in 2.0 RC's release notes, and elsewhere, and came up dry. Is the gloda search engine a part of Seamonkey 2.0? tia, -Craig ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 Folder Won't Open

Tom Pamin wrote: When I try to open the new Seamonkey folder under Program Files, I get a Windows error (Windows Explorer has encountered a problem...)and have to close the folder. How do I fix this? The file referred to in the error is mshtml.dll. _

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 Folder Won't Open

Tom Pamin schrieb: > Tom Pamin wrote: >> When I try to open the new Seamonkey folder under Program Files, I get >> a Windows error (Windows Explorer has encountered a problem...)and >> have to close the folder. How do I fix this? > > The file referred to in the error is mshtml.dll. Do you have s

Where is Form Manager in 2.0?

How do you access the new Form Manager in 2.0? I can't find it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 Folder Won't Open

. Do you have similar errors when using the windows help? have you installed SM2 to a completely new directory? regards Martin I reinstalled 2.0 and now the folder opens ok. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https

Thanks to the team of 2.0

Just would like to thank everyone related to the latest version of Sea Monkey. It took care of all of my "so called" problems such as slowness and not being able to set it to default and installed easily the only thing I have to do is delete to old 1.1.17 and it files. It seems everything that

Does Form Manager in 2.0 Work?

Can anyone get the new version of Form Manager to work? I can't see how to use it, and so far it doesn't do anything. Very disappointing. I may have to stay with 1.18 now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https

SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

First and in general - I like it. But... ...have observed the following in about a hour of using SM 2.0 under OS 10.6.1 on a 3.06 GHz MacBook Pro with 4 Gig RAM: 1) SeaMonkey asks for the Master Password at startup even though I have the Preference set to only ask at the first time it is

Re: SM 2.0 mail bookmarks question

On 10/28/2009 5:49 AM cmcadams wrote: Can anyone tell me if SM2 does a *physical* bookmarks sort (as 1.1.18 does). SM 2.0's bookmarks management back-end is still the same (with some annoying bugs fixed, that is). SM 2.1 (*not* 2.0.1) will probably use the same as FF. HTH Jens --

Re: [RESOLVED] Re: SM1.1.18 to 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 10/29/2009 02:42 PM, BeeNeR wrote: /snip/ So this thread can be tagged with [RESOLVED] then eh? Its your thread, go for it! Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinf

[SM 2.0] Re: Migrating a Profile

uot;myprofile" I created previously. The migration > wizard ran and now I have a legitimate myprofile profile -- I hope. > > Serially -- has this stuff really been tested?? Perhaps you were absent for the "SeaMonkey 2.0 RC1 pre-testing - help wanted!" announcement &am

Mail Down Loading in SM 2.0...

Hello all, I have a serious problem, now, with SM 2.0 on my XP machines. Mail is being downloaded up to four (4) times on these systems. I Am using SM 2.0, which was just down loaded, MS XP Pro sp2. What is going on here? Did not have this issue with SM 1.1.18. Losing space on hd every three

Re: Form Manager Replacemenmt for 2.0?

Tom Pamin wrote: Has anyone found a good replacement to use with 2.0 for the now missing Form Manager from 1.18? Does Roboform work with 2.0? Is it similar to Form Manager? I sure hope developers rethink the removal of Form Manager from 1.18, and add it back to 2.0 Given my experience with

Re: Seamonky 2.0 E-Mail problem

u...@domain.invalid wrote: I installed 2.0 and now I cant send email. I get this message. "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.west.cox.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen t

Re: Seamonky 2.0 E-Mail problem

Lou wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: I installed 2.0 and now I cant send email. I get this message. "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.west.cox.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen t

Re: Form Manager Replacemenmt for 2.0?

Tom Pamin wrote: Has anyone found a good replacement to use with 2.0 for the now missing Form Manager from 1.18? Does Roboform work with 2.0? Is it similar to Form Manager? I sure hope developers rethink the removal of Form Manager from 1.18, and add it back to 2.0 Roboform don't work o

Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

Hi, I know you guys are very windows centric, but I am having font rendering issues with seamonkey 2.0 in Debian Linux. It is indeed like firefox, which also has poor font rendering in Debian, despite tweaking appearance. I know there are branding issues issues with Debian which is dumb

Re: SM 2.0 configuration parameter - browser.cache.check_doc_frequency

User schrieb: > Could someone tell me what exactly the function of the SM 2.0 > configuration parameter called: > > browser.cache.check_doc_frequency > > is for and how its value may impact performance? The parameter appears > to suggest how frequently the browser would c

Re: SM 2.0 configuration parameter - browser.cache.check_doc_frequency

Martin Freitag wrote: User schrieb: Could someone tell me what exactly the function of the SM 2.0 configuration parameter called: browser.cache.check_doc_frequency is for and how its value may impact performance? The parameter appears to suggest how frequently the browser would check its

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... No, it doesn't encrypt by default,

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Jens Hatlak wrote: Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... No, it doesn't encry

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Jens Hatlak schrieb: Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... No, it doesn't encry

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

KaiRo - Robert Kaiser wrote: Keith Whaley schrieb: I have a feeling I might want to know a litle more detail about that last sentence. Would you kindly elaborate on "...we always encrypt, but default generate a key from an empty master password."? Not on personal mail, if you want a reply, ple

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Robert Kaiser wrote: Jens Hatlak schrieb: Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... No, it

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Rufus wrote: http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128 bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need to give it the Master to show passwords in the Manager

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

n overview. Still, what I don't have is a deep view into those things, others are better there. In any case, we're using the exact same password manager in SeaMonkey 2.0 as in Firefox 3.5, and it always goes through the encryption mechanism when storing passwords (and eventually migrat

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128 bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need to give it the Master to show

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Jens Hatlak schrieb: Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Jens Hatlak schrieb: Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength

Re: Sea Monkey 2.0 spoofing - Again

genecomcast schrieb: > > I am still not getting the "File, Open." toolbox tabs when I download and > run Sea Monkey 2.0. However, 1.1.18 has been running fine. I have tried the > following without any success.. What toolbox tabs are you talking about? > Sea M

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Rufus wrote: ...and is it true that SM uses strong encryption? As I said, I'm no expert on that and so I can't tell. The only thing I actually can tell you is that we're using the same code as Firefox 3.5, so if that one does strong encryption there, we do it. If it doesn't, we don't. I'm no

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Rufus schrieb: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Rufus wrote: >>> http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html >>> >>> >>> Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128 >>> bit encrypti

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128 bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

CarolinaBill wrote: I am using Windows XP Pro in each computer, and the only variation I can think of is that I have my profiles in a non-standard location on a different hard drive. However, I would think that if SeaMonkey could not find my old profile, it would at least provide me with a defau

Mail issues with version 2.0 installation

installation to follow the usual procedure of deleting the prior working version and overriding the desktop icons, as in prior upgrades. It did not do so, thereby causing a conflict with incoming mails which arrived in version 2.0 on the first session right after installation, then yo version

SM 2.0: Threaded message display order

I've set all my views in mail/news to show only unread messages. Today I also turned on threaded view. I found that a reply to a post I had made earlier showed up as the parent, while my original post appeared below it as a child post- instead of vice versa as one would expect. In unthreaded

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

I am having a similar problem. Last night I installed Seamonkey 2.0 over top of 1.1.18. The installation went well and at the end it opened 2.0 and I used it for a while. This morning I booted up my computer and opened Seamonkey only to find that it is still 1.1.18! Add/Remove programs shows 2.0

still can't download 2.0 on Mac

Left a copy of message below so you know the history. First, removed all cookies. Can't find anything about how to remove history. Second: Removed all cookies. Tried to download again without luck. Get this message: Following disk images failed to mount: SeaMonkey 2.0 dr because corrupt

cookies not accepted in 2.0 SM

I'm guessing that you've tried going to Tools, Cookie Manager and choosing "Use default cookie permissions"? James . . Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:31:22 -0600 From: jack To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: cookies not accepted in 2.0 SM Message-ID:<4jkdnb

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

On Nov 2, 7:46 pm, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > CarolinaBill wrote: > > I am using Windows XP Pro in each computer, and the only > > variation I can think of is that I have my profiles in a non-standard > > location on a different hard drive. However, I would think that if > > SeaMonkey could not fin

cookies not accepted in 2.0 SM

I have a problem where sites that you have to sign into like yahoo mail and others say that to turn on cookies then try again. I have it set up to accept all even 3rd party and it still does not work. has not worked for me in previous versions either. anyone have a clue or work around? thanks __

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

Stephanie : schrieb: > I am having a similar problem. Last night I installed Seamonkey 2.0 > over top of 1.1.18. The installation went well and at the end it > opened 2.0 and I used it for a while. > > This morning I booted up my computer and opened Seamonkey only to find >

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

version out. On Nov 4, 2:02 am, Martin Freitag wrote: > Stephanie : schrieb: > > > I am having a similar problem. Last night I installed Seamonkey 2.0 > > over top of 1.1.18. The installation went well and at the end it > > opened 2.0 and I used it for a while. > >

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

f anything Seamonkey is running. If so shut it down; you may need to reboot. If it still doesn't work try booting into safe mode and launch 2.0. Luck, James . . Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:24:12 -0800 (PST) From: "Stephanie :" To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Fai

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

nt on MultiZilla ever releasing a version for SM 2.0... I suggest you create groupmarks for all your sessions, install SM 2.0 (which will pick up your bookmarks and thus groupmarks), install the Session Manager extension (see below) and set up sessions for your groupmarks. <https://addons.moz

Re: Failure to install SeaMonkey 2.0

Jens Hatlak schrieb: > I suggest you create groupmarks for all your sessions, install SM 2.0 > (which will pick up your bookmarks and thus groupmarks), install the > Session Manager extension (see below) and set up sessions for your > groupmarks. > > <https://addons.mozill

Re: SM 2.0 personal toolbar strangeness...

Andrew Paxton wrote: Hi, Apologies if this has already been discussed & I've missed it - just joined this list and there is a lot of stuff.. Just upgraded to Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 on both my home &

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

Sarah Austin wrote : > I just downloaded & installed Seamonkey 2.0 and my current profile > from 1.8.1.1 ( I think was the latest I had installed ) is missing, > doesnt even show up as an option I can switch to anymore. How can I > get that back, please? > > Co

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

as the Mozilla directory in application data. Then I reinstalled 1.1.18, after it installed I opened it to create a profile then I deleted the files in the new profile it created and copied over the files from the temp directory and it loaded in perfectly. Then I reinstalled 2.0 and this time th

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

2.0 is a suite it's all or nothing but I suppose you don't have to use the email but there is no seperate browser that you could download. During the install there is an option to pick the defaults for browser, email and newsreader try just unchecking the email and newsreader and

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

Sarah Austin wrote: Sarah Austin wrote : I just downloaded& installed Seamonkey 2.0 and my current profile from 1.8.1.1 ( I think was the latest I had installed ) is missing, doesnt even show up as an option I can switch to anymore. How can I get that back, please? Correction, I

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. I hope they fix this in future versions. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

Sarah Austin wrote: I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. I hope they fix this in future versions. Fix what??? Lee gave you a solution so you could fix it yourself!! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

Sarah Austin wrote: I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. I hope they fix this in future versions. No, it isn't going to get "fixed". The big problem here is that you seem to have jumped into this without understanding just how big a jump this is. I

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

Leonidas Jones wrote: Sarah Austin wrote: I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. I hope they fix this in future versions. No, it isn't going to get "fixed". The big problem here is that you seem to have jumped into this without understanding just how

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

William Morrison wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Sarah Austin wrote: I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. I hope they fix this in future versions. No, it isn't going to get "fixed". The big problem here is that you seem to have jumped into this withou

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

) and the newsgroup (mozilla.support.seamonkey) I'm guessing that the problem is that I'm reading these as email and not in the newsgroup. Again Sorry Leonidas Jones wrote: William Morrison wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Sarah Austin wrote: I just took the simple route and delet

Re: SM 2.0. Archives and newsgroups

John Doue wrote: It looks like that whatever settings are chosen for Newsgroup, a copy of a sent post is stored as Archives in a folder chosen by the user. Is this correct, or am I misunderstand the meaning of Archives? The new Archive feature is a purely manual one. If you choose Archive from

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

Leonidas Jones wrote : > Sarah Austin wrote: >> I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. >> >> I hope they fix this in future versions. >> > > No, it isn't going to get "fixed". > > The big problem here is that you

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 lost my profile

William Morrison wrote : > Leonidas Jones wrote: >> Sarah Austin wrote: >>> I just took the simple route and deleted 2.0 and kept 1.1.18. >>> >>> I hope they fix this in future versions. >>> >> >> No, it isn't going to get "fixe

Re: SM 2.0. Archives and newsgroups

Jens Hatlak wrote: John Doue wrote: It looks like that whatever settings are chosen for Newsgroup, a copy of a sent post is stored as Archives in a folder chosen by the user. Is this correct, or am I misunderstand the meaning of Archives? The new Archive feature is a purely manual one. If you

Re: Can't Remember Passwords in 2.0

Howdy25 wrote: I'm new to News Groups but very old to PC's, networks, programing, etc. so a quick question. For those sites that won't allow the Remember drop down to remember name and password entry's, is there any way to force an entry of the url and pw in Sea Monkey 2

SM 2.0 and full email folder

Hello all, I Am running SM 2.0 and every time I dl mail, there is one folder which is skipped with the following message: "The folder is full, and can't hold any more messages. T make room for more messages, delete any old or unwanted mail and compact the folder" This

SM 2.0: Location bar autocomplete oddities

Hi, I don't know if this is a bug but it's at least confusing. In the privacy & security settings I have configured SeaMonkey to "always clear my private data when I close SeaMonkey". Now, if I enable "erase browsing history" and disable "erase location bar history" and then close and restart

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528192> Hi, please excuse me for my test posting. After I upgraded to 2.0 I was no longer able to post in the newsgroups, after I deleted my "news.mozilla.org" account and recreated it, everything works

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

On 11/14/2009 10:26 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528192> Hi, please excuse me for my test posting. After I upgraded to 2.0 I was no longer able to post in the newsgroups, after I deleted my "news.mozilla.o

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: See Comment I just added to your bug. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528192> Hi, please excuse me for my test posting. After I upgraded to 2.0 I was no longer able to post in the newsgroups, after I deleted my "news.mozilla.org" account and recreate

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528192> Hi, please excuse me for my test posting. After I upgraded to 2.0 I was no longer able to post in the newsgroups, after I deleted my "news.mozilla.org" account and recreate

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

do "Copy Image" and paste it in paint by instance, it works. Here is the link for reference.: http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg Is there a way to fix it or it's a bug in SM 2.0? When I right mouse click on the image you posted the link to, I get

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

I do "Copy Image" and paste it in paint by instance, it works. Here is the link for reference.: http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg Is there a way to fix it or it's a bug in SM 2.0? When I right mouse click on the image you posted the lin

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

image's name, (file name) SM show "url.html" and "Save as Type": SeaMonkey > >> Document. But if I do "Copy Image" and > >> paste it in paint by instance, it works. > > >> Here is the link for reference.: > > >>http://www.ol

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

Monkey Document. But if I do "Copy Image" and paste it in paint by instance, it works. Here is the link for reference.: http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg Is there a way to fix it or it's a bug in SM 2.0? When I right mouse click on the im

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

Phillip Jones schrieb: I experienced the same thing on my Mac. I end up in this position after I manually removing the _msf_ files to newsgroups to clean up some strange problems (Massages being marked as read before I could get to read them and so on.). Its a bug once this is set it should not

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >