Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread chicagofan
Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I experienced the same thing on my Mac. I end up in this position after I manually removing the _msf_ files to newsgroups to clean up some strange problems (Massages being marked as read before I could get to read them and so on.). Its a bug once t

Re: SM 2.0 Install Mistake, possibly??

2009-11-15 Thread Smiles
Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I just installed SM 2.0 on my vista machine and mistakenly clicked on do not import or transfer info from 1.1.18 and deleted from my registry 1.1.18 SM 1.1.18... Is there any way to go back and get the files from 1.1.18 into 2.0 or are they in the abyss

Re: SM 2.0 Install Mistake, possibly??

2009-11-15 Thread Jens Hatlak
Smiles wrote: you should be able to migrate using seamonkey -migrate from run command To the OP: Make that -migration. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread Jens Hatlak
Brian D. Symmes: Rainer Bielefeld wrote: please excuse me for my test posting. After I upgraded to 2.0 I was no longer able to post in the newsgroups Check that your default outgoing SMTP server matches the email address you are using to post with. Posting to a news server doesn't use

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I experienced the same thing on my Mac. I end up in this position after I manually removing the _msf_ files to newsgroups to clean up some strange problems (Massages being marked as read before I could get to read them and so on.). Its a bug once t

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread Phillip Jones
Jens Hatlak wrote: Brian D. Symmes: Rainer Bielefeld wrote: please excuse me for my test posting. After I upgraded to 2.0 I was no longer able to post in the newsgroups Check that your default outgoing SMTP server matches the email address you are using to post with. Posting to a news

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread Phillip Jones
e": SeaMonkey Document. But if I do "Copy Image" and paste it in paint by instance, it works. Here is the link for reference.: http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg Is there a way to fix it or it's a bug in SM 2.0? When I right mouse cl

Re: SM 2.0 Install Mistake, possibly??

2009-11-15 Thread Samuel S
Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I just installed SM 2.0 on my vista machine and mistakenly clicked on do not import or transfer info from 1.1.18 and deleted from my registry 1.1.18 SM 1.1.18... Is there any way to go back and get the files from 1.1.18 into 2.0 or are they in the abyss??? Thank you

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread JD
and "Save as Type": SeaMonkey Document. But if I do "Copy Image" and paste it in paint by instance, it works. Here is the link for reference.: http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg Is there a way to fix it or it's a bug in SM 2.0? Wh

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread erwincas
Image" and > >>>>> paste it in paint by instance, it works. > > >>>>> Here is the link for reference.: > > >>>>>http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg > > >>>>> Is there a way to f

Re: Save image As ... SM 2.0

2009-11-15 Thread JD
7;s name, (file name) SM show "url.html" and "Save as Type": SeaMonkey Document. But if I do "Copy Image" and paste it in paint by instance, it works. Here is the link for reference.: http://www.olcsobbat.hu/static/product_images/400x400/10002/1002351.jpg Is ther

Re: newsgrops problem with seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-16 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Rainer Bielefeld wrote: I now finished that problem finally by deleting and recreating my news accounts, all other recommended fixes did not work for me. Thank you and best regards Rainer ___ s

Re: Classic look for Seamonkey 2.0?

2009-11-16 Thread taz043
same exact look. Thankyou, Rudra I also vote for the return of the 1.18 classic theme. The new classic theme in 2.0 reminds me too much of firefox... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.or

Re: Classic look for Seamonkey 2.0?

2009-11-16 Thread chicagofan
on to keep the same exact look. Thankyou, Rudra I also vote for the return of the 1.18 classic theme. The new classic theme in 2.0 reminds me too much of firefox... I never used 1.1.8, but the classic SM theme I had in 1.1.4 is no different, except for the smaller, slightly different icons o

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-16 Thread Drew C.
they were! Agreed. I've tried 2.0 and have found it generally an improvement over 1.x, but I don't like the new download progress dialog. Specifically, I miss 1.x's large buttons and, more critically, the ability to easily copy the local path of a download (bug 474640) so I c

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-16 Thread NoOp
hootin' darts to hit those "buttons"...put 'em back the way >> they were! >> > > Agreed. I've tried 2.0 and have found it generally an improvement over 1.x, > but I don't like the new download progress dialog. Specifically, I miss > 1.x'

Re: Classic look for Seamonkey 2.0?

2009-11-17 Thread Gerald Ross
Acharya Swami Rudra Kali Das wrote: Hi, Thankyou for your replies. Yes , I did already have the default theme , which is the closest to 1.18 and Netscape 7.2., but still a little different. Is there any chance a "Classic Theme" could be added which would give the option to keep the same exact l

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-17 Thread Benoit Renard
NoOp wrote: Regarding the size of the buttons; very much agree. There was a dission over on the mozilla.support.seamonkey group prior to the release of SM 2.0. Maybe they'll be adjusted in 2.0.x. Unfortunately, such things don't get changed in mino

Re: Classic look for Seamonkey 2.0?

2009-11-17 Thread Benoit Renard
Acharya Swami Rudra Kali Das wrote: Is there any chance a "Classic Theme" could be added which would give the option to keep the same exact look. You can get a port of the Classic theme on addons.mozilla.org (AMO). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list s

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-17 Thread NoOp
On 11/16/2009 07:11 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 11/16/2009 06:06 PM, Drew C. wrote: ... >> Agreed. I've tried 2.0 and have found it generally an improvement over 1.x, >> but I don't like the new download progress dialog. Specifically, I miss >> 1.x's large buttons

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-17 Thread Rufus
Benoit Renard wrote: NoOp wrote: Regarding the size of the buttons; very much agree. There was a dission over on the mozilla.support.seamonkey group prior to the release of SM 2.0. Maybe they'll be adjusted in 2.0.x. Unfortunately, such things don't get changed in minor releases.

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-17 Thread Drew C.
On Tuesday, November 17, 2009, at 1:29 p.m., NoOp wrote: On 11/16/2009 07:11 PM, NoOp wrote: You can copy the path of the download from the download progress dialog *and* the download manager - just right-click the link being downloaded and select 'Copy Download Link'. Forgot to add: from the

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-17 Thread NoOp
by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this "feature" really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving a file:

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-18 Thread Benoit Renard
paying attention and it goes astray. Is this "feature" really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving a file: Save files to... or keep the

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-18 Thread NoOp
go to only one folder >> & can find the file by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes >> astray. >> >> Is this "feature" really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to >> 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a '

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-18 Thread Drew C.
On Wednesday, November 18, 2009, at 9:50 p.m., NoOp wrote: But let's get real here; if the "feature" is no longer available in 2.0, is that something that one would reasonably say is a blocker for them to go from 1.1.18 to 2.0? You're right, this isn't a catastrophic

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-19 Thread Daniel
a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this "feature" really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving a file: Save fil

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-19 Thread Phillip Jones
he file by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this "feature" really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-19 Thread Benoit Renard
lder & can find the file by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this "feature" really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-19 Thread Benoit Renard
Daniel wrote: Talk about "Bloat"!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all. The browser and composer always had to

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel
Benoit Renard wrote: Daniel wrote: Talk about "Bloat"!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all. The browser and

Update on problems with SeaMonkey 2.0

2009-11-21 Thread Campy
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the upgrade to Windows 7. The problem: 1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not connect or something similar. These are sites such as

SM 2.0 Copy Function Not Working

2009-11-21 Thread John Galt
Windows XP SP3 Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 1. I can copy from a web page in Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 and paste it anywhere including into the Sea Monkey Composer. 2. I cannot copy anything from a Sea Monkey 2.0 web page anywhere. The information never gets posted to the Clipboard. I even tried saving a web

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-23 Thread Martin Freitag
Steve B. schrieb: Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox but it would not install in SM 2.0 It used to be possible to open a page in Composer (SM can send a page to composer via the

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-23 Thread David E. Ross
On 11/23/2009 11:17 AM, Steve B. wrote: > Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey > 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox > but it would not install in SM 2.0 > > Steve Why not use the W3C validator at <

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-23 Thread Steve B.
Martin Freitag wrote: Steve B. schrieb: Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox but it would not install in SM 2.0 It used to be possible to open a page in Composer (SM can send a pa

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-23 Thread Steve B.
David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator at? The Seamonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-sea

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-23 Thread Frosted Flake
Steve B. wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator at? The Seamonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve Disable Compatibility Checking in the Addon manager and then install it -

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-24 Thread Martin Freitag
Steve B. schrieb: Martin Freitag wrote: If this is not enough for you, there's Html Validator: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/seamonkey/addon/249 That's the one I tried, and it generates this message: Html Validator 0.8.5.8 could not be installed because it is not compatible with Sea

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-24 Thread David Wilkinson
Set it to "false" Try to install the extension again. Alternatively you can also download the extension, rename the xpi to zip, unzip it, change the SM-max-version to 2.0 in the file install.rdf, zip it again, rename it back to xpi and install it. regards Oh, the joy of using SeaMon

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-24 Thread Phillip Jones
Steve B. wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator at? The SeaMonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve Don't have this for Mac OSX -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-24 Thread Leonidas Jones
David Wilkinson wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: /snip/ But thanks for the tip. I cannot live without HTML Validator. For me a web site whose web pages pass validation is a strong quality indicator. Would you buy software from a company that cannot even write a valid web page? (Unfortunately you

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-24 Thread Leonidas Jones
Phillip Jones wrote: Steve B. wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator at? The SeaMonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve Don't have this for Mac OSX See my recent post in

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

2009-11-24 Thread Bill Davidsen
it is not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.0 This is because the author hasn't updated the compatibility after SM2.0a3 came out. The Easiest way to get around that is to disable the compatibility-check in SM: Type "about:config" in your address-bar Filter for "extensions.checkCompatibi

Re: Importing passwords to SM 2.0

2010-09-20 Thread Jens Hatlak
Bill Spikowski wrote: Are instructions posted anywhere on how to import passwords from Seamonkey 1.18 on an old PC (Win XP) to Seamonkey 2.0 on a new PC (Win 7) with an entirely new profile? <http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1978391> describes two possible app

Re: Importing passwords to SM 2.0

2010-09-20 Thread Bill Spikowski
Jens Hatlak wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: Are instructions posted anywhere on how to import passwords from Seamonkey 1.18 on an old PC (Win XP) to Seamonkey 2.0 on a new PC (Win 7) with an entirely new profile? <http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1978391> describes tw

Re: Adding search to SeaMonkey 2.0

2010-11-28 Thread Jens Hatlak
imprecise then. You need a browser that supports OpenSearch. SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't, SeaMonkey 2.1 will. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak <http://jens.hatlak.de/> SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker <http://smtt.blogspot.com/> ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Adding search to SeaMonkey 2.0

2010-11-29 Thread Edward
probably a bit imprecise then. You need a browser that supports OpenSearch. SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't, SeaMonkey 2.1 will. HTH Jens Yes it does, thank you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozill

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

2011-02-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Stéphane Grégoire schrieb: I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks. How fixing it? Make a backup of your profile (which you should always do anyhow), and esp. your places.s

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

2011-02-21 Thread Yamo'
Hi, Le 18/02/2011 13:35, Robert Kaiser a écrit: > If it already happened, you should be able to get back your bookmarks at > least by going into the bookmarks manager and restore older bookmarks > from the Tools menu. Or you can try renaming the places.sqlite-corrupt > (or similar) file back to

Certificates disappeared from Seamonkey 2.0.x

2011-05-11 Thread user
Mac OS X 10.6.7 Seamonkey 2.0.14, problem first noticed under 2.0.13 My personal certificates and the CA certificates which authenticate them have disappeared from Seamonkey. This used to all work prior to 2.0.13 but not neither my personal certificates nor the CA Authority ceriticates shows up i

Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-06 Thread Don
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for t

Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Don
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-11-29 Thread Daniel
Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote: 5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again, this is only true when using the default theme. If you select/highlight a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-11-29 Thread Phillip Jones
Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote: 5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again, this is only true when using the default theme. If you sel

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-11-29 Thread Rufus
Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote: 5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again, this is only true when using the default theme. If you sel

Re: I'm pretty happy with SeaMonkey 2.0

2009-12-04 Thread Laurie
Rob Steinmetz wrote: I though I'd pass along my compliments. I use Seamonkey to manage mu email and Newsgroups. I have 10 email accounts 3 news servers and more than 50 email filters on my primary account. I spend much of my day working in Seamonkey. I had not done extensive testing of pre-rele

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-12-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote: 5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again, this is only true when using the default theme. If you sel

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-12-07 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bill Davidsen wrote: Like many people who don't quite understand the NNTP protocol and equate it to mail or web or mailing list or something they thought up, you are confusing DELETE (move to trash or just erase) with CANCEL (send NNTP CANCEL message, attempt to remove this from every server e

can SM 2.0 and 1.1.18 co exist?

2009-12-08 Thread hawker
I would like to upgrade to 2.0 and start trying it but there is at least one extension that does not work in 2.0 that is a near show stopper for me. That said I am also having issues in 1.1.18 that I hear were corrected in 2.0. Can I install SM in a different directory and use Mozbackup or

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-12-08 Thread Bill Davidsen
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Like many people who don't quite understand the NNTP protocol and equate it to mail or web or mailing list or something they thought up, you are confusing DELETE (move to trash or just erase) with CANCEL (send NNTP CANCEL message, attempt to remov

Re: SM 2.0 Won't Display .htm file

2009-12-08 Thread David E. Ross
ight have been programmed to guess what your page meant and displayed it in a form you found acceptable. The current version of Gecko may have been programmed to guess differently. I have confirmed that SeaMonkey 2.0 will indeed load and properly display a file with the .htm extension. That is, i

Re: SM 2.0 Won't Display .htm file

2009-12-09 Thread Arnie Goetchius
Sqwertz wrote: http://sqwertzme.googlepages.com/JunThai.htm It says it's a Seamonkey document and asks if I want to use the default application to open it. It then downloads it into the SM temp directory and displays it there. Did Google do something to way the page is served (I know Googlepag

Re: SM 2.0 Won't Display .htm file

2009-12-09 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/9/2009 5:34 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > Sqwertz wrote: >> http://sqwertzme.googlepages.com/JunThai.htm >> >> It says it's a Seamonkey document and asks if I want to use the >> default application to open it. It then downloads it into the SM >> temp directory and displays it there. >> >> Did

Re: SM 2.0 Won't Display .htm file

2009-12-09 Thread Arnie Goetchius
David E. Ross wrote: On 12/9/2009 5:34 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: Sqwertz wrote: http://sqwertzme.googlepages.com/JunThai.htm It says it's a Seamonkey document and asks if I want to use the default application to open it. It then downloads it into the SM temp directory and displays it there.

Re: Does Form Manager in 2.0 Work?

2009-12-09 Thread Arsbajt Tosov
> How does one correct mistakes. In the other you could go in and correct. > Now there appears no way to correct things. Not only that, but the new form manager saves information that I DON'T WANT it to save, like CREDIT CARD NUMBERS. There is no way now to remove that information without deleting

Re: Does Form Manager in 2.0 Work?

2009-12-09 Thread me2
restore form manger On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:58:48 -0800 (PST), Arsbajt Tosov wrote: >> How does one correct mistakes. In the other you could go in and correct. >> Now there appears no way to correct things. > >Not only that, but the new form manager saves information that I DON'T >WANT it to

Re: Making SM 2.0 default email client

2009-12-11 Thread Sqwertz
Sqwertz wrote: I rarely send email from applications, but Adobe Professional and it's Print to PDF Driver insist on using the Windows Default, which is technically Outlook, according to the Internet Options Control Applet. How do you force Adobe and other apps to use SM? I switched the default

Re: Getting passwords from 1.1.18 to 2.0?

2009-12-18 Thread Martin Freitag
Devil's Advocate schrieb: Ok, I'm finally trying to setup and use SM 2.0. It seems decent but it didn't import my passwords from 1.1.18. How can I do that? It should have asked you to migrate your profile on the first start. You can start migration manually, too: <http://

Re: Can't send email in Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-21 Thread chicagofan
marstokyo wrote: I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But now, when I try to send an email I get this message: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.earthlink.net. It does not support authentication

Re: Can't send email in Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-21 Thread Phillip Jones
marstokyo wrote: I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But now, when I try to send an email I get this message: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.earthlink.net. It does not support authentication

Re: Can't send email in Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-21 Thread rolfp
On Dec 21, 12:54 pm, marstokyo wrote: > I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But > now, when I try to send an email I get this message: > Sending of message failed. > An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server > smtp.earthli

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2009-12-31 Thread Phillip Jones
Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? Thanks, Tom Click on the menubar and hold, a menu should pop up choose customize. when menu opens drag the printer icon to desired location men

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2009-12-31 Thread Mark Hansen
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: > Tom wrote: >> I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version >> 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? >> >> Thanks, Tom > > Click on the menubar and hold, a menu should pop up choose customize. > wh

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2009-12-31 Thread Jay Garcia
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? Thanks, Tom Click on the

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2009-12-31 Thread Phillip Jones
Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? Tha

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2009-12-31 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking o

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-01 Thread Jay Garcia
On 31.12.2009 20:55, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the o

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-01 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? Thanks, Tom In addition to the other responses, I would note that almost every Windows program will respond to CTRL-P, even those that preten

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-01 Thread Phillip Jones
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? Thanks, Tom In addition to the other responses, I would note that almost every Windows program will respond to CTRL-P

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-04 Thread Tom
Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PRINT? Thanks, T

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-04 Thread Phillip Jones
Tom wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: --- Original Message --- On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version 2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE-->PR

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-04 Thread Leonidas Jones
Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: /snip/ I always consider the Menu bar that contains the major task (File Edit View Option Tools window and help and other at the Main level) the Main menu bar. whereas other items such as send address at

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-04 Thread Phillip Jones
Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: /snip/ I always consider the Menu bar that contains the major task (File Edit View Option Tools window and help and other at the Main level) the Main menu bar. whereas other items

Re: No MAIL Print button in 2.0?

2010-01-04 Thread Leonidas Jones
Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Tom wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote: /snip/ I always consider the Menu bar that contains the major task (File Edit View Option Tools window and help and other at the Main level) the Main menu bar

external editor for mail in seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-12 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hello I know that the there is an app for thunderbird (vs 2 or 3) which allows you to use an external editor. Unfortunately this app does not work for seamonkey. - how different is the code between the mail application for Seamonkey and Thunderbird? - does anybody know about a

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-15 Thread dominique
Jeffrey Needle wrote, On 2/16/2010 8:44 AM: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. mozilla.support.calendar is the place (same news server) Dom ___ suppor

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-16 Thread Cecil Bankston
Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows) nightly build from this

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-16 Thread Jeffrey Needle
dominique wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote, On 2/16/2010 8:44 AM: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. mozilla.support.calendar is the place (same news server) Dom Thanks! ___

Re: 1.1.18 => 2.0.x migrate ignores chatzilla?

2010-02-19 Thread Jens Hatlak
Bill Davidsen wrote: > Why do I get an empty chatzilla after migrate? No preference, no > scripts, empty virgin CZ like I downloaded it from the website. > > It's bad enough that users have to migrate every profile totally > manually if they have more than one, but the CZ didn't migrate it looks >

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-19 Thread Bill Davidsen
Cecil Bankston wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows) n

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-19 Thread Bill Davidsen
Bill Davidsen wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-19 Thread Bill Davidsen
Bill Davidsen wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working w

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

2010-02-20 Thread Robert Kaiser
lease version would not install in SM 2.x. Just use Lightning 1.0 Beta 1 from addons.mozilla.org as that one works fine with all SeaMonkey 2.0.x versions. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: 1.1.18 => 2.0.x migrate ignores chatzilla?

2010-02-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
Jens Hatlak wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Why do I get an empty chatzilla after migrate? No preference, no scripts, empty virgin CZ like I downloaded it from the website. It's bad enough that users have to migrate every profile totally manually if they have more than one, but the CZ didn't migrat

Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

2010-04-23 Thread art
On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as cmd/C, cmd/X, cmd/V, cmd/shift/C (mark all

Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

2010-04-23 Thread Reed
Art: Thanks! I'd use the 'mute' button but times I have streaming audio as I use SM. Reed art wrote: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS i

Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

2010-04-30 Thread Gabriele
art ha scritto: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as cmd/C, cmd/X, cmd/V, cmd

Re: ROT13 decoding with Seamonkey 2.0.x?

2010-05-02 Thread Stéphane Grégoire
for rot13, and customizing. Now > mnenhy will not install since it is not compatible with 2.x versions of > seamonkey. Now I'm missing my rot13-function. Mnenhy now works with Seamonkey 2.0.* <http://mnenhy.mozdev.org/> Copy and FU2 mozilla.support.seamonkey -- Stéph

IMAP slow on Seamonkey 2.0 alpha 2

2008-12-16 Thread doinkmaster
It seems like the IMAP is very slow especially on a large inbox with hundreds of messages using SSL. Much much slower than version 1. Every time I click on a message it says 'looking for folders' or something similar as if it has to reconnect every time.

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >