Seamonkey starts off OK for sure. Memory usage low, lower than most other
browsers on start-up.
As browsing continues, memory usage grows and grows, getting up to 500,000K,
then higher, up to 750,000K or more. Then, often crashes and freezes.
And this is when only a few tabs are opened. The pro
I'm afraid I don't know the answer to either of your questions. The one
I am using is:
Restart Application Button 53.0
By Baris Derin
Restart Application Button lets you restart your Firefox and SeaMonkey
application by a quick toolbar button click.
This is in my list of extensions and it shoul
Ah. I wonder what command it is using to tell it to automatically
relaunch. Does it work when SM is stuck and automatically tell its
startup's prompt to force exit the stuckage and relaunch? I get those
once in a while with seamonkey.exe process stuck even though I quit SM
earlier.
On 9/17/2
The restart application button closes SeaMonkey and then launches it
again. With the hot key you must start SeaMonkey manually.
Dave
> Ant wrote:
> What is the difference between than regular exit (I use its default
> ctrl-q hotkeys)?
>
> On 9/16/2020 6:02 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
>> I use th
What is the difference between than regular exit (I use its default
ctrl-q hotkeys)?
On 9/16/2020 6:02 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I use the "restart Application Button" add-on here for this.
Dave
Ant wrote:
You can't do a normal quit? Sometimes I can do that if it lets me and
still save my s
I use the "restart Application Button" add-on here for this.
Dave
> Ant wrote:
> You can't do a normal quit? Sometimes I can do that if it lets me and
> still save my sessions.
>
> On 9/16/2020 1:29 AM, Szymon Stryczek wrote:
>> I have exactly the same experience (just on 64-bit Windows).
>> Slo
You can't do a normal quit? Sometimes I can do that if it lets me and
still save my sessions.
On 9/16/2020 1:29 AM, Szymon Stryczek wrote:
I have exactly the same experience (just on 64-bit Windows).
Slowdowns start to happen around Seamonkey reaching 2GB of RAM usage and
they extend for me no
I have exactly the same experience (just on 64-bit Windows).
Slowdowns start to happen around Seamonkey reaching 2GB of RAM usage and
they extend for me not only to tab switching but all, site scrolling,
mail sending etc.
"about:memory" + GC seems to help a little bit but honestly the only
opti
Unfortunately this is my experience, too (on 64-bit linux)
I typically keep 8-10 tabs open, which a t the end of a day
typically means SM2.49.5 uses about 1-1.2 GB RAM.
With SM2.53.3 this balloons to 2.5-3GB - much higher.
There are also perceivable delays to switch between tabs.
I am not compla
On 9/9/20 8:06 PM, 🐴 Mr. Ed 🐴 wrote:
I noticed today while running FaceBook and trying to turn off Messenger
Active Status the screen went slightly blurry, the "X" in upper right corner
turned RED and the pointer became a spinning circle. Everything froze. I was
able to open Task Manager via t
Yes. Same with YouTube, LinkedIn, Gmail, Twitter, etc. :(
On 9/9/2020 5:06 PM, 🐴 Mr. Ed 🐴 wrote:
I noticed today while running FaceBook and trying to turn off Messenger
Active Status the screen went slightly blurry, the "X" in upper right corner
turned RED and the pointer became a spinning cir
I noticed today while running FaceBook and trying to turn off Messenger
Active Status the screen went slightly blurry, the "X" in upper right corner
turned RED and the pointer became a spinning circle. Everything froze. I was
able to open Task Manager via the "Control-Alt-Delete" and checked
Sea
Apples and oranges.
IE is build into Windows and uses internal functions which are not reported by
the memory usage. It also does not support many newer web features which are
unfortunately memory hungrier.
SM 64 bit is around 300 MB from start with a few add-ons. x86 50 to 100 MB less.
Tom P
On 9/12/2018 12:09 PM, Ant wrote:
...
Thus, the content of Web pages -- text, images, scripts, etc -- is the
major factor in sizing.
LinkedIn.com is the worse. Very slow, bloated, and a hogger especially
with multiple tabs. :(
Facebook.com is another one. :(
--
"You're kissing an ant hill."
On 9/12/2018 8:23 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/12/2018 3:13 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Geck
Tom Pamin wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Tom Pamin wrote:
>>> SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
>>> 55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
>>
>> Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
>>
> Just disabled Adblock Pl
On 9/12/2018 3:13 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
> SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
> 55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
>
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.4
28 e
On 9/12/2018 3:45 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
Just disabled Adbl
Richmond wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
Just disabled Adblock Plus. Usage went down to 364,000.
__
GerardJan wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Dear Tom,
I have a ¨top¨ attached so you can see how much /memory/ *seamonkey*
uses at my site.
I have 4Gbyte RAM and uses
Tom Pamin wrote:
> SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
> 55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
Are you using any addons? I found adblock plus was memory greedy.
___
support-seamonkey mailing l
SM 2.49.4 is using 414,000K of memory in Task Manager. IE uses about
55,000. Why the big difference? Can I reduce memory usage for SM?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seam
Thanks for the report. I will check my own setup and see what the cause
might be.
It could be one of my addons not working correctly.
Daniel wrote:
Google Maps works for me, SM 2.8 on Mandriva Linux 2007!
--
# Jesse Molina
# Mail = je...@opendreams.net
# Page = page-je...@opendreams.net
Jesse Molina wrote:
Follow-up on this issue from last month.
I had posted about using Seamonkey on Linux. I use mail and browser and
have a lot of tabs open and I almost never reboot or restart Seamonkey
unless I need to. I was finding that Seamonkey was really dragging with
the amount of load
Jesse Molina wrote:
Follow-up on this issue from last month.
I had posted about using Seamonkey on Linux. I use mail and browser and
have a lot of tabs open and I almost never reboot or restart Seamonkey
unless I need to. I was finding that Seamonkey was really dragging with
the amount of load
Follow-up on this issue from last month.
I had posted about using Seamonkey on Linux. I use mail and browser and
have a lot of tabs open and I almost never reboot or restart Seamonkey
unless I need to. I was finding that Seamonkey was really dragging with
the amount of load I was putting it
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So w
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for
On 02/29/2012 05:13 AM, Daniel wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 02/27/2012 02:28 AM, Daniel wrote:
>> ...
>>>
>>> Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
>>>
>>> Very few problems on either!
>> If you mean:
>> From: Daniel
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2)
>> Gecko/20120216
Daniel wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64
NoOp wrote:
On 02/27/2012 02:28 AM, Daniel wrote:
...
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
Very few problems on either!
If you mean:
From: Daniel
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2)
Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
from your other post. The "WOW64"[1] in your URI tel
Jim Taylor wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows bi
On 02/27/2012 02:28 AM, Daniel wrote:
...
>
> Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
>
> Very few problems on either!
If you mean:
From: Daniel
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2)
Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
from your other post. The "WOW64"[1] in your URI tells me t
Jim Taylor wrote:
I haven't seen a 64 bit windows build since 2.0. That doesn't
mean there hasn't been one, just that I haven't noticed one. The
win64 2.0 is available at http://wiki.mozilla-x86-64.com/Download
Thank you, Jim. If 64-bit development is not tracking 32-bit
from the perspectiv
Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows binary ?
All I see un
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows binary ?
All I see under "Contribute
Daniel wrote:
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!! Very few problems
on either! Check out "Contributed Builds" at bottom of page
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.2
So where do I look for mention of a 64-bit Windows binary ?
All I see under "Contributed builds" is as follow
Jesse Molina wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jesse, the SeaMonkey Council has been releasing an "unsupported" 64bit
SeaMonkey since back in the SM 1.x.x daysI am posting this reply
using SM 64bit on my Mandriva Linux!!
Also have SM 64 bit on my Windows 7 Pro!!
Very few problems on either!
Check out
Oh really... I had no idea.
Do any plugins or addons have any problem with it?
Do you know of any other trouble that I might want to look out for?
Thanks for the tip! I will definitely try it out.
Daniel wrote:
Jesse, the SeaMonkey Council has been releasing an "unsupported" 64bit
SeaMonk
Jesse Molina wrote:
Hi. I am currently on a 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel. I am aware that
Seamonkey is only 32 bit and of the 2GB limitation, and I've seen it max
out at 2GB many times before.
I regret that it may be some time... if ever, that we see Seamonkey go
64bit. So much old code in there.
Jesse Molina wrote:
Hi. I am currently on a 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel. I am aware that
Seamonkey is only 32 bit and of the 2GB limitation, and I've seen it max
out at 2GB many times before.
I regret that it may be some time... if ever, that we see Seamonkey go
64bit. So much old code in there.
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Jesse Molina wrote:
> I have 16GB of RAM, very modern multi-core CPU etc. Seamonkey
> only goes up to 2GB before it maxes out.
Seamonkey is currently a 32-bit application; are you running
a 32-bit or 64-bit O/S, and if the former, are you using PAE,
4GT or AWE ? Only 4G
Hi. I am currently on a 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel. I am aware that
Seamonkey is only 32 bit and of the 2GB limitation, and I've seen it max
out at 2GB many times before.
I regret that it may be some time... if ever, that we see Seamonkey go
64bit. So much old code in there.
Philip TAYLOR
Jesse Molina wrote:
> I have 16GB of RAM, very modern multi-core CPU etc. Seamonkey
> only goes up to 2GB before it maxes out.
Seamonkey is currently a 32-bit application; are you running
a 32-bit or 64-bit O/S, and if the former, are you using PAE,
4GT or AWE ? Only 4GT is likely to be of he
A few more things that I forgot to mention...
I have been using Seamonkey since Netscape came in a box. I probably
should start over with a new profile. I have not needed to do that in a
long time though, so some things in there could be slowing me down and I
do not realize it.
I have 16G
Hi all
I use Seamonkey. Both mail and the browser.
My platform is Linux 32-bit.
I leave my computer running constantly and the only time Seamonkey gets
restarted is when it crashes or when it gets so slow that I just kill it
and restart.
I have a tenancy to run with maybe twenty windows,
46 matches
Mail list logo
