On 1/9/21 9:39 AM, Julia Bolton Holloway wrote:
I can no longer access the line with 'File/Edit/View/ etc. , needed for
accessing 'Edit' from 'File' to get to the composer for web pages, which I
have always used from Netscape through Seamonkey. It's excellent and I hope
not dead.
Julia Bolton
On 09/01/2021 2:39 pm, Julia Bolton Holloway wrote:
I can no longer access the line with 'File/Edit/View/ etc. , needed for
accessing 'Edit' from 'File' to get to the composer for web pages, which I
have always used from Netscape through Seamonkey. It's excellent and I hope
not dead.
Julia
I can no longer access the line with 'File/Edit/View/ etc. , needed for
accessing 'Edit' from 'File' to get to the composer for web pages, which I
have always used from Netscape through Seamonkey. It's excellent and I hope
not dead.
Julia Bolton Holloway, Ph.D.
--
Julia Bolton Holloway,
Can You correct the URL, please.
--
Julia Bolton Holloway, Mediatheca 'Fioretta Mazzei', 'English' Cemetery,
Piazzale Donatello, 38,
I-50132 Firenze, Italy
http://www.umilta.net http://www.florin.ms http://www.ringofgold.eu
http://piazzaledonatello.blogspot.com
Can you correct the URL so we can download the latest version, please.
Julia Holloway
With you from Netscape!
--
Julia Bolton Holloway, Mediatheca 'Fioretta Mazzei', 'English' Cemetery,
Piazzale Donatello, 38,
I-50132 Firenze, Italy
http://www.umilta.net http://www.florin.ms
LXLE users have been commenting positively on the latest version of SM.
Many are glad to see active development continuing. Fast and does what I
want is often said. Great work everyone.
~Ronnie
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 26/05/2013 00:42:
You can use this page:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
Or you can set this pref:
Edit | Preferences | Software Installation
...
SeaMonkey
[x] Automatically check for
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17 this situation is gone, i just read on that
page:
*Congratulations!* You've downloaded (or
asked Why this page did not tell me that i
have not the latest stable version.
What i had before is a very smooth indication of my version status.
I prefer that way of being informed that the constant repeatedly ALERT
that a new version is available (by using the [x] Automatically check
Why this page did not tell me that i
have not the latest stable version.
What i had before is a very smooth indication of my version status.
I prefer that way of being informed that the constant repeatedly ALERT
that a new version is available (by using the [x] Automatically check
for updates
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 26/05/2013 00:42:
You can use this page:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
Or you can set this pref:
Edit | Preferences | Software Installation
...
SeaMonkey
[x] Automatically check for updates (o)
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 26/05/2013 00:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17 this situation is gone, i just read on that
WaltS wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 26/05/2013 00:42:
You can use this page:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
Or you can set this pref: Edit | Preferences | Software
Installation ... SeaMonkey
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 26/05/2013 23:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17 this situation is gone, i just read on that
page:
him it is outdated.
This is exactly what i asked Why this page did not tell me that i
have not the latest stable version.
What i had before is a very smooth indication of my version status.
I prefer that way of being informed that the constant repeatedly ALERT
that a new version is available
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17 this situation is gone, i just read on that
page:
*Congratulations!* You've downloaded (or compiled) a
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 26/05/2013 00:42:
You can use this page:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
Or you can set this pref:
Edit | Preferences | Software Installation
...
SeaMonkey
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17 this situation is gone, i just read on that
page:
*Congratulations!* You've downloaded (or
Ray_Net wrote, On 27/05/2013 17:03:
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 26/05/2013 23:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i
can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17 this situation is
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 26/05/2013 00:42:
You can use this page:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
Or you can set this pref:
Edit | Preferences | Software Installation
...
SeaMonkey
[x] Automatically check for updates (o) daily (•) weekly
[ ]
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 31/05/2013 12:40:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 30/05/2013 11:52:
Ray_Net wrote:
Snip
All things being equal, Ray, when SM 2.19 comes out, I might have gone
to 2.20B1, but I might hang back a bit to see if this page does change.
Why did you always need
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 27/05/2013 17:03:
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 26/05/2013 23:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i
can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the past.
Now with my SM version 2.17
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 29/05/2013 13:05:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 27/05/2013 17:03:
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 26/05/2013 23:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i
can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote, On 31/05/2013 05:02:
Interviewed by CNN on 30/05/2013 12:14, Ray_Net told the world:
Why did you always need to have the lastest beta version ?
You do the same about your wife ? Always changing to have the lastest
beta version ? :-) :-)
*Someone* has to use
Daniel wrote, On 29/05/2013 13:05:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 27/05/2013 17:03:
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 26/05/2013 23:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page - where i
can
read the latest released version number of SM.
This was working well in the
Interviewed by CNN on 30/05/2013 12:14, Ray_Net told the world:
Why did you always need to have the lastest beta version ?
You do the same about your wife ? Always changing to have the lastest
beta version ? :-) :-)
*Someone* has to use the beta versions so it gets tested. That's the
entire
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 30/05/2013 11:52:
Ray_Net wrote:
Snip
All things being equal, Ray, when SM 2.19 comes out, I might have gone
to 2.20B1, but I might hang back a bit to see if this page does change.
Why did you always need to have the lastest beta version ?
You do the same
Daniel wrote, On 31/05/2013 12:40:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 30/05/2013 11:52:
Ray_Net wrote:
Snip
All things being equal, Ray, when SM 2.19 comes out, I might have gone
to 2.20B1, but I might hang back a bit to see if this page does change.
Why did you always need to have the
Daniel wrote, On 30/05/2013 11:52:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 29/05/2013 13:05:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 27/05/2013 17:03:
Jens Hatlak wrote, On 26/05/2013 23:42:
Ray_Net wrote:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/ is my SM home page -
where i
can
read the latest released
MCBastos wrote, On 31/05/2013 05:02:
Interviewed by CNN on 30/05/2013 12:14, Ray_Net told the world:
Why did you always need to have the lastest beta version ?
You do the same about your wife ? Always changing to have the lastest
beta version ? :-) :-)
*Someone* has to use the beta versions
NoOp wrote:
On 04/11/2012 05:43 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Is there a switch I can set in config to prevent checking for new
versions of SM? I don't want the pop-up, easiest way to prevent that is
not to check.
Test environment, 1st rule, when chasing problems change only
On 04/12/2012 06:53 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 04/11/2012 05:43 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Is there a switch I can set in config to prevent checking for new
versions of SM? I don't want the pop-up, easiest way to prevent that is
not to check.
Test
Is there a switch I can set in config to prevent checking for new
versions of SM? I don't want the pop-up, easiest way to prevent that is
not to check.
Test environment, 1st rule, when chasing problems change only one thing
at a time.
--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
Running in a test
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Is there a switch I can set in config to prevent checking for new
versions of SM? I don't want the pop-up, easiest way to prevent that is
not to check.
Test environment, 1st rule, when chasing problems change only one thing
at a time.
In reply to a message I got via email
On 04/11/2012 05:43 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Is there a switch I can set in config to prevent checking for new
versions of SM? I don't want the pop-up, easiest way to prevent that is
not to check.
Test environment, 1st rule, when chasing problems change only one thing
NoOp wrote:
On 10/02/2011 10:38 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
My Seamonkey 2.3.3, in invoking Check for updates says ...
nothing that can be copied and then pasted
W H Y can I not copy text from the Software Update window,
Actually I think this is an excellent
Otto Wyss wrote:
AUS:SVC gCanApplyUpdates - testing write access C:\Program
Files\SeaMonkey\update.test
AUS:SVC gCanApplyUpdates - unable to apply updates. Exception:
[Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80520015
(NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED) [nsILocalFile.create] nsresult:
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.3.3 since I thought this was the newest version. Checking
for updates doesn't show any new version, not even a hint. Yet there's already
2.4.1 out. What's wrong?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:24:50 +0200, /Otto Wyss/:
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.3.3 since I thought this was the newest
version. Checking for updates doesn't show any new version, not even
a hint. Yet there's already 2.4.1 out. What's wrong?
Open about:config, what does your app.update.channel (w/o
Otto Wyss wrote:
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.3.3 since I thought this was the newest version.
Checking for updates doesn't show any new version, not even a hint.
Yet there's already 2.4.1 out. What's wrong?
My Seamonkey 2.3.3, in invoking Check for updates says ...
nothing that can
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Openabout:config, what does your app.update.channel (w/o the
quotes) say?
It says release.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Otto Wyss wrote:
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.3.3 since I thought this was the newest version.
Checking for updates doesn't show any new version, not even a hint. Yet
there's already 2.4.1 out. What's wrong?
Ok, few things to try:
First and Most Likely.
* Help-Check For Updates.
If that does
On 10/02/2011 10:38 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.3.3 since I thought this was the newest version.
Checking for updates doesn't show any new version, not even a hint.
Yet there's already 2.4.1 out. What's wrong?
My Seamonkey 2.3.3
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:33:59 -0700, Sailfish
removecapssailf...@removecapsunforgettable.com wrote in
hdwdnfio_41crthtnz2dnuvz_v-dn...@mozilla.org:
[mozilla.support.seamonkey,mozilla.support.firefox reinserted]
A quick search of this newsgroup would have shown you that this topic
has been
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:25:31 -0500, Ron Hunter rphun...@charter.net wrote
in xnudnaqn_4exr9htnz2dnuvz_rydn...@mozilla.org:
On 8/17/2011 9:54 PM, Peter Boulding wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:33:59 -0700, Sailfish
removecapssailf...@removecapsunforgettable.com wrote in
or
operations. If a security patch is required that will affect user
options then a new version level needs to be created with full
documentation.
Full documentation does not mean disclosing the code base in question,
but dose mean how the changes will affect user experience with the new
upgrade
. If a security patch is required that will affect user
options then a new version level needs to be created with full
documentation.
Full documentation does not mean disclosing the code base in question,
but dose mean how the changes will affect user experience with the new
upgrade.
Failure to perform
John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
think the majority of users would agree.
Since Firefox and SeaMonkey embarked on their accelerated release
schedule, we've seen
On 8/29/2011 8:16 AM, Daniel wrote:
John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
think the majority of users would agree.
Since Firefox and SeaMonkey embarked on their
Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/29/2011 8:16 AM, Daniel wrote:
John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
think the majority of users would agree.
Since Firefox and SeaMonkey
that will affect user
options then a new version level needs to be created with full
documentation.
Full documentation does not mean disclosing the code base in question,
but dose mean how the changes will affect user experience with the new
upgrade.
Failure to perform these simple tasks
is required that will affect user
options then a new version level needs to be created with full
documentation.
Full documentation does not mean disclosing the code base in question,
but dose mean how the changes will affect user experience with the new
upgrade.
Failure to perform these simple tasks
The next version of Firefox (version 7.0) is scheduled for 27th
September 2011. Please make a note in your diary!
Good luck.
John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
snipped
___
On 19/08/11 11:54, David Wilkinson wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
It is not true that none of those working with Mozilla cannot see the
problems.
Triple negative here.
As written this says that it is not true that everybody working at
Mozilla can see the problems.
As evidenced by his second
On 08/19/2011 03:12 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
...
About the discoverability of version numbers, bug 678775
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678775 has been mentioned
(perhaps without the bug number) in this thread. I'm added the link so
that anybody can go and see (but this is
On 8/17/2011 9:54 PM, Peter Boulding wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:33:59 -0700, Sailfish
removecapssailf...@removecapsunforgettable.com wrote in
hdwdnfio_41crthtnz2dnuvz_v-dn...@mozilla.org:
[mozilla.support.seamonkey,mozilla.support.firefox reinserted]
A quick search of this newsgroup would
On 8/18/2011 5:35 AM, Peter Boulding wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:25:31 -0500, Ron Hunterrphun...@charter.net wrote
inxnudnaqn_4exr9htnz2dnuvz_rydn...@mozilla.org:
On 8/17/2011 9:54 PM, Peter Boulding wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:33:59 -0700, Sailfish
On 8/18/2011 10:59 AM, Ryan P. wrote:
On 8/18/2011 6:24 AM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/18/2011 5:35 AM, Peter Boulding wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:25:31 -0500, Ron Hunterrphun...@charter.net
wrote
inxnudnaqn_4exr9htnz2dnuvz_rydn...@mozilla.org:
On 8/17/2011 9:54 PM, Peter Boulding wrote:
On
Ryan P. wrote:
On 8/17/2011 4:53 PM, Ran Garoo wrote:
On 8/17/2011 14:26, John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
think the majority of users would agree.
Since
On 8/18/2011 1:07 PM, Rufus wrote:
Ryan P. wrote:
On 8/17/2011 4:53 PM, Ran Garoo wrote:
On 8/17/2011 14:26, John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
think the majority
Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/18/2011 1:07 PM, Rufus wrote:
Ryan P. wrote:
On 8/17/2011 4:53 PM, Ran Garoo wrote:
On 8/17/2011 14:26, John wrote:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
My bloviated meandering follows what John graced us with on 8/17/2011
2:26 PM:
I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never
to use IE.
The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I
think the majority of users would agree.
Since Firefox and
On 8/17/2011 4:26 PM, John wrote:
Since Firefox and SeaMonkey embarked on their accelerated release
schedule, we've seen several updates incorporating many significant
behavioral changes which are causing grief to many users. Along with
this we are being encouraged to upgrade promptly because
On 8/17/11 3:26 PM, John wrote:
There's never time to do it right, but there's always time to do it over
That doesn't just apply to electronics and software, I suspect it's
prevalent everywhere.
I used to work as a aircraft mechanic, and worked at a shop where we
repaired wrecks. I had to
NoOp a écrit :
On 06/30/2011 01:30 PM, sean nathan bean wrote:
cyberzen sent me the following::
PhillipJones a écrit :
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still
Cecil Bankston wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 27/06/2011 11:43, Cecil Bankston told the world:
Where in SeaMonkey does one find the advertise Firefox compatibility
option?
Edit/Preferences/Advanced/HTTP Networking.
It's a new option with Seamonkey 2.1. It's enabled by
JAS wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail.
I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I received
cyberzen sent me the following::
PhillipJones a écrit :
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
use seamonkey's Mail client
On 06/30/2011 01:30 PM, sean nathan bean wrote:
cyberzen sent me the following::
PhillipJones a écrit :
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 27/06/2011 11:43, Cecil Bankston told the world:
Where in SeaMonkey does one find the advertise Firefox compatibility
option?
Edit/Preferences/Advanced/HTTP Networking.
It's a new option with Seamonkey 2.1. It's enabled by default. I should
note that
On 6/26/2011 12:59 PM PT, Stanimir Stamenkov typed:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Long term solution is complain to
PhillipJones wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I received the same
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 26/06/2011 11:37, PhillipJones told the world:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Cecil Bankston wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 26/06/2011 11:37, PhillipJones told the world:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't
Interviewed by CNN on 27/06/2011 11:43, Cecil Bankston told the world:
Where in SeaMonkey does one find the advertise Firefox compatibility
option?
Edit/Preferences/Advanced/HTTP Networking.
It's a new option with Seamonkey 2.1. It's enabled by default. I should
note that yours is already
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail.
I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I received the same mail. It mentioned I
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
PhillipJones a écrit :
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
use seamonkey's Mail client ?
pop.mail.yahoo.fr (SSL, port
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Must be a Mac thing. I just updated with UA Build identifier:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Works for me using SM 2.0.14
user agent spoof: Firefox/3.6
Interviewed by CNN on 26/06/2011 11:37, PhillipJones told the world:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I see your
On 2011/06/26 10:37 (GMT-0400) PhillipJones composed:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Long term solution is
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 26/06/2011 11:37, PhillipJones told the world:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:55:09 -0400, /Felix Miata/:
On 2011/06/26 10:37 (GMT-0400) PhillipJones composed:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept
PhillipJones wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 26/06/2011 11:37, PhillipJones told the world:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept
cyberzen wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
cyberzen, it seems your mail sender cuts off
PhillipJones wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
So I see two possible problems:
1. Your CamelCase naming of FireFox (sic). The official product
name is Firefox. If the script Yahoo is using is case-sensitive,
it will not recognize CamelCase FireFox.
2. Perhaps, just PERHAPS, they don't recognize
Le 26/06/2011 22:23, Keith Whaley a écrit :
cyberzen wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I received the same mail. It mentioned I had
PhillipJones wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail.
I go
to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA
set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that?
I received the same
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Without taking a position either way, how does the user know it's really
Mozilla supplying the update? Is there some kind of authentication
process, or do we just have to close our eyes and trust?
We require SSL-encryption for delivery of updates (both for the info
release or beta version before we turn on updates.
On the testing channels where we do daily updates (nightly, aurora) we
still do some automated testing so we know the builds run at least on
our test systems, but we suppose people know how manually get themselves
to install a new version if the old
people know how manually get themselves
to install a new version if the old one doesn't run, or else they would
not run testing versions but at least beta or better release versions.
Robert Kaiser
Good replies to both Phillip and Paul. My question is more a suggestion
than a question (may
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Without taking a position either way, how does the user know it's really
Mozilla supplying the update? Is there some kind of authentication
process, or do we just have to close our eyes and trust?
We require SSL-encryption for delivery of
, but we suppose people know how manually get themselves
to install a new version if the old one doesn't run, or else they would
not run testing versions but at least beta or better release versions.
Robert Kaiser
Good replies to both Phillip and Paul. My question is more a suggestion
than a question
or as
old as IE, but still a lot.
I am using FF 3.6.17. I do get updated regularly, but I have never had
any message about moving to FF 4. In fact I thought that new version
was still not yet ready. And again, as my version of FF works just
fine for me why change?
Neil
On 03.06.2011 23:45, MCBastos wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Interviewed by CNN on 04/06/2011 00:14, Jay Garcia told the world:
On 03.06.2011 20:49, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
If Mozilla is the only one supplying the updates then how do you
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thanks, we already know how this works. What we're speaking of here
is that Mozilla is contemplating silent updates where no user input
is required.
Currently, I have to click a button to approve a proposed update --
you're thinking of doing away with this option, or making
On 04.06.2011 11:08, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thanks, we already know how this works. What we're speaking of here
is that Mozilla is contemplating silent updates where no user input
is required.
Currently, I have to click a button to approve a
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
