On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
client.
Of course one
Daniel wrote:
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
client.
Of
EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
On 11/02/2014 02:18 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking at it
again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail client.
Of course one user likes tabs and another user doesn't.
But for me a so called Internet Suite should contain the
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail client.
Of course one user likes tabs and another user doesn't.
But for me a so called
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
client.
Of course one user likes tabs and another user
Recent changes to Toolkit's Password Manager (for SeaMonkey, implemented
with 2.29) supposedly enabled the saving of passwords despite
autocomplete=off per bug #956906. However, the companion changes (bug
#658936 and #1025703) to fill-in passwords on login pages -- especially
when the user ID and
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header field exceeds server limit.
Cookie
/n
I had no problem with SM 2.25
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header field exceeds server limit.
Cookie
/n
I
Danny Kile wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header field exceeds server
Danny Kile wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header field exceeds server
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header field exceeds server limit.
Cookie
/n
I
On 05/22/2014 05:26 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote:
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header field exceeds
NoOp wrote:
On 05/22/2014 05:26 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote:
When I go to the following URL using SM 2.26,
https://6387-4.portal.athenahealth.com/
I get the following Error Message
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Size of a request header
[Solved] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=955830
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
The header Disposition-Notification-To: E-Mail-Address will be ignored.
The pref mail.mdn.report.enabled has no effect ...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Interviewed by CNN on 09/09/2013 19:10, Rob told the world:
Apparently the mails sent by Flyertalk.com do contain the deceiving
links that SeaMonkey classifies as likely scam.
I don't know what kind of mails Flyertalk.com is sending, but when
it is some service that has user accounts and is
/winaprize//a
Yes, that's what I proposed two days ago:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Request For Email Scam Detection Enhancement
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:56:05 -0400
From: Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com
Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey
References
Philip Taylor wrote:
EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:
That item is checked. I still never see any warnings.
Perhaps you never received anything that Seamonkey classes as
a scam. If you care to post your real e-mail address, I can
forward you something that Seamonkey false-detects as a scam
on
Arnie Goetchius arnie.goetchius@invalid.domain wrote:
Rob wrote:
Arnie Goetchius arnie.goetchius@invalid.domain wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not
PhillipJones pjones...@comcast.net wrote:
Philip Taylor wrote:
A Williams wrote:
Why bother? It is just a warning of a potential threat, if you have a
reason to know better then simply ignore it for that mail.
And for the next, and the next, and the next, ad nauseam.
As Arnie quite
Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
SeaMonkey has no way to see that an e-mail is the same as one that
you have seen before. That probably is not true, anyway.
So your ooptions are to disable the detector or to live with it.
Rob, it is a fundamental feature of good software design that
Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
SeaMonkey has no way to see that an e-mail is the same as one that
you have seen before. That probably is not true, anyway.
So your ooptions are to disable the detector or to live with it.
Rob, it is a fundamental
Rob wrote:
Yes, but in this case that is not a simple task.
The user says this is an e-mail I have seen before, it should not
be detected as a scam.
But what properties of the mail do you want to store in a whitelist?
Certainly not the sender address, as it can very easily be spoofed.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same trusted
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:
That item is checked. I still never see any warnings.
Perhaps you never received anything that Seamonkey classes as
a scam. If you care to post your real e-mail address, I can
forward you something that Seamonkey false-detects as a scam
on my machine (the regular
Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Rob wrote:
Yes, but in this case that is not a simple task.
The user says this is an e-mail I have seen before, it should not
be detected as a scam.
But what properties of the mail do you want to store in a whitelist?
Certainly not the sender
Rob wrote:
Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
SeaMonkey has no way to see that an e-mail is the same as one that
you have seen before. That probably is not true, anyway.
So your ooptions are to disable the detector or to live with it.
Rob, it is a
Philip Taylor wrote:
Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
SeaMonkey has no way to see that an e-mail is the same as one that
you have seen before. That probably is not true, anyway.
So your ooptions are to disable the detector or to live with it.
Rob, it is a fundamental feature of good
Rob nom...@example.comwrote:
This would not work for scam mail, as the objective for a scam mail
it to look like a genuine mail but still deceive the user.
Scammers copy genuine mails from banks and other companies and edit
them as little as possible. There is too much probability that
Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Rob nom...@example.comwrote:
This would not work for scam mail, as the objective for a scam mail
it to look like a genuine mail but still deceive the user.
Scammers copy genuine mails from banks and other companies and edit
them as little as
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same trusted source. The quick fix is to completely
A Williams wrote:
Why bother? It is just a warning of a potential threat, if you have a
reason to know better then simply ignore it for that mail.
And for the next, and the next, and the next, ad nauseam.
As Arnie quite righly says, Seamonkey should learn from user
responses when a given
EE wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same trusted source. The quick fix is to
Arnie Goetchius arnie.goetchius@invalid.domain wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same trusted source.
Rob wrote:
Arnie Goetchius arnie.goetchius@invalid.domain wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same trusted
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Edit | Preferences | Mail Newsgroups | Junk Suspect Mail
At the bottom: [x] Tell me if the message I'm reading is a
suspected email scam
This should have the same effect as toggling Arnie's key in
about:config.
It does not have the same
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rob wrote:
Arnie Goetchius arnie.goetchius@invalid.domain wrote:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same
Philip Taylor wrote:
A Williams wrote:
Why bother? It is just a warning of a potential threat, if you have a
reason to know better then simply ignore it for that mail.
And for the next, and the next, and the next, ad nauseam.
As Arnie quite righly says, Seamonkey should learn from user
Interviewed by CNN on 08/09/2013 10:31, Arnie Goetchius told the world:
Periodically I receive emails from trusted sources where SM warns that
this email might be a scam. Clicking on Not a Scam makes the message
go away. However, SM does not learn and keeps giving the same warning
for the same
I would prefer to keep _*Mozilla*_ under /Slackware/ _*Linu**x*_ as my Browser
and */not switch/* as requested because
o I can inspect sites to see if they leave cookie crumbs behind.
Certain sites such as /_www._/*/_MOSSAD_/*/_.gov.il_/ and
/www./*/CIA/*/.gov/
leave cookies on your
?...
I appreciate this a very basic request but I don't think I canbe the
only one.
I have my SeaMonkey in a folder named applications.
My process is to download to /home/wls*/Downloads.
Then cut and paste the file into my /home/wls*/applications folder,
where I extract
On 11/01/2012 10:47 AM, Gerry wrote:
I enjoy using Seamonkey I like the totality of the suite. I'm using
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.I have SM 2.8 I'm encouraged to download 2.13.1 which
I've done (to ///Downloads) I extract the file but then what?...
I appreciate this a very basic request
Philip Chee wrote:
I understand that Ubuntuzilla has .deb's for SeaMonkey which will
automatically create the launcher in the Applications menu.
That's been my experience. Since I moved to monitoring ubuntuzilla for
Seamonkey updates, I've been pleased with the behavior, including prompt
appreciate this a very basic request but I don't think I canbe the
only one.
Easiest way is to follow Walt's advice (somewhat modified). Create a new
folder 'seamonkey':
Home
/seamonkey
Move the bz2 download to that folder and extract there (right click in
Nautilus select 'extract here
extract the file but then what?...
I appreciate this a very basic request but I don't think I canbe the
only one.
Easiest way is to follow Walt's advice (somewhat modified). Create a new
folder 'seamonkey':
Home
/seamonkey
Move the bz2 download to that folder and extract there (right click
I enjoy using Seamonkey I like the totality of the suite. I'm using
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.I have SM 2.8 I'm encouraged to download 2.13.1 which
I've done (to ///Downloads) I extract the file but then what?...
I appreciate this a very basic request but I don't think I canbe the
only one
On 11/01/2012 01:47 PM, Gerry wrote:
I enjoy using Seamonkey I like the totality of the suite. I'm using
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.I have SM 2.8 I'm encouraged to download 2.13.1 which
I've done (to ///Downloads) I extract the file but then what?...
I appreciate this a very basic request but I
Gerry wrote:
I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.I have SM 2.8 I'm encouraged to download
2.13.1 which I've done (to ///Downloads) I extract the file
but then what?... I appreciate this a very basic request but I don't
think I canbe the only one.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/install
Mike Easter wrote:
WaltS wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
Personally, I am actually most interested in differences between SM and
Tb focusing on the news client aspect, not the browser or mail agent.
Would any who are currently familiar with Tb SM news care to comment?
Shouldn't this be in
WaltS wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
WaltS wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
Personally, I am actually most interested in differences between SM and
Tb focusing on the news client aspect, not the browser or mail agent.
I'm not exactly sure what you are looking for, so my casual observations
follow.
On 10/23/12 12:03 PM, Mike Easter wrote:
Currently there is a discussion^1 in slashdot about SeaMonkey where some
longtime SM users are contributing.
Once upon a time Chris Ilias had a useful page comparing SM with Tb/Ffx,
but it has grown stale http://ilias.ca/SeamonkeyvsFirefox The
Currently there is a discussion^1 in slashdot about SeaMonkey where some
longtime SM users are contributing.
Once upon a time Chris Ilias had a useful page comparing SM with Tb/Ffx,
but it has grown stale http://ilias.ca/SeamonkeyvsFirefox The
Differences between SeaMonkey versus Firefox and
On 10/23/2012 03:03 PM, Mike Easter wrote:
Currently there is a discussion^1 in slashdot about SeaMonkey where some
longtime SM users are contributing.
Once upon a time Chris Ilias had a useful page comparing SM with Tb/Ffx,
but it has grown stale http://ilias.ca/SeamonkeyvsFirefox The
WaltS wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
Personally, I am actually most interested in differences between SM and
Tb focusing on the news client aspect, not the browser or mail agent.
Would any who are currently familiar with Tb SM news care to comment?
Shouldn't this be in mozilla.general?
I
... i would like a mail notifier for when i am using the browser
and receive a message it would automatically, say change the color
of the browser so i now. i always miss the little 'you have mail' msgs
and this would hlp. is it possible or does it already exist???
Mr. Kevin W Mc Auley
1107
Mr. Kevin W Mc Auley wrote:
... i would like a mail notifier for when i am using the browser
and receive a message it would automatically, say change the color
of the browser so i now. i always miss the little 'you have mail' msgs
and this would hlp. is it possible or does it already exist???
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj:
SM 2.4.1 on Windows 7.
I accidentally clicked clear list instead of exit.
How do I recover the list?
What is the name of the file that I need to undelete, or
recover from backup?
Just a guess. I have a file with the name downloads.sqlite in my
SM 2.4.1 on Windows 7.
I accidentally clicked clear list instead of exit.
How do I recover the list?
What is the name of the file that I need to undelete, or
recover from backup?
Advance thanks
--
Rostyk
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj:
SM 2.4.1 on Windows 7.
I accidentally clicked clear list instead of exit.
How do I recover the list?
What is the name of the file that I need to undelete, or
recover from backup?
Just a guess. I have a file with the name downloads.sqlite in my
profile, which *might* be the
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/09/2011 18:10, Ray_Net told the world:
Very difficult to understand what you want ...
I know a similar person ... She is happy with windows live mail and it's ok.
Windows Live Mail (at least the old version -- I didn't test the 2011
version) had an
Sirs;
I have a request. I am trying to help a friend. She has a new win 7
, but she is using windows live mail. She knows NOTHING. {not even copy
and paste)
I request that a file that will automatically install SM from
inside her mail client so she can just click on it or a link
km wrote:
Sirs;
I have a request. I am trying to help a friend. She has a new win 7 ,
but she is using windows live mail. She knows NOTHING. {not even copy
and paste)
I request that a file that will automatically install SM from inside her
mail client so she can just click on it or a link
Interviewed by CNN on 23/09/2011 18:10, Ray_Net told the world:
Very difficult to understand what you want ...
I know a similar person ... She is happy with windows live mail and it's ok.
Windows Live Mail (at least the old version -- I didn't test the 2011
version) had an horrid bug/design
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/09/2011 18:10, Ray_Net told the world:
Very difficult to understand what you want ...
I know a similar person ... She is happy with windows live mail and it's ok.
Windows Live Mail (at least the old version -- I didn't test the 2011
version) had an
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/09/2011 18:10, Ray_Net told the world:
Very difficult to understand what you want ...
I know a similar person ... She is happy with windows live mail and it's ok.
Windows Live Mail (at least the old version -- I didn't test the 2011
version) had an
Ray_Net a écrit :
Did you feel that implementing IRC-Chat and RSS are more pressing
matters ? :-)
Well, as far as IRC goes, if I'm not mistaken, it's used by some
programmers to interact. So far as it's used to push programming
forward, I can't blame them for giving it priority. Plus,
Ray_Net a écrit :
Lokk at the huge amount of unresolved bugs and of
small-feature-needing-half-an-hour-work suggestion not implemented. And
this situation exist from 10 years ago.
If it's so simple, why don't you volunteer do it?
S.
___
Ray_Net a écrit :
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Because, for example, in my job, I need to use four sites in succession
hundreds of times a day. If I had only one window, I'd waste a huge
amount of time going from site to site,
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Lokk at the huge amount of unresolved bugs and of
small-feature-needing-half-an-hour-work suggestion not implemented. And
this situation exist from 10 years ago.
If it's so simple, why don't you volunteer do it?
Because i don't have my pc with all the
Ray_Net a écrit :
You may do exactly the same without tabs ...
I have also some sites opened 3 with SM and another with IE (sorry :-))
The bottom bar is very usefull and/or ALT-TAB to switch from one to
the other *no* *need* to wait for load nor login.
The bottom bar is *huge* and wastes too
Ray_Net a écrit :
Did you think that having the same action when replying than when
forwarding a mail is so much work . it's already existing in the
forward coding.
That's not for me to say. Seeing how it's hardly a critical problem, nor
one that's bothering much people, I can't blame
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
You may do exactly the same without tabs ...
I have also some sites opened 3 with SM and another with IE (sorry :-))
The bottom bar is very usefull and/or ALT-TAB to switch from one to
the other *no* *need* to wait for load nor login.
The bottom bar is
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Did you think that having the same action when replying than when
forwarding a mail is so much work . it's already existing in the
forward coding.
That's not for me to say. Seeing how it's hardly a critical problem, nor
one that's bothering much
Ok, so there are about 50% to 50% negative and positive comments on this
feature request, I think it's really worth implementing folks :)
Also, consider this: when you are using gmail WEB interface, you basically
have your email in a new tab. Why not have seamonkey mail client in a new
tab
NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:34:52 +0200, Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only
of software design is to please the users. So Tht users will
use their product.
Viliam Kubis wrote:
Ok, so there are about 50% to 50% negative and positive comments on this
feature request, I think it's really worth implementing folks :)
Also, consider this: when you are using gmail WEB interface, you
PhillipJones a écrit :
bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower.
Again: much much less than having multiple windows open does.
The last version of SM 1 and all of the current 2.0 series, I have been
having problems with loading pages in the
PhillipJones a écrit :
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The developers care very deeply about users. How can you think any
otherwise?
The object of software design is to please the
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower.
Again: much much less than having multiple windows open does.
The last version of SM 1 and all of the current 2.0 series, I have been
having problems with
PhillipJones a écrit :
Explain Why the only Browsers I have a problem with Are Mozilla Browsers.
Because there is something in your system that conflicts with them for
some reason.
I personally have had various versions of SM installed in Win2K, XP and
7 as well as Red Hat Linux. I have
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The developers care very deeply about users. How can you think any
otherwise?
The object of software design is
PhillipJones a écrit :
Well many of use users ask not to put a silly feature in or in some
cases to fix a problem and they problem don't get fixed or the silly
feature still shows up.
Tabs are not a silly feature and my computer would slow down to a crawl
without them. They're a godsend in
Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower.
Again: much much less than having multiple windows open does.
This is not true, due to the re-entrancy coding.
___
Ray_Net wrote: Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Is this another one of those copy MS or copy Apple things?
It's like double-clicking on folders in some Linux distros.
It copies a
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The developers care very deeply about users. How can you think any
otherwise?
Lokk at the huge amount of
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Ray_Net wrote: Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Is this another one of those copy MS or copy Apple things?
It's like double-clicking on folders in some Linux
Ray_Net wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Tabs RULE!!! They save desktop space and keep things within on app
organized - like having multiple desktops. Tabs ROCK!
--
-
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any plans
to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are needed to make it
fully operational?
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are needed to make it
fully
Of course as an option, not fixed for everybody. You could choose whether
to open the mail client in the traditional way (new window) or in new tab.
VK
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:52:48 +0200, WLS wls15...@yahooremove.com wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from
Viliam Kubis wrote:
Of course as an option, not fixed for everybody. You could choose
whether to open the mail client in the traditional way (new window) or
in new tab.
This look inconsistent.
Mail is not another web page, it's completely different.
Opera is wrong - he mixed two different
to hear some pros and cons of
the concept, in terms of code / development costs and not personal
preferences whether this feature is practical or not.
I realise that there are many more important goals in the seamonkey
project than this one, but it's just a feature request that I think many
/ development
costs and not personal preferences whether this feature is practical or
not.
I realise that there are many more important goals in the seamonkey
project than this one, but it's just a feature request that I think many
people (including me) would find convenient.
Thank you
On Wed
101 - 200 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
