IL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> Seems to me that one of the biggest zealots was put to death about this
time of year a while back.Crazy thing was,he didn't do it for just a few.He
did it for you too.There's nothing
Amen!
-Original Message-
From: rico suavae [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 7:11 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
Seems to me that one of the biggest zealots was put to death about this time
of year a while back.Crazy
Hello Tad,
- Original Message -
From: "Tad Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
>
> >Well Tad, I've no wish to be antagonistic, but then you've been
> >antagonistic,
Drawing a blank here. Who is it that you are referring to?
- Original Message -
From: "rico suavae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> Seems to me that one of the biggest zealots was put
ty. The other only a narrow
corridor.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> Further to which...
>
> http://www.alternet.org/story.
Hi MM
>On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:32:07 +0900, you wrote:
>
> >Hi Todd
> >
> >>All a bit sad.
> >
> >It would be less sad if it were the first time rather than an
> >established and regular phenomenon.
> >
> >>It would appear that you're a bit more patient than I.
> >
> >I don't think so - you have mo
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:32:07 +0900, you wrote:
>Hi Todd
>
>>All a bit sad.
>
>It would be less sad if it were the first time rather than an
>established and regular phenomenon.
>
>>It would appear that you're a bit more patient than I.
>
>I don't think so - you have more choice than I.
>
>>The "c
exchanges.
thank you,
John Ware
-Original Message-
From: Appal Energy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:49 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
All a bit sad.
It would appear that you're a bit more patient t
n my plate to keep me busy for two
>lifetimes.
You and me both, and a lot of us here I think. Well, all we can do is
get on with it a best we may.
All best
Keith
>Todd Swearingen
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
n my plate to keep me busy for two
lifetimes.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> Hi Todd and all
>
> Sorry to any that Tad has
sition the misleading information as truth and the
>truth as "propaganda." Sounds as if you're more interested in what you want
>to hear than accuracy or truth.
>
>So spin your wheels trying to fit square pegs into round holes. That's your
>prerogative. But don
http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/article.asp?id=254
The Fake Parade
BY JONATHAN MATTHEWS
ENVIRONMENT | 12.3.2002
"Carrying his placard the man in front of me was clearly one of the
poorest of the poor. His shoes were not only threadbare, they were
tattered, merely rags barely being held toget
tew know nothing than tew know what ain't so."
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: "Tad Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> At 03:40 AM 3/30/2004 +0900, you wrote:
>At 03:40 AM 3/30/2004 +0900, you wrote:
> >Well again Tad...
> >
> >Seems I was right about Mr Murdoch, sad. You're obviously
> >well-intentioned, but I'm afraid many of those very same good
> >intentions have been paving other people's roads to hell for quite a
> >long time.
>
>It doesn't matter
At 03:40 AM 3/30/2004 +0900, you wrote:
>Well again Tad...
>
>Seems I was right about Mr Murdoch, sad. You're obviously
>well-intentioned, but I'm afraid many of those very same good
>intentions have been paving other people's roads to hell for quite a
>long time.
It doesn't matter. Talking about
r her code.
One serves the broadest interests of humanity. The other only a narrow
corridor.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> Furt
Have you noticed that the american tabloids don't touch much on
politics?
Fred
On Monday, Mar 29, 2004, at 02:49 US/Eastern, Tad Johnson wrote:
>
>> If I wanted SPIN I would read the National Enquirer.
>
> "The Guardian" might as well be the National Inquirer, and everyone
> over there
> seem
Further to which...
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18259
The Christian Taliban
Best
Keith
> >Some really sick crap..
> >
> >http://www.cdfe.org/
> >
> >Pick a link. According to these asinigned zealots the sypmtoms are the cause
> >of the disease.
>
>Some of them may be zealo
Well again Tad...
Seems I was right about Mr Murdoch, sad. You're obviously
well-intentioned, but I'm afraid many of those very same good
intentions have been paving other people's roads to hell for quite a
long time. All the myths of Middle America, eh? I'll have to respond
to some of them,
This is what's keeps bugging me.
At the pump diesel fuel is 66 C (Cdn) per litre.
Bulk canola oil, grown here, in Ontario, $1.27 per litre , in 55 gal
barrels (I have to pick it up).
There seems to be a huge disparity in cost.
At one end , its a processed diesel fuel, byproduct of crude oil, whi
Tad Johnson wrote:
> I was quite surprised that a
> list of
> this subject (biodiesel) would contain anything political, nor why
> there
> would be
> any reason for it to contain political propaganda.
First of all, the subject of this list is NOT exclusive to
biodiesel. Secondly, it is i
Hallo Tad,
Monday, 29 March, 2004, 06:44:21, you wrote:
...snip...
TJ> Do we simply sit back and watch this happen every few years and
TJ> not do anything about it? Is it somehow our fault that we were
TJ> attacked on 9-11? Is it ok for terrorists to attack and kill not
TJ> only Ameri
ginal Message -
From: "J. Curtis Cheney, VII" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
> Tad,
>
> I agree. Less politics and more biodiesel.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> J. Curtis Cheney, VII
>
Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: "Tad Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Corporate ethics
>
> >Well Tad, I've no wish to be antagonistic, but then you've been
> >antagonistic, ha
Tad,
I agree. Less politics and more biodiesel.
Cheers,
J. Curtis Cheney, VII
Tad Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well Tad, I've no wish to be antagonistic, but then you've been
>antagonistic, haven't you?
I was posting a humorous view of your posting. I was quite surprised that a
>Well Tad, I've no wish to be antagonistic, but then you've been
>antagonistic, haven't you?
I was posting a humorous view of your posting. I was quite surprised that a
list of
this subject (biodiesel) would contain anything political, nor why there
would be
any reason for it to contain politi
> >If I wanted SPIN I would read the National Enquirer.
>
>"The Guardian" might as well be the National Inquirer, and everyone over there
>seems to bask in the conspiracy theories and the extreme left, taking both as
>the ultimate truth. Actually all the articles I've read on the "The
>Guardian" m
Mr Little
>Mr. Addison,
>You seem to have a lot of pent up hostility!
Do I now. You haven't though, eh?
Well, there wasn't any hostility, nor is there now, but I'll admit to
a little impatience - never mind, it'll pass.
All this means: "You seem to have a lot of pent up hostility!" is
that y
>If I wanted SPIN I would read the National Enquirer.
"The Guardian" might as well be the National Inquirer, and everyone over there
seems to bask in the conspiracy theories and the extreme left, taking both as
the ultimate truth. Actually all the articles I've read on the "The
Guardian" make
"
Mr. Addison,
You seem to have a lot of pent up hostility!
Again I have worked in and around industrial plants for 25 years, and I have
had the misfortune of losing good men to an industrial accident, as well as
having a disgruntled employee sabatoge a volatile process. I have been
investigated
Hello C. Little
>When I place myself on this E-Mail list, I was not aware political and
>business bashing was part of the scheme.
Good, then you can stay unaware of it, as it's not the case and there
is no "scheme" here.
>I have noticed that reports and reporters with pointed agendas never qui
Great Idea!I'm there!
Regards,
John
Lillie Bennett wrote:
>>How do you feel about outlawing all corporate contributions to all
>>
>>
>political
>
>
>>parties and candidates, and limiting personal contributions to a
>>
>>
>reasonable amount,
>
>
>>say US$1000 (I am presuming you are
> How do you feel about outlawing all corporate contributions to all
political
> parties and candidates, and limiting personal contributions to a
reasonable amount,
> say US$1000 (I am presuming you are based in the U.S.) per election period
per
> candidate?
>
Oh, I'd vote for that in a second! I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I place myself on this E-Mail list, I was not aware political and
> business bashing was part of the scheme.
Over the time I have spent on this e-mail list, I have concluded there is no
"scheme". It's a very open and educational forum, open to debate on a wide
When I place myself on this E-Mail list, I was not aware political and
business bashing was part of the scheme.
I have noticed that reports and reporters with pointed agendas never quite
tell the whole story..frankly because they don't want the whole story. Some
folks just want to place blame
>Some really sick crap..
>
>http://www.cdfe.org/
>
>Pick a link. According to these asinigned zealots the sypmtoms are the cause
>of the disease.
Some of them may be zealots, but I think most of them are just...
damn, the term that's used is "whores", but that's an abusive term
for prostitu
Hi Todd
>Well, Mr. Buck?
As expected, Mr Buck cavils, twists and turns, and does everything
but answer the question "Well, Mr. Buck?" It is unedifying, so I've
kept it offlist until such a time as he's prepared to respond to
what's been put before him in a forthright and even-handed manner.
Some really sick crap..
http://www.cdfe.org/
Pick a link. According to these asinigned zealots the sypmtoms are the cause
of the disease.
Think I'd rather bed down with the Taliban. At least their doctrine has some
assemblance of social order and construct other than exploiting anything and
Well, Mr. Buck?
> ESBuck
>
> IF you don't mind, and even if you do, we can do without this
toxic
> "Wise Use" BS.
>
> YOU can believe it if you want, but posting it to a Biofuel
mailing
> list brings up a couple of questions.
>
> First, about your powers of discernment - don't you recognis
39 matches
Mail list logo