Comment #9 on issue 2482 by fredrik@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
Yes, mpmath can be considered stable (and has been for a few versions).
There should be no future changes that affect compatibility with SymPy.
--
You received this
Comment #19 on issue 1262 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: fix sympy to work in
python3.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1262
Well, as I've mentioned on IRC, at least openSUSE 11.4 (and 11.3, the
previous release) use 3.1 as the default Python, I'm sure other
distributions do
Comment #7 on issue 2160 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: List of dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2160
Here is my opinion (I agree with Aaron):
+1 to have lists of optional dependencies.
+1 to keep sympy depending on pure Python, -1 to stard hard depending on
something
Comment #10 on issue 2482 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
I am -1 on this. On linux there is no problem installing all the
dependencies, on Mac it is a bit harder (no apt-get install scipy), and on
Windows it is way harder.
Comment #11 on issue 2482 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
Btw, it is actually a problem on linux as well --- for example at work, I
don't have root access to my computer.
The bigger solution is for example EPD, Sage or
Comment #25 on issue 1117 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
+1 to any work that any of you do in this area. :)
I have a server, and also an AWS account if needed. The AWS is not much
free, but the linode server is pretty
Comment #12 on issue 2482 by fredrik@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
A possibility would be to remove sympy.mpmath but still bundle mpmath with
sympy (there could be a sympy download without mpmath, for use by distros),
assuming that
Comment #13 on issue 2482 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
First of all, I have to say that I don't consider ease of porting to Py3 a
major argument. Yes, it makes things a little easier, but as Aaron said, I
can work around
Comment #14 on issue 2482 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
There's another major reason for not bundling external libraries:
avoiding DLL hell, i.e. the situation where there are multiple versions
of the same library
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
Since multiset_partitions has been pushed but there were issues raised that
weren't addressed, I am opening
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Assumptions
New issue 2486 by matt...@gmail.com: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
When I change this to True or remove this property (because it is inherited
from Number anyway), I get:
Comment #1 on issue 2486 by matt...@gmail.com: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
Also oo and Float('+inf') behave inconsistently:
In [1]: oo.is_finite
Out[1]: False
In [2]: oo.evalf().is_finite
Out[2]: True
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: Polynomial Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2484 by matt...@gmail.com: Create Poly by coefficients
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2484
Pull request is here:
Comment #2 on issue 2486 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
See issue 2294. S.Zero.is_finite == False is in perfect agreement with the
(confusing) definition of is_finite. OTOH, oo.evalf().is_finite ==
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/416 fixes the returning of None from
multiset_partitions.
--
You received this message
Comment #15 on issue 2482 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
There are several packages of mpmath in Debian, and some of the older ones
do break sympy. When I, as a user, download sympy, I expect it to just
work. If I want to
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.c...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2487 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: make isympy work with ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2487
See the
Comment #26 on issue 1117 by asmeurer: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
If server costs become too much for you, you could start accepting
donations to keep them up. A lot of open source projects do this.
But as we discussed before, this is all
Comment #9 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
Issue 2487 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group,
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1797
Comment #1 on issue 2487 by asmeurer: make isympy work with ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2487
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2486.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #3 on issue 2486 by asmeurer: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
This suffers from the same problem as issue 2294 and also issue 2164, which
is issue 2196 (Document assumptions). Unless we very clearly write
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #4 on issue 2294 by asmeurer: Remove .is_finite assumption
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2294
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2294.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2294
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2164.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2164
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #2 on issue 2164 by asmeurer: invalid assumptions for
non-infinitesimal/nonnegative
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2164
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2488 by asmeurer: SymPy 0.7.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2488
I have created a release candidate for the 0.7.0 release. See the
downloads tab.
I need people to review
Comment #27 on issue 1117 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
I am good for now. Ideally I would like to start something like github for
sympy, so that people can host and run their codes online. Then I will be
able to
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.1 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #10 on issue 1797 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I changed the milestone, we need to fix this *before* this release.
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 1858 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars doesn't supply
symbols when none are given
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1858
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #4 on issue 1782 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this
Updates:
Cc: elliso...@gmail.com
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Critical Testing
Comment #11 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I understand the need, but how quickly can this be fixed? From what
Updates:
Cc: lazov...@gmail.com
Comment #2 on issue 2480 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Lambda erases
assumptions on its variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2480
Thinking a bit more, there are some details that need to be decided:
Lambda(x, x**2) == Lambda(y, y**2)
Comment #12 on issue 1797 by elliso...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
The next version of IPython will be released quite soon (in the next month)
and will have many new features that users will want to upgrade quickly
Comment #13 on issue 1797 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I agree with Aaron. I think 0.7.0 shouldn't try to support something that
hasn't been released yet, but nothing prevents us from releasing a 0.7.1
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: Polynomial Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2484 by matt...@gmail.com: Create Poly by coefficients
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2484
Pull request is here:
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/416 fixes the returning of None from
multiset_partitions.
--
You received this message
Comment #9 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
Issue 2487 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group,
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #4 on issue 1782 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this
Updates:
Cc: elliso...@gmail.com
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Critical Testing
Comment #11 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I understand the need, but how quickly can this be fixed? From what
Comment #12 on issue 1797 by elliso...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
The next version of IPython will be released quite soon (in the next month)
and will have many new features that users will want to upgrade quickly
Comment #13 on issue 1797 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I agree with Aaron. I think 0.7.0 shouldn't try to support something that
hasn't been released yet, but nothing prevents us from releasing a 0.7.1
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason is basically described in the commit message. See
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1379.
I didn't realize that both numpy
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:02 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
The pull request is in. It works for me and it is fairly trivial, but there
is always the possibility of side effects.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/406
Thanks for this Stefan. pyglet doesn't
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Tomo Lazovich lazov...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:20 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
That remark is quite important. In the same spirit I would like to know if
there are any arguments for using an
How did you resolve it?
Ondrej
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:42 AM, SherjilOzair sherjiloz...@gmail.com wrote:
Issue resolved.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Hi Luke,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:07 AM, luke luca.giaco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi eveyone,
I'm developing an web application which has to interact with user-
defined formulas of some financial kpis.
I decided to use sympy to have a more solid math engine.
If you plan to put it online and make
Hi,
when I try to import isympy in the newest ipython (installed in
Qsnake from qsnake.com), I get:
Qsnake: ondrej@eagle:~/repos/sympy(cg_coeff)$ bin/isympy
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/isympy, line 180, in module
main()
File bin/isympy, line 177, in main
There's a sample script at
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797. I don't know if it's
still relevant.
Aaron Meurer
On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
when I try to import isympy in the newest ipython (installed in
Qsnake from qsnake.com), I get:
Hi,
I was wondering why the quantum stuff (new and old) uses implicit
imports. Well, it turns out that
2.5 years ago we have pushed in a fix
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/commit/0d259619130f7610112ad1a87e85ed2fc1dd7b4f
to make sure we test implicit imports in doctests and the new regular
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed the tox.ini.sample in the root directory and also read:
http://vperic.blogspot.com/2011/05/continuous-integration-and-sympy.html
I have two questions:
1) Wouldn't it make sense to move the
On 06/12/2011 08:16 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
Maybe you need to update Sphinx. I am using 1.0.5 and it works fine.
I think maybe it got a little less picky about formatting in
docstrings. For example, I get some severe warnings, but the build
still continues.
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011
Hi,
I wrote a simple function to fit polynomials. Its based on this
article.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeastSquaresFittingPolynomial.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To
Hi,
I wrote a simple function to fit polynomials. Its based on this
article.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeastSquaresFittingPolynomial.html
Maybe it is useful for you.
from sympy import Float, Matrix, S, Symbol, Integer, lambdify, sqrt
def fit_poly(x, y, sym, degree=1):
Fit
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:55 AM, andy andreas.m.doerf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a simple function to fit polynomials. Its based on this
article.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeastSquaresFittingPolynomial.html
Maybe it is useful for you.
Awesome! Would you mind sending
I think I'm a little confused about how this would work if I'm inheriting
from Function instead of Lambda. Is it still possible, by inheriting from
Function, to get behavior like this (maybe not the same exact constructor,
but the same general idea)?
f = Wavefunction(x, x**2)
f(0)
0
To get
Hi Ondrej,
Glad you like it.
I hope this pull request worked, first time for me working with git
and github.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/415
I'm open to suggestions/improvements.
Andy
On Jun 13, 8:02 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:55
But they probably want to start this at the application level right?
So the config gets parsed. Ondrej, we should figure this out before
sympy0.7 is released so that isympy works with the soon-to-be-released
IPython 0.11.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Min RK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, andy andreas.m.doerf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Glad you like it.
I hope this pull request worked, first time for me working with git
and github.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/415
I'm open to suggestions/improvements.
Thanks a lot.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Brian Granger elliso...@gmail.com wrote:
But they probably want to start this at the application level right?
So the config gets parsed. Ondrej, we should figure this out before
sympy0.7 is released so that isympy works with the soon-to-be-released
IPython
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Brian Granger elliso...@gmail.com wrote:
But they probably want to start this at the application level right?
So the config gets parsed. Ondrej, we should figure this out before
sympy0.7 is
I don't know if this is at all what you had in mind, but I just pushed a
commit for a Wavefunction which now inherits only from Function and is still
callable. Feedback is greatly appreciated, since I'm still new at this.
Ondrej,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Brian Granger elliso...@gmail.com wrote:
But they probably want to start this at the application level right?
So the config gets parsed. Ondrej, we should figure this out before
Ondrej,
One other thing that probably should be changed is that currently the
sympy test suite requires IPython and I think the APIs it relies on
have changed in significant ways. It would be nice to decouple the
test suite from IPython.
Cheers,
Brian
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Brian
Greetings,
My name is Dave Shein, and I'm an Adjunct Faculty at Rochester Institute of
Technology. Along with Chris Tyler
http://teachingopensource.org/index.php/User:Chris_Tylerof Seneca College,
we are hosting a week long
POSSEhttp://teachingopensource.org/index.php/POSSEboot-camp at the
I think SymPy fits this need. It only really requires git and Python to
develop in (though depending on what you are doing, you may need other tools as
well). And since it is written in Python, the deveopment turnover time is
fast, meaning that you can get a lot done in a sprint.
Our issue
Is trying to increase covereage a sprint worthy goal?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For
67 matches
Mail list logo
