[sympy] Re: GSoC

Welcome! On Mar 29, 2:35 pm, karthik CS wrote: > I am a sophomore undergraduate at IIT Bombay. I have a very strong   > mathematical > background. I have spent the last one year exploring  various areas of > theoretical computer science - from graph theory to communication complexity > to > stre

[sympy] Re: GSoC

On Mar 30, 3:26 pm, "Alexey U. Gudchenko" wrote: > Also, I added, that more freshness patch guide is in [3] now. > > [3]https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Development-workflow Thanks, this is the better link. We should update our website. Vinzent -- You received this message because you are s

[sympy] Re: GSOC

Playing around quickly on WolframAlpha, SymPy Live and Gamma SymPy I noticed some features on Wolfram that would be nice to implement on the other sites. - Link to share 'sessions' or results on the queries made on both sites - Related queries (Suggested based on your previous searches) - Add q

[sympy] Re: GSOC

I'll learn about IPython, that should be better than implementing all that stuff from scratch and would also integrate the communities (I think this would bring more users/developers to know SymPy and get along with it). About your dream to live.sympy.or Login on google is already an option on gam

[sympy] Re: GSOC

I see. You're right, that should be the main concern. I will try to make a 'list of tasks' or some sort of schedule and post it here to see if it matches the project's priority, even though I pretend to keep contributing after the program and so any other features/ suggestions would be implemented

[sympy] Re: GSOC

I was absent for my computer have broken. About the collaboration thing. I guess that as Aaron have said, the main focus during gsoc is to implement the other features of SymPy that are currently not available on the live/gamma sites followed by the other ideas discussed a part from collaboration.

[sympy] Re: GsoC

Can we work on the supplied projects for GSOC instead of our own projects ? On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:03:32 PM UTC+5:30, Yurij Alexandrovich wrote: > > Hello. > I'm writing this to know whether symPy is participating in Google Summer > of Code this year. And if yes, how can we get involved

[sympy] Re: GSoC

On Monday, April 8, 2013 9:37:41 PM UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > We were accepted for gsoc. > Congratulations ;) Sage got accepted too! H -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[sympy] Re: Gsoc

Hi Teo Pavel Nice to know that you are interested. I myself will also apply for google summer of code pro gramme with sympy. I tell you the resources which will elp you to get started with you application and project proposal. First of all visit this https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Developm

[sympy] Re: GSoC

Congratulations! On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 12:40:32 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > SymPy has been accepted into GSoC again. > > All students interested in applying, please start here > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2018-Student-Instructions. > The application period star

[sympy] Re: GSoC

Hello, I'm a first year undergrad at IIT Bombay, India. I would like to contribute to Series Expansions. Please guide me. On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 12:40:32 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > SymPy has been accepted into GSoC again. > > All students interested in applying, please start

[sympy] Re: GSoC

> > Hello, I'm a first year undergrad at IIT Bombay, India. I would like to contribute to series expansions. Please guide me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e

[sympy] Re: GSoC

The student application period has started. The deadline is March 27, 16:00 UTC. Be sure to get your final proposals in well before the deadline, as Google will not extend it for any reason. Otherwise, be sure to discuss your proposal with us, and follow the instructions in https://github.com/symp

[sympy] Re: GSoC

Hello, My name is Rohith Gandhi G and I am a final year undergrad, I am highly interested series expansions and ordinary differential equations. Can you please guide me so that I can pick one and work on it. Thank you. On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 04:59:49 UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > The stu

[sympy] Re: GSoC

A tick means that Travis has run tests on your commit and all of them passed. To satisfy the patch requirement, someone with write access needs to have a look at it, decide if they like what you did and merge it into the master branch. You could wait for a bit until someone gets around to it or

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2010

Tensors could be also a great project, given that I heard that many are complaining about Mathematica's implementation. Also see http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=16 for this. Vinzent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To p

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2010

I finally purchased Bronstein's book, which just arrived today. How much of it remains to be implemented in SymPy? My main motivation for getting it was to learn the Risch Algorithm, but I am wondering also if there is some way I can make a GSoC project out of it too, since I would like to partic

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2010

On 8 Mrz., 05:05, Ondrej Certik wrote: > [...] The wiki is a bit fragile[...] Could you please be more concrete? Vinzent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2010

Hello all. My name is Micah Lerner, and I am a freshman who is attending Brandeis University. I am majoring in Math and Computer Science and I have grown very interested in SymPy. I am very interested in implementing the Risch algorithm or working on other improvements to SymPy's integration algor

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2010

Hello all. My name is Micah Lerner and I am a Computer Science and Math student at Brandeis University. I am very interested in implementing the Risch algorithm (or other algorithms) as well as improving series expansion or the integration module. Do you have any suggestions for these projects? M

[sympy] Re: GSoC started

I started my blog at http://ojensen.wordpress.com/ Øyvind On 27 Mai, 02:22, Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi, > > the GSoC has started this Monday. All GSoC students are required to > blog at least once a week (but of course you can blog more often:), > the deadline is each Friday midnight PST (which i

[sympy] Re: GSOC Introduction

Thanks for the link Aaron. What other parts of SymPy could be optimised without working on deprecated code? I could try to produce a dependence graph to find the most referenced modules. I read in that thread that removing the old assumptions could be a challenging project. What skills does it re

[sympy] Re: GSOC Application

Thanks for the reply. Just to let you know, I started a wiki page, as suggested: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC%202011%20Tom%20Bachmann:%20Definite%20Integration > By the way, the integration algorithms are my particular interest in SymPy, > so I would like to discuss this more with yo

[sympy] Re: GSOC Introduction

Hi. I'm continuing to look at Cython. I've added a wiki page. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Optimising-SymPy-using-CythonGSoC-Proposal,-Ben-McDonald Ben M On Mar 24, 1:10 pm, "Aaron S. Meurer" wrote: > Yes, maybe you could look at cythonizing the logic code (ilke the SAT > solver).  A

[sympy] Re: GSOC Introduction

Hey, I’m learning about SymPy’s use of Cython at the moment so I can write my proposal. I've been looking at past discussions and the code. The ‘cythonized’ decorator seems to cast all given variables to local C int types ('cython.int'). Why only ints and no decimals? Is this because SymPy has it

[sympy] Re: GSoC application

Welcome! On Mar 27, 10:51 am, Deshe wrote: > Hello > > I've published an application for a project and, as your page > suggests, I'm turning to anyone kind enough to help me improve it. > > It's currently very unstructured, and I'd appreciate any insight > building a feasible work program which i

[sympy] Re: GSOC Introduction

Hi, I am looking at Issue 834 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=834. I feel I understand the problem and how I would fix it. But would I be able to get feedback on what fix would be best so I can practice submitting a patch? I've added a comment to the issue with my questions about

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC

30.03.2011 17:09, Vinzent Steinberg пишет: Welcome! On Mar 29, 2:35 pm, karthik CS wrote: I am a sophomore undergraduate at IIT Bombay. I have a very strong mathematical background. I have spent the last one year exploring various areas of theoretical computer science - from graph theory to

[sympy] Re: GSoC Introduction

Welcome! On Mar 29, 6:32 pm, Nishant Jain wrote: > Hi, > I am a student at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. I'm a third > year undergraduate student studying mathematics and computing. > I have gone through the Ideas page and I am interested on working on > 'Efficient Groebner bases

[sympy] Re: GSOC Application

Dear all, I'm just bumping this up to let potential mentors and/or application reviewers (except for Aaron and Ronan, thanks a lot again for your input!) know that my application is at [1]. If there is anything unclear to you, or if there is anything you would like me to add or expand on, please d

[sympy] Re: GSoC application

On 7 Apr., 08:54, Hector wrote: > Hello people, > > Sorry, I couldn't be active in the community in the recent days and for > asking again to review my GSoC proposal[1]. > > One more thing, one of my patch has been added and I have one open pull > request[2]. The first was only about adding a doc-

[sympy] Re: GSoC Deadline

Hi, Is it possible to extend the deadline. I have my exam on Monday so I won't be able to submit a patch by working over the weekend. I was hoping if deadline could be extended. Thanks Nakul On Apr 7, 3:27 am, "Aaron S. Meurer" wrote: > Hi everyone.   > > This is just a friendly reminder that

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2012

Hello SymPy, I am an undergraduate student loving Python and because of my field of study (control engineering) connected closely to scientific software. I am successful participant of GSoC 2011. A project called Plotting module (from your ideas wiki page) sounds very exciting for me. Could you pl

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2012

The framework with matplotlib and Pyglet backends is right now beeing reviewed for inclusion in master. See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/673. This doesn't mean you couldn't imporove it even further though. On Feb 6, 5:42 pm, Edyta Przymus wrote: > Hello SymPy, > > I am an undergraduate stu

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2012

Hi all, When I was considering this topic I began to think that the "basis" of my proposal would be (at this moment) this point of quite extended Plotting topic: ---> Write/fix/extend/port backends: matplotlib, google chart API link, pyglet, asciart... Could you provide me information about state

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC

> > > These are all nice features. The IPython community recently released their ipython notebook. It's very good and I recommend you take a look at this project if live.sympy.org interests you. The IPython notebook allows users to share sessions and include text/tex within a session, making it fee

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC

Hello, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:56 PM, dekozo wrote: > The collaboration in real-time should be a bit tricky, I guess but it > would be a VERY nice feature indeed. This could be like etherpad used to be. After Google bought it, it was discontinued and open sourced (http://code.google.com/p/ethe

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC

There is a login for live.sympy.org. In fact, that's the only place where it actually does anything: it saves your searches (in SymPy Gamma, it's just a dummy). Since it's on the app engine, it's real easy to do federated login through a Google account, so we should probably just stick with that

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:26 PM, dekozo wrote: > Playing around quickly on WolframAlpha, SymPy Live and Gamma SymPy I > noticed some features on Wolfram that would be nice to implement on > the other sites. > >  - Link to share 'sessions' or results on the queries made on both > sites >  - Related

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC

Am 24.02.2012 02:19, schrieb Renato Coutinho: Unfortunately the main infrastructure is in Java, but the UI is, of course, javascript - not sure how much can be reused. Etherpad Lite seems to be a better original to look up. (It is Etherpad rewritten in pure Javascript using Node.js.) 1.5 M ins

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Congratulations -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http:

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

OK, the list has been officially published. Actually, the list at google-melange.com only has those orgs who have filled out their profile, so it will be missing a few until everyone does this. I should also note that Sage was accepted as a mentoring organization, for the first time. Their proje

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I want to help you review applications or as a backup mentor. I am GSoC mentor since 2008 and GCI mentor since 2010. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

[sympy] Re: GSOC application.

> Which one of these you like most?  There are already on-going > discussions on both of these topics (for example, [0] and [1], but > there are more), you may find looking at them useful. I'd like to implement parsers, since I have no background in symbolic integration. Thanks for references. > A

[sympy] Re: GSoC Idea

Also, another idea is to write ode solvers in sympy so that we can numerically simulate our systems within sympy without dependencies; currently we use SciPy to d our numerical stuff and plotting. Angadh On Mar 25, 3:25 pm, Angadh Nanjangud wrote: > Hi Everyone > > I'm Angadh, a third year Ph.D.

[sympy] Re: GSoC Idea

Angadh was one of the students who had to learn how to use physics.mechanics for class this past quarter. I think he would be in a good position to improve the documentation for this submodule, considering he just had to learn it on his own. I think I did a good job on the documentation, but just d

[sympy] Re: GSOC 2012

Hi, I read this algorithm from a calculus textbook "Thomas' Calculus 12th Edition". It's in chapter 5, Integration. -Saurabh Jha On Mar 27, 12:55 am, someone wrote: > Hi, > > > Can you provide a reference for this algorithm?  I'm not familiar > > with it. > > As far as I could find out in my se

[sympy] Re: GSoC Idea

On Mar 25, 3:49 pm, Matthew Rocklin wrote: > I quite like the idea of writing an ODE in SymPy and numerically computing > it elsewhere. I could see this going in two ways: > > 1) Sending simple systems to scipy's odeint - it seems ideal not to > reinvent odeint if possible > 2) Hook into the cod

[sympy] Re: GSoC Idea

Now that you put it that way, it makes sense to me. :) Thanks! Angadh On Apr 1, 1:36 am, Tim Lahey wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Angadh Nanjangud wrote: > > > Gilbert's latest code does use scipy but our thoughts are to eliminate > > external dependencies like that and just h

[sympy] Re: GSOC application.

Excuse me, I did not write sooner. It was nessesary to do all thing related to university. Now Im afraid I have no time. But anyway, > OK. What exactly would like to implement? I red this issue https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Parsing Well, the task is to implement a parser framework for sympy

[sympy] Re: GSOC application.

> Then that task is probably not for you. Thanks anyway, I'll look for the corresponding literature. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

[sympy] Re: GSOC '13

Yeah, I'm planning on starting work on a patch this weekend, once I actually have some free time! On Jan 27, 11:29 pm, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Great.  Let us know if you have any questions.  I take it you've seen > the ideas page:https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2012-ideas. > > One thing th

Re: [sympy] Re: GsoC

Yes, it is recommended to pick an idea from the ideas page (https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2013-Ideas). If you want to do something that is not on that page, you can discuss it with us, but for most part, you should pick something off that list. Aaron Meurer On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:

[sympy] Re: GSoC Proposal

@moorepants, would like your input on the API idea. I want to finalize my entire project idea before I start with my proposal. @asmeurer, do you think I could get a mentor on this, considering no work has been done in sympy in this direction till now? -- You received this message because you ar

[sympy] Re: GSOC 2013

.Hey, My proposal is also going to be in the same area (Ordinary Differential Equations), I am going to deal with the implementation of series solutions and solving of first order equations using Lie groups. As far as I know, there are many other topics also given under differential equation

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2013

Here you go. https://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list?q=label:EasyToFix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post t

[sympy] Re: GSoC Proposal

Hello everyone. Sorry about being out of touch for some time now. I have worked on my project idea to quite some extent and I am done with the first draft of the API I plan to implement. I have put up my proposal on the wiki, the link is- https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSOC-2013-Application

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC

I filled out the profile. It is in the list now. Now that I am at my computer and can write more: To students: read https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2013-application-template. Our ideas page is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2013-Ideas. Contact us about your idea. Get a patc

[sympy] Re: GSoC Proposal

I don't mean to bug you guys, but since my project idea is new and not in the current list of ideas for SymPy, I would like some general inputs from the community about my proposal. Could somebody from sympy.physics or the potential mentors please review it? And Aaron, does it meet the Applicati

[sympy] Re: GSOC Application

Hi, I have made refinements of proposal, adding more details and pseudocode. I would appreciate any feedback from community members. https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/saurabh_jha/11001 Sincerely, -Saurabh Jha On Apr 27, 2:55 pm, Saurabh Jha wrote: > Hi > > I

[sympy] Re: GSOC Application

Hi, I have added references about algorithms as well as added a new section "Demo" in my proposal. I know it's very near the deadline and I may be spamming. The proposal already had some reviews from Aaron Meurer and David Joyner. Just posting it notifying about the changes made in proposal. I am

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Hi Sachin and Prasoon, I have also CCed Aaron, Gilbert and the mailing list as a whole. If you have questions send them publicly to the mailing list, not privately to the mentors (unless you consider the issue to really be a private matter) First of all, congratulations! Be sure to setup blogs f

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Oh, one more thing. About actually representing your objects. Sympy roughly follows the following requirement `type(obj)(*obj.args)==obj`. It is rather important detail. Check out this https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Args-Invariant and please learn why this invariant is important (tree travers

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Hi Sachin. Yes, the one thing I need from you is your blog RSS feed. Send it to me, or send a pull request to https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org (edit the planet.ini file). The same goes to the other accepted GSoC students. The reason we decided to have Gilbert and Stefan both comentor you

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

On May 28, 2013, at 5:30 AM, Stefan Krastanov wrote: Oh, one more thing. About actually representing your objects. Sympy roughly follows the following requirement `type(obj)(*obj.args)==obj`. It is rather important detail. Check out this https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Args-Invariant and ple

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

@Aaron, this is the link to my blog - http://codesachin.blogspot.in/ I am not that acquainted with RSS and feeds, but is this what you need? - http://codesachin.blogspot.in/feeds/posts/default On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On May 28, 2013, at 5:30 AM, Stefan Krastanov

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Here's mine. I just created it today. http://allpython.wordpress.com/ And I here's the link to the RSS feed: http://allpython.wordpress.com/feed/ Also, I am under some heavy load till this week ends due to a project. So, I might not be able to create the wi

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

@Prasoon, I may pen some things down on a wiki page, I will point you to it. Do make the changes and comment as you see fit. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Prasoon Shukla wrote: > Here's mine. I just created it today. > http://allpython.wordpress.com/ >

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I'm a little hashed for time, so it would be great for you students to actually send a pull request to https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org with your blog (edit planet.ini). Regarding your blogs, I don't want to stifle your creativity, but it would help me a lot if you have your name prominen

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I think Stefan has already covered many good points here. I would request that in addition to the mock sympy sessions, you also write out (by hand or using something like LaTeX) the problems and make them available on the same wiki page. I find it helpful to see the notations people are working wi

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I will dedicate this first week's blogpost (codesachin.blogspot.in) to a written solution (on paper) of the generic problem posted by Stefan. By the end of my GSoC period, I hope to enable my proposed module to solve problems of such type entirely in code. Hence, having the API in mind would be a g

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Be aware that I did not check whether what I asked has an analytical solution. Feel free to change the details. On 29 May 2013 08:14, Sachin Joglekar wrote: > I will dedicate this first week's blogpost (codesachin.blogspot.in) to a > written solution (on paper) of the generic problem posted by

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

@Stefan, as I have mentioned in my proposal, I am not yet clear how I am gonna represent and deal with special charge distributions. For the time being, is it cool if I take 'rho' as a scalar potential? On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Stefan Krastanov < krastanov.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Be a

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

It is a "scalar field", not a "scalar potential". But yes, there is no need to deal with degenerate (line or surface) charge distributions for the moment. On 29 May 2013 12:57, Sachin Joglekar wrote: > @Stefan, as I have mentioned in my proposal, I am not yet clear how I am > gonna represent an

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

OK, planet SymPy is definitely not working. Ondrej... Aaron Meurer On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I'm a little hashed for time, so it would be great for you students to > actually send a pull request to > https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org with your blog (edit >

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Does anyone know of a better alternative to the planet software? It seems that it hasn't been updated since 2007 (http://people.gnome.org/~jdub/bzr/planet/devel/trunk/). It would be nice if there were just some webservice we could use. It would even be fine if we could stream the rss into somethi

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Hi, I am busy today and tomorrow, but I should have time to look at it on Friday. Alternatively, I can give access for anyone interested in fixing it to the server to investigate. Ondrej On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > OK, planet SymPy is definitely not working. Ondrej..

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I am a little busy till Saturday but I took a look at the planet.sympy.org repository. If I understand correctly, it is working by updating an rss file and then pushing changes to the server. The server then uses a tool to convert the xml feeds into html. First thing is that we can definitely u

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I went through Prasoon's proposal in detail, and I think it won't be too difficult coordinating our work so that his code fits well into mine. However, I have some queries that I would like cleared from Prasoon and Stefan to ensure we are all on the same page- 1.) Why define every Vector's coordin

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

(Sorry about the duplicate mail, @Prasoon and @Stefan) And I feel, we should atleast have something like a group chat over the weekend before we open a wiki page for the Vector module. It will help us get on the same page, and discuss how Prasoon and I can make our timelines gel together. Once we a

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

# Concerning the charge densities I think you are doing it a bit backwards. Both the electric field and the charge density are scalar fields. I do not see the need for a class like ScalarPotential or ChargeDensity when for both of them you can use ScalarField. Moreover, I think it is just wrong to

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I know that Prasoon still has some academic responsibilities at home. When he is ready it would be great if the four of us (Gilbert, Prasoon, Sachin and me) can meet on the mailing list (or maybe a "realtime wiki" like piratepad.net while we are discussing the api). Is Sunday or Monday ok for all

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Monday is good for me. I will be done with the project by Saturday night. Time for the meet doesn't matter mostly for me; I can stay awake late or wake up early according to the time required. Sachin will need to give his opinion on this though. But yes, that particular time suits me quite nicely.

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

@Stefan, I guess I put it in a wrong way. I plan to implement ScalarPotential as a special case(subclass, if you will) of scalar fields, because I want them to be functional as field generators for conservative fields (something like scalarpotential.efield()). Charge densities will obviously be sca

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

There is one issue with what you suggest. Maybe there is a nice solution, but I do not see it. So here is my question: What if I want the superposition of two `ScalarPotential` fields? Or what If I want to multiply a `ScalarPotential` by (say) 2. Or add 2 to the `ScalarPotential`. By the way, bot

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

If I am going to use ScalarPotential to denote the Potential of a conservative field, then adding just '2' to it won't make sense. Or maybe you mean something like ScalarPotential(2, 'MKS'). In this case, the overloaded operators will ensure that things like '2*scalar_potential' or 'scalar_potentia

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Why is ScalarPotential(2, 'MKS') any better than just 2? Why do you need a subclass ScalarPotential? What advantages does it have over just scalar field? The detail about overloading the operators so it always returns scalar potential seems good. _However_ I suspect that you are doing the same mi

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Makes sense. I guess I originally thought of ScalarPotential to facilitate conceptually distinguish ChargeDensity and ScalarPotential. So something like '-spotential.laplacian(frame)' instead of 'spotential.density(frame)'. We can add docs/tutorials at the end of coding so that the process is clear

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Monday (10:00) for me works. How about we all log onto IRC at that time, and decide where to work/discuss then? -Gilbert On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Prasoon Shukla wrote: > Monday is good for me. I will be done with the project by Saturday night. > Time for the meet doesn't matter mostly f

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Fine by me. Will enter SymPy room around 22:00 on Monday. On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gilbert Gede wrote: > Monday (10:00) for me works. How about we all log onto IRC at that time, > and decide where to work/discuss then? > > -Gilbert > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Prasoon Shukla >

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Okay then. I'll be on the #sympy Monday night, 10 pm IST. On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Sachin Joglekar wrote: > Fine by me. Will enter SymPy room around 22:00 on Monday. > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gilbert Gede wrote: > >> Monday (10:00) for me works. How about we all log onto IRC

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

Ok, then it is on IRC at: - 10:00 West Coast, - 19:00 Europe, - 22:30 India On 1 June 2013 15:02, Prasoon Shukla wrote: > Okay then. I'll be on the #sympy Monday night, 10 pm IST. > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Sachin Joglekar > wrote: > >> Fine by me. Will enter SymPy room around 22:

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I think the problem is with the DNS somehow. According to https://help.github.com/articles/my-custom-domain-isn-t-working#dns-errors, the dns should point to 204.232.175.78, but I get $dig planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I think the problem is with the DNS somehow. According to > https://help.github.com/articles/my-custom-domain-isn-t-working#dns-errors, > the dns should point to 204.232.175.78, but I get > > $dig planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd >

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

I now get $dig planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd ;; global options: +cmd ;planet.sympy.org. IN A planet.sympy.org. 14400 IN A 204.232.175.78 but planet.sympy.org and sympy.github.io/planet.sympy.org both still point

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

It still doesn't work. Aaron Meurer On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I now get > > $dig planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd > ;; global options: +cmd > ;planet.sympy.org. IN A > planet.sympy.

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

And by the way, even the gh-pages branch is out of date. Aaron Meurer On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > It still doesn't work. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> I now get >> >> $dig planet.sympy.org +nostats +nocomments +nocmd >> >>

[sympy] Re: GSoC Acceptance

The gh-pages branch is updating : https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org/blob/gh-pages/index.html This contains newer posts from some of the GSoC participants. I haven't checked whether these are all the new posts though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

[sympy] Re: GSoC Conclusion

Thank you for the update Aaron. Regards, Thilina On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > The Google Summer of Code program has officially ended, and I'm happy > to announce that all seven of our students have passed. > > This hopefully doesn't mean the end of their participation

[sympy] Re: GSoC Conclusion

Thanks to the SymPy community for giving me the opportunity to code for SymPy this summer. It has been one really awesome experience. And also congratulations to my fellow GSoCers at SymPy. :) -- Regards, Manoj Kumar, Mech Undergrad http://manojbits.wordpress.com -- You received this message be

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >