On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, John Smith wrote:
>
> We really don't seem to be on the same wave
> length at times. :)
Amen to that :P
> What we have now is when we tag a stop sign it has the implication of
> effecting both lanes and various suggestions put forth so far try to
> distingush thi
2009/8/28 Roy Wallace :
> Ok, I understand. Do you have any antibiotics?
If have an answer or not doesn't matter, the OSM community is more
than the sum of it's parts and some people may already have experience
with other systems that do do this already and may be able to offer
insight into how t
2009/8/28 Lester Caine :
> This does bring up a few more combinations that are not currently
> covered. I've had a couple of runs over to Milton Keynes in the last
> couple of days, and GETTING into the correct lane even to go straight on
> can be a problem, with the outside lane of a pair forcing
Hi, I'm from Croatia and I have seen something strange when looking at
borders. If you look at this map you will clearly see borders:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.2&lon=16.51&zoom=7&layers=B000FTF
But if you zoom in or out the borders start to dissapear, especially
between Slovenia and Cro
Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
> This is a proposal for a generic way of tagging a node which
> represents an object which faces a certain way - e.g. a traffic sign
> such as a stop sign.
It lacks an example where this complex modelling would even be
necessary. In all examples mentioned so far, a node mo
2009/8/28 Roy Wallace :
> I actually think it leaves things in slightly better shape - like me
> tagging a post box outside, or tagging my addr:housenumber. Sure, it's
I'm not talking about post boxes or house addressing schemes, I'm
talking about being able to tag lanes on a way differently when
More diary spam:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mariann/diary/7691
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Sorry for thinking out loud but here we go.
A Way can have many lanes, Infact the default is lanes=2 (or is it?)
oneway=yes infers lanes=1
lanes can be used for many purposes including turning, parking, walking cycling.
Lanes need names I guess partially if we all going to use them to
describe
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Roy Wallace :
>
>> Ok, I understand. Do you have any antibiotics?
>
> If have an answer or not doesn't matter, the OSM community is more
> than the sum of it's parts and some people may already have experience
> with other systems that
2009/8/28 Peter Childs :
> A Way can have many lanes, Infact the default is lanes=2 (or is it?)
>
> oneway=yes infers lanes=1
Seems like a sane assumption.
> A Lane may need to be in a relation etc.
The way would be the relation, and the properties of the way should
cascade to the lane, and then
On 27/08/2009, at 9:09 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I'd say the only thing you know for sure is that the source is unknown
> unless it is explicitly tagged. I wouldn't assume anything besides
> that. There are people who don't upload their traces (i personally
> always do) and who have all righ
John Smith wrote:
> Actually no, you can still tag stop signs on a way like people always
> have, then when lanes get sorted out they can be dealt with properly.
I believe that stop signs have usually nothing to do with lanes (though
there probably are exceptions). They apply to everyone travellin
2009/8/28 Tobias Knerr :
> I believe that stop signs have usually nothing to do with lanes (though
> there probably are exceptions). They apply to everyone travelling into a
> certain direction, no matter on what lane. This becomes apparent in
> streets where there are no distinct lanes for the two
2009/8/28 James Livingston :
> If someone doesn't upload their trace _and_ doesn't add a source tag,
> then I'll assume that my GPS trace is more accurate than whatever they
> used. I think that's fair, because all someone has to do if they have
> an accurate way is let other mappers know that by
Accounts spamming are banned.
They're usually caught in good time by our master admin.
2009/8/28 John Smith :
> More diary spam:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mariann/diary/7691
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.
2009/8/28 Thomas Wood :
> Accounts spamming are banned.
> They're usually caught in good time by our master admin.
Why not make use of crowd sourcing?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 28/08/09 09:24, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Thomas Wood:
>> Accounts spamming are banned.
>> They're usually caught in good time by our master admin.
>
> Why not make use of crowd sourcing?
What do you mean exactly?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
__
2009/8/28 Tom Hughes :
> What do you mean exactly?
Well if enough people can tag a post as spam it would effectively
disappear from the site to be reviewed and/or deleted, maybe you could
have a more extensive rating system, don't know, but this would allow
native speakers of various languages to
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
> Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to use name.
This was the original tag. However, it has various problems - for
example, it makes it hard to render a lock as a single
On 28/08/09 09:39, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Tom Hughes:
>> What do you mean exactly?
>
> Well if enough people can tag a post as spam it would effectively
> disappear from the site to be reviewed and/or deleted, maybe you could
> have a more extensive rating system, don't know, but this would
On 27/08/09 14:27, Mike Harris wrote:
> On a related canal issue, I have a problem with deciding how to tag a canal
> bridge as a segment of a way. The way will often already have name= and ref=
> tags as a highway; but I want to add a name= and ref= tag for the canal
> bridge. Not keen on name_1 o
On 26/08/09 21:42, Mikel Maron wrote:
> IMO, the wiki should reflect the current collective thinking. If the
> collective thinking is in disagreement,
> then the wiki should show both sides, equally, with _respectful_
> disagreement.
If, however many years after starting the project, we are in res
Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
I see nothing happening at proposed features page for this feature:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/volleyball
Cheers,
Valent.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.
2009/8/28 Valent Turkovic :
> Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
People have been using natural=sand to tag golf bunkers.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Hi, I'm from Croatia and I have seen something strange when looking at
> borders. If you look at this map you will clearly see borders:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.2&lon=16.51&zoom=7&layers=B000FTF
>
> But if you zoom in or out the borders start to dissapear, esp
On 28/08/2009 10:12, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
>
> I see nothing happening at proposed features page for this feature:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/volleyball
>
> Cheers,
> Valent.
I'd tag it something
On 08/28/2009 03:46 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> If dieterdriest has found a number of people who've been ignoring the
> definition,
Nobody (that I know of) has been ignoring the definition. It's just
that the definitions didn't match the top-leveldescription. *None* of
the definitions of the
On 28/08/2009, at 9:23 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 08/28/2009 03:46 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> If dieterdriest has found a number of people who've been ignoring the
>> definition,
>
> Nobody (that I know of) has been ignoring the definition. It's just
> that the definitions didn't match the top-
I second option that highway tag isn't used for physical purposes.
Physical status of road *can* define it's importance (legal or
subjective), and I think there is where disagreement is.
More or less comon practice is to follow some kind of rules/laws when
tagging roads. But it is also clear that
2009/8/28 Micha Ruh :
> All,
>
> please note that 'Dieterdreist' (german) translates to 'brazen Dieter' /
> 'uppity Dieter'.
>
> My vote got deleted by him _without any notice_.
>
> *** ** ** ***!
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Highway_key_voting_
> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
>
>> lock=yes
>> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>
> When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
> already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
>
Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal on its individual nodes?
I
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Valent Turkovic :
>> Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
>
> People have been using natural=sand to tag golf bunkers.
But that is tagging for the renderer and hopefully people will change
over to the pro
2009/8/28 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> 2009/8/28 Richard Weait :
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John Smith wrote:
>>> 2009/8/28 Valent Turkovic :
Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
>>>
>>> People have been using natural=sand to tag golf bunkers.
>>
>> But that
2009/8/28 Richard Weait :
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John Smith wrote:
>> 2009/8/28 Valent Turkovic :
>>> Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
>>
>> People have been using natural=sand to tag golf bunkers.
>
> But that is tagging for the renderer and hopefully
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Craig Wallace wrote:
> On 28/08/2009 10:12, Valent Turkovic wrote:
>> Hi, I would like to know how to tag beach (sand) volleyball courts?
>>
>> I see nothing happening at proposed features page for this feature:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_f
2009/8/28 :
>> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
>>
>>> lock=yes
>>> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>>
>> When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
>> already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
>>
> Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal on
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð
Bjarmason wrote:
I'm splitting this from the previous thread.
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Richard Fairhurst
> wrote:
>> Potlatch uses the OSM wiki for localisation. I have no plans to change this
>> in favour of a third-party solution.
>
> Pe
Peter Childs wrote:
> The Canal way will need to be split at the lock gates, (or in
> some cases where a diversion starts (due to some rivers
> going over weirs) while there is a lock for boats.
(UK-specific tagging stuff follows)
Ideally I'd like to discourage people from using a (non-closed
>> I'd tag it something like this:
>>
>> leisure=pitch
>> sport=beach_volleyball
>> surface=sand
>
> I surveyed one last year
> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/25866824) and tagged it as:
>
> leisure = pitch
> sport = volleyball
> surface = sand
>
> Perhaps that's a mistagging. I like your
unsubscribe
Dit elektronisch bericht en zijn bijlagen zijn vertrouwelijk en bedoeld voor
exclusief gebruik door degenen die door de zender als geadresseerd zijn
bedoeld. Het bericht en zijn bijlagen kunnen informatie bevatten voor beperkt
gebruik of onderworpen aan copyright of andere wetsbepali
Hello,
Here's an update on the current state of the local chapters working group:
*Local Chapters Agreement*
The debate around the details of setting up local chapters is happening on
the local chapters wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters and its
discussion pa
On 28 Aug 2009, at 16:49, Nick Black wrote:
Hello,
*Next Meeting of the Local Chapters Group*
The local chapters working group will meet at 6pm BST on Weds 30th
September to discuss these issues and others. The agenda of the
meeting is:
* What is the process for creating draft agr
2009/8/29 Peter Miller :
> As agreed in an earlier thread on talk [1] can we have an email list for
> this subject. How about talk-local? Can we have it now!
+100
Why are people being excluded from these decisions when I've
repeatedly told/emailed you that 6pm BST is unsuitable for a number of
in
Hi,
On the talk-ca list it's still in the works (i put forward the idea, but no
responses yet).
Once the Canada Import is done... that'll be a BIG difference in Map
quality. :-)
But anyway, being a local foundation might let us work closer with Natural
Resource Canada, and with Non-profits and he
Peter, John + list,
Not sure where the details of payment have gone - I'll try to take a look at
the history over the weekend, but I might not get the chance. The info is
definitely on the wiki discussion page, which seemed a good place to hold
the contentious issues.
Totally agree regarding a ma
OSM is featured in Wired Magazine today:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/08/gps-hackers/
Cheers,
Morten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/28 Richard Fairhurst :
>
> Peter Childs wrote:
>> The Canal way will need to be split at the lock gates, (or in
>> some cases where a diversion starts (due to some rivers
>> going over weirs) while there is a lock for boats.
>
> (UK-specific tagging stuff follows)
>
> Ideally I'd like to dis
2009/8/28 Morten Kjeldgaard :
> OSM is featured in Wired Magazine today:
>
> http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/08/gps-hackers/
And now mirrored in CNN http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/08/27/gps.digital.maps/
--
Matt Williams
http://milliams.com
___
Or not even limited to volleyball at all. Here in Rio de Janeiro it is very
common to play futevôlei ("footvolley", volley played with the foot, not
with the hand) in the volleyball pitches.
:)
Cheers,
2009/8/28 Peteris Krisjanis
> >> I'd tag it something like this:
> >>
> >> leisure=pitch
> >
2009/8/28 Arlindo Pereira :
> Or not even limited to volleyball at all. Here in Rio de Janeiro it is very
> common to play futevôlei ("footvolley", volley played with the foot, not
> with the hand) in the volleyball pitches.
Indeed. However, in most cases they *are* (beach) volleyball courts.
That
Hello
During a meeting of Lithuanian mappers we raised an idea, that it
would be useful to have type of track recorded along access/security
details. That is currently you only specify how your traces can be
accessed (public, private, intermediary). It would be nice to be able
specify how were t
2009/8/28 Tomas Straupis :
> This could later be used in editors to use different colours for
> different types of traces. This way we would rather approximate street
> track along motorcar traces (if available) rather than "foot-traces"
> done walking alongside the street.
in JOSM there is a plu
Hi, I would really appreciate if the JOSM presets dictators could
remove the option about motorcar in the JOSM presets dialog.
We get on the french ML more and more complains about the confusion
between unclassified, tracks, footway, path, etc. If in addition, the
JOSM presets about highway=path s
Peter Childs wrote:
> I have no knowledge of Canals and shipping, so maybe we need an
> expert on how to map waterways properly.
Yeah, maybe we could ask the editor of the biggest-selling waterway
magazine, established since 1972 and which publishes a series of detailed
pull-out waterway maps ev
54 matches
Mail list logo
