U nedjelju 16.3.2014. s početkom u 15:00h bit će održan prvi Virtualni dan
slobodnih i otvorenih tehnologija.
Kako bi mogli pratiti virtualni dan trebaju vam sljedeći linkovi:
HULK onAir youtube kanal gdje ćete moći uživo pratiti predavanja:
Hoi,
Ter info:
http://www.toerismelimburg.be/nl/content/werken-op-het-fietsroutenetwerk
Eind maart 2014 is de nieuwe fietskaart voor het toeristisch
fietsroutenetwerk beschikbaar. Na een periode van 5 jaar zonder grote
wijzigingen op het fietsroutenetwerk, gaan er dit jaar heel wat nieuwe
On Friday 14 March 2014 11:26:51 Stijn Rombauts wrote:
Ik ben al een paar nieuwe en verplaatste
knoopunten tegengekomen. De fietsers onder ons gaan weer weten wat doen.
Ook in de provincie Antwerpen worden er deze maanden heel wat routes
aangepast, dus nog meer werk :-)
Ben
Hi Jorieke,
Thanks for the feedback. I like copy paste, so I will copy your questions
and answer them one by one.
- now the oldest member is on top, maybe it is interesting to put the
newest member on top?
Good idea:
Hi Julien,
I already read part of your comments but I will try and have a closer look
soon... I also received word that OKFN is doing the same. Maybe we could
merge this work with theirs?
Best Regards,
Ben
___
Talk-be mailing list
Do you have any indication from when the data may be? At least roughly
pre/post licence change (pre-licence change data would naturally pose a
number of questions)?
In general attribution of OSM in the context of non-map uses is not
particularly good and hasn't been policed at the same level. We
Paweł Paprota writes:
Unless you protect and license your work, you *will* be exploited
by a powerful corporation.
It is not possible for any powerful corporation to exploit
OpenStreetMap data.
That's because OpenStreetMap is not way #20101312, it is Paweł
Paprota. OpenStreetMap is not node
Alex Barth writes:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21221
Another aspect of where the ODbL hurts us: Because we are using a
restrictive license, we cannot argue against other parties that use a
restrictive license. Look at New York State's GIS
Clearinghouse. Individuals not
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:26:23AM -0400, Alex Barth wrote:
Hello everyone -
I've been sitting on writing about the detrimental effects of
OpenStreetMap's share-alike license (ODbL) for a while and finally decided
to, um, share. I've been listening long to many OpenStreetMappers I respect
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/14/2014 12:41 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
Am 13.03.2014 15:26, schrieb Alex Barth:
Looking forward to your comments,
No! Stay at Share alike to avoid misuse of open data! Compare it to
the GPL which is frequently used in OS-Sortware.
Am I
With current ODbL I'm mainly concerned about 1. small and medium
corporations as well as 2. government entities.
I'm not so concerned about big companies, especially G* exploiting
OSM (although I dislike some behaviours of G*).
So I'm in favor of CC-BY (e.g.
On Friday 14 March 2014, Florian Lohoff wrote:
[...]
Today maintaining the Linux Kernel or OSM without a HUGE community is
a lost fight so there is nothing to gain by taking this data _from_
the community. Those who do this are the ones to loose, not the ones
giving away their code/data.
One thing I would like to hear about in this context of this discussion,
are examples of concrete use cases that are not happening because of
share alike and that are in general things that the community would like
to support (so not evil corp can't take the data now and keep it).
Concrete in the
2014-03-14 10:58 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
Example: one of the classical straw men is that government GIS offices
over the whole world would wide spread directly take OSM data and
integrate it in to their own official datasets, if you believe that, I
have a number of bridges
Norbert,
1. Yes, it would be fair to say that ODbL is much closer to LGPL than
it is to GPL. The ODbL does not require Share-Alike merely on
combining two datasets, but only if you modify the data that's in OSM
in addition to adding your own.
2. Using GPG is good. Using GPG without MIME
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:58:57 +0100, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
One thing I would like to hear about in this context of this
discussion, are examples of concrete use cases that are not happening
because of share alike and that are in general things that the
community would like to support
To throw another log into the fire: What about imports?
OSM having a share-alike licence enabled us to incorporate (and otherwise
use) all kinds of open data sets, which may be licensed PD/CC0, CC-BY,
CC-BY-SA or ODbL. (A lot of open government data in the EU is released
under CC-BY or
Am 14.03.2014 12:43, schrieb o...@k3v.eu:
...
On the flip side of this, if share alike is so great where are the
examples of organisations contributing back to OSM because of it?
Mostly I think organisations contribute because it is in their interest
to do so (a better map makes their
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:43 AM, o...@k3v.eu wrote:
On the flip side of this, if share alike is so great where are the
examples of organisations contributing back to OSM because of it?
We see this already. I've spoken to companies and orgs who have said
specifically that they would not
Simon Poole wrote:
One thing I would like to hear about in this context of this discussion,
are examples of concrete use cases that are not happening because of
share alike and that are in general things that the community would like
to support (so not evil corp can't take the data now and keep
Am 14.03.2014 14:17, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
..
Hi Simon,
We have considered that we cannot use OpenStreetMap as a background map in
any of the applications where users are sending location aware information
back to administration. For showing existing data it would be OK but not
On 14 March 2014 12:01, Martin Raifer tyr@gmail.com wrote:
OSM having a share-alike licence enabled us to incorporate (and otherwise
use) all kinds of open data sets, which may be licensed PD/CC0, CC-BY,
CC-BY-SA or ODbL. (A lot of open government data in the EU is released under
CC-BY or
Hi Jukka,
although I'm curious about an answer from someone who's more competent
in the legal things, I'm not sure with your argument here.
ODBL does not require Share-Alike for produced works.
The map, even when based on OSM data is a produced work.
Therefore even if the map is based on osm
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:58:57AM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
One thing I would like to hear about in this context of this discussion,
are examples of concrete use cases that are not happening because of
share alike and that are in general things that the community would like
to support
Simon Poole wrote:
Two remarks/questions:
- is the derived data actually being publicly used?
Sometimes is, sometimes not. If it is publicly used then it may be that
only part of the attributes are public. Something that is not publicly
used right now may come public in the future but still
Hi,
is there really no way to avoid those horrible captchas whenever I add
a link to a JOSM bug ticket or another friendly website to the wiki??
There are at least 2 tickets open which could help a lot:
*https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5116
*https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3898
I
I disagree. This is about money; my personal belief is that CloudMade would
have made more dollars without having to ShareAlike. More business models open
up, and it wouldn’t have had to deal with the community. Indeed I imagine this
was a topic of continual discussion.
The ODbL requires only
What I saw on Tuesday seem to indicate that ReMAPTCHA (Stefan?) is
nearly here. As the name says it is map related.
Unluckily it is still a pain to use if you have problems with your
eyesight, but at least you are not working for google at the same time.
Simon
Am 14.03.2014 16:06, schrieb
On 14.03.2014 16:06, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
is there really no way to avoid those horrible captchas whenever I add
a link to a JOSM bug ticket or another friendly website to the wiki??
How about interlinks ?
JOSM Trac has some for most common external website (OSM, OSM-wiki,
OSM-Trac etc.)
On 14/03/14 15:06, Richard Z. wrote:
How about an OSM quiz instead of captchas?
You're offering to write one I take it?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:43:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/03/14 15:06, Richard Z. wrote:
How about an OSM quiz instead of captchas?
You're offering to write one I take it?
will think about one. In the short term, there are open tickets
which should make it a lot easier
Richard
On 14/03/14 15:50, Richard Z. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:43:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/03/14 15:06, Richard Z. wrote:
How about an OSM quiz instead of captchas?
You're offering to write one I take it?
will think about one. In the short term, there are open tickets
which
On 14.03.2014 17:01, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/03/14 15:50, Richard Z. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:43:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/03/14 15:06, Richard Z. wrote:
How about an OSM quiz instead of captchas?
You're offering to write one I take it?
will think about one. In the
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
We see this already. I've spoken to companies and orgs who have said
specifically that they would not contribute to OSM if it was not
Share-Alike. No one wants to be competing against themselves in the
future.
This
On 14.03.2014 17:15, Tom Hughes wrote:
I think most of those are already whitelisted aren't they?
Unless I'm mistaken, these are the currently whitelisted URLs:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Captcha-addurl-whitelist
___
talk mailing
2014-03-13 15:26 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com:
I've been sitting on writing about the detrimental effects of
OpenStreetMap's share-alike license (ODbL) for a while and finally decided
to, um, share. I've been listening long to many OpenStreetMappers I respect
a ton telling me it's not
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:12:13PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 14.03.2014 17:15, Tom Hughes wrote:
I think most of those are already whitelisted aren't they?
Unless I'm mistaken, these are the currently whitelisted URLs:
Richard Z. ricoz.osm at gmail.com writes:
I need on average 4 captcha-reloads before I get a captcha picture which
I can recognise with good enough confidence to even try it.
You only have to type the right number for the distorted figures. You can
type whatever you like for the photograph.
Andrew, ha, as a rule, you can recognize a photo but not a distorted
figures.
2014-03-14 22:50 GMT+01:00 Andrew Hain andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk:
Richard Z. ricoz.osm at gmail.com writes:
I need on average 4 captcha-reloads before I get a captcha picture which
I can recognise with good
2014-03-14 16:19 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
What I saw on Tuesday seem to indicate that ReMAPTCHA (Stefan?) is
nearly here. As the name says it is map related.
Wonderful idea!
There's a demo/the code somewhere?
Cristian
___
talk mailing
On 14/03/2014, o...@k3v.eu o...@k3v.eu wrote:
On the flip side of this, if share alike is so great where are the
examples of organisations contributing back to OSM because of it?
There's one fairly obvious to me : the share-alike requirement is
necessary to enforce the attribution requirement
On 14/03/2014, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi wrote:
For showing existing data it would be OK but not
for gathering data from users because user could locate a place corner of
Annankatu and Merimiehenkatu http://osm.org/go/0xPLoLTa0?m= by looking at
the OSM map. The interpretation
On Mar 14, 2014 8:24 AM, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi
wrote:
Simon Poole wrote:
One thing I would like to hear about in this context of this discussion,
are examples of concrete use cases that are not happening because of
share alike and that are in general things that the
Hallo!
TL;DR: Is het een goed idee om te proberen de lijst van brievenbussen van
PostNL los te peuteren en te importeren in OSM? Ik zie dat ik brievenbussen op
de kaart toe kan voegen, maar ik ben er nog geen enkele tegengekomen, laat
staan compleet met lichtingsmomenten zoals ze wel op de
I got nothing back. Didn't follow it up.
On 14 Mar 2014, at 19:50, Daniel Cussen d...@post.com wrote:
I've just got a response from An Garda that my request has been passed up
the chain.
Fingers crossed.
Donie
Donie Did you ever get an official response from the Gardai regarding
your
PessoALL,
Sou do Rio de Janeiro e estou dando manutenção no OSM desde novembro de
2013 (estou aprendendo bastante!) e vim pedir ajuda, principalmente aos
colaboradores do Rio de Janeiro que conhecem bem os trechos que irei falar...
Fiquei bastante contente ao conseguir minha primeira
Há um novo texto no blog do Serge sobre a dificuldade de manutenção de
dados importados no OSM:
http://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2014/03/13/the-maintenance-of-imported-data-in-openstreetmap/
On 04-02-2014 19:59, Wille wrote:
Compartilho um texto muito bom sobre a questão das importações no OSM:
Taí uma tag que eu nunca entendi como preencher, REF
Sempre que rodo o validador do JOSM, aparecem críticas relacionadas.
E é tanta coisa colocada lá que fica dificil saber o que é mesmo para ficar.
Marcelo
2014-03-13 23:53 GMT-03:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 13,
ref é uma etiqueta genérica para Código de referência (corrijo o que
disse antes, não é número, é código).
Assim como para a etiqueta name, tem outras etiquetas
relacionadashttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Refpara usos
similares, como
loc_ref, old_ref, ref:* e outros.
A etiqueta ref pode ser
2014-03-14 9:12 GMT-03:00 Marcelo Pereira pereirahol...@gmail.com:
Taí uma tag que eu nunca entendi como preencher, REF
De forma bem resumida, no Brasil ref vai ser comumente utilizada nas
saídas de rodovias (quando na placa tem Saída 430A você vai colocar
430A na ref) e nas rodovias (por
Alterei a tradução de *Reference* no editor
iDhttps://www.transifex.com/projects/p/id-editor/translate/#pt_BR/presets/11487835?q=refpara
Código de referência.
Em 14 de março de 2014 09:23, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.comescreveu:
2014-03-14 9:12 GMT-03:00 Marcelo Pereira
2014-03-14 8:13 GMT-03:00 Hélio Ricardo Pinheiro Coutinho
helio_couti...@hotmail.com:
Porém, notei que o mapa compilado, já no GPS Garmin, ficou com alguns
problemas:
Por acaso você está usando o poly daqui
http://downloads.cloudmade.com/americas/south_america/brazil/rio_de_janeiro
para extrair
Eu uso http://gaemin.openstreetmap.nl/
Depois um tempo p gerar (muitos vezes instantanio) a mapa com qualquer
poligonio voce quer ser disponível, geralmente gerando somente Brazil, mas
dezembro passado girei Brazil com Portugal no mesmo mapa
Os arquivos e disponíveis em os mais usados formatos
Osmanianos,
Lendo a frase Rivers and streams should not be tagged with layer -1 along
long sections of their length, eu entendo que a tag layer NÃO deve ser
usada em longas seções de rios e ( seja-lá-o-que-for ) streams.
Mas deduzo que é possível usá-la em rios nos pontos/trechos onde estiver
Obrigado!Vou tentar o novo Poly indicado para o Rj.Uma pergunta, e quanto ao
mapa do Brasil, aparecem praticamente os mesmos problemas. Você teria como me
indicar um outro arquivo Poly para o Brasil?
Não querendo abusar, quando faço pesquisa de endereço no GPS com esses mapas,
aparecem após a
- Pra renderização o que ficaria melhor ?
Depende do seu renderizador. Para o Mapnik, layer=0 nas pontes fica
melhor nesse caso específico porque daí ele consegue conectar o
preenchimento e o contorno da via da ponte ao preenchimento e contorno
das vias em que a ponte se conecta. Daí, o rio
2014-03-14 10:39 GMT-03:00 Hélio Ricardo Pinheiro Coutinho
helio_couti...@hotmail.com:
Uma pergunta, e quanto ao mapa do Brasil, aparecem praticamente os mesmos
problemas. Você teria como me indicar um outro arquivo Poly para o Brasil?
Tem esse aqui:
Em 14 de março de 2014 08:13, Hélio Ricardo Pinheiro Coutinho
helio_couti...@hotmail.com escreveu:
PessoALL,
Sou do Rio de Janeiro e estou dando manutenção no OSM desde novembro
de 2013 (estou aprendendo bastante!) e vim pedir ajuda, principalmente aos
colaboradores do Rio de Janeiro
Nelson,
Obrigado mais uma vez! Este Poly que você me indicou só tem 5KB o que usei
tem 2133KB, é isso mesmo?
Abs,
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:53:03 -0300
From: nao...@gmail.com
To: talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-br]Kit para compilação Garmin em Windows e mapas
Do not use layer=-1 to *hide warnings* about crossing or overlapping ways.
Either *fix them* or leave the easily visible warning so that others can
fix them.
Quem disse está sendo feito assim para esconder alertas? Eu tratei cada
um dos alertas originais, e por fim coloquei layer=-1 no rio. Está
2014-03-14 11:07 GMT-03:00 Hélio Ricardo Pinheiro Coutinho
helio_couti...@hotmail.com:
Este Poly que você me indicou só tem 5KB o que usei tem 2133KB, é isso
mesmo?
Sim, está certo :-)
É uma versão mais simplificada, com número menor de nós.
___
Boa, Nelson, vou incluir esse poly no kit. A propósito, você teria por aí
os polys dos outros estados?
[]s
PC
Em 14 de março de 2014 10:03, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.comescreveu:
2014-03-14 8:13 GMT-03:00 Hélio Ricardo Pinheiro Coutinho
helio_couti...@hotmail.com:
Porém, notei
Qual a origem desse dogma, na minha opinião: ao importar a hidrografia
de uma certa região, alguns importadores acharam mais conveniente
colocar layer=-1 em todos os rios pra se livrar dos alertas do JOSM do
que deixar os alertas e, quem sabe, adicionar as pontes corretamente.
Bem, tem 1 coisa
Bom, manter um mapa atualizado é um desafio. Não vejo porque esse seria um
problema exclusivo da parte que é importada. Meu primeiro tracklog
(enviado ao Tracksource) foi de uma rampa de asa-delta que visitei em
Congonhal-MG em 2004. Nem sei se ainda existe.
2014-03-14 8:56 GMT-03:00 Wille
Paulo Carvalho,
- O mapa base pego daqui (como está indicado na BAT do projeto COCAR):
http://download.geofabrik.de/south-america/brazil-latest.osm.pbf
- Captura: Não estou com o GPS aqui no trabalho, posso enviar a noite...
- Procuro sempre habilitar um mapa por vez...
- Não
Hélio,
Se você apontar um exemplo (dando nome da Rua ou apontando no OSM) eu
mesmo faço a verificação no meu GPS contra o mapa-base do OSM.
[ ]s
Paulo
Em 14 de março de 2014 11:17, Hélio Ricardo Pinheiro Coutinho
helio_couti...@hotmail.com escreveu:
Paulo Carvalho,
- O mapa base
2014-03-14 11:09 GMT-03:00 Paulo Carvalho paulo.r.m.carva...@gmail.com:
Boa, Nelson, vou incluir esse poly no kit. A propósito, você teria por aí
os polys dos outros estados?
Posso gerar. Hoje e fim de semana está meio corrido, mas no máximo até
segunda eu gero de todos.
Paulo, segue,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204618440#map=19/-22.82102/-42.99988
Rua Almirante Nestor Pinto Alves (ao lado do Supermercado Extra) aparece no ID
e não aparece no mapa OSM no GPS, entre outras próximas.
Abs,
Hélio.
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:20:38 -0300
From:
Nélson, não tenha pressa. Pensei que talvez você os já tivesse prontos.
Mas se dispondo a gerá-los, só temos a agradecer.
[]s
Paulo
Em 14 de março de 2014 11:20, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.comescreveu:
2014-03-14 11:09 GMT-03:00 Paulo Carvalho paulo.r.m.carva...@gmail.com:
Boa,
Pra quem quiser acompanhar:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-March/016865.html
2014-03-14 11:10 GMT-03:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
Qual a origem desse dogma, na minha opinião: ao importar a hidrografia
de uma certa região, alguns importadores acharam
Pessoal, qual devo deixar desses dois rios sobrepostos?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/151882080
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
2014-03-14 14:48 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com:
Pessoal, qual devo deixar desses dois rios sobrepostos?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/151882080
Não é sobreposto. Um é o rio em si e o outro a área do rio.
Está certo (só teria que ajustar a área dele)
Pelo que eu sei, em rios vc pode desenhar uma área para marcar o
espaço que ele ocupa, e também pode desenhar uma linha para marcar o
seu curso (principalmente para ser usado quando for feito um
planejamento de navegação), Talvez o que precise se feito ali é
somente o ajuste do curso do rio.
Troquei as respostas :-)
Pra http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42433318 você pergunta para a pessoa.
Para http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205363395 (no caso seria o outro
lado da avenida e os trechos dela), deixa a avenida de forma correta
(mão dupla).
Do jeito que está está correto. Está assim por causa das obras da copa.
2014-03-14 16:46 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com:
Okay. Vou ver quem esta ativo lá e perguntar.
Em 14/03/2014 16:41, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com escreveu:
Troquei as respostas
Braulio. Então nos dois casos é pra deixar?
Em 14/03/2014 16:52, Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com escreveu:
Do jeito que está está correto. Está assim por causa das obras da copa.
2014-03-14 16:46 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com:
Okay. Vou ver quem esta
2014-03-14 16:52 GMT-03:00 Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com:
Do jeito que está está correto. Está assim por causa das obras da copa.
Aqui onde a avenida Aminta Barros, na parte de cima, muda de direção
na Rua Professor Antônio Campos (ficando com os dois sentidos dela
para uma única direção),
Sim. Tanto a avenida Amintas Barros como a Miguel Castro (ao sul desta)
estão com alguns trechos em mão única, mesmo onde há canteiro central.
Há mais alterações além dessas, mas não estou conseguindo acompanhar :(.
Mas pelo menos essa mais importantes e duradouras eu coloquei no mapa.
2014-03-14 16:57 GMT-03:00 Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com:
Sim. Tanto a avenida Amintas Barros como a Miguel Castro (ao sul desta)
estão com alguns trechos em mão única, mesmo onde há canteiro central.
Faltou um note explicando isso então ;-)
___
Braulio. Eu não vou corrigir, vou deixar pra você que tem mais conhecimento
do caso.
Em 14/03/2014 17:03, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com escreveu:
2014-03-14 16:57 GMT-03:00 Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com:
Sim. Tanto a avenida Amintas Barros como a Miguel Castro (ao sul desta)
Hi!
Um wieder auf die Originalmail zurückzukommen:
- der Verfasser gibt keine Auskunft über seine Identität oder Legitimation
dort überhaupt etwas zu fordern.
- er macht eine ominöse Andeutung von erheblichen Problemen, nennt aber
die angeblichen Probleme nicht
- er spricht von Straftaten, aber
+1
Sachliche Argumentation und sehr gute Vorschläge wie ich finde!
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Hochsitze / Bitte um Entfernung von Daten
Datum: Fri Mar 14 2014 07:52:10 GMT+0100
Von: NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de
An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hi!
Um wieder auf die
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Hochsitze / Bitte um Entfernung von Daten
Datum: Thu Mar 13 2014 22:15:42 GMT+0100
Von: Christian H. Bruhn br...@arcor.de
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hochsitze sind allgemein gut sichtbar, wenn
Hi Nop,
volle Zustimmung.
Am 14.03.2014 07:52, schrieb NopMap:
- der Verfasser gibt keine Auskunft über seine Identität oder Legitimation
dort überhaupt etwas zu fordern.
Selbst, wenn er Mitarbeiter des Forstamtes/Schießvereins/
Ehrenvorsitzender der Niedersächsischen Jägerschaft wäre, hätte
Am 14. März 2014 08:56 schrieb Andreas Schmidt schmidt-postf...@freenet.de:
Die Herren Hobbyschlachter müssen sich halt damit abfinden, dass ihre
Freizeitbeschäftigung bei einem Teil der Bevölkerung nicht besonders
hoch angesehen ist.
Das widerrechtliche Beschädigen von Leitern, das ich
Hallo Alle,
zur Frage welche Karten Hochsitze anzeigen.
Ich habe auf meinem Android Smartphone die App MapsWithMe:
http://mapswith.me/de/home installiert. Die verwendet OSM als Basis.
Rendert aber offensichtlich selbst, denn Hochsitze werden angezeigt.
Hallo Hartmut,
Am 13.03.2014 13:13,
On 03/14/2014 09:14 AM, Lothar Beck wrote:
Nist- und Brutplätze sind oft (nicht bei allen Arten) temporär und
daher für OSM nur bedingt geeignet. :)
ich stoße hier im Wald immer wieder mal auf fest installierte
Nistkästen und -hilfen, die meisten davon mit einer deutlich
lesbaren Nummerierung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.03.2014 08:56, schrieb Andreas Schmidt:
[...] Die Herren Hobbyschlachter [...]
Ich verbitte mir eine solche Ausdrucksweise in öffentlichen
Diskussionen. Man mag zur Jagd stehen wie man will, aber man sollte
auch Menschen, deren Hobby man
Am 13.03.2014 22:14, schrieb Michael Reichert:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Frederik,
Am 13.03.2014 20:21, schrieb Dirk Sohler:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Ich weiss nicht ganz, wie ich darauf reagieren soll.
Gar nicht.
Hat er sich überhaupt mit mehr Informationen als
Hallo!
Bitte Vorträge für die SOTM-EU einreichen, die Frist endet am 17. März!
Details: https://sotm-eu.org/en/pages/cfp
/al
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:23:18AM +0100, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Am 14.03.2014 08:56, schrieb Andreas Schmidt:
[...] Die Herren Hobbyschlachter [...]
Ich verbitte mir eine solche Ausdrucksweise in öffentlichen
Diskussionen. Man mag zur Jagd stehen wie man will, aber man sollte
auch
Hartmut Holzgraefe hartmut.holzgra...@gmail.com wrote:
Jetzt mal ganz blöd gefragt: werden Hochsitze auf den gängigen
Karten überhaupt gerendert? Mir ist noch nie einer aufgefallen,
das kann aber auch einfach daran liegen das hier in der Gegend
keiner erfasst ist ...
Die Reit- und
Am 13/mar/2014 um 15:42 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@gmail.com:
Vielleicht kann eine teporäre Herausnahme (z.B. durch Änderung des
Keys) den Jäger davon überzeugen, dass seine Hochsitze auch ohne OSM
beschädigt werden und die Leute auch so in den Wald gehen.
dagegen
Immerhin
Hallo,
Am 14.03.2014 16:50, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 13/mar/2014 um 15:42 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@gmail.com:
Immerhin
hat der Jäger angefragt, wenn auch nicht sehr höflich, und nicht
gleich Hand an die Daten gelegt.
wahrscheinlich wusste er nicht, wie es geht ;-)
Ich
Moin,
mich erschreckt die kompromisslose Haltung und die teils aggressive
Wortwahl als Reaktion auf eine höflich geschriebene Bitte.
Ich habe in einigen Fällen darauf verzichtet, mir bekannte Fakten in OSM
einzutragen. Einen Seeadlerhorst und den stationären Bauwagen eines
Waldkindergartens
Am 14. März 2014 18:11 schrieb Stephan Wolff s.wo...@web.de:
Wir sollten in wenigen Einzelfällen auf Eintragungen in OSM verzichten,
auch wenn kein gesetzlicher Anspruch darauf besteht.
ja, aber darum geht es ja gar nicht. Klar trägt jeder nur das ein, was ihm
sinnvoll vorkommt, und das er
Meiner Meinung nach sollte man die Hochsitze nicht löschen, um keinen
Präzedenzfall zu schaffen. Die Erfassung von Hochsitzen ist
datenschutzrechtlich nicht zu beanstanden. Demnächst fordert dann
jemand, wir sollten Höhlen aus OSM löschen (wie kürzlich bei Wikipedia
geschehen) oder irgendein
ciao a tutti.
oggi il mio dubbio riguarda le grandi università che spesso non sono
localizzate in un unico punto, ma il discorso può essere esteso a svariati
ambiti (ospedali, circoli scolastici etc etc)
nello specifico oggi ho provato a sistemare il Politecnico di Milano secondo
la suddivisione
Ciao,
ieri, Simon Poole, chairman della openstreetmap foundation ha
pubblicato un entry nel suo diario osm in cui parla delle clausole
share-alike della ODBL:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/21225
sabas, sbiribizio e io lo abbiamo tradotto in italiano e pubblicato al
volo:
Cristian Consonni wrote
Ecco qui di seguito cosa produce una ricerca in Emilia per
roof:material=eternit
nella pagina wiki per roof:material mi sembra ci sia un po' di
confusione...
oltre al discusso tag roof:material=eternit (forte comunque dei numeri in
taginfo), c'è una classificazione
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
