What are your opinion of adding bus=yes along with
public_transport=platform + highway=bus_stop?
I can't find info on the wiki that supports this practice, I know it was
introduced by iD, but I don't see where this has been discussed.
My question arises because there is only one user who is adding
It seems a bit odd for Osmose to be flagging highway=footway, foot=yes as
an error just because foot access is implied by default. Whilst there might
be the tiniest bit of redundancy I can't see any particular reason to
remove it and, indeed, there might be an argument that an explicit tag is
山下です。皆さん、こんにちわ。
京都！街歩き！マッピングパーティ 再開の19回は、来週末の 7/19 に
日本唯一の狛猫がある丹後のこんぴらさん金刀比羅神社 と花街の残り香漂う琴平新地でニャッピングパーティ！
https://openstreetmap-kyoto.connpass.com/event/179584/
皆様の参加をお待ちしています！
2020年6月20日(土) 9:55 yasunari yamashita :
>
> 京都！街歩き！マッピングパーティ世話役の山下です。
> 皆さんこんにちわ。
>
>
On 10/07/2020 22:27, Nick wrote:
Hi Lester
I think there needs to be some thought as to the "proper channel to feed
corrections to the 'data officer' responsible". It took me months to get
a 'data officer' to correct the location of a single UPRN, so my thought
is that this needs to be a
Dear Pierre
Thanks for your reply, that makes a lot of sense. I wonder whether it may make sense to have an automated bot/script or whether this really has to be done by hand? It seems like a lot of work and its quite repetitive and the potential for error is low (merging ways that are
Hi Lester
I think there needs to be some thought as to the "proper channel to feed
corrections to the 'data officer' responsible". It took me months to get
a 'data officer' to correct the location of a single UPRN, so my thought
is that this needs to be a 'public' (open) channel that shows a)
Hi, I'm the changeset commenter,
I added the foot=yes on the common based on it being a registered common
with definite legal access. I also add foot=yes to signed public footpaths.
I would only add foot=designated where there is a blue person sign or
similar (not a green/wooden public footpath
Je viens de corriger la description pour ajouter "parfait" à "aucune
restriction". L'idée est de conserver un texte court pour les petit écran.
Yes pas de source dans le changeset mais le détail de la source est présent sur
chacune des modifications. L'image mapillary associé est placé sur le
Sveiki
Atsinaujino OSRM maršrutizavimo duombazė, žvilgterkit į Vilniaus
Senamiesčio eismą, kas žinote niuansus:
http://map.project-osrm.org
Pagrindines taisykles lyg ir sudėliojom, bet yra visokių mažyčių
detalių, kurios visą mintį* sugadina, tarkim ar nėra uždrausta
Vokiečių gatvėje va
>I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
>highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over >from a preset in Potlatch
>1.
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
>
>I got a changeset comment querying the edit.
Hi Andrew,
My understanding is that
Le ven. 10 juil. 2020 à 14:34, deuzeffe a écrit :
> Le 10/07/2020 à 13:04, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
> L'auteur, enfin, l'autrice initiale, c'est moi (qui voulais supprimer et
> non pas "virer"). Étonnant, n'est-ce pas ? Et il s'agit bien de données
> d'usage dans un périmètre local parfaitement
Le ven. 10 juil. 2020 à 14:34, deuzeffe a écrit :
> Le 10/07/2020 à 13:04, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
>
> Bonjour aussi.
>
> > /SNIP ta réponse... je n'ai pas été "impoli" envers qui que ce
> > soit...
>
> Si, envers tous les lecteurs de la ML. Tu as eu parlé le la nétiquette :
> tu faisais
Oui mais la base a du retard à rattraper... les modifs ne sont pas visibles
avant au moins 24 heures (apparemment la base est chargée à minuit)
Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 17:37, Christian Quest a
écrit :
> Il s'agit du rendu qui compare les données OSM avec le carroyage de la
> population de
Hi,
It's worth pointing out that if Wimbledon Common is (as I assume)
registered as common land then there would normally be a legal right of
access on foot under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, so
foot=yes would be correct.
Kind regards,
Adam
On 10/07/2020 16:00, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
After not having any luck in finding out of copyright maps that helped I
wondered, if a FOI request to Ealing Council, naming the exact location
and asking for the name would be fruitful. Did anyone ever try something
like this? Would this
On 10/07/2020 14:21, Lester Caine wrote:
On 10/07/2020 11:27, Mark Goodge wrote:
This is, of course, one of the problems with proprietary data. It can
be difficult to spot errors, because the people who are most likely to
spot errors - members of the general public with local knowledge -
Merci de ne pas alimenter le troll ou si vous préférez la polémique stérile.
Bien à vous.
Rpnpif
Le 10/07/2020 à 14:33, deuzeffe a écrit :
Le 10/07/2020 à 13:04, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
Bonjour aussi.
/SNIP ta réponse... je n'ai pas été "impoli" envers qui que ce
soit...
Si, envers tous
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 11:54 +, Andrew Hain wrote:
> I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning
> for highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset
> in Potlatch 1.
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
>
>
>
>
>
> I
Thank you for this absolute masterpiece of detective work, Marc! I'd never
thought that looking through old Notes would spark such an interest :)
As reported before, my own dip into having USRN data underlying JOSM at that
particular point showed that this stub (in USRN the part where the
Buenos dias Maperos
Alguno ha podido usar un WMS de los datos abiertos de Bogota en JOSM?
de estos: https://datosabiertos.bogota.gov.co/dataset?q=UAECD
He intentado con varios y ninguno funciona.
Gracias !
Rodrigo
___
Talk-co mailing list
Jul 10, 2020, 14:49 by ajt1...@gmail.com:
> On 10/07/2020 12:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
>
>> I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
>> highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset in Potlatch
>> 1.
>>
>>
On 10/07/2020 13:35, David Woolley wrote:
> On 10/07/2020 13:11, Colin Smale wrote:
>> What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we
>> tag all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is
>> "designation=public_footpath" enough?
>>
>
> I don't know the situation in
On 10/07/2020 11:27, Mark Goodge wrote:
This is, of course, one of the problems with proprietary data. It can be
difficult to spot errors, because the people who are most likely to spot
errors - members of the general public with local knowledge - tend not
to have easy access to the data.
(apologies for the double reply)
I just remembered I wrote a diary entry last year about this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/diary/391053 . That has
some useful links in such as a pointer to the start of "designation"
tagging, in 2009:
Cambio oggetto perché la discussione ormai è su altro.
Dunque, ci ho pensato a lungo e devo ammettere che l'approccio di Martin mi sembra
adatto, considerato che anche per il landuse=farmland facevo già la stessa cosa, evitando
di "coprire" strade e masse d'acqua.
Manuel
Il 30/06/2020 10:45,
On 10/07/2020 12:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning
for highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset
in Potlatch 1.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
If Osmose is flagging "highway=footway;foot=yes"
On 10/07/2020 13:11, Colin Smale wrote:
What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we
tag all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is
"designation=public_footpath" enough?
I don't know the situation in Wimbledon Common, but most footpaths in
public park
Le 10/07/2020 à 13:04, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
Bonjour aussi.
/SNIP ta réponse... je n'ai pas été "impoli" envers qui que ce
soit...
Si, envers tous les lecteurs de la ML. Tu as eu parlé le la nétiquette :
tu faisais référence à quoi ?
Et Wikipedia n'est pas une référence sur le sujet.
Hola,
gracias al enlace que ha enviado Andy y el enlace a la discusión que ha
enviado Alejandro, he comprobado que algunos de los elementos que formaban
las aguas territoriales todavía existen.
También he visto que un usuario con una única edición en su haber, borró y
modificó alguno de los
The changeset comment seems backwards to me, foot=designated is more
specific than foot=yes (which would be the default for any mapped footpath).
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 1:12 PM Colin Smale wrote:
> What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we tag
> all Public Footpaths
What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we
tag all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is
"designation=public_footpath" enough?
On 2020-07-10 13:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
> I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
>
I have always believed that highway=footway in the UK implies foot=yes (and
not foot=designated), though I actually don't know if UK tagging practice
is successfully documented. IMHO the use of "designated" is quite specific
and probably shouldn't be assumed as an invisible default.
Best
Dan
Op
I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset in Potlatch 1.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
I got a changeset comment querying the edit.
* I note you have removed foot=yes
Hi Mark
Brilliant comment - "because the people who are most likely to spot
errors - members of the general public with local knowledge - tend not
to have easy access to the data". Now we need the evidence (errors)
collated centrally (OSM?).
On 10/07/2020 11:27, Mark Goodge wrote:
Apologies
Ce noeud
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7701888072
"Nouveau lieu de loisirs et d’animations familiales"
selon :
https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/vienne/a-biard-ce-soir-le-mana-ouvre-ses-portes-en-fanfare
comme on y joue à la pétanque et qu'il y'a un panneau de basket j'ai mis
«
Hi,
On 10/07/2020 11:27, Mark Goodge wrote:
So this is a bit of a warning, really, for the open mapping community.
Although the open data release of USRN ids and coordinates is welcome,
don't be tempted to look up street names on the street list published,
with a restrictive licence, on
Yo uniría esta reclamación con el tema de Gibraltar, ya que el caso es
exactamente el mismo, y la resolución debería ser igual: aguas
territoriales reclamadas, pero no reconocidas por una parte.
Así, si la política o normas de OSM nos quita las aguas territoriales de
Ceuta y Melilla, al menos
Le jeu. 9 juil. 2020 à 20:09, deuzeffe a écrit :
> Le 08/07/2020 à 20:46, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
>
> Bonjour également,
> (voir https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A9tiquette#Politesse )
>
> /snip le top-posting (cf
> https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOFU_(Usenet_et_Internet) ) non seulement
>
Apologies for the long read, but this may be interesting to some folk.
This follows on from my earlier response to Kai Michael Poppe about
"Fairfield Road" in Ealing.
On 04/07/2020 12:02, I wrote:
To find the USRN of the path, you need to use the lookup tables supplied
by OS. Doing that, we
El tema parece que se discutió hace unos años en
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038
El vie., 10 jul. 2020 a las 11:54, Andy Townsend ()
escribió:
> On 10/07/2020 09:38, Miguel Sevilla-Callejo wrote:
> > Buscando por aquella vez que "metí las narices en el caso" [1]
On 10/07/2020 09:38, Miguel Sevilla-Callejo wrote:
Buscando por aquella vez que "metí las narices en el caso" [1]
encontré este changset [2]
Por algún lado debe estar mi interacción con la gente que maneja los
límites internacionales.
[1] https://tinyurl.com/y9n387qk
[2]
sent from a phone
> On 10. Jul 2020, at 09:55, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu
> wrote:
>
>> ma per aree meno dense, per esempio in montagna, potrebbe essere
>> un’alternativa interessante.
>>
>> Ciao Martin
>>
>
> grazie della segnalazione.
dimenticavo (l’avrete visto)
Le 09/07/2020 à 14:21, Percherie OnDaNet a écrit :
La mission "Passages piéton en fauteuil roulant" :
https://pic4review.pavie.info/#/mission/1103
Avant de la proposer comme modèle sur Pic4Review, pouvez-vous vérifier
si je n'ai pas fait de coquille dans les tags utilisé ? Vous pouvez
les
Le 10/07/2020 à 09:59, François Lacombe a écrit :
Le ven. 10 juil. 2020 à 09:45, Christian Quest
mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr>> a écrit :
Je n'ai pas encore pu trouver une copie de la lettre de mission, pour
savoir exactement de quoi il retourne...
Je trouve par exemple
Buscando por aquella vez que "metí las narices en el caso" [1] encontré
este changset [2]
Por algún lado debe estar mi interacción con la gente que maneja los
límites internacionales.
[1] https://tinyurl.com/y9n387qk
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49804213
--
*Miguel
Gracias por el enlace a la Wiki Alejandro, justo me faltó eso en mi mensaje.
David, dejando a un lado las aguas de Gibraltar, te animo a abrir un hilo
al respecto si es necesario, aunque si puedo entender lo de que España
patrulla la zona de Ceuta y Melilla... ¿Qué límites aplicamos?¿Dónde
Le 29/06/2020 à 22:03, Yves P. a écrit :
Concernant ce tag amenity=events_venue, je ne le connaissais pas et
pour cause, c'est une ébauche.
Ok.
Honnêtement pour moi ca ferait doublon avec community_centre sauf si
c'est un lieu dédié à ca, ce qui est rarement le cas, sauf peut-être
chez des
Ciao a tutte e tutti,
volevo comunicarvi che nei prossimi mesi inizierà le attività di mappatura per
il progetto "ViaLibera?! - Progetto di mappatura e valutazione
dell’accessibilità del Municipio 9 di Milano",
Il lavoro di mappatura verrà svolto dal mese di Settembre e sarà diviso in due
Le ven. 10 juil. 2020 à 09:45, Christian Quest a
écrit :
>
>
> Je n'ai pas encore pu trouver une copie de la lettre de mission, pour
> savoir exactement de quoi il retourne...
>
> Je trouve par exemple étonnant qu'on parle d'ouverture "opportune",
> alors que c'est la règle par défaut.
>
C'est
Il 09/07/20 23:23, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
> Vi segnalo che Martin Zdila ha esteso la copertura di Freemap anche su Italia.
>
> Non è uno stile per i centri urbani:
>
> https://www.freemap.sk/?map=14/41.898508/12.477336=X
>
> ma per aree meno dense, per esempio in montagna, potrebbe
- Mail original -
> Je trouve par exemple étonnant qu'on parle d'ouverture "opportune",
> alors que c'est la règle par défaut.
Le qualificatif m'a moi aussi fait tiquer. Il a comme un goût de rétropédalage.
Sébastien
--
Sébastien Dinot, sebastien.di...@free.fr
Le 10/07/2020 à 07:42, Jean-Christophe Becquet a écrit :
Bonjour,
Le député Éric Bothorel est investi d’une mission sur la politique de
la donnée et des codes sources.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT42025804
Voir par exemple : [Actualités du droit ]
Le 09/07/2020 à 23:36, Christian Rogel a écrit :
Je n’ai vu nulle part d’indication sur une panne de TagInfo Fr inaccessible
depuis 3 jours.
Au niveau mondial, pas souci.
Qui a des infos ?
Christian R.
Accessible pour moi, par contre, les chiffres n'ont pas l'air cohérents...
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:10 AM THEVENON Julien
wrote:
>
> Very nice !
>
thank you
> Hope to see France covered one day, my holiday destination is not so far
> from the coverage limit :-(
>
The limit is dictated by our hardware. But in the future we may expand even
more :-)
--
Ing. Martin
Le jeudi 9 juillet 2020 à 21:41:06 UTC+2, Martin Ždila
a écrit :
Hello,
> Let me announce that we have expanded our outdoor map to more (european)
> countries. You can see it in action at www.freemap.sk/?layers=X
> Most of it is the work of a single person (me) doing it in his free time and
55 matches
Mail list logo
