Yes, achavi fails with an error because the result is not in the
expected Augmented Diff format.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Dear Colleagues,
We are pleased to announce that we will hold the second programming
competition on January 28th, 2015.
2015 Europe/Hungary/Debrecen 2: The purpose of this competition is to
start building the community around the Robocar World Championship.
Organizers: Norbert Bátfai, PhD
the competing teams.
If you are interested in joining our initiative please read the wiki page
https://code.google.com/p/robocar-emulator/wiki/RobocarWorldChampionship for
details and updates.
Thank you for your attention. I hope to be hearing from your team soon.
Yours sincerely,
Norbe
7.n5.nabble.com/Overpass-API-v0-7-50-almost-done-td5808154.html
https://sotm-eu.org/en/slots/37
Norbert
Am 26.09.2014 um 14:00 schrieb Janko Mihelić:
I was under the impression that this tool:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/
was able to show historical geometry, but whenever I try to use i
surprised the editors
wouldn't let me do this. So this might also be the most intuitive way to
add multiple values. Some years of OSM made me forget about that. ;-)
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
im?) for all variants, and I'd say a simple string
split at a semicolon is easier to implement than checking every key for
possible numbers at the end.
And the semicolon list is in my eyes more logical when it comes to
removed values, eg. what does it mean when name2 is deleted, but name3
still
limits are reported for streets with variable speed limits? There may be
a speed limit when the users passes the sign but that limit might change
only minutes later, so these notes are just creating noise at the moment.
Thanks for posting updates here and trying to improve your reporting
feature.
Norb
On 08/11/2014 12:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Il giorno 11/ago/2014, alle ore 12:25, Norbert Wenzel
> ha scritto:
>> A lot of messages posted with the same text and known to be of dubious
>> quality
>
> Have there been cases where at the time the note was creat
ected (and the report might
be bogus since the error might only be in the datausers data/app).
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 08/10/2014 09:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Il giorno 09/ago/2014, alle ore 13:56, Norbert Wenzel
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> just seeing these notes along a
>> motorway every few kilometers. And since these messages don't tell what
>> the actual spe
you get any responses so far? I'm just seeing these notes along a
motorway every few kilometers. And since these messages don't tell what
the actual speed limit should be and where it starts it gets really
annoying to close all these automatically generated notes.
Norbert
___
mous reporter wanted to
say.
So your point about the note placement made me think if these notes also
were reports from some third party software, possibly the same.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03/15/2014 11:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Am 14/mar/2014 um 09:48 schrieb Norbert Wenzel
>> :
>>
>> And to the topic. It might not always be easy to enforce the
>> share-alike clause, but I really like the fact that we have it and may
>> enforce
ike the fact that we have it and may
enforce it if necessary. I don't see why this should render OSM non-free.
Norbert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTIsJeAAoJEN1BMR2v0jNa1ak
ssible to tell if lane changes are allowed or even
possible.
I don't know if you also meant that when you said the ways are not
joined, but imo that's definitely also wrong with this sort of mapping.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@opens
ature, I'm not sure whether to continue in that
direction or to focus on short-term and live viewing.
Norbert
2013/2/23 Norbert Renner mailto:iko...@gmx.de>>
Hi,
here is a first alpha version of a change viewer based on Overpass
API Augmented Diffs:
http://o
t
maybe you find it already useful.
Many thanks to Roland Olbricht for providing the Augmented Diffs and
being very supportive.
Norbert
[1] https://github.com/nrenner/achavi
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
er menu on the *edit* button is far from
obvious. (That was actually the text I got from my girlfriend, when she
wanted to view some data, that she could not see directly in the rendering.)
So thanks for that info to you Richard and thanks Toby for telling where
to find the Data Layer in the fi
On 15.02.2012 11:27, Chris Hill wrote:
On 15/02/12 09:43, Norbert Wenzel wrote:
On 15.02.2012 06:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is there a way (in JOSM or otherwise) to find all dead-ends (nodes
contained in only one highway way) without highway=turning_circle or
noexit=yes in an area
On 15.02.2012 06:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is there a way (in JOSM or otherwise) to find all dead-ends (nodes
contained in only one highway way) without highway=turning_circle or
noexit=yes in an area?
Shouldn't keepright[0] report these as errors?
Norbert
[0] http://keepright.ip
ving maps[0] at heise.de.
Since heise.de is probably the largest german IT-related website,
there's a bunch of pages that died because of links from one of their
articles.
Norbert
[0]
http://www.heise.de/ct/meldung/OpenStreetMap-ruft-zur-Nacht-der-lebenden
ieden Bräu".
If you happen to be in Vienna today you are of course invited, but I
think most of you can safely ignore that message.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the big one we had at Sotm-EU last summer (picture [0]).
Norbert
[0] http://www.flickr.com/photos/sotmeu/5960372816
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ble the sunday.
I'll be there too, so if there is any help needed, I'd be available.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
we do
not have the right to publish it or we have technical problems with the
video (Steves Keynote seems not to work. Andreas Trawöger is still
working on this together with the TU Teaching Support Center.)
kind regards,
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
is the right tool
to achieve this goals.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
>Sometimes it's a bit delayed because of a problem with
>delayed minute diffs (http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute-replicate/)
Perhaps the "replay" could be a bit faster. I think, that as it is now the
delay will never get sm
y used
for equal features in reality. If people use the same tag for different
meanings the information is lost.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
our.
Norbert
PS: Mumin doesn't show data for tah.openstreetmap since some days
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
quot; is defined. It's nonsense to
look in the db for "used" tags if you do not know what objects those tags
are used for.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
is explained. Else we will have the problem
in the future that we have them in the db - but nobody knows if it is
billard clubs or only the billard table in my cellar (just beside my
winecellar and the swimming pool :).
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
No, Roy wants to tag the semantics of the stop-sign. If this really
simplifies the task of the data consumers, it's all the better.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
>Which it is at literally every single point in space along most Danish
>cycleways. This seems like a poor plan.
But else the mapping would mean: "there is no connection".
This is why I think, creating a new way for the cycleway is often a poo
leway. track can be considered "deprecated" ;-)
But don't forget to connect the cycleway to the road wherever it is
possible to change from one to the other.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
of
design.
>- and that we have to update almost every way in the system already
why?
>and change every bit of software we already have
why?
Norbert "playing advocatus diaboli"
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ry borders or specific legals and changing
some default in the WIKI will no longer invalidate data.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Highway=path is, that there is no implication besides "not
wide enough to be a track".
norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
restrictions for motor_vehicles and some
special rules for bicycles).
>That's why it's highway=cycleway + motor_vehicle=yes (instead of an
>implied motor_vehicle=designated for "normal roads".
That's why I would call it highway=residential + designation=cy
stly residentials with special access restrictions and
priority rules.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
o some related
point at the side"/"farther from ..." doesn't really make a difference.
Perhaps, if always the same proposal is made ("Let's use the order stored
in the db to define a /direction/ of a way and then use "right" and "left"
to /name/ the sides.&
aversion against editors, that are not totally key-ignorant is not so easy
to understand.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 20 Jan 2009, at 12:38, Norbert Wenzel wrote:
Dirk-Lüder Kreie wrote:
Steven Le Roux schrieb:
In adequation, I'm proud too to announe that my french city : Brest
area, offer vectorals datas.
Here is a preview : http://galerie.le-roux.info/main.php?g2_itemId
] and
thousands klick through on the preview URL.
I'd be curious to see the (anonym) logs or some statistics in a few
days. The story has been published around 13.00 CET, so the peak should
be clearly visible.
cheers,
Norbert
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
to be done quickly and without opening another OSM view and
checking the data layer.
So I would think that adding the data layer to OSB would help very much
on that issue.
cheers,
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.or
, since I found a small castle which is
built in a lake and simply added as building over the lake[1] has not
been rendered, though it is layer=1 whereas the lake is layer=-1.
I think, though it's not the best way to tag that castle, at least it
should render.
cheers,
Norbert
[0]
http:/
map, so it wouldn't need a high priority.
cheers,
Norbert
[0]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.71974&mlon=13.06424&zoom=17&layers=B000FTF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Ian Dees wrote:
"The first near-lightspeed routing application!"
It's good I read that discussion at home and not at work. At least
they'd looked strangely.
I just wanted to say, I'd love that discussion and I'd officially give
the LHC it's own tag h
lp in making it
routable.
You're right with the addr: property, that was not well thought from my
side. But I'd nevertheless prefer the double amenities, just because the
that's what those nodes are. One building or machine with multiple uses
at the very same place.
Norbert
Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
Norbert Wenzel schrieb:
Hi,
I just mapped a street and did not find a proper access tag. The sign
can be found in Wikimedia Commons [0]. It says it is forbidden to drive
with hazardous material. I don't think I'm the first one to map such
streets, since t
ess you add the addr: properties to every node inside
that building.
So personally I think duplicate keys would be the easiest and best way
to tag such double-uses.
Norbert
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
ta
v vehicles either? Tagging
for all motorized vehicles would be quite annoying.
Norbert
[0] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Vorschriftszeichen_7e.svg
[1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Vorschriftszeichen_6c.svg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
Well, that was a long and illustrative answer. No need to "fix" this, I
was just curious if this was a bug or if this - let's call it
non-obvious - behaviour was intended.
As stated before, I was just curious and don't consider this important.
Norbert
Jon Burgess wrote:
me is only shown in
z17 and disappears again in z18.
Shouldn't both churches be rendered the same in every zoom level, since
they only differ on the denomination (and of course the name) property?
Or are that different rendering styles intentional?
Norbert
[0]
http://www.openstr
Norbert Wenzel wrote:
I quite often use this tag, just because Mapnik has it in it's standard
entries for roads and I just fill them because they are proposed.
I just saw the bullsh*t I wrote. I meant Merkaartor, not Mapnik.
Shouldn't do three things at the same time I guess.
ndard
entries for roads and I just fill them because they are proposed.
I would only render some arrows if the default behaviour of the street
tagged "oneway=no" would be "oneway=yes". That would make sense to me.
Norbert
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIM
just change my filter from email address to subject and everythings
as you like it.
regards,
Norbert
PS: I sent this mail only to the list, just to be sure you don't
consider this mail rude. ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ppen with the "old" relations?
Everything "tagged for the renderer" until now will have the semantics of
e.g. a "lake in the lake" or "a building inside of a bulding".
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
yikes - I can just imagine the uproar if I started tagging all the
snooty clubs around as nightclubs! I meant the english-style clubs with
exclusive membership, where people meet to play cards,
snooker/billiards, table tennis. These would also have rooms, bar,
dining h
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
hi,
I cannot seem to find a tag for a club. I have been tagging as guest
house or hostel.
You mean amenity=nightclub? [0]
[0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:amenity%3Dnightclub
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
aypoints. Might the edit from
the 21st be a joining of the many ways the coastline consisted before?
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
, when scrolling the map
"vertically"?
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
From http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Tiles/info.php?x=3449&y=1891&z=12
Requested at 2008-04-05 04:00:18, by koelly:tahCltReReq:NoData, with
priority 1.
Current state is Active (out to client).
Taken by client at 2008-04-09 00:41:39.
Norbert
___
talk
or the test or are
they going out "to the wild"?
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
construction="disused"
>
>
>Does that seem ok?
>
I think
highway="disused"
disused="trunk"
would be more consistent to "construction" and "proposed".
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
efiles.
Norbert
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
he lowzoom tiles I think that the color of the
"compressed" pixels after stitching is darker than the medium of the 4
pixels before compression. So on the way from zoom 11 to 0 the land gets
darker and darker. (Could be an artefact of my monitor??)
Norbert
66 matches
Mail list logo
