On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ronny Ager-Wick - Develo Ltd.
r...@develo.ltd.uk wrote:
Absolutely, there are still roads to be traced here.
The imagery we have at the moment are from Yahoo! and they allowed
OSM to use them.
Do we have a time limit on the use of these images?
AFAIK, there
Hi all,
Sorry but my french is not that good and for international reference
(sharing experience), I will write in english.
I've been touring around in Gent and the surroundings, mapping with GPS and
drawing routes from it for some months now. When I jumped in, some people
had already done an
Hello,
I'm a newcomer living in the south of Brussels (Braine-le-château),
My hobbies are hiking, cycling (mountain bike), photography and geocaching.
I'm a new owner of a Garmin etrex Vista HCx and I'm happy to use free map.
So I'm volunteer to complete the very well detailed map of my region.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Although, for the most part, CC-BY-SA does have roughly the same effect in
all jurisdictions. You can do whatever you want with the geodata, so long
as you don't legally restrict others from using the geodata you add.
In
Two related things on Contributor Terms:
[80n on share-alike]
By comparison, ODbL+Contributor Terms has properties that break
this principle. A derived work can not be fed back into OSM unless
the author agrees to the contributor terms.
Matt set up a poll at
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:24:47PM +, 80n wrote:
Any share-however-you-like license has the properties you describe. We're
talking about share-alike here.
It may suit you, as a consumer of OSM data, to not give a damn about
contributing back to the project, but that's not what OSM is
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:33:44PM +, Rob Myers wrote:
back, and that having changed licences once it's important that OSM be
able to change/upgrade/whatever the licence in the future
I believe the contributor terms are too broad. I answered the poll in
favour of moving to the ODbL, but
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
The upgrade clause in the ODbL should be sufficient
for any future licensing, and if the change is away from that, I expect
as a contributor to be consulted about it.
any change away from that must be chosen by a vote of the
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:03:51AM +, Matt Amos wrote:
any change away from that must be chosen by a vote of the OSMF
membership and approved by at least a majority vote of active
contributors.
if you want to be consulted about any future licensing change, just
join OSMF or continue to
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:03:51AM +, Matt Amos wrote:
any change away from that must be chosen by a vote of the OSMF
membership and approved by at least a majority vote of active
contributors.
I also think the definition of an active contributor is too narrow. I
actually think it should
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:21:41AM +, Matt Amos wrote:
It may suit you, as a consumer of OSM data, to not give a damn about
contributing back to the project, but that's not what OSM is about.
i'm both a producer and a
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
I also think the definition of an active contributor is too narrow. I
actually think it should be scrapped completely, because it doesn’t
matter whether somebody isn’t active any more.
Oh yes it does, because if someone isn't active any more it will become
harder and
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:44:53AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Oh yes it does, because if someone isn't active any more it will become
harder and harder to get an opinion out of him. Someone who is not
active any more will often have lost interest or lost his life, that's
why, while
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:44:53AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Oh yes it does, because if someone isn't active any more it will become
harder and harder to get an opinion out of him. Someone who is not
active any more will often have lost interest or lost his life, that's
why, while
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:44:53AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Unless you're willing sign something that says I agree that OSMF will
make two attempts to contact me at my registered e-mail address with
information on how to vote on an upcoming license change suggestion, and
if I don't react
2010/1/5 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I feel that I/we Australians are in danger of being misrepresented, like we
I don't think Roy and I share your same concerns to the extent we need
to copy erronus information from others, the ends don't justify the
means.
legal basis that says that
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:51 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but accuracy is important to some of us, and using
commercial data is inaccurate, visiting is one way to get correct
information, as is contacting the council responsible for the roads.
Absolutely, but
2010/1/5 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
2) map by survey alternate legal methods, extremely fast progress
right now, with fairly good accuracy widespread, and for several
years: correct the errors
I'm not disagreeing that shouldn't be done, I'm saying we shouldn't be
in such a mad rush
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Andreas Labres wrote:
Patrick from talk-at found this by chance: http://openmaps.eu/ They
seem to be reinventing the wheel, somehow...
I sent their proeminent members (papa71, kepenu, KiVi, peter68,
Trackman and BigMick) a gentle enquiry through their forum's
2010/1/4 Lauri Kytömaa lkyto...@cc.hut.fi
The national officials here are allegedly constructing a
database for a online routing service for cycling and they have concluded
that the information can not be described with sufficient detail for
very accurate routing as tags on the roads.
Am 05.01.2010 08:23, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
mailto:ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
P.S: All that time it was - for me - simply out of question to copy map
data from Google or other alike sources to get free and
With lack of Aerial images where I live and map, and with many narrow
streets with tall buildings on each side (urban cannyon effect), I
often need 10-15 GPS tracks of the same street to have reliable data
to enter the physical road into the database. As I often don't have a
chance to drive up and
How should I map a staircase connecting a bridge to a street below? My
initial thought was to approximate it with a vertical way with
highway=steps, but is it even possible to have a vertical way? I.e,
can you have two nodes at the same lat/lon but with different layers?
(Do nodes even have
Am 04.01.2010 18:25, schrieb Aun Johnsen:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
mailto:ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now ...
In this area we have a lot of mappers, activities like mapping parties,
fair booths, local press contacts, ... in
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 04.01.2010 18:25, schrieb Aun Johnsen:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
mailto:ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now ...
In this area we have a lot of mappers,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
And I fail to see how carrying out a pilgrimage to the street in
question changes anything.
It certainly builds confidence that the names you're entering
Am 05.01.2010 15:17, schrieb Anthony:
I certainly don't suggest blatantly breaking the law. What I suggest is
not acting as though there is a law when you have no evidence that there is.
So far no one has shown me the law that is supposedly being broken. One
brief attempt pointed to EU
2010/1/5 Ture Pålsson t...@lysator.liu.se:
How should I map a staircase connecting a bridge to a street below? My
initial thought was to approximate it with a vertical way with
highway=steps, but is it even possible to have a vertical way? I.e,
It isn't really. I'd use a single, short
Hi!
The OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi) just got a new Highways view.
It shows problems with highway types, names, refs and some other tags such
as oneway and maxspeed.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways
Doc is in the wiki at
Ture Pålsson wrote:
How should I map a staircase connecting a bridge to a street below? My
initial thought was to approximate it with a vertical way with
highway=steps, but is it even possible to have a vertical way? I.e,
can you have two nodes at the same lat/lon but with different layers?
2010/1/5 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
As you can see, osm and omp is created roughly parallel in time, but if
we look back to the root (turistautak.hu) we're older than osm.
And we have different aims as we can see.
- our primary aim is to create maps for portable gps devices. We have
2010/1/5 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
So I don't have any answer to the question of how to join forces with
openmaps.eu. There's one practical suggestion that I'd like to make:
Unless they remove their NC (Non Commercial Use Only) clause, colloborating
with openmaps.eu is a non
I have found that only Turks have public notary as mapping feature
(amenity=notary)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Map_Features
Do you think we should make this a official mapping feature?
What is the correct way making amenity=notary an official mapping feature?
Cheers!
--
pratite me
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:04 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The purpose of the share-alike principle is to enable derived work to be fed
back into the main body.
that's your opinion. my opinion is that the purpose of share alike is
to allow data to be remixed, mashed-up or otherwise modified
On 01/05/2010 11:42 AM, Pieren wrote:
I suggested some time ago to use a new general key for such things
(when it's not really an amenity, a shop or a leisure like for
lawyers, architects, designers, etc) : office=notary
service? Though that conflicts slightly with the service=* for
2010/1/6 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Really? Where? What laws are being suggested to be broken?
Not familiar with frivilous lawsuits?
Also Australian's, and the OP seems to be mapping in Australia, don't
have the same copyright laws as in the US:
Telstra, a carrier, won it's copyright case over
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested some time ago to use a new general key for such things
(when it's not really an amenity, a shop or a leisure like for
lawyers, architects, designers, etc) : office=notary
Ah, Pieren touches on an issue which is
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:04 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The purpose of the share-alike principle is to enable derived work to be
fed
back into the main body.
that's your opinion. my opinion is that the purpose of
2010/1/6 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
Hi!
The OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi) just got a new Highways view.
It shows problems with highway types, names, refs and some other tags such
as oneway and maxspeed.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways
It still show's long ways
2010/1/6 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com:
Yet the same English word notary.
It gets even more fun in Australia, we have JPs (Justice of the Peace)
to stamp/witness documents being signed, but in the US a JP is
something like a judge.
___
talk
On 05/01/10 19:24, 80n wrote:
It may suit you, as a consumer of OSM data, to not give a damn about
contributing back to the project, but that's not what OSM is about.
Yes, any copyleft/share-alike licence *enables* this. But I think the
discussion here (and I've been guilty of this myself in
Hi, I'm newbie on OSM and as I can see we have only Yahoo imagery as
base to map some cities on Brasil (only some bigger ones)
Recently I read on wiki that a service called nearmaps host maps to
be used on OSM.
I know a service on Brazil that have some ortophotos free, all can use
it (services
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, enqd wrote:
I would like to ask if OSM or anyone can host this images to be used on OSM.
The images are here:
ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/mapas/ortofoto/
Will be great to Brazilian users if we have this images as base to add
streets and places on OSM.
Hope someone can host
You can also ask Andy:
http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2009/12/09/the-view-from-above/
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, enqd wrote:
I would like to ask if OSM or anyone can host this images to be used on OSM.
The images
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
I would like to ask if OSM or anyone can host this images to be used on
OSM.
The images are here:
ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/mapas/ortofoto/
Hmm, what format do you want it to be hosted in?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:56 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm newbie on OSM and as I can see we have only Yahoo imagery as
base to map some cities on Brasil (only some bigger ones)
Recently I read on wiki that a service called nearmaps host maps to
be used on OSM.
I know a service on
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm newbie on OSM and as I can see we have only Yahoo imagery as
base to map some cities on Brasil (only some bigger ones)
Recently I read on wiki that a service called nearmaps host maps to
be used on OSM.
I know a service on
Just a thought - I haven't thought this through - could relation be used to
form a close relationship between a road and a track? Create a highway,
create a track, then link both with a relation. You could even have a role
for the track like left_cycleway or something. An approach like this might
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested some time ago to use a new general key for such things
(when it's not really an amenity, a shop or a leisure like for
lawyers, architects, designers, etc) : office=notary
Yeah, I agree amenity is overused. Also
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
They include all ways, not just vehicular roads.
Essentially the State Government layer also contains some non-vehicular ways
as well, so it is difficult to compare apples with apples.
Is the State Government
John Henderson wrote:
I go to the local tourist information place and start asking for names.
They give me a photocopy of a street directory which shows all the
names. But this photocopy has a copyright notice.
Can I enter names from that page into OSM for the already-mapped ways?
I
Liz wrote:
Be brave
nothing ventured, nothing gained.
a circular way (usually)
one way (get that bit right)
highway=type
junction=roundabout
may have a name, but not often
join the other roads on
Following on from this and some earlier discussion about naming
roundabouts.
I was
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
So if all you need is street names,use whatever published source you wish.
Just make sure that you only get street names. And whatever you do, don't
advertise it, or discuss it in forums. There are always some smart-arse
2010/1/5 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
I was testing the Garmin's route instructions on some familiar roads today.
Normally it says SW on Northern Road to Roundabout, followed by 2nd exit
on roundabout or similar. but one part came out as SW on Northern Road to
Northern Road, which seemed
2010/1/5 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
The issue of copying names from a street directory is very similar. The
publishers of the directory hold copyright over the graphic layout of the
map, but they cannot hold copyright over the street names themselves. Those
That's assuming what they
2010/1/5 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Interesting. What strikes me about the street names thing is that in
general, there's actually no way to prove it, other than by the person's own
admission. Whereas with copyright breach in general, you can show a
similarity between two expressions
There are street names I have seen on Google that are wrong and I guess
there are others if you went looking. (Don't mention the streets that just
aren't there.)
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/5 Steve Bennett
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/5 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
The issue of copying names from a street directory is very similar. The
publishers of the directory hold copyright over the graphic layout of the
map, but they cannot hold copyright over the street names themselves. Those
That's
2010/1/6 John Henderson snow...@gmx.com:
I missed that Telstra case. Do you have a reference to a good summary?
http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/articles_pdf/A01n09.pdf
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
2010/1/6 John Henderson snow...@gmx.com:
I've just set myself up with a login to the OSM wiki. Should I simply
refer to the above relation IDs and names in the wiki under Bush
Walking and Cycling Tracks?
I'd link to the relations, not just mention the ID numbers,
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Richard Colless wrote:
Liz wrote:
Be brave
nothing ventured, nothing gained.
a circular way (usually)
one way (get that bit right)
highway=type
junction=roundabout
may have a name, but not often
join the other roads on
Following on from this and some earlier
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:50 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I'm wanting to reopen this discussion.
The context is long-distance walking tracks, and avoiding duplication of
the relations covering them (as bits and pieces get added in different
geographical areas).
I've found a
Steve Bennett wrote:
I'll be adding the Overland Track in February
Enjoy. I first walked that in February, 41 years ago.
I grew a beard on that trip and still have it - never shaved since :)
John
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:29:14 +1100
From: John Henderson snow...@gmx.com
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Copyright questions
To: Talk-AU at OpenStreetMap talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: 4b4384fa.7060...@gmx.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
John Smith wrote:
Hi,
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 4. Januar 2010 23:55 schrieb Johann H. Addicks addi...@gmx.net
mailto:addi...@gmx.net:
Auch auf die Gefahr hin, Stirnrunzeln zu ernten: Gibt es irgendwo für
Deutschland für Garmin-Geräte fertige OSM-Karten ohne POIs und
Adresslayer,
Hallo,
es ist sicherlich möglich, von einer Stadt, Gegend versch. Karten mit der
geschichtl. Entwicklung (Straßenverlauf, Bebauung, ..) zu zeichnen. Ferner ist
eine Dokumentation der Entwicklung der Bausubstanz in den letzten 100 Jahren
möglich.
Es sind dann etliche bis eher viele OSM-Karten
Am 5. Januar 2010 12:03 schrieb Lothar Emmerich l.emmer...@t-online.de:
Hallo,
es ist sicherlich möglich, von einer Stadt, Gegend versch. Karten mit der
geschichtl. Entwicklung (Straßenverlauf, Bebauung, ..) zu zeichnen. Ferner
ist eine Dokumentation der Entwicklung der Bausubstanz in den
wie werden die deutschen Mautbrücken getaggt?
Aktuell noch nichts offizielles.
Nimm doch vorerst erstmal als Node oder Way:
highway=toll_bridge
operator=Toll Collect GmbH
Das barrier=toll_booth kann man hierzulande ja eigentlich auch nur für die
wenigen Sonderfälle verwenden. Abgerechnet wird
ja, das ist sicher möglich und wird auch schon gemacht.
In OSM gibt es derzeit allerdings keine etablierte Methode dafür,
und sorgt daher potentiell auch für Probleme (Verwechslung von
historischen und aktuellen Features, Überschwemmung des Editors, etc.).
Ja, ganz so einfach ist es nicht.
Am 05.01.2010 14:05, schrieb Mirko Küster:
BTW fehlt auch noch etwas für Matrixanzeigen die unterschiedliche
Maxspeed,Warnungen oder Sperrungen ausgeben. Aktuell könnten die zwar nur
als Hinweis angezeigt oder angesagt werden. Aber wer weiß, vielleicht
fließen die aktuellen Zustände irgendwann
Danke für die ausführliche Antwort.
- Es würde vorerst nur eine Fläche von ca. 5x5 km betreffen
- Für jede Epoche z.b. (2010, 1950, 1930, 1898, 1718, ...) würde mit Mapnik
eine eigene Karte gerendert. In jeder Epoche würden nur Daten aus diesem
Zeitraum in der Datenbank stehen.
Die aktuellen
Carsten Schwede schrieb:
Die POIs kann man sich selbst in den Einstellungen im GPS-Gerät
abschalten, so daß die nicht mehr dargestellt werden. Geht soweit ich
weiss (kanns grade nicht testen) mindestens so, daß man die
Sichtbarkeit auf einen Level von unter 30m sichtbar stellt, die
Dichte auf
Hi!
Ich habe eben im OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) einen neuen
Highways-View freigeschaltet. Er zeigt Probleme mit Straßentypen,
Straßennamen und einigen anderen typischen Straßentags (oneway, maxspeed, ...)
an.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways
Doku im Wiki unter
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
Ich habe eben im OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) einen neuen
Highways-View freigeschaltet. Er zeigt Probleme mit Straßentypen,
Straßennamen und einigen anderen typischen Straßentags (oneway, maxspeed, ...)
an.
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:16:12PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
Ich habe eben im OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) einen neuen
Highways-View freigeschaltet. Er zeigt Probleme mit Straßentypen,
Straßennamen und
hi,
am ak hg - a5/a661 wurden vom user Ana Luisa diverse refs entfernt.
meist wohl an den tangenten.
cheers
gary68
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:22:37PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hm. Hast Du Beispiele? Alle pedestrian areas (also das sind ja Plätze), die
mir so einfallen, haben auch einen Namen.
(Und klar gibt es immer Ausnahmen in all diesen Fällen.)
Ich habe auch Schulhoefe von Schulen so getagged
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:28:16PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:22:37PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hm. Hast Du Beispiele? Alle pedestrian areas (also das sind ja Plätze), die
mir so einfallen, haben auch einen Namen.
(Und klar gibt es immer Ausnahmen in all
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Schulhöfe und Bahnsteige sind m.E. keine highway=pedestrian. Nur weil man da
rumlaufen kann, heißt das nicht, dass das pedestrian ist. Für mich sind
highway=pedestrian Straßen oder Plätze, die das Schild mit Mutter und Kind im
blauen
Ich freue mich eine neue Anwenundung vorzustellen.
Den TMC Validator. Hab die ganze Weihacnhtszeit daran gebastelt.
Ihr findet Ihn unter:
http://osm-tmc.anders-hamburg.de/
In der Hoffung das damit das Thema TMC vielleicht ein paar mehr Leuten
näher gebracht werden kann.
Unter der Map steht der
Am 05.01.2010 17:28, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:22:37PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hm. Hast Du Beispiele? Alle pedestrian areas (also das sind ja Plätze), die
mir so einfallen, haben auch einen Namen.
(Und klar gibt es immer Ausnahmen in all diesen Fällen.)
Ich habe
Am 05.01.2010 16:56, schrieb Jochen Topf:
Hi!
Ich habe eben im OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) einen neuen
Highways-View freigeschaltet. Er zeigt Probleme mit Straßentypen,
Straßennamen und einigen anderen typischen Straßentags (oneway, maxspeed, ...)
an.
Wo wir das Thema ja gerade auf der englischen Liste hatten.
Gibt es eigentlich irgendwo zugänglich den Source Code zum OSM Inspector?
Ich konnte im Wiki nix dazu finden.
Frederik hat sich in demselben Thread dazu geäußert:
gleich eine Frage ...
warum wird bei
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highwayslon=10.70084lat=53.87734zoom=13
highway=platform angezeigt ??
Gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
jupp habe ich.
Nachdem ich letztens Probleme mit dem Navigieren (auf Autobahnen
insbesondere auf Autobahnkreuzen und Dreiecken) hatte, hatte ich hier ne
Disskusion angeregt bzgl der Ref-Tags (der mototway_junction) an diesen
Stellen. ( das ganze kann unter Navigationsproblemen an
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:35:14PM +0100, Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
gleich eine Frage ...
warum wird bei
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highwayslon=10.70084lat=53.87734zoom=13
highway=platform angezeigt ??
Hab ich übersehen. Ist jetzt mit eingebaut, ab morgen mittag sollte das
Werner Hoch schrieb:
Hallo,
On Montag, 4. Januar 2010, SLXViper wrote:
Werner Hoch schrieb:
2. Bus-Routen um Villingen Schweningen
--
gleiches Problem wie in Karlsruhe
Die type-Tags halte ich allein deshalb für enorm wichtig, damit man
Am Di Januar 5 2010 glaubte Sven Anders zu wissen:
Ich freue mich eine neue Anwenundung vorzustellen.
Den TMC Validator. Hab die ganze Weihacnhtszeit daran gebastelt.
[...]
Alternativ kann man unter:
http://osm-tmc.anders-hamburg.de/area.php?lcd=1
auch hierachisch ohne Landkarte
Am 05.01.2010 18:21, schrieb Lars Francke:
Wo wir das Thema ja gerade auf der englischen Liste hatten.
Gibt es eigentlich irgendwo zugänglich den Source Code zum OSM Inspector?
Ich konnte im Wiki nix dazu finden.
Frederik hat sich in demselben Thread dazu geäußert:
Hallo Frederik,
Meiner Meinung nach duerfte ein Verbot fuer Fahrzeuge aller Art
(Z250) durchaus als access=no, foot=yes getaggt werden. Kommt das
Zusatzzeichen Z1022-10 (Fahrraeder frei) hinzu, wuerde sich das in
einem bicycle=yes niederschlagen.
Warum so kompliziert?
Wir haben eine
Moin !
hat sich einer von Euch schon einmal die Arbeit für eine
Präsentationsmappe (offline) gemacht !
Ich denke mir das es manchmal bei Anfragen gut sein kann etwas unterm
Arm zu haben ohne groß Beamer etc.
Dann kann man vorher schnell Themenbezogen etwas umstecken - fertig.
Gruß Jan :-)
Stefano Kowalke blued...@gmx.net [Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:08:50PM CET]:
Hallo,
wie werden die deutschen Mautbrücken getaggt?
Ich finde jetzt noch nicht einmal international Beispiele, zum
Beispiel die Golden Gate Bridge hat keine Bezeichnung, die auf
Mautpflicht hindeutet. Humber Bridge auch
Hallo,
eine Brücke der B 70 hat den tag osmarender:renderRef = no.
Soll wohl das Rendern von ref unterdrücken.
Macht das Sinn? Man liest ja oft wir taggen nicht für die Renderer.
Gruß
Dieter Jasper
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Schön wäre es, wenn die Regel welche highways sind ok (und ähnliche
solche Regeln) offen zugänglich wären, dann hätte man zumindest ne
Chance, das mit den anderen Validatoren mal zu vergleichen.
Die Doku im Wiki sagt zu jedem
ja also ich habe da keine bestimmte meinung und ich kenne das kreuz
nicht im speziellen. aber: die straßen haben in der regel alle eine ref.
und nur weil ein gerät damit nicht klarkommt, sollte man diese infos
meiner meinung nach nicht entfernen.
die refs stehen am straßenrand!
On Tue,
Am 05.01.2010 21:30, schrieb Dieter Jasper:
Hallo,
eine Brücke der B 70 hat den tag osmarender:renderRef = no.
Soll wohl das Rendern von ref unterdrücken.
Macht das Sinn?
Ist halt ne unschöne Krücke, laut den Osmarender Leuten aber ab und zu
sehr hilfreich.
War zumindest mal so. Keine
Hallo Jan,
wichtig für eine Präsentation ohne OH sind
- nicht zu viel Text auf einer Seite
- Jede Seite deckt einen Bereich ab
- Für möglichst jeden Teilnehmer vorher ein Exemplar aushändigen
- Am 05.01.2010 um 20:42 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
- Am besten die Seiten durchnummerieren
- je mehr
Am 05.01.2010 21:19, Johannes Huesing:
Stefano Kowalkeblued...@gmx.net [Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:08:50PM CET]:
Hallo,
wie werden die deutschen Mautbrücken getaggt?
Ich finde jetzt noch nicht einmal international Beispiele, zum
Beispiel die Golden Gate Bridge hat keine Bezeichnung, die auf
Am 05.01.2010 10:22, schrieb Carsten Schwede:
Die POIs kann man sich selbst in den Einstellungen im GPS-Gerät
abschalten, so daß die nicht mehr dargestellt werden.
O.k. ich habe nicht das ganze Anwendungsszenario beschrieben.
Die selbstdraufgeladenen POIs (nicht: Wegepunkte) sollen noch
Am 05.01.2010 21:19, schrieb Johannes Huesing:
Ich finde jetzt noch nicht einmal international Beispiele, zum
Beispiel die Golden Gate Bridge hat keine Bezeichnung, die auf
Mautpflicht hindeutet. Humber Bridge auch nicht.
Es gibt in Deutschland zumindest zwei Mauttunnel, die auch entsprechend
1 - 100 von 217 matches
Mail list logo
