I'll be there too. Hope to see a few more folks there as well :-)
Rob
On 3 February 2015 at 16:12, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
wrote:
I will be there this Thursday (hopefully not on my own).
-- Matthijs
On 3 February 2015 at 09:24, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote
for details.
Best wishes,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Ah yes, I should have pointed out that this is our normal first Thursday of
the month meetings at this stage. We will aim to set up some Saturday
events most likely in partnership with the Nottingham folks.
Rob
On 20 January 2015 at 10:04, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Historically
Missing link :-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mappa_Mercia#Events
On 19 January 2015 at 21:54, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've sketched out a blank template of upcoming Mappa Mercia events so that
everyone knows the dates of our future meets. April's
: Please suggest mapping locations. We had a lot of success
mapping Shenstone [1] last year as this turned out to be a perfect size for
us to map in one evening.
Best,
Rob
[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/52.6364/-1.8386
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands
maximise paths
mapped, I think this is a respectable number. Well done everyone :-)
Rob
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
The Mapillary team are working on integration with ScoutSigns
Yay that's great news! To me this is as big as when Bing let us use their
imagery. It'll be a great resource and shows that companies are confident
enough in OSM to make it part of their day-to-day and to share back so
freely :-)
Rob
There have been a couple of threads on OpenStreetMap’s mailing list this
month to do with change. The first, entitled “Request for feedback: new
building colours in openstreetmap-carto”, is all to do with a change to the
way the default map style *looks* on openstreetmap.org. The second, “MEP –
Hi Dave,
Although I wasn't there so don't know for certain, I would expect that
Henk's (the compère) comment was in reference to the previous talk about
Canadian Postal addresses. These things get lost without the full context
:-)
Regards,
Rob
___
Talk
Hi,
This talk was given at SOTM 2014 and the video is now online:
http://vimeo.com/album/3134207/video/115313286
Summary:
Telenav are collecting photos of roadsigns and making them available to OSM
via a JOSM plugin. Most coverage is in Germany but there is also a fair
number in the UK. See the
that Telenav are willing to do the processing and release the data
to OSM :-)
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
added some more details to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Mapping_Meetup
See you soon,
Rob
p.s. If you're planning to come please let us know :-)
On 24 December 2014 at 12:55, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for such a good response to the Doodle Poll.
A couple
added some more details to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Mapping_Meetup
See you soon,
Rob
p.s. If you're planning to come please let us know :-)
On 24 December 2014 at 12:55, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for such a good response to the Doodle Poll.
A couple
On 29 December 2014 at 17:06, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for Rob for adding the missing footpaths
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/hanbury-footpaths_24885#14/52.8432/-1.7341
(although I've read his blog posts about using umap, seeing is believing).
Obviously we can potentially
I would map to the first dropped kerb and join back to the road. I would
leave what's there but add a link to the road (perhaps at the exit road of
the station).
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
there is more than enough fuzziness to sit quiet at this point in time.
Simon
Thanks Simon, I hadn't seen that. Will speak with Mikel.
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the following statement:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html
Whilst a more formal written text is sitting with Mike Collinson and we
hope to have him and LWG ok it soon.
Best,
Rob
p.s. Any comments on alignment very welcome especially if evidenced with
GPS traces. :-D
I would be tempted to go a little bit darker - not much but right now the
proposal looks very washed out against the background and the contrast
between buildings and churches is very stark.
But in general this is a good idea.
Rob
___
talk mailing list
Take a look at http://walks.io/ as a good starting point.
Regards,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
to be in
line with the various guidelines.
- Serge
Hi Serge,
I've started to produce that page now:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/wikidata
So far I've included comments from August and November.
I need to review the Sep-Oct comments on talk mailing list.
Regards,
Rob
Hi,
This is a neat little tool that shows you the recent edits in OSM. Instead
of just showing changeset boxes it shows the individual ways!
http://tyrasd.github.io/latest-changes/#13/52.2782/-1.5759
Rob
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb
Nice idea. Too often our communications are faceless and I wonder if this
in any way has an effect on the tone of the discussions (that is, would we
be more polite if we could 'see' the person we are talking too)?
Rob
p.s. The more time I spend on the mailing lists, the more I see them as a
tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/14 02:11 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
We have no significant third party ODbL data releases due to OSM
share alike to show for,
Then clearly OMS should have stuck with BY-SA for the database, as
that did gain third party data releases.
but
with
the share-alike content/data to become share-alike itself.
It's congenital, not viral. It propagates by inheritance, not
contagion.
;-)
- - Rob.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUUPtbAAoJECciMUAZd2dZ91cH/1jbALOpOXN2kjNmTI1WkpuO
their commercial point of view re the licensing
of OpenStreetMap data.
Does it really deserve any more attention than that?
Uncertainty is simply a term of art that means obvious impediments
to my sense of entitlement.
Likewise, lack of clarity means haven't read the contributor terms.
- - Rob
to support. A venue would be great but not essential (hopefully a
year in advance in a large city still leaves lots of suitable venues left).
Rob
P.s If it turns out to be too much of a challenge I guess the deadline will
just have to slip back beyond SotM 2014.
On 28 Oct 2014 01:53, Michael Kugelmann
. This is
a great day :-)
Best,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I recognise that artist's work! He has a piece in Coventry too. I was
pretty sure I'd mapped it and could just add the wikidata tags but turns
out I was wrong. Anyway it's now mapped and includes wikidata tags and the
English Heritage listed status tags:
of :-)
All the best,
Rob
*Jóhannes Birgir Jensson*
*Thu Oct 23 08:47:05 UTC 2014*
--
On behalf of the Icelandic applicants we are fairly sure that we are the
only ones representing our area and we will strive hard to include
others who will be or are interested in the area
seems to change all the time). As
such I've added a link to the above page from the UK page and the UK
tagging guidelines page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom#Find_Out_More
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#See_also
Regards,
Rob
, but in this case I feel we could have
got an initial message out with the formal confirmation following.
Best,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
as heat
of the moment messages can turn out to be very bad).
Thank you Simon for your work and input into the OSMF Board.
Regards,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
this years program together,
including all who submitted a talk for consideration, the evaluation team,
and the local sotm team for putting the final program together (it's no
small task to try to put talks of a similar theme together within the
limits of time and available rooms).
Best,
Rob
local groups that feel they represent the geographic
regions included in the first three applications.
Also I'm curious :-)
Best,
Rob
[1]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2014-October/002697.html
[2] http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_OSMF_Chapters
.
(In regards to that last one I know I wouldn't be supported because I've
raised it before and got nowhere. And getting a sotm banner on osm.org can
be an uphill battle too!)
Regards,
Rob
[1] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Communication_Working_Group
___
talk
there is little need to be knowledgeable in regards to
the inner workings of the OSM data/site. A strong personality and
persistence would be beneficial ;-)
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
adjustments based on a constructive review of his work.
Assuming these are resolved then let's push forwards.
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
earlier this year to give more time to work on securing a venue.
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
subset of the tags).
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
are you still reading this, get bidding :-)
Regards,
Rob
SotM 2013 (Birmingham) local team
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
copied a recent email from Chris at NLS below.
Regards
Rob
p.s. If you find these maps useful, please tell me how you're using them so
I can feed this back to Chris at the NLS.
---
We’ve put several thousand more maps online in the last few months – most
notably of interest for the OSM community
/extracting-centroids-from-openstreetmap.html
Hope this helps.
As for the issue of too many points, one option is to have uMap collect
data dynamically (as per our guide) and restrict to only showing data when
at a certain zoom level or above (with clustering at lower zoom levels).
Best,
Rob
What's everyone's plans for food? Do we know if the place does food / there
is somewhere nearby? If no then, not a problem, I'll just grab something
before meeting.
See you later
Rob
On 1 October 2014 09:48, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
A few suggestions:
The new building
On 24 September 2014 11:46, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments?
Wow, that looks great. The light blue is tricky to see, but otherwise this
looks fantastic :-) How long did it take you?
I need to restart my attempt to add the Warwickshire data. Seeing this
should keep me
and the data has
been removed from OpenStreetMap [1].
This is a good example of why we need to be very careful mapping temporary
features. Many data users update infrequently.
Suggestions of how to get the balance right are welcome.
Regards,
Rob
[1] http://osmapa.pl/#lat=51.0220lon=-2.8997z=10m=ms
these should be
signposted and have special regulations:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=living_street
I guess highway=residential and surface=paving_stones is most suitable
unless someone has some better suggestions?
Regards,
Rob
___
Talk
this thinking need to be done sooner. We'll have
to cross this question even if this import doesn't occur.
Regards,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
tags in OSM, checking whether
the script would add a wikidata tag to an object when there is already a
different object in OSM with that wikidata tag, and a check on the 400m
distance rule [2].
Are these things possible Edward?
Regards,
Rob
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014
manually. At which stage you end up with some wikidata tags in OSM, an API
based on Edward's work, and no doubt lots of overlap and wasted effort.
In summary I'm not sure an API is a good strategy. Instead I support the
proposed import.
Regards,
Rob
P.s. I consider myself part of the UK local
Yeah I was thinking the same when I drove to work this morning. Shouldnt
make a habit of it though :-p
I'll put a tweet out.
On 22 Aug 2014 15:06, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
As two of us are only available on 28 August and not on 4 September, I
have decided to go ahead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/08/14 01:58 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It would be great if people would help fill in the blanks, or
correct me where I might have misrepresented the discussion.
The page asserts:
Geocodes are a Produced Work by the definition of the ODbL
Hi Matthijs,
Who else can't make September 4th in Coventry? I don't mind moving the date
but only if it's causing a lot of problems and we know that the new date
will be more popular.
Regards,
Rob
On 15 August 2014 22:10, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
Dear all,
It turns
References beginning with three or more letters or containing a semicolon:
Hi Andrew,
Any with FP or RB in them are public rights of way. We've been mapping
those to the prow_ref= tag.
Best,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
, and the renderer all align. And as you pointed
out so eloquently the best way to do this is by having a healthy community
that talk and listen. :-)
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 12 August 2014 21:43, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 12/08/14 20:18, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Example 2
6, The Hollies,
Birmingham Road,
Town,
...
Hard to say without knowing what The Hollies is exactly, but this is
probably a case that we don't have a good answer
Nice one.
I've added a few OSM Notes of things that caught my attention when checking
with the geofabrik OSM Inspector tool. If you have time to stop by these,
that would be great.
Rob
On 7 August 2014 22:12, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrapped up the remaining main Shenstone
Hi Matthijs,
Spotted the following sign related to your tagging of private roads
discussion the other day. Enjoy :-)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6J5ZA1hu93beGxtSTVGeUR2aFRqQzdaYXNGR0d6WlBhQXFr/edit?usp=sharing
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk
Mary,
That was almost a year ago - I'd be surprised if anyone remembers!! In any
case why would you like to know?
Rob
On 10 Aug 2014 05:55, mooney.osm mooney@gmail.com wrote:
I vaguely remember someone asking if there was a spare delegate badge. I
think his name began with a G.
Does
Just a few of my thoughts:
1. Bus routes
Stuart wrote:
I will need to think what to do when a bus turns off halfway along a road
that is mapped as one line
Here in Coventry we have all the bus routes mapped in OSM (splitting the
road as necessary). Check out the render on the Transport layer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/07/14 08:46 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Il giorno 30/lug/2014, alle ore 16:44, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com
mailto:a...@mapbox.com ha scritto:
your lawyers did really say according to their understanding a
pair of coordinates is
Looks like I'll tackle 3. I need something quick and easy as I don't think
I'll have much time to map :-(
Rob
On 30 July 2014 21:29, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll tackle 5 and 8
On 29 July 2014 11:00, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
On 29 July 2014 09:33
been open in the current session). Another
small enhancement would be for JOSM to add the filename (test.shp in this
case) to the upload changeset tags.
Rob
p.s. An import is not a simple thing to do, suggesting that any newbies
than manage to work it out must have a reasonable technical
by the Local Authority, and know I couldn't maintain the data
without such a tool. Having said that, I don't know the import policy
inside out so cannot say that this import was wrong.
Jerry, you know the data very well. What's the quality like?
Rob
___
Talk-GB
#Next_meeting
This a location to the north east of Birmingham so might be suitable for
some East Midlands mappers :-) Everyone welcome.
Rob
p.s. This change is to make way for our OpenStreetMap 10th anniversary
meeting on 9th August
http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2014/07/openstreetmap-10th-birthday-party
photogenic
if that was what they wanted. Alternatively think about the type of thing
you struggle to map and target groups that will have more knowledge of
those things.
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
Great work with the press statement.
Can the London group please decide on a venue and update the OSM wiki page.
I want to send out some tweets to UK organisations to invite them to attend
one of the UK events. It would look better if there was an agreed venue for
London.
Cheers,
Rob
p.s. I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/07/14 04:38 PM, Jake Wasserman wrote:
I agree that geocoded private data must be allowed to stay
private.
The ODbL goes to great lengths to explain that it only covers publicly
released data.
At a minimum, we need to find a way to say
be a valid way of tagging
(i.e. close off access to all transport types and then overwrite for people
on foot, as per the access hierarchy)
The exception to the rule is if you tag the route as highway=path. In this
case access tags are required.
Regards,
Rob
What we really need is people actually editing the Wiki in the first
place and in my opinion the best way to get people to do so would be a
better editor: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor
There's an issue for this on trac [1] but the main problem is that the
extension moved from
, translations not updated, or a
non-English page updated and not copied back to the English page (in any
language). I'd encourage people to copy between the pages even if they just
mark the text as needing translating.
Regards,
Rob
[1] You could also copy it to other language pages, but at a bare minimum
to keep everything up and running and as such a stable version
is a reasonable request. If anything it's the visualeditor developers who
need to hurry up and stop pushing the requirements up - mw 1.22, mw 1.23,
mw 1.24, ... when will it stop!!
Rob
___
talk
Hi Brian,
Thanks. If you pull a list of organisations together then I'll produce a
list of local contributors. Given that google drive worked well for SOTM, I
will share the list there and then people can just tick off who they've
contacted.
Rob
On 23 July 2014 19:43, Brian Prangle br...@mappa
and
there will of course be lots on offer from the café. Everyone is welcome to
come along and we are hoping to see a lot of new faces.
Registration is not required but you may want to drop us a message so we
have an idea of how many people are coming.
See you there,
Rob
[1] http
://landregistry.data.gov.uk/app/ppd/ppd
Best,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.48162mlon=-1.89657#map=18/52.48162/-1.89658*
*Best regards, *
On 17 July 2014 15:52, Brian Prangle br...@mappa-mercia.org wrote:
Hi everyone
Thanks Rob for your tweet. I popped in to 6/8 Kafé today and secured us
their basement room. I'm just awaiting email
Hi All,
Our mappa mercia page on the OSM wiki tells me that we have arranged our
August monthly meet up to be a week early (due to the 10th birthday event
on August 9th). It's listed as being Tamworth/Shenston.
Do folks still want to run this event, and if yes where shall we meet?
Rob
p.s. I'm
! Shenstone is quite small, but it has
the advantage that we can map the entire village in one evening.
Tamworth seems to be already quite well-mapped, are there any
particular things we want to map there?
-- Matthijs
On 17 July 2014 21:24, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
we should expect but I can help spread the
word via twitter, the blog and the OSM message system. We should get the
plan confirmed in the next couple of days though :-)
Rob
p.s. I need to check travel times, but at the moment I don't think I will
make it up from Kent in time.
On 15 July 2014 07
that displeases everyone equally.
Luis mentioned that there's case law for the concept of substantial.
There's no mention of this on the current Wiki page. I think it would
be productive to seek that out next.
- - Rob.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http
changing the national tags to conform to
the OSM norm?
Rob
On 11 July 2014 21:35, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
listed_status=local_grade_B; heritage=6;
heritage_operator=Birmingham_CIty_Council. See tagwatch for other examples
On 9 July 2014 22:08, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker
,
Rob
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:listed_status
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
in Birmingham CC's administrative area?
Rob
On 9 July 2014 22:04, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
There's another option using the heritage
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage tag,
which is basically corresponds to an admin_level. Personally find it a bit
clunky
.
If they have any GPS data we would be able to use that too :-)
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Thanks Phil, I agree that proposed highways should only be added (and
tagged as proposed) when they are certain to get built, however, we're not
talking about proposed highways here. We are talking about working with the
HA to get dates of road completions.
Rob
p.s. OSMand rendering is a matter
, if they have maps that are based on OS OpenData (for example the
OS StreetView maps) then I would love to see them. This is how we are
working with Birmingham City Council to get maps of their proposed 20mph
zones.
Perhaps step one is to find out what they have.
Rob
I've had a couple of responses off list. These are:
* Constructing the past
* something with crowd in it?
Thanks, for these good ideas. Any more suggestions?
Rob
On 18 June 2014 21:04, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
A few OSM members interested in historic maps are working
the name as things evolve. :-)
Rob
On 19 June 2014 23:13, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
Open Historical Map which already has a website www.openhistoricalmap.org
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
wrote:
A few OSM members interested
Outliner
We're after your thoughts - which name works best? Is there some amazing
name we haven't thought of yet?
Best,
Rob (RobJN)
p.s. You're more than welcome to help in other ways. We're on the historic
mailing list if you want to follow the progress
.
Regards,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
be a great start
(one for maproulette?) but I'm hoping under tight controls we will find
that the level of accuracy is high enough to consider automation. I'm not
here to force automation on anyone so lets just focus on a script that
flags potential matches for now.
Rob
some interest amongst osm developers.
Rob
On 17 Jun 2014 23:24, John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
To make this process smoother, it could be good to do things such as
retrieve the target object location according to Nominatim and show the
wikidata page or preferably the wikipedia page on X
.
Regards,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
be a great start
(one for maproulette?) but I'm hoping under tight controls we will find
that the level of accuracy is high enough to consider automation. I'm not
here to force automation on anyone so lets just focus on a script that
flags potential matches for now.
Rob
some interest amongst osm developers.
Rob
On 17 Jun 2014 23:24, John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
To make this process smoother, it could be good to do things such as
retrieve the target object location according to Nominatim and show the
wikidata page or preferably the wikipedia page on X
popular this was
(sorry for the room fiasco Andy) so I'm sure there will be a lot of other
people who are equally delighted to see this latest update. Thanks to all
involved.
Best,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https
greater prominence in the main editors
Best,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
the general
quality of public data.
I unfortunately don't have the skills to help with editing, but support
initial trials as a good step to working more closely with wikimedia
commons.
Best,
Rob
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_errors
___
Talk-GB
store and links to the wikipedia articles in all
languages), but I wouldn't complain if more wikipedia tags were added.
Rob
p.s.
name=foo to all objects would be a type 2 fail. In the wikidata example you
would want to add the wikidata reference to object foo only if name=foo
in OSM (and geographic
(and then just eyeball it ourselves for any new errors).
So we can ignore the old github repo and use the new one then? I'm busy
this week but will aim to look at the website from next week. If anyone has
some good images we could use in place of the default NYPL ones then shout
:-)
Rob
On 2 June
It's not all big projects - little ones are also much appreciated :-D
Best,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
601 - 700 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo