- it is a completely valid
suggestion in for example Poland.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
My Ubuntu bionic (due for upgrade to Focal shortly) claims to have a current
GDAL - using an ubuntigis unstable repo, but that's behind as well - I'm on
GDAL 3.04 while upstream is 3.11.
Paul Bivand
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
e or
less stable
- for example roads are far less likely to be moved/renamed than bus lines.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
friend has
done some preliminary work) or similar. This is not elegant but is perhaps a
first step in enabling a whole lot of development?
Cheers
Nick
On 02/07/2020 18:38, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for producing that map.
I was able to look at
ps://osm.mathmos.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
That is an unrelated failure that caused tile of
the default map style to stop updating
(other servers relying on the same toolchain also
were likely to be affected)
Jun 28, 2020, 21:08 by danstowell+...@gmail.com:
> I won't presume that everyone on talk-gb wants the gory technical
> d
ly one seeing this: do I need to investigate further?
>
> ael
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
t; Tony Shield
>
> TonyS999
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
and/or
comment on the user experience.
Just throw me a line at o...@poppe.dev and I'll send you the download link.
Thanks in advance!
Kai
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Jun 21, 2020, 03:54 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
>
>
>
> Jun 21, 2020, 01:28 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net:
>
>> We think in particular that a significant part of the cycle parking data
>> (generally the residential areas, where there is little parking p
21 Jun 2020, 12:07 by p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020,
t;
https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=crossings_junctions/#14.77/51.50656/-0.08864
is missing bicycle=yes foot=no intentional? See say
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24923378 (RWG082685)
that seems impassable for pedestrians
https://api.cyclestreets.net/v2/infrastructur
d images to Wikimedia Commons and link them with
wikimedia_commons?
It would make easier to verify what went wrong in case of manual verification.
Is there a plan which tags would be used by changeset itself?
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@op
nd instead of
bicycle_parking=locked
note=Own lock
use
access=private
(id RWG102738)
I remember big import preparations that had issue tracker about tag conversion
- is it this project?
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
0/Proposal/Potlatch_2_for_desktop
> Where is best to raise this, if not here?
>
It was possible to comment on and support microgrant proposals but deadline for
that ended.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
in volume (both in London
> and internationally - though London, due to the fragmented local authorities
> seems to be doing it in far more varied ways than other places) there is a
> benefit to establishing this now
>
>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ke. So frozen_food sounds a bit too
>limited.
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Regards, Phil.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Sainsbury's with a Lloyds Pharmacy inside it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6868601075 Tesco with a Tesco pharmacy
inside https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6841571554
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
ki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=%22Unsuitable+for+Heavy+Goods+Vehicles%22=Special%3ASearch=Go
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=Unsuitable+for+HGV=Special%3ASearch=default=1
searches
(and that was primary reason for creating it).
___
> If you save the living environment, the biodiversity that we have left,
> you will also automatically save the physical environment, too. But If
> you only save the physical environment, you will ultimately lose both.
>
> 1) Don’t drive species to extinction
>
> 2) Don’t destroy a habitat that species rely on.
>
> 3) Don’t change the climate in ways that will result in the above.
>
> }<(((*>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
y, abandonded:highway=footway or
removed:highway=footway, depending on whether the path is still visible and
whether the blockage would be relatively easy or difficult to remove. This
seems to me to be much better than highway=no.
Regards,
Mike
_______
are typically a mixrure of all three.
>
> What I'm trying to achieve is a 'built-up-area' rendering which covers the
> whole of the built up area of a town or city. Not looking for
> administrative boundaries - but the actual physically built-up area.
>
> Thanks,
> Nic
to spend a while trying this" as "I'm doing it NOW".
Best Regards,
Andy
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
From: Peter Neale via Talk-GB
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 10:43 AM
To: Talk-GB ; Jez Nicholson
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?
I think that I understand the issue. A solution may be to delete individual
points until the whole way is small enough to be shown
the OSM revert
scripts https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Revert_scripts would have worked,
but I'd have needed to explicitly say "yes please delete the new way and the 3
new nodes".
Best Regards,
Andy
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstree
309666
m: 07968 341930
skype: nealepb
On Monday, 27 April 2020, 10:44:26 BST, Peter Neale via Talk-GB
wrote:
I think that I understand the issue. A solution may be to delete individual
points until the whole way is small enough to be shown on a screen at editable
zoom.
I am happy
to
assist please?
I only have anecdotal evidence (like this one) but it seems that a 'new user
thing to do' is to 'correct my local area'. Might be another reason to lock
boundaries from new user changes?___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
, Edward Catmur
wrote:
These things can be permanent – mosaic or other types of inlay.
From: Mike Parfitt
Sent: 27 April 2020 08:56
To: mar...@templot.com; neal...@yahoo.co.uk; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] underfoot art
There may be some merit in tagging
These things can be permanent – mosaic or other types of inlay. From: Mike ParfittSent: 27 April 2020 08:56To: mar...@templot.com; neal...@yahoo.co.uk; talk-gb@openstreetmap.orgSubject: Re: [Talk-GB] underfoot art There may be some merit in tagging permanent artwork on the sides of buildings.But
called?
https://goo.gl/maps/uVVfLbicFhT25TM5A
https://goo.gl/maps/5g1yJnsAGEHzpqqY6
I got as far as tourism=artwork but then
artwork_type= ?
thanks,
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
th LibreOffice; I'm not
sure about Excel.) The address lines seem to be used inconsistently,
but everything is back aligned when you get to the postcode field.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://
ut Excel.) The address lines seem to be used inconsistently,
but everything is back aligned when you get to the postcode field.
Best wishes,
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.
"Anyone?" Huh? (seems to be lacking the back-story!)
Regards,Peter
On Thursday, 16 April 2020, 15:16:45 BST, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
Anyone?
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin
ll locked up in PDFs.) Can anyone help out here?
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
tag as amenity=pharmacy in OSM. For internal
>hospital and prison pharmacies, and for internet-only pharmacies that
>you can't get prescriptions from as a walk-in customer, I don't think
>they should be tagged as amenity=pharmacy.
>
>Best wishes,>
>Robert.
>
>--
>Robert Whittaker
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
locations (e.g. for events) and internal
>hospital and prisons pharmacies. This will hopefully make the
>comparison shown by the tool must more useful.
>
>* Because of the change to exclude hospital and prison pharmacies from
>the GPhC data, OSM objects with pharmacy=yes will only
then UK. So that would make the keys ref:GB:uprn
and ref:GB:usrn .
Robert.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
:29:05 BST, Lester Caine
wrote:
On 03/04/2020 10:15, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
> So, will I have to quote a 20-digit alpha-numeric code, if I want to
> order something from Amazon? ..or get my grandchildren to send me a
> birthday card?
>
> (I do not know what these UP
that's necessary for, say, Amazon to deliver a package to me is for them
to know the UPRN of my house. Their routing software will then do all
the heavy lifting of plotting how to get the package from their depot to
my door.
Mark
___________
Talk-GB mail
imageries
available with FB detections as a background source and will not use RapidID
editor or JOSM. Also changeset comments will be addressed by our team on top
priority.
Regards,
Jothirnadh
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
amenity=waste_basket
- waste_basket:model=”metal square twin”
- condition=good/fair/poor
- waste_basket:defects=loose
- waste_basket:collection_days=mon/fri (or lcc:collection_days ?)
- lcc:id=1849
- lcc:comments=”under city centre team management”
What do you think?
Cheers
e road,
orientated for buses heading NW along Station Road as they come off the busway.
So yes, it is incorrect in OSM.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east and anglia
On 22 Mar 2020, at 14:17, Dave F via Talk-GB
mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org><mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.
Bedfordshire, and is on the left hand side of the road,
orientated for buses heading NW along Station Road as they come off the busway.
So yes, it is incorrect in OSM.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east and anglia
On 22 Mar 2020, at 14:17, Dave F via Talk-GB
mailto:talk-gb
who claims there a service, run by Govia
Thameslink, which goes to Luton, which is a bit surprising as it's
oneway. It also means the bus stop is located on the wrong side of the
road.
Cheers
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
changes with
> no source given, and I wonder if copyright material has been used.
>
Given no reply and confirmed tagging for renderer reverting all similar edits
should be acceptable (and likely - desirable).
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
dn’t mean to suggest it as a requirement but more of
an optional extension that would serve to both give users greater detail and
help contributors ‘prove’ that they were not copy Refills data.
>
> Mark
>
> _______
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-G
ever recall
seeing behaviour like that. It most certainly isn't acceptable. Minor
disagreements at times, sure, but outright abuse is way over the top.
He's gone.
Cheers,
Matthew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
On 14/03/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Op za 14 mrt. 2020 om 11:20 schreef Tom Hughes via Talk-GB
:
On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote:
As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack
list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email
this mailing
the situation
with them before attempting a putsch.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
at this point. The UK
community should nominate one or more, and ask the OWG to instate them as list
moderators. In any case pleading to them here will not work (and likely
wouldn't work even if there were some).
Simon
Am 13.03.2020 um 23:37 schrieb Peter Neale via Talk-GB:
List Moderators
m.
cheers,
dzidek23
Dnia 13 marca 2020 16:03 talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org napisał(a):
Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions totalk...@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gbor, via email, send a m
-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
For the avoidance of doubt (and to retain my good name), can I please point out
that "this swearing jerk" referred to by @BrianPrangle is not me but...
>- Forwarded message ->From: Daniel Holsey >To:
>European Water Project >Cc:
>"talk-gb@openstree
:
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
smandapp/OsmAnd-resources/commit/15f5c919d3ac25cc048c4f3e0a569f7981999f65>
Many thanks
Jake
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I plan to be there.
Ian
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 14:17, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Thursday March 5th 730 The Bull. Come with ideas for travelling meetings
> in the summer
>
> Regards
>
> Brian
>
> ___
>
ed as. I think commercial is usually wrong, for
> the reasons I've already given, but I can see an argument for either
> grass, recreation_ground or even park.
>
> Thoughts, anyone?
>
> Mark
>
>
> _______
> Talk-GB mailing li
'proposed' data, as developments are often severely amended or
cancelled. It's much better to wait until there's ground evidence. Much
rather be accurate than first.
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 06/02/2020 16:49, Phillip Barnett wrote:
And here is the email from the guy who did the original mapping, the last time
this came up, including his reasoning for the amenity Tag rather than building
tag https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017457.html
Note the time
ould. I'm mildly irritated that these corrections have to
be done by those who didn't create the errors in the first place.
DaveF
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 31/01/2020 23:49, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi
Over the past few months I've been sorting & adding detail to the UK's
National Rail railway stations so that OSM has the correct amount.
As it's been a week, with no objections, I'm proceeding with the
amendments. I'm keeping a
ers,
Jerry
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 15:15, Dave F via Talk-GB
wrote:
On 04/02/2020 14:28, Dan S wrote:
Hi Dave,
I agree with what you suggest. Can we be a bit precise though about
what you propose? You're proposing to remove amenity=university from
building=university in Cambridge, and make
Daer all,
>
> By my calendar it is the next meetup this coming Thursday. I am assuming
> central Birmingham, likely at The Bull...?
I'll be there as well.
Eike
>
> *Rob*
>
> _______
> Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing lis
>On Tuesday, 4 February 2020, 16:40:21 GMT, Andy Townsend
wrote: > >On 04/02/2020 15:37, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
>>There isn't, I'm afraid.. it's a right hotchpotch
>>IMHO, it would be a waste of time, if you tried to create a single area
obje
Feb 4, 2020, 16:37 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> >> (Ironically, the current tagging makes it hard for me to search to see
> >> if there's a "proper" amenity=university in there somewhere, e.g. as a
> >> relation or area covering a large swathe of them.)
Feb 4, 2020, 15:14 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> Hi
> There was a discussion 5 years ago. There may have been others.
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017455.html
>
> Many amenity=university tags were added unnecessarily to building=yes
>
d by colleges, mixed in with shops,
offices and other buildings, and asked which way to go to the University.
Regards,Peter
On Tuesday, 4 February 2020, 15:15:38 GMT, Dave F via Talk-GB
wrote:
On 04/02/2020 14:28, Dan S wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I agree with what you suggest. Can we be
0 om 14:15 schreef Dave F via Talk-GB
:
Hi
There was a discussion 5 years ago. There may have been others.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017455.html
Many amenity=university tags were added unnecessarily to building=yes
A contributor had converted these to building=
Hi
There was a discussion 5 years ago. There may have been others.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017455.html
Many amenity=university tags were added unnecessarily to building=yes
A contributor had converted these to building=university, in accordance
with the wiki
ing
>> central Birmingham, likely at The Bull...?
>>
>> *Rob*
>> _______
>> Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
>> Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
>>
Yes, still a few of those around,
>>> probably many of them in some countries.
>>>
>>> amenity=fuel / fuel=solid perhaps but that will receive a petrol pump on
>>> the map for your efforts.
>>>
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7171642306
>>>
>
map for your efforts.
>
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7171642306
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Andy
>
>_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
t;
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
> _______
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
addition. The last publication date was 2009,
however & missing about of the 50 newest stations.
Are you aware of a later issue? Has another organization squired
responsibility?
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
h
.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Feb 1, 2020, 00:49 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> I've now added them with the more explicit tag 'request_stop=yes'.
>
BTW, I just created wiki page for this tag at it appeared to be undocumented
and it
seems to have no competing versions:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:reques
On 01/02/2020 00:05, Martin Wynne wrote:
The traditional distinction was that Halts were unstaffed.
These are now classed as DfT F, which is also worth adding.
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
make a distinction
between halts & stations in their renders.
Carto label them the same but display halts at a higher zoom level,
which personally, I find irritating.
Opinions/Suggestions?
Cheers
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.o
the law.
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/open-data-portals-go-
ahead-group/
Any comments?
Thanks
Cj
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
re cleaning up before they
>can ever be reused.
>
>Cheers
>Andy
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
>[mailto:robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 10 January 2020 14:10
>To: talk-gb
>Subject: [Talk-GB] Stale Developments
>
>I'd like
Whittaker
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I forgot to mention that linear ways do have an implied width. It can be
explicitly declared with the width tag. Although, other than waterways I
don't /think/ any renderers take advantage of it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
DaveF
On 01/01/2020 00:49, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote
/footpaths o the
'standard' rendering.
On 31/12/2019 18:45, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 31/12/2019 18:10, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
I would add the appropriate surface=* tag to the way.
Thanks Dave.
But a way is a *line*.
I want to tag the *area*. I've got 3 ways - 2 fences and a track.
Tagging
, its banks could be separately mapped and the area
between them mapped as water. Tracks and fences/hedgerows don't seem
to have anything comparable.
Thanks.
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
rs
Chris
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
in Bing's OS Explorer map & in the local
authority's digital database.
Cheers
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
eing one way,
it doesn't need relation roles - direction can be ascertained from the
way itself.
BTW the bus lay-by /can/ be joined & should be tagged as one way
.
Cheers
DaveF
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
things mapped as roundabouts aren't legally
roundabouts, but rather traffic circles.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
hat all
>1000 other ways in the relation would then have to be tagged "main ".
Open for comments / suggestions.
Regards, Peter
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
- Forwarded message - From: "Peter Neale" To:
"Talk-gb OSM List" Cc: Sent: Thu, 19 Dec
-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-
> https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain
> spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, at 4:31 PM, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote:
>
> Further to this - if you want to look for barrier=kerb + highway=crossing
> nodes in your area, which may be disrupting rout
I can see the logic of placing the restriction on the bend, but how long is a
"long vehicle"?
Is there an official definition?
Peter
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 14:30, SK53 wrote:
_______
Talk-GB mailing li
On 19/12/2019 02:09, Warin wrote:
On 19/12/19 13:01, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 19/12/2019 01:41, Andy Townsend wrote:
Aside from this particular question, that's actually a problem that
happens all the time with things like "amenity=pub; tourism=hotel" -
I'd rather the m
ut the one that is marked? Should I include it, or not?
Regards,Peter
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
is antonymous to disused:building
Cheers
DaveF
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
way=crossing should be regarded as a mistake.
> Taginfo shows ~ 1000 of them (0.47 of barrier=kerb nodes; 0.03% of
> highway=crossing nodes) which should fixable.
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:37 PM Philip Barnes
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 18 December 2019, David Woolley
201 - 300 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
