Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits

Je ne vois nulle part de lieux-dits comme "surfaces" dans le cadastre : les surfaces du cadastre sont les limites de parcelles anonymes (seulement numérotées), suivant un découpage historique avec de nombreux démembrements et remembrements, et les groupements sont les zones cadastrales (1 ou

Re: [Talk-in] Kerala Road mapping with FB ML data

Please add ur comments here, if you are ok to import the ML data. https://github.com/osm-in/mapping/issues/1 On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:15 PM muzirian wrote: > In late July 2018, severe flooding affected Kerala state in India due to > unusually high rainfall during the monsoon season, Kerala's

Re: [Talk-GB] When is a hedge a wood?

Hi Martin, 1) The boundary is is clearly a fence. Thats what stops you just walking across. You can map the trees as several natural : tree or a tree_row depending on how long the row is I guess. Certainly not a hedge or wood. 2) The road is a highway, the grass is a verge.. the wiki suggests

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] station de rechargement d’hydrogène

Pas de soucis, vaut mieux poser la question que créer un doublon sans demander ! Jean-Yvon > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. August 2018 um 19:58 Uhr > Von: "bruno Piguet - bruno.pig...@gmail.com" > > An: talk-fr@openstreetmap.org > Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk-fr] (osm: message 3 of 20) station de

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-08-27 01:27, Neil Matthews wrote: > *If* there are used for looking up addresses, then there is some very slight > advantage to having them -- I still occasionally see websites/people > referring to Avon :-) Postal counties are a whole new family-sized can of worms Everybody knows

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

*If* there are used for looking up addresses, then there is some very slight advantage to having them -- I still occasionally see websites/people referring to Avon :-) Neil On 26/08/2018 23:49, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > To repeat, They do exist, but only as a record of old data, not > current.

[Talk-GB] Mapping horse steps?

I'm tempted to map these horse-mounting steps as stairway=to_heaven http://85a.co.uk/images/little_hereford7_960x800.jpg http://85a.co.uk/images/little_hereford8_960x500.jpg Other suggestions welcome. Clearly horse riders need to know where these useful installations are located.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits

Pour moi ce n'est pas une question d’être utile ou pas, c'est plus une question de cohérence ou un truc comme ça :) Le problème c'est que l'on va ajouté ces soit disant lieux dits avec un tag place=locality et on va les mélanger avec les vrai place=locality. J'ai l'impression qu'une partie de ces

Re: [Talk-GB] boundary mania

On 2018-08-27 00:24, Mark Goodge wrote: > On 26/08/2018 21:36, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-08-26 21:17, David Woolley > wrote: > > It looks to me as though boundaries can be defined recursively, so Hampshire, > rather than its bounding ways, ought to to be the object referenced in the > bigger

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi To repeat, They do exist, but only as a record of old data, not current. just as there's a record of Humberside & Avon. That they don't get altered is irrelevant. I disagree about their legality. DaveF On 26/08/2018 23:01, Adam Snape wrote: Hi, Both Colin and Dave have repeated the

Re: [Talk-GB] When is a hedge a wood?

When someone's appearance is still presentable after being dragged backwards through one. DaveF ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] When is a hedge a wood?

On 26/08/2018 23:16, Martin Wynne wrote: Both. It's administratively and legally part of the highway, but it's the part of the highway which consists of a grass verge. Thanks Mark. I think I should map that as landuse=highway landcover=grass However for some inexplicable reason,

Re: [Talk-GB] boundary mania

On 26/08/2018 21:36, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-08-26 21:17, David Woolley wrote: It looks to me as though boundaries can be defined recursively, so Hampshire, rather than its bounding ways, ought to to be the object referenced in the bigger entities. This wouldn't work in the case of civil

Re: [Talk-GB] When is a hedge a wood?

Both. It's administratively and legally part of the highway, but it's the part of the highway which consists of a grass verge. Thanks Mark. I think I should map that as landuse=highway landcover=grass However for some inexplicable reason, landuse=highway isn't allowed. I was told the

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi, Both Colin and Dave have repeated the implication that the traditional counties don't exist. It's very much arguable I guess, certainly successive governments have made clear that they recognised the continued existence of the traditional counties, and that administrative changes neither

Wochennotiz Nr. 422 14.08.2018–20.08.2018

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 422 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2018/08/wochennotiz-nr-42/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-08-26 22:47, Adam Snape wrote: > I feel I should stress at this point that we do map a fairly similar set of > boundaries, the so-called 'ceremonial counties'. These are basically a modern > attempt at providing a set of geographic county areas which don't strictly > follow county

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 26/08/2018 21:47, Adam Snape wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 21:20 Mark Goodge, > wrote: I think it's slightly unfortunate that OSM uses the tag 'historic' for something that's different to what we are discussing here. As well as being

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:32:01PM +0200, Heiko Jacobs wrote: > Am 22.08.2018 um 13:43 schrieb chris66: > > Habe im Forum eine (inoffizielle) Abstimmung eingestellt: > > Meine dortige, von schon zweien bestechend empfundene Antwort auch hier: > > Ich weiß nicht, wie man da auf service kommen

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-08-26 22:05, Martin Wynne wrote: >> I don't think it's for those who have mapped something in OSM to >> demonstrate majority support for its retention. I think it is for those >> seeking to have others' contributions removed to demonstrate a clear >> consensus in favour of deletion. > >

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 21:20 Mark Goodge, wrote: > > I think it's slightly unfortunate that OSM uses the tag 'historic' for > something that's different to what we are discussing here. As well as > being potentially ambiguous, it may also encourage people to add > boundaries that are "historic" in

Re: [Talk-GB] boundary mania

On 2018-08-26 21:17, David Woolley wrote: > It looks to me as though boundaries can be defined recursively, so Hampshire, > rather than its bounding ways, ought to to be the object referenced in the > bigger entities. This wouldn't work in the case of civil parishes as components of districts

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 26/08/2018 16:37, Andrew Black wrote: Before we can decide whether to delete or document it we need to decide whether it is wanted. Might a Loomio vote be a way forwards. As a relatively recent newcomer to OSM as a contributor, I was wondering about that. Does OSM have the equivalent of

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 26/08/2018 20:54, Colin Smale wrote: There is a wiki page for boundary=historic, which I think makes it clear that these boundaries should not be in OSM. I think it's slightly unfortunate that OSM uses the tag 'historic' for something that's different to what we are discussing here. As

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Disagree. We all add data which abides by certain rules & criteria. We vet it ourselves as we're adding it. If a contributor fails to do that, they should be expected to justify the reasons. This hasn't occurred. That they still exist as historical documents is not a viable argument. As Dave

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 26/08/2018 21:05, Martin Wynne wrote: I don't think it's for those who have mapped something in OSM to demonstrate majority support for its retention. I think it is for those seeking to have others' contributions removed to demonstrate a clear consensus in favour of deletion. Should this

Re: [Talk-GB] When is a hedge a wood?

On 26/08/2018 20:35, Martin Wynne wrote: Rural boundaries can be extraordinarily difficult to map. For example, is this:  https://goo.gl/maps/FtjMZiwNj542 a) a fence, b) a hedge, c) a very narrow wood, d) all three at the same time? I'd call it a hedgerow. I'm not sure if OSM has a

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I don't think it's for those who have mapped something in OSM to demonstrate majority support for its retention. I think it is for those seeking to have others' contributions removed to demonstrate a clear consensus in favour of deletion. Should this consensus be among OSM mappers or OSM users?

Re: [Talk-GB] boundary mania

On 26/08/2018 20:01, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 08/26/2018 12:46 PM, Colin Smale wrote: It has gone all quiet here, and in the mean time smb001 has been making steady progress across England. I think he shouldn't have done this. He should have argued his case here and the community should

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-08-26 20:45, Adam Snape wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think it's for those who have mapped something in OSM to demonstrate > majority support for its retention. I think it is for those seeking to have > others' contributions removed to demonstrate a clear consensus in favour of >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] station de rechargement d’hydrogène

La pollution des sols par l'hydrogène est quasi nulle, contrairement au gaz butane/propane. L'hydrogène est très facilement synthétisé dans l'environnement. Au pire il va acidifier un peu le sol en cas de dissolution mais la dissolution est très faible et vite cet acide oxyde le milieu et les

[Talk-GB] When is a hedge a wood?

Rural boundaries can be extraordinarily difficult to map. For example, is this: https://goo.gl/maps/FtjMZiwNj542 a) a fence, b) a hedge, c) a very narrow wood, d) all three at the same time? Is the area in front of it a) grass, b) highway, c) both? (Not mapping from Google, I walked

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits

> Le 25 août 2018 à 16:30, marc marc a écrit : > > Le 23. 08. 18 à 15:13, djakk djakk a écrit : >> place= administrative_locality >> quand on recopie le cadastre ? > > cela ne me semble pas une bonne idée. > la question est plutôt de se demander son utilité et d'agir en fonction. J’ai

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits

> Le 25 août 2018 à 16:30, marc marc a écrit : > > Le 23. 08. 18 à 15:13, djakk djakk a écrit : >> place= administrative_locality >> quand on recopie le cadastre ? > > cela ne me semble pas une bonne idée. > la question est plutôt de se demander son utilité et d'agir en fonction. J’ai

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits

> Le 25 août 2018 à 16:30, marc marc a écrit : > > Le 23. 08. 18 à 15:13, djakk djakk a écrit : >> place= administrative_locality >> quand on recopie le cadastre ? > > cela ne me semble pas une bonne idée. > la question est plutôt de se demander son utilité et d'agir en fonction. J’ai

Re: [Talk-GB] boundary mania

On 26/08/18 20:01, Frederik Ramm wrote: I think we should all think twice before duplicating and triplicating data in OSM just because there's yet another boundary that includes Hampshire. We should find a way to reference existing boundaries instead of copying them. It looks to me as though

Re: [Talk-GB] boundary mania (was: 'historic' county boundaries added to the database)

Hi, On 08/26/2018 12:46 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > It has gone all quiet here, and in the mean time smb001 has been making > steady progress across England. I think he shouldn't have done this. He should have argued his case here and the community should have come to an explicit resolution,

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi, I don't think it's for those who have mapped something in OSM to demonstrate majority support for its retention. I think it is for those seeking to have others' contributions removed to demonstrate a clear consensus in favour of deletion. Kind regards, Adam On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 16:38

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] suivit de l'intégration des batiments dans osm

> > > - Noir : Invalidé. Quelqu'un a signalé l'élément comme mal renseigné > > - Rouge : Critique. Jamais validé et dernière modification ancienne > > - Orange : Moyenne. Jamais validé et dernière modification récente ou > > déjà validé et dernière modification ancienne > > - Vert :

Re: [Talk-cz] A-GPS Re: Zkusenosti s openstreetcam vs mapovani rychlosti na silnicich

On 8/26/18 1:26 PM, majka wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 12:28, Marián Kyral > wrote: > > On 8/26/18 8:52 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Ahoj! > > > >> Taky jsem na to chtěl použít svůj předchozí telefon, ale ten > bez SIM > >> karty nebyl schopen

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] station de rechargement d’hydrogène

Pour ce qui est des stations privé je les ajoute pour tester des itinéraires optimisés. Je pense que ça a donc un intérêt. Au niveau environnement cela a aussi un intérêt car en car de fuite la pollution des sols aura aussi un sacré impact. Le dim. 26 août 2018 à 19:59, bruno Piguet a écrit : >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] station de rechargement d’hydrogène

Au temps pour moi... Le dim. 26 août 2018 à 14:59, a écrit : > L'h2 est déjà dans la liste, pourquoi l'ajouter ? Car c'est de l'hydrogene > liquide je suppose. > > Jean-Yvon > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. August 2018 um 09:56 Uhr > > Von: "bruno Piguet - bruno.pig...@gmail.com" > > > An:

[Talk-de] Erinnerung Berliner OSM Hackweekend 15.&16.09.2018

Hallo, zur Erinnerung möchte ich auf das Berliner OSM-Hack-Weekend am 15./16.9.2018 aufmerksam machen. Alle Infos dazu gibt es auf der Wiki- und Meetup-Seite [1][2]. Das Wichtigste: Wann:  15./16.09.2018 jeweils ab 10:00 Uhr Wo: mindbox Berlin, Holzmarktstraße 6-9, 10179 Berlin ÖPNV:

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Before we can decide whether to delete or document it we need to decide whether it is wanted. Might a Loomio vote be a way forwards. On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 15:42, Colin Smale wrote: > I wanted to talk about the process, not the outcome. It is obvious there > is not an overwhelming consensus

[Talk-in] Importing Kerala, India road network from Facebook's ML generated data

In late July 2018, severe flooding affected the Indian state of Kerala due to unusually high rainfall during the monsoon season. It was the worst flooding in Kerala in nearly a century.Over 373 people died within a fortnight, while at least 280,679 people were evacuated. It is estimated that

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I wanted to talk about the process, not the outcome. It is obvious there is not an overwhelming consensus one way or the other, and as usual the debate just fizzles out with no conclusion. If we do nothing, the data stays in the database because nobody has the balls to delete it, but it can't

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I agree with Dave F " It's still historic data, irrelevant to OSM. They are neither "current or real". That they will "never change" is irrelevant. They add no quality to the database.They should be removed." On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 12:58, Colin Smale wrote: > I agree, but where do we

Re: [OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people

I've built from scratch and tested an aircraft based on Kline-Fogleman modified KFm2 airfoil. It's wingspan is 75 cm (aprox. 30 inches). The cost of the airframe is less that 5 USD (a sheet of foam-board 2 USD, a stick of hot glue 50 cents, the packing tape 1 USD, two zip ties 20 cents.).

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 12:59 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote: > > They add no quality to the database. > > They do for someone wanting to know where the historic boundaries > lie. In that case they would be more appropriate in OHM. Phil (trigpoint) ___

[talk-au] ACT, Australia Buildings Import

I'm interested in seeing buildings in ACT Australia imported into OpenStreetMap in line with the Import Guidelines . At this stage I'm seeking buy in from the local community as well as feedback on the plan. The data is available from

[Talk-ca] hebdoOSM Nº 422 2018-08-14-2018-08-20

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 422 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10636/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] station de rechargement d’hydrogène

L'h2 est déjà dans la liste, pourquoi l'ajouter ? Car c'est de l'hydrogene liquide je suppose. Jean-Yvon > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. August 2018 um 09:56 Uhr > Von: "bruno Piguet - bruno.pig...@gmail.com" > > An: talk-fr@openstreetmap.org > Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk-fr] (osm: message 2 of 20)

[OSM-talk-fr] hebdoOSM Nº 422 2018-08-14-2018-08-20

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 422 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10636/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-ht] hebdoOSM Nº 422 2018-08-14-2018-08-20

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 422 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10636/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-africa] hebdoOSM Nº 422 2018-08-14-2018-08-20

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 422 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10636/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

Re: [Talk-es] ¿Ha desaparecido la capa Catastro?

También PNOA, he puesto un issue en el repositorio de iD: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5250 Saludos El dom., 26 ago. 2018 a las 14:17, Fco. Javier González Jiménez (< fjavier...@hotmail.com>) escribió: > Hola, > > > > Veo que hoy ha desaparecido la capa del Catastro del editor web.

[Talk-es] ¿Ha desaparecido la capa Catastro?

Hola, Veo que hoy ha desaparecido la capa del Catastro del editor web. ¿Sabéis algo de que ocurre? Saludos ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-pt] Talk-pt Digest, Vol 103, Issue 4

Devem permanecer. É o que está na legislação da classificação da rede viária DL222/98 https://www.amt-autoridade.pt/media/1269/decreto-lei-nº-2221998-de-17-de-julho.pdf Às 13:00 de 26/08/2018,

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I think there's certainly an argument for including the traditional boundaries. There's certainly enough people arguing the pros for us to say that there's no clear consensus against it. As you say, there is a certain culture of tolerance within OSM that would be at odds with removal. I do,

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

They add no quality to the database. They do for someone wanting to know where the historic boundaries lie. For example in cross-referencing the old OS County Series maps, see for example: https://maps.nls.uk/view/121856992#zoom=3=8515=14122=BT Martin.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I agree, but where do we actually go from here? We have some options... 1) remove them all 2) leave them in the database and quietly ignore them 3) leave them in the database and document them, even though they are controversial, to say the least Option 2 is least desirable IMHO, as we

Re: [Talk-es] Corregir Metro de Granada

Buenos días, he estado recopilando datos de OSM y el Metro de Granada. Las dudas que tenemos están entre tram y light_rail, creo que subway está más que descartado. Adjunto 2 documentos con la información recogida. A continuación destaco algunas de las características del Metro de Granada que

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

No, it's hasn't been acquiesced. It's still historic data, irrelevant to OSM. They are neither "current or real". That they will "never change" is irrelevant. They add no quality to the database.They should be removed. DaveF On 26/08/2018 11:46, Colin Smale wrote: It has gone all quiet

Re: [Talk-cz] A-GPS Re: Zkusenosti s openstreetcam vs mapovani rychlosti na silnicich

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 12:28, Marián Kyral wrote: > On 8/26/18 8:52 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Ahoj! > > > >> Taky jsem na to chtěl použít svůj předchozí telefon, ale ten bez SIM > >> karty nebyl schopen zafixovat GPS, takže smůla. Telefon dostala dcerka a > >> u té dosloužil. > > Telefon bez

Re: [Talk-it] quando wikipedia sbaglia

Ciao. È sufficiente modificare le coordinate qui: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3144282 Dario Il giorno dom 26 ago 2018 alle ore 12:40 claudio62PG ha scritto: > Sto mappando qui a Perugia l'Ipogeo di san Manno guardando su wikipedia la > mappa (OSM) lo mette al centro dello stadio del

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

It has gone all quiet here, and in the mean time smb001 has been making steady progress across England. I take it that means acquiescence to these historic county boundaries being in OSM. I guess we should get smb001 to write up the tagging in the wiki. Or is there a discussion going on

[Talk-it] quando wikipedia sbaglia

Sto mappando qui a Perugia l'Ipogeo di san Manno guardando su wikipedia la mappa (OSM) lo mette al centro dello stadio del Perugia Ipogeo changeset 62003494 Che fare per

Re: [Talk-cz] A-GPS Re: Zkusenosti s openstreetcam vs mapovani rychlosti na silnicich

On 8/26/18 8:52 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Ahoj! > >> Taky jsem na to chtěl použít svůj předchozí telefon, ale ten bez SIM >> karty nebyl schopen zafixovat GPS, takže smůla. Telefon dostala dcerka a >> u té dosloužil. > Telefon bez SIM karty nema asistenci na GPS, takze ta GPS funguje > ... o

Re: [Talk-de] http://wms.openstreetmap.de/

Hallo Sven, die Daten von Radolfzell sind alte Luftbilder von 2010, die würde ich nicht umziehen. Falls jemand diese braucht, vermittle ich gerne diese Daten. Ich frage mal in Radolfzell nach, ob von dort neues Material angeboten würde. mhGruß Ludwig On 15.08.2018 16:20, Sven Geggus wrote:

[Talk-africa] OSMkilawiki #422 2018-08-14-2018-08-20

Habari za OpenStreetMap, swala 422, sasa linapatikana kwenye mtandao katika lugha ya Kiswahili, kutupa muhtasari wa mambo yote yanayotokea katika ulimwengu wa OpenStreetMap: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/sw/archives/10636/ Furahia! OSMkilawiki? uwe nani?

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] micro-mapping de parkings

Moi j’aime bien ce micro-mapping :) djakk Le dim. 26 août 2018 à 01:58, Philippe Verdy a écrit : > Les surfaces de parkings devraient être connectées, longées ou traversées > par des rues ou voies d'accès. Les emplacements précis (forcément à côté) > ne sont donc pas adaptés au

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] station de rechargement d’hydrogène

Hydrogène n'existe pas sur la page wiki qui décrit la clef fuel ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel), mais il faut militer pour l'ajouter, car les stations d'hydrogène se répandent en Allemagne ( https://h2.live/). Cependant, dans le cas cité ici, si c'est la pompe privée d'une seule

Re: [Talk-es] Corregir Metro de Granada

Hola. El «metro» de Granada circula en todo su recorrido por vías exclusivas, ya sea en superficie o en subterráneo, y a excepción únicamente de los lugares donde se cruza con otras cosas, en los que tiene prioridad en los semáforos. Por este criterio, no debería ser tram, puesto que la

[Talk-cz] A-GPS Re: Zkusenosti s openstreetcam vs mapovani rychlosti na silnicich

Ahoj! > Taky jsem na to chtěl použít svůj předchozí telefon, ale ten bez SIM > karty nebyl schopen zafixovat GPS, takže smůla. Telefon dostala dcerka a > u té dosloužil. Telefon bez SIM karty nema asistenci na GPS, takze ta GPS funguje ... o poznani hur. Ale fungovat by mela, staci najit peknou