The top ten islands is almost complete (not in the mandelbrotian sense).
I added a new list of coastline bounty in the wiki (11-30 largest islands)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/Coastline_Corrections#Priorities
Please edit the status as you start working on each
maning sambale wrote, On Wednesday, 14 July, 2010 04:02 PM:
Note that some have a 99% status already, but, it is good for other
eyeballs to have a look and comment on the actual %age and status.
I was surprised to see Palawan as 99% complete, so I whizzed over there for a
quick look. I'd have
jim,
What I mean here is the mainland of Palawan. But yes the smaller
islands needs more work.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jim Morgan j...@datalude.com wrote:
maning sambale wrote, On Wednesday, 14 July, 2010 04:02 PM:
Note that some have a 99% status already, but, it is good for other
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:32 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is there's no time limit either. The process can be allowed to
drag on for another 5 years if necessary.
All the time that there is uncertaintly about the license it is harming the
project. Deterring potential
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:25 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/13 Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com:
If Richard's statement relayed through Frederik of that at least 90% of data
is an absolute minimum becomes binding, (which would still leave a huge
amount of room for
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see a definition (or an attempt of one, or an order of magnitude
suggestion) of critical mass in that document (or any of the others). So how
is this detailed with respect to this point? If anyone can point me to
On 14 July 2010 19:25, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
However, I'd be interested in hearing what you think. Could you put
some numbers on what would make you feel comfortable? I've tried such
an exercise myself (and came to the same conclusions as the LWG in the
end) but that doesn't
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Sam Larsen wrote:
I feel imho that the LWG do represent the vast majority of mappers, care
about the project, care about all the hard work that we all have put into
this, have noted all the concerns that have been raised and will not make
a decision that will cause too
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:32 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is there's no time limit either. The process can be allowed
to
drag on for another 5 years if necessary.
That's not quite true, and I think
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The correct way to re-license a project is to fork it.
I whole-heartedly disagree. Do you think that wikipedia should have
forked for their relicensing? Or Mozilla? They managed to find ways to
achieve relicensing without the massive
I've split this from the original thread before it derails the one it
was in any further, and cc'd legal-talk.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:57, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The correct way to re-license a project is to fork it.
I whole-heartedly disagree. Do you think that wikipedia should have
forked for their relicensing?
On 14 July 2010 14:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
I.e. can the legal advice only be shared among people actually on the
LWG conference call, and not all OSMF members?
Who can be on the call - LWG members, any OSMF member, or anyone involved
in the project? Actually, I
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 13:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in
Am 14.07.2010 01:26, schrieb John Smith:
There has been a slightly disturbing thread on the legal-talk list
about defining critical mass, so far things aren't any closer to being
defined and statistics are being abused to suit positions:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
I had hoped that after the dust settled a bit the OSMF learned from these
discussions, but reading the above legal talk thread I still see the same
elitist behaviour from the inner circle as before - very sad to see
On 14 July 2010 17:59, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
A lot of the points in this thread was already discussed by others and me
around 2009. The whole license (change) discussion in 2009 (to my
understanding) boiled down to: Become member of the OSMF or shut up and
follow our
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:19:00 +1000
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. In my area (Victoria, Australia), we have administrative
boundaries supplied by the government, and you can see that in some
places they follow roads or creeks, but we've never quite taken the
step of confirming
Am 14.07.2010 09:59, schrieb Ulf Lamping:
See what our (IMHO not so) respectful OSMF chairman and project founder
Steve C had to say about license (working group) critics in December
2009:
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2009/12/fable.html
Um, I think it is worth pointing out the word
Ulf Lamping wrote:
See what our (IMHO not so) respectful OSMF chairman and project founder
Steve C had to say about license (working group) critics in December 2009:
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2009/12/fable.html
You are aware that you pointed to a post by _fake_ stevec? I.e.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
A lot of the points in this thread was already discussed by others and me
around 2009. The whole license (change) discussion in 2009 (to my
understanding) boiled down to: Become member of the OSMF or shut up and
On 14 July 2010 19:08, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
See also http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes if
you are interested in seeing what's been involved in the LWG so far.
How about defining some specific points about what an acceptable loss
of data will be,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:08, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
But there's no intention to create an inner circle or, by
corrollary, exclude other people. What could we (you/me/LWG) do to
make this more inclusive?
[...]
See also
On 14.07.10 09:59, Ulf Lamping wrote:
A lot of the points in this thread was already discussed by others and me
around 2009. The whole license (change) discussion in 2009 (to my
understanding) boiled down to: Become member of the OSMF or shut up and follow
our judgement.
Well, I am an OSMF
Am 14.07.2010 12:03, schrieb Andreas Labres:
On 14.07.10 09:59, Ulf Lamping wrote:
I had hoped that after the dust settled a bit the OSMF learned from these
discussions, but reading the above legal talk thread I still see the same
elitist behaviour from the inner circle as before - very sad
Andy Allan wrote:
But there's no
intention to create an inner circle or, by corrollary, exclude other
people. What could we (you/me/LWG) do to make this more inclusive?
1. Define reasonable limits for your future decisions, so people know
what to expect.
2. Let active contributors have a say
I would like to filter OSM data in a large area which is about 600km square
and find what has been surveyed by a particular mapper.
If data has been added to this later eg a maxspeed tag by another mapper, I do
not want this data excluded.
I accept that this may involve a series of searches.
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
That doesn't just go for the LWG, it seems that a lot of the people
involved in the OSMF prefer to do things via conference calls. The
calls aren't recorded and published (that I've seen)
Recording and making public such conversations would mean that
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
On 14.07.10 09:59, Ulf Lamping wrote:
I had hoped that after the dust settled a bit the OSMF learned from these
discussions, but reading the above legal talk thread I still see the same
elitist behaviour from the inner
Am 14.07.2010 11:08, schrieb Andy Allan:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
See what our (IMHO not so) respectful OSMF chairman and project founder
Steve C had to say about license (working group) critics in December 2009:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
That doesn't just go for the LWG, it seems that a lot of the people
involved in the OSMF prefer to do things via conference calls. The
calls aren't recorded and published (that I've
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:18 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 July 2010 19:08, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
See also http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes if
you are interested in seeing what's been involved in the LWG so far.
How about
Ulf Lamping wrote:
For example remember positions like Richard Fairhursts in the thread
(I know that it's not an official OSMF/LWG position)
Of course it isn't. I'm not on the OSMF board let alone LWG; indeed, I
actively told OSMF earlier this year that I did not intend to assist it in
any
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I am simply saying that if you wanted to get involved in the decision
whether or not to ask users how they would licence their contributions,
there was a really simple way to do so: by joining OSMF.
That I did, and was disappointed at the failure
Richard Weait wrote:
Interesting idea. How should this work? Something like?:
... steps leading to today
- users indicate ODbL acceptance or not
- summarize user replies: x replies, y accept.
- somebody processes all the results to show data effect
- publish those results
- users
On 14 July 2010 20:59, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
What do you suggest would be acceptable / unacceptable?
I would consider things to fail if more than 5-10% of data disappears
in any region. At the very least it would be demoralising for anyone
that spent even a few hours working to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjO1S0AYMs4
Emilie Laffray
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjO1S0AYMs4
State of the Map 2010 wasn't all panel discussions, intense technical
debate and delicious tapas.
State of the Map 2010 was also a bit of fun. Five songs were entered
in the Concert Contest for the entertainment of the performers, and
even the
I've split this from the original thread before it derails the one it
was in any further, and cc'd legal-talk.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:57, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in many languages. I'd think having English-only
discussion at a set time
On 14 July 2010 14:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
I.e. can the legal advice only be shared among people actually on the
LWG conference call, and not all OSMF members?
Who can be on the call - LWG members, any OSMF member, or anyone involved
in the project? Actually, I
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 13:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in
In a project where there are endless copies of the data floating around the
net I can't see how deleting non-trivial amounts of data is going to work
anyway. What is going to stop people who don't care about the license
change, or are just pissed off to lose their work, just re-uploading the
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Further to what Frederik has said, there's a couple more points that
are important. The OSMF receives legal advice on matters relating to
the license change, and as far as I'm aware they are forbidden from
making the
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
I am simply saying that if you wanted to get involved in the decision
whether or not to ask users how they would licence their contributions,
there was a really simple way to do so: by joining OSMF.
If you want to
Hi all,
Is there an #osm-garmin IRC chat for those who specialize in making
custom garmin maps?
I think there is a need to combine the tallent that is collectively
known about all the tools available to make it.
With an aim to make a better central repository for the maps.
And a slippy map system
El 14/07/2010 14:04, Emilie Laffray escribió:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjO1S0AYMs4
And so, the IvanSanchez fan club is born:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Melaskia
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
___
talk mailing list
2010/7/14 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
And so, the IvanSanchez fan club is born:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Melaskia
HAHAHAHAHAHA, yeah yeah, I really need to set that up!
Emilie Laffray
___
talk mailing list
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjO1S0AYMs4
Does anyone have the lyrics and/or video from what was presented on the
screen behind him?
___
talk mailing list
Hello Guillermo,
We talked directly by gtalk, but I would like to answer you on the list so
more people can give their opinion.
This license published at INPE site restricts the use of images by people
outside Brazil. On the other hand, I got an answer from a director of INPE,
authorizing the
El día Wednesday 14 July 2010 17:56:54, Ian Dees dijo:
Does anyone have the lyrics and/or video from what was presented on the
screen behind him?
http://ivan.sanchezortega.es/need_a_map/song.html
It still has a couple of bugs, though. And, believe it or not, I didn't have
the time to finish
Am 13.07.2010 21:08, schrieb Peter Herison:
Am 12.07.2010 23:04, schrieb Peter Herison:
Does anyone encounter errors loading Yahoo-Images in Potlatch?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=39.111598lon=-94.712041zoom=19
...
I had no problems today in the office. Everything works fine, but...
Peter Herison wrote:
Now the strage part: Closed FF. Cleared browser cache without hope
but... After starting FF again, the error-images were gone. I could
continue editing like before and see all Yahoo-Images. Even these
tiles that has errors before.
I tried the same here at home (again)
Richard Weait wrote:
Allow contributors to vote before the change over occurs, not just if
they agree to license their data under ODBL or not...
Interesting idea. How should this work? Something like?:
... steps leading to today
- users indicate ODbL acceptance or not
- summarize user
[I re-added attribution for John Smith that appears to have been
dropped during context trimming.]
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Allow contributors to vote before the change
Am 14.07.2010 18:37, schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
Flash Player tends to cache things very aggressively - it's a
constant pain.
The question is: Where?
I close FF, clear the browser cache, start FF and open Potlatch. I can
see files emerging in the cache-folder. When I open them in paint, I can
On 15 July 2010 04:56, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
[I re-added attribution for John Smith that appears to have been
dropped during context trimming.]
Pretty sure Kai was responsible for this sentiment on the legal list thread.
Right, the contributor terms state 2/3 of active
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
Interesting idea. How should this work? Something like?:
... steps leading to today
- users indicate ODbL acceptance or not
- summarize user replies: x replies, y accept.
- somebody processes all the results to show data effect
- publish
Richard Weait wrote:
Right, the contributor terms state 2/3 of active contributors and a
minimum of three weeks for the vote. Would an additional three-week
or longer voting period, added to the process now be a problem?
Given that the whole process has taken on the order of two years, I
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 20:56, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
[ ... ]
Or more simply. Ask users if they are willing to proceed. Calculate
and show users the results. Then ask users if that is good enough to
Looking at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maxspeed , it clearly say
that, for countries that use imperial values (i.e. in miles/hour), we
should tag the speed limits shown on the signs (+ mph), not convert them
to kph.
Assuming there is no significant disagreement with this, why should
Luitjes,
Dit was even aan mijn aandacht ontsnapt. Vanavond kan ik jammer genoeg niet
meer.
Ik wil het wel warm houden, wie kan er volgende week een keer?
Ideeën voor wat te doen en waar? Ik ga wel voor een wiki-cleanup!
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
Laziness – Impatience – Hubris
Hoi,
Er is zojuist een nieuwe check bij gekomen. Deze kijken of de knooppunten wel
aan een weg zijn verbonden (het type maakt niet uit). Dit zijn momenteel 369
nodes. Met wat lokale kennis moet dit heel eenvoudig een stuk lager te kijrgen
zijn. Voor de lijst zie [1]
Groet,
--Roeland
[1]
Howdy,
Enkele tijd terug heeft Lennard een kaartje naar deze lijst gestuurd met
daarop het volgende voorstel. Het omtaggen van:
highway=tertiary + AND:importance_level=5 + version=1
= highway=unclassified
Hierbij was teven een visualisatie [1]. Deze visulisatie laat de kaart zien
met de
Hi,
I'm planning a Sydney Canberra trip this weekend and will be able to make at
least one direction a full day trip and do some mapping.
So, does anyone have a suggestion for an unmapped own that is on the
way(ish) ?
cheers
--
Franc
___
Talk-au
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Franc Carter wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning a Sydney Canberra trip this weekend and will be able to make at
least one direction a full day trip and do some mapping.
So, does anyone have a suggestion for an unmapped own that is on the way(ish)
?
You can use
Hi Franc,
I think I have filled most of the holes between
Campbelltown, Goulburn on the Hume Highway secondary roads. You may
want to look closely at Sautter to find missing pieces to the South of
Goulburn, back of lake George Bungendore, Lake Bathurst, or alternatively
Hi talk-au,
I've gotten an interesting request from Chris McAlister and Alex
Webster for OSM to get involved in a MapMyTown event at Bell, Qld. It
would tentatively be scheduled for 31 October.
I will be collaborating with Chris and Alex in getting OSM involved in
this event, and having access
The Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute, Queensland Young
Professionals Committee (SSSIQ YPs) are running their MapMyTown
project for the first time in 2010.
The project:
The MapMyTown project aims to use as many available spatial
surveying technologies and methods as possible to build
Eu acabei de mandar para o Arlindo, e assim ele coloca no slideshare para
todos verem!
2010/7/14 Duke duke1...@gmail.com
Legal Vitor,
eu quero a apresentação sim, pode mandar
Emerson Vinicius
On 13/07/2010, at 14:58, vitor wrote:
Legal, né? No final eu troquei bandeira com um cara de
*Status dos Projetos OSM-br*
*
B250C - Brasil 250 Cidades*
Página do Projeto:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades
*2a. fase*
Conectividade em *74,58%* *(-1,24%)*
Grid Atualizado (html): http://mapaslivres.org/cidades-distancias.html (15
Mb)
Grid
http://www.slideshare.net/nighto/state-of-brazil-2010
[]s
Em 14 de julho de 2010 09:31, vitor vitor.geo...@gmail.com escreveu:
Eu acabei de mandar para o Arlindo, e assim ele coloca no slideshare para
todos verem!
2010/7/14 Duke duke1...@gmail.com
Legal Vitor,
eu quero a apresentação
Am Mittwoch 14 Juli 2010, 00:08:56 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 13. Juli 2010 20:02 schrieb Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com:
sollte man vielleicht dann eher village_green nehmen?
m.E. sollte man village_green ausserhalb der Länder, wo es das gibt,
überhaupt nicht verwenden, ich
Florian Gross usenet-spam-genausoguel...@grossing.de wrote:
Welchen Zweck erfüllt eine solche Relation eigentlich?
Bleiben sie für die nächsten 100 Kilometer auf der B42? In der Tat ist es
natürlich so dass ein passendes ref Tag auf allen Teilstücken den selben
Zweck erfüllen könnte.
Sven
--
Am 14.07.2010 02:03, schrieb Florian Gross:
fly glaubte zu wissen:
Er hat auch die network-Relation aller Bundesstraßen (id 31495) gelöscht.
Welchen Zweck erfüllt eine solche Relation eigentlich?
man kann per (X)API relativ schnell eine Liste aller Bundesstraßen
bekommen. Laut Wiki sind
2010/7/14 Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de:
Am 14.07.2010 02:03, schrieb Florian Gross:
fly glaubte zu wissen:
Er hat auch die network-Relation aller Bundesstraßen (id 31495) gelöscht.
Welchen Zweck erfüllt eine solche Relation eigentlich?
man kann per (X)API relativ schnell eine Liste aller
Am 14.07.10 09:34, schrieb Chris66:
Am 14.07.2010 02:03, schrieb Florian Gross:
fly glaubte zu wissen:
Er hat auch die network-Relation aller Bundesstraßen (id 31495) gelöscht.
Welchen Zweck erfüllt eine solche Relation eigentlich?
man kann per (X)API relativ schnell eine Liste aller
Am 12.07.2010 14:53, schrieb Georg Feddern:
Moin,
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Nun habe ich auf [1] das Tag CUISINE gesehen. Würdet Ihr das auch
dafür verwenden und wenn ja mit welchem Wert?
na ja, cuisine gibt ja eigentlich das an, was dort angeboten wird - das
unterscheidet sich eher weniger,
Am 13.07.2010 21:36, schrieb steffterra:
Am 13.07.2010 um 20:00 schrieb Tobias Knerr:
Am 13.07.2010 18:31, schrieb steffterra:
- Unterbrechungen der durchgezogenen Mittellinie kann man einfach zwischen
zwei Knoten durch das absichtliche Setzen des no-Werts abbilden.
- z.B. wenn zwischen
Am 14.07.10 09:57, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
auf [1] gibt es ein beispiel für cuisine mit dem wert coffee_shop.
kann mir einer sagen was ihr unter dem begriff coffee_shop verstehen
würdet. solche geschäfte wie [2].
Man merkt, dass du aus dem Norden kommst:
Am 14.07.2010 09:41, schrieb Marcus Wolschon:
Er hat auch die network-Relation aller Bundesstraßen (id 31495) gelöscht.
Welchen Zweck erfüllt eine solche Relation eigentlich?
man kann per (X)API relativ schnell eine Liste aller Bundesstraßen
bekommen.
Leider nicht.
Denn du musst die Fälle:
Am 14.07.2010 10:15, schrieb André Joost:
Am 14.07.10 09:57, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
auf [1] gibt es ein beispiel für cuisine mit dem wert coffee_shop.
kann mir einer sagen was ihr unter dem begriff coffee_shop verstehen
würdet. solche geschäfte wie [2].
Man merkt, dass du aus dem Norden
Du meinst auf deutsch denkmalgeschützte Gebäude (ggf. Anlagen)? Wir
haben wohl leider echt noch nichts dafür, hatte mal vor 1-2 Jahren ein
SVG mit dem Symbol gemacht und Roman Grabolle geschickt, der sich
darum kümmern wollte, weiss aber nicht, was daraus geworden ist (liest
er hier
Am 14.07.10 10:24, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 14.07.2010 10:15, schrieb André Joost:
Am 14.07.10 09:57, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
auf [1] gibt es ein beispiel für cuisine mit dem wert coffee_shop.
kann mir einer sagen was ihr unter dem begriff coffee_shop verstehen
würdet. solche geschäfte wie
Am 14.07.2010 09:40, schrieb Norbert Kück:
Ja, es kann ein personenbezogenes Datum in so einer Aufnahme liegen:
[...]
- Der Erhaltungszustand und die erkennbare Ausstattung des Gebäudes
lassen Schlüsse auf die Finanzkraft der Eigentümer/Bewohner zu.
- Erkennbare Einrichtungen (oder deren
frede...@remote.org (Frederik Ramm) am 13.07.10:
Ulkigerweise, sehe ich an meinen Logs, stelle ich dadurch eine ganze
Menge von Objekten wieder her, die pfoten_weg_!_ zuletzt
bearbeitet hatte, die beiden scheinen im gleichen Gebiet untewegs zu
sein.
Ein Schelm, der böses dabei denkt.
Rainer
Am 14. Juli 2010 09:53 schrieb Rainer Knaepper rain...@smial.prima.de:
frede...@remote.org (Frederik Ramm) am 13.07.10:
Ulkigerweise, sehe ich an meinen Logs, stelle ich dadurch eine ganze
Menge von Objekten wieder her, die pfoten_weg_!_ zuletzt
bearbeitet hatte, die beiden scheinen im gleichen
Hallo!
(Ich fange einen neuen Thread an, weil ich nix gefunden habe, wo ich es sinnvoll
dranhängen kann)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Open_Data_License_FAQ
An anderer Stelle wurde grade festgestellt, daß es problematisch ist, den ersten
Bearbeiter eines Objektes als den Urheber
Hallo,
Andreas Labres wrote:
IMO kann man aus der History einfach nicht herauslesen. Punkt. Drum finde ich es
nicht ok, daß beim Lizenzwechsel der erste Bearbeiter jetzt als der Urheber
des Objektes angesehen wird. Das heißt für mich, ich muß jetzt alle Objekte, die
ich je angefasst habe, neu
Am 14.07.2010 10:41, schrieb André Joost:
Am 14.07.10 10:24, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 14.07.2010 10:15, schrieb André Joost:
Am 14.07.10 09:57, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
auf [1] gibt es ein beispiel für cuisine mit dem wert coffee_shop.
kann mir einer sagen was ihr unter dem begriff
On Tuesday, 13 July 2010 22:40:06 +0200,
steffterra steffte...@me.com writes:
Am 13.07.2010 um 21:07 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 13. Juli 2010 19:06 schrieb steffterra steffte...@me.com:
[...]
2. Da der Knoten aber (z.B. im Mindest-Falle einer T-Kreuzung) auch Teil
eines weiteren
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Klar gibt es Edits, die so weitreichend sind, dass vom Original
praktisch nichts mehr uebrig bleibt. Auch die sollten bei einer was
loeschen wir-Entscheidung beruecksichtigt werden. Wird alles nicht
leicht! Aber kein Grund, jetzt in Aktionismus
Hallo
am 14.07.2010 10:41 schrieb Tobias Knerr:
Am 14.07.2010 09:40, schrieb Norbert Kück:
Ja, es kann ein personenbezogenes Datum in so einer Aufnahme liegen:
[...]
- Der Erhaltungszustand und die erkennbare Ausstattung des Gebäudes
lassen Schlüsse auf die Finanzkraft der Eigentümer/Bewohner
Benjamin Lebsanft schrieb:
On Mo, 2010-07-12 at 00:57 -0700, NopMap wrote:
Benjamin Lebsanft wrote:
Jetzt habe ich dank Gummiramierung ein Neugerät mit Firmware 3.30
bekommen, das die Karte auch so langsam lädt.
Nachdem mein Vista auch unter Gummiablösung leidet: Wie alt war
Deines und
Am 14.07.10 13:01, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 14.07.2010 10:41, schrieb André Joost:
Am 14.07.10 10:24, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 14.07.2010 10:15, schrieb André Joost:
Am 14.07.10 09:57, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
auf [1] gibt es ein beispiel für cuisine mit dem wert coffee_shop.
kann mir
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 13. Juli 2010 19:06 schrieb steffterra steffte...@me.com:
2. Da der Knoten aber (z.B. im Mindest-Falle einer T-Kreuzung) auch Teil eines
weiteren ways ist,
-1
auch -1
der entsprechende Knoten ist da, wo das Schild ist, das ist nie die
Mitte einer Kreuzung.
Am 14.07.2010 09:57, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
auf [1] gibt es ein beispiel für cuisine mit dem wert coffee_shop.
kann mir einer sagen was ihr unter dem begriff coffee_shop verstehen
würdet. solche geschäfte wie [2].
zurück auf meine frage nach den bauern- / hofcafes würde ich dann
Am 14.07.2010 10:20, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
Am 14.07.2010 09:41, schrieb Marcus Wolschon:
Er hat auch die network-Relation aller Bundesstraßen (id 31495) gelöscht.
Welchen Zweck erfüllt eine solche Relation eigentlich?
man kann per (X)API relativ schnell eine Liste aller Bundesstraßen
Am 14. Juli 2010 13:58 schrieb Steffen Wolf s...@gmx.de:
Ah, interessant. Ich hab die Abloesung auf die aktuelle Hitzewelle
geschoben. Hatte schon ueberlegt, mal selbst Hand anzulegen. Hat damit
jemand Erfahrungen?
Ich habe ein etrex vista hcx, gekauft im Mai 2008. Im Sommer 2008 ging
das
Selber reparieren!!
GARMIN bekommt das Problem seit Jahre nicht in den Griff!!
brauchbare Tipps gibt es hier:
http://www.gps-tour.info/forum/read.php?f=4i=9821t=2572
Am 14.07.2010 um 13:58 schrieb Steffen Wolf:
Benjamin Lebsanft schrieb:
On Mo, 2010-07-12 at 00:57 -0700, NopMap wrote:
1 - 100 di 328 matches
Mail list logo
