Glavne kategorije za tourism su same po sebi jasne, ali ne znam kako
tagirati prenoćišta i sobe za iznajmljivanje. Prenoćišta trenutno
označavam kao tourism=bed_and_breakfast, ali ni jedan renderer ih ne
iscrtava. Hoteli/moteli/hosteli sigurno nisu, a iz wikija mi ni nije
najjasnije što je
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:15:07 +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
umjesto na autoput. Gdje je problem?
Izgleda ovdje: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
mlat=45.512063mlon=15.548539zoom=17layers=M
Kao da je ilaz izlaz/ulaz na autoput kod Karlovca krivo ucrtan. Idem
popraviti pa provjeri ponovo.
--
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:27:07 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Kao da je ilaz izlaz/ulaz na autoput kod Karlovca krivo ucrtan. Idem
popraviti pa provjeri ponovo.
Pardon, nije tu problem nego na petlji Lučko, nema prelaza sa sjeverne
strane zagrebačke obilaznice prema Karlovcu.
Pogledajte ovaj
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:27:07 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:15:07 +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
umjesto na autoput. Gdje je problem?
Izgleda ovdje: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
mlat=45.512063mlon=15.548539zoom=17layers=M
Kao da je ilaz izlaz/ulaz na autoput kod
Meni čak ne izgleda loše, a može teoretski koristiti biciklistima koji se
zažele hlada. Na wikiju piše da se drva stavljaju samo ako su baš uočljiva i
velika, kao recimo palme na Trogirskoj rivi, a mislim da nije preporučljivo
stavljati drva koja manje-više prirodno rastu kako rastu na livadi.
Da
True, i might be better after to just compile the GPS tracks to one
person who might want to do a visualization or else, we just have fun
after and relax and make kwento. Maybe teach some of the newcomers on a
laptop etc.
I agree with that post though for newcomers, an introduction to the
The second clause grants “OSMF a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive,
perpetual, irrevocable license to do any act that is restricted by
copyright over anything within the Contents. It has been debated that
this is even necessary already, so I’m not going to start on that…
What I would like
On 26 August 2010 01:05, Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de wrote:
Starting a new project would be like rebuilding the whole house, just to
make it a new color. The upgrade clause is like repainting the house, but
restricting this to only very few colors, might make a future owner unhappy.
Hi,
Kevin Peat wrote:
Well I think someone wanting a PD project would need to start from
scratch anyway as it would be hard for them to demonstrate that any
existing data wasn't encumbered with other licenses given the wide use
of imports and tracing in lots of countries.
I think so too,
Replying to myself here but...
The city sent me a prompt reply to my email.
They're big fans of our work and would like to help. I will probably be
meeting with one of them in the coming week to discuss ways that we can
collaborate and what data sets we would like access to. I wanted to ask
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:04:01AM +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
So I don't think setting a minimum attribution level is a good idea,
at least from a user freedom point of view.
I agree. I mentioned a minimum attribution because others seem to want
that. The LWG and/or OSMF only seem to be
On 26/08/2010, at 2:12 AM, Simon Ward wrote:
I don’t know if that’s how legal types read it, but couldn’t it also be
taken transitively as follows:
1. CTs allow licensing under ODbL 1.0;
2. ODbL 1.0 allows licensing under a compatible licence, or later
version of the ODbL;
3. By (1)
On 25/08/2010, at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
There is also a very practical reason against fixing anything, and
*specifically* a share-alike requirement, in the CT, and that is that in
order to make *clear* what you want you will have to write half a license
into the CT.
I completely
The License Working Group met Tuesday. Most, if not all, comment at the moment
is on the Contributor Terms. Therefore we will devote next week's meeting (Aug
31) entirely to going though each issue already raised. We will then pass these
on to legal counsel for review. When we get a response,
Mike
thanks for the update.
Regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Mike Collinson
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:20 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Contributor Terms review
The License Working Group met Tuesday. Most, if
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 06:56:15PM +1000, James Livingston wrote:
On 25/08/2010, at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
There is also a very practical reason against fixing anything, and
*specifically* a share-alike requirement, in the CT, and that is that in
order to make *clear* what you want
Anthony wrote:
Another possibility is to assign the task of deciding what share
alike means to Creative Commons. Of course, that isn't likely
to work if you want to go with the ODbL...
I suspect CC's answer would be similar to
Hello,
I would like to know if the new license is compatible with the old one.
will we be able to use CC-SA-2.0 licensed data or we will have to get
new contracts with the donators of data?
for example, we have gotten much of the data for Kosovo donated under
written contract for CC-SA-20, many
Hi,
I got notified by a fellow mapper about that the Greek governmental
cadastre organisation wants to release data to the public (orthophotos
'aerials') covering all or large parts of Greece. I've checked the
orthophotos('aerials') for my city, Thessaloniki and they are ok,
maybe a bit more
Hi,
...thus I take the chance for a little more guidance(never hurts), why
not comment on my edits?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/logictheo/edits . I hope you will
have an interesting read.
Regards,
Niklas
___
talk mailing list
Whey I load relation 1144866 in JOSM and run the validator, I get an
illegal tag/value combinations error with no details. Is there an
error here that I'm missing, or is it a bug in JOSM?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi Niklas
I didn't look into your Changesets in detail, but I think, your
Changeset comments are okay.
Sometimes you could be a little bit more precise - but I'm not better
with mine, I fear.
For me (other user's) changeset comments are useful to get a fast
overview over the change made.
On Thursday 26 August 2010 09:58:12 Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Whey I load relation 1144866 in JOSM and run the validator, I get an
illegal tag/value combinations error with no details. Is there an
error here that I'm missing, or is it a bug in JOSM?
There is definitely a bug, because there are
Location based comments could be added automatically by
JOSM/Potlatz
edits near: town/area/major road
I admit, adding all useful additions to a comment is not an easy task.
Gert Gremmen
Before printing, think about the environment.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:
Maarten Deen wrote:
As highway=path means no motorized traffic, it might be a footpath or
cyclepath or bridleway (or others). That's the more specific part.
highway=path doesn't mean no motorized traffic, if means no wide vehicles.
So no cars, but mopeds are still allowed.
Greetings
Ben
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:28:53 +0200, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
As highway=path means no motorized traffic, it might be a footpath or
cyclepath or bridleway (or others). That's the more specific part.
highway=path doesn't mean no motorized traffic, if means no
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:34:26 Maarten Deen wrote:
That is not how it is described in the wiki:
Then the wiki is wrong.
In the initial discussions about the path tag, one of the things that kept
cropping up was: snowmobile trail. Snowmobiles are definitely motorised.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
n Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:34:26 Maarten Deen wrote:
That is not how it is described in the wiki:
Then the wiki is wrong.
It's not detailled enough. A path is too narrow for a 4 wheels vehicle like
a car but not for a 2
What additional tag would one use to state that a particular path is not
advisable for vehicular use (for instance, because it contains steps at one or
more points), but doesn't have a sign forbidding vehicular use? My impression
is that tags such as bicycle=no and motorcycle=no are generally
Dear list,
I'm planning to send this letter to the Greek cadastre authority
asking under which license they are providing their orthophotos/aerial
photographs for Greece, or if OpenStreetMap has explicit permission to
use that data. Do you think it is ok? Any comments are welcome.
subject
Some people decided recently and alone to introduce the tag culvert=yes on
the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:culvert
Question 1 : is culvert commonly used by native english speakers ? Is that
a term mainly used by civil engineers ?
Pieren wrote:
Question 1 : is culvert commonly used by native english speakers ?
Is that a term mainly used by civil engineers ?
It's in very frequent use among boaters on the British canals, largely
because the ruddy things keep collapsing and taking the canal with them.
cheers
Richard
--
Pieren wrote:
Question 1 : is culvert commonly used by native english speakers ?
Is that a term mainly used by civil engineers ?
It's in very frequent use among boaters on the British canals, largely
because the ruddy things keep collapsing and taking the canal with them.
cheers
Richard
--
Hi,
I've found one approximate match in GNS so far (Mota- Kha-n Darra for
requested Mota Khan
Danda), if that source may help (http://geonames.nga.mil - it is
compatible with OSM, unlike geonames.org).
Best wishes,
Jean-Guilhem
(present on #hot and #osm IRC channels, on oftc.net)
The term culvert is also standard usage in American English. Tunnel is
generally used to mean an underground passageway large enough for a person to
walk through, if not larger. Also, the default assumption is that a tunnel is
not intended for drainage, unless there is a longer phrase such as
This is how I understand culvert, from New Zealand. Although I've rarely
heard sewer tunnel, it's just sewer.
Tim.
On 27 August 2010 06:29, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
The term culvert is also standard usage in American English. Tunnel is
generally used to mean an underground
Yeah, being in tornado alley the word culvert is frequently used in
tornado safety instructions as a last resort shelter if you encounter
a tornado on the open road. For example:
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/oun/?n=safety-severe-roadsafety
Toby
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tim McNamara
Hello everyone,
I finally sent the message to the info email at geodata.gov.gr 'as
is'(just as I published it on the list with subject and message body).
I hope first that they will reply here, because if I get a private
email I can't disclose it. (although I could maybe tell a summary,
that
Sewer tunnel would be a description of the largest sewers, containing the
merged outflow of many smaller sewers. As you said, frequently these are
simply referred to as sewers. I remember watching one large storm-sewer tunnel
being built, years ago; it was about seven meters in diameter.
2010/8/26 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
What additional tag would one use to state that a particular path is not
advisable for vehicular use (for instance, because it contains steps at one
or more points), but doesn't have a sign forbidding vehicular use?
this is not to solve by
On Thursday 26 August 2010 19:52:02 Pieren wrote:
Some people decided recently
Those some people are the Dutch who are active on the OSM forum.
As you might know the Netherlands is a very wet country. So we have many
culverts in the country. Not surprisingly the Dutch word for such a water
2010/8/26 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
n Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:34:26 Maarten Deen wrote:
That is not how it is described in the wiki:
Then the wiki is wrong.
I agree with Cartinus here: the wiki is wrong. Path is not
Wouldn't that only be used on the section of the path that actually has the
steps, however? I am wondering how (or if) you would tag the entire path to
indicate that you can, legally, use a bicycle or motorcycle on it, but it isn't
well-suited to such use. Another reason that you might want
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Sometime last year on talk or tagging there was discussion about culverts.
IIRC you opposed special tagging for them then too.
I opposed because I though that it was a technical term only known by civil
engineers. But go
Well, the culvert is used where the waterway passes under the roadway. Also,
many culverts are located where there is running water only during, or shortly
after, a rainstorm, so the ditch or low spot they are intended to drain may
well not be marked on the map. As far as I know, we aren't
2010/8/26 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Wouldn't that only be used on the section of the path that actually has the
steps, however?
yes, of course. And dependant where (how far) you want to go, it might
also be suitable to take the path.
I am wondering how (or if) you would tag the
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Have you not noticed how your posts are becoming repetitious?
If by that you mean, Thanks Steve for your insights on moderation, I
think you have now clearly communicated your point of view, then,
good, I'll stop.
If it was
On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:30:11 Pieren wrote:
Not bad for a hidden tag. The question is to know how many are on the
waterway and not on the road and how many different contributors used it.
70 different authors worldwide.
There were 4 places worldwide where culvert=yes was used on the same
On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:45:58 John F. Eldredge wrote:
As far as I know, we aren't trying to make a full topographical map
Really?
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=14lat=51.94058lon=5.00546layers=B00
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
talk
On 21 August 2010 04:29, Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com wrote:
Yes it seems strange to tag place_of_worship the whole area. According
to the wiki should apply to the church, synagoge, temple... the place of
worship, not the office, the garden and so on.
To me, it's not strange at all.
On 27 August 2010 09:31, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
How about a church run unemployed support centre? (gives out food,
This could border on the absurd...
Several of the job agencies[1] contracted to the Australian Federal
Government are run/backed by religious organisations, these
The way I understand it, a culvert is just a tiny pseudo-bridge, physically
equivalent to a tunnel under an embankment. Culverts don't show up in the US
National Bridge Inventory, which is a database of bridges on public roads.
They normally carry water under roads, but may also carry a private
On 27 August 2010 10:04, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
The way I understand it, a culvert is just a tiny pseudo-bridge, physically
equivalent to a tunnel under an embankment. Culverts don't show up in the US
National Bridge Inventory, which is a database of bridges on public
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2010 10:04, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
The way I understand it, a culvert is just a tiny pseudo-bridge, physically
equivalent to a tunnel under an embankment. Culverts don't show up in the
Question 1 : is culvert commonly used by native english speakers ? Is that
a term mainly used by civil engineers ?
I understand it to be a passage under a road that isn't big enough for a
vehicle - maybe a 0.5m pipe for water, or maybe just big enough for some
animals, but a human going
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?relation=1141252
Mapnik has no problems with it, but Osmarender won't fill the northern
part correctly. (It's not a delay in rendering; I added the swamps
after creating the multipolygon.)
___
talk mailing list
That is, indeed, a highly detailed map, but since it doesn't show elevation
contours (or at least not any visible at maximum zoom from my phone's browser),
it would not be classified as a topographical map. By definition, a
topographical map shows the three-dimensional topography of an area.
+1
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Question 1 : is culvert commonly used by native english speakers ? Is that
a term mainly used by civil engineers ?
I understand it to be a passage under a road that isn't big enough for a
vehicle - maybe a 0.5m pipe
This might be more suitable for Lake Eyre etc...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/41007651
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bégin, Daniel daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca
Date: 27 August 2010 06:29
Subject: [Tagging] Intermittent water
To: tagg...@openstreetmap.org
Cc:
Just thought I'd give people a heads up if they're looking for a good
deal on mobile broadband, currently Vodafone are offering 1.5G/mo for
$15 on a month to month post pay account and Crazy Johns are offering
2G/mo for $15 on a 6mth post pay account.
If you get a rootable android handset you can
Hi !
in der letzten Zeit habe ich mir vermehrt die Tafeln an den Tankstellen
angesehen und bei einigen so meine Schwierigkeiten diese dem
OSM-Template zuzuorden.
Vielleicht kann mir einer von Euch weiterhelfen
Super BLEIFREI = fuel:.
und speziel der Gelb/Rote Muschel anbieter hat
Am 25.08.2010 14:04, schrieb Martin Czarkowski:
Am 25.08.2010 12:19, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
* Datenspende Enaikoon
gibt es darüber was im Web? Wann, welche Daten, wo verfügbar?
Ich habe dazu eine Seite im Wiki angelegt.
Ich hoffe in ca. zwei Wochen dazu mehr sagen zu können.
Hallo Martin,
Am 25. August 2010 16:13 schrieb Thomas Ineichen osm.mailingl...@t-i.ch:
- Von jeder Strasse 5 m abschneiden und mit name=* taggen
würde ich zusätzlich zur area machen, aber nicht nur 5 m, sondern die
komplette Länge über den Platz (sind deutlich mehr), bis zu den
Super BLEIFREI = fuel:.
Super ist fuel:octane_95,
Normal fuel:octane_91 und
Super+ ist fuel:octane_98.
und speziel der Gelb/Rote Muschel anbieter hat dann noch die 2 V-Power
sorten ...
V-Power = fuel:...
V-Power Diesel = fuel:...
V-Power Racing = fuel:...
V-Power Diesel ist
Am 25.08.2010 16:35, schrieb Bernd Wurst:
Wobei das 2000er Limit ja nicht für Members pro Relation
sondern nur für Nodes pro Way gilt.
Ganz große Relationen sollte man also auch vermeiden, grade im Hinblick auf
die Möglichkeit, das jemals wieder von einem privaten Netzanschluss in
fuel:lpg
fuel:cng
what is ethanol? fuel:e85 ?
2010/8/26 Alexander Matheisen alexandermathei...@ish.de:
Super BLEIFREI = fuel:.
Super ist fuel:octane_95,
Normal fuel:octane_91 und
Super+ ist fuel:octane_98.
und speziel der Gelb/Rote Muschel anbieter hat dann noch die 2 V-Power
sorten
Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2010, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marcus Wolschon:
fuel:lpg
fuel:cng
what is ethanol? fuel:e85 ?
Steht auch alles im Wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfuel
___
Talk-de mailing list
Am 26.08.2010 03:08, schrieb Johann H. Addicks:
Was jedoch irgendwie völlig übersehen wurde ist die Tatsache, dass die
Hausnummernerfassung bei OSM selbst in Großstädten noch sehr, sehr dünn
gesäht ist und dort auch keine Trendwende abzusehen ist.
Ich vermute mal, wenn wir es hinbekämen, dass
Indem man die Fährverbindung (route=ferry) inkl. access-rights
(motorcar=yes/no) richtig in OSM einträgt.
Ein beliebter Fehler ist, die Route nicht mit dem Straßennetz zu verbinden.
Oh ja, das war hier bei einer der Rheinfähren ein Problem. Da war der
Serviceweg zur Fähre nicht mit der Fährspur
Hallo Andreas,
Und evtl. kann man auch Usern, die nur mal schnell was eintragen wollen
ein Werkzeug zur Hand geben, wie sie z.B. ihre Hausnummer oder ihren
Laden in die Karte einzeichnen, ohne sich durch alle Tags und Editoren
durchzuwühlen. Halt so wie es Google vorgemacht hat ;-)
Hallo Andreas,
Hausnummernerfassung
in Garmins und andere Routingprogramme
das Hausnummernrouting gut implementieren
Anreiz Hausnummern mit einzutragen.
ein Werkzeug zur Hand geben, wie sie z.B. ihre Hausnummer oder ihren
Laden in die Karte einzeichnen, ohne sich durch alle Tags und Editoren
Am 26.08.2010 10:27, schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2010, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marcus Wolschon:
fuel:lpg
fuel:cng
what is ethanol? fuel:e85 ?
Steht auch alles im Wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfuel
es ging in der Anfrage auch nur um diese
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Ich vermute mal, wenn wir es hinbekämen, dass die Garmins und andere
Routingprogramme das Hausnummernrouting gut implementieren wäre seitens
der Anwender ein Anreiz da es mit einzutragen.
Mir würde es schon reichen, wenn ein
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Mir würde es schon reichen, wenn ein Routing nach Ort + Straße
funktionieren würde (die Nummer finde ich dann selbst). Ich benutze die
OpenMTBMap (weiß nicht ob es an dieser speziell liegt), aber ich konnte
noch NIE einen Ort+Straße per Routing finden
Am 26. August 2010 11:02 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
Am 26.08.2010 10:27, schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2010, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marcus Wolschon:
fuel:lpg
fuel:cng
what is ethanol? fuel:e85 ?
Steht auch alles im Wiki:
Am 26.08.2010 11:02, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
es ging in der Anfrage auch nur um diese speziellen Sorten ...
... und SUPER BLEIFREI ? = fuel:
Das ist Super (fuel:octane_95). Der Zusatz bleifrei stammt noch aus
der Zeit, als es auch Super verbleit gab. Seit 2000 ist dies
allerdings in
Am 26.08.2010 11:22, schrieb Andreas Tille:
Irgendwie scheint da noch was im argen zu sein und bevor das
nicht richtig funktioniert ist natürlich das erfassen von Hausnummern
erst recht nicht attraktiv.
Ja, das Garmin Format ist halt noch nicht 100% entschlüsselt, aber
der Trend geht ja
Hallo!
Da fällt mir grade was anderes ein: in Wien gibt's ein paar E-Tankstellen für
E-Bikes bei Spar Supermärkten:
http://www.spar.at/spar/meine_vorteile/regional/emobility_wien.htm
Würdet Ihr die wirklich als amenity=fuel taggen wollen?
Servus, Andreas
Am 26. August 2010 00:27 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer [dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Zitat aus
http://www.business-geomatics.com/online/anwendungen-a-produkte/59-anwendungen-a-produkte/317-hobby-kartographen-erfassen-die-welt.html
Die Navteq-Daten werden nach der ISO-Norm 9000 erhoben. 'Dadurch
Am 26. August 2010 16:45 schrieb Chris66 [chris66...@gmx.de]
Ausserdem ist es sehr wenig Aufwand nebenbei täglich ein paar
Hausnummern zu mappen, einfach 'nen POI mit der Nummer und fertig.
Stimmt.
Habe kürzlich damit angefangen.
Pro Stunde Spaziergang so nebenbei 60 Hausnummern.
Willi
Am 26.08.10 11:55, schrieb Andreas Labres:
Hallo!
Da fällt mir grade was anderes ein: in Wien gibt's ein paar E-Tankstellen für
E-Bikes bei Spar Supermärkten:
http://www.spar.at/spar/meine_vorteile/regional/emobility_wien.htm
Gibts auch schon in groß:
Am 26.08.2010 11:55, schrieb Andreas Labres:
Da fällt mir grade was anderes ein: in Wien gibt's ein paar E-Tankstellen
für
E-Bikes bei Spar Supermärkten:
http://www.spar.at/spar/meine_vorteile/regional/emobility_wien.htm
Würdet Ihr die wirklich als amenity=fuel taggen wollen?
Nein, da es
Am 26. August 2010 10:50 schrieb 007 northc...@gmx.de:
Indem man die Fährverbindung (route=ferry) inkl. access-rights
(motorcar=yes/no) richtig in OSM einträgt.
Ein beliebter Fehler ist, die Route nicht mit dem Straßennetz zu
verbinden.
Oh ja, das war hier bei einer der Rheinfähren ein
Hi !
es gibt ja Möglichkeiten Relationen als gpx-Datei herunterzuladen.
Wenn man sich eine solche Datei ansieht wird man feststellen das diese
immer aus unterschiedlich großen Segementen bestehen.
Will man nun eine Auswertung über diese Daten machen dann müssen diese
auch den Weg
Am 24.08.2010 23:35, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Es ist natuerlich Dein Recht, diese Menschen alle fuer fehlgeleitete
Idioten zu halten, aber es reissen sich eine ganze Menge Leute in der
OSMF/DWG fuer den Lizenzwechsel den Arsch auf. Denen waere nichts
lieber, als wenn ploetzlich Grund zu der
HI !
die Automaten für die Autobahngebühr als
* amenity
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity=*vending_machine*
* vending http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vending=vouchers
* operator=tollcollect
oder als tollcollect = yes an die übergeordenten POI - z.b.
Am 26.08.2010 15:06, C. Brause:
Ich les hier immer wieso die aktuelle Lizenz schlecht bzw. ungeeignet
sein soll. Ab und zu lese ich auch, was bei PD besser sein könnte. Aber
was an der neuen Lizenz besser sein könnte, was den Aufwand der
Umstellung rechtfertigt, das finde ich hier irgenwie
Hi!
Wie kann man denn wohl diese RWE Ladesäulen eintragen? Das sind
lediglich alleinstehende Säulen.
amenity=fuel
fuel:electricid=yes
vllt noch operator=RWE ?
Ich weiß nicht, ob die spezielle Anschlüsse haben. Sollte man vielleicht
noch kennzeichnen, dass keine anderen Treibstoffe (Benzin,
Chris66 schrieb:
Am 26.08.2010 11:55, schrieb Andreas Labres:
Da fällt mir grade was anderes ein: in Wien gibt's ein paar
E-Tankstellen für E-Bikes bei Spar Supermärkten:
http://www.spar.at/spar/meine_vorteile/regional/emobility_wien.htm
Würdet Ihr die wirklich als amenity=fuel taggen
André Riedel schrieb:
Verbleites Benzin ist nicht mehr für den PKW-Verkehr zu gelassen
weltweit?
neugierig
malenki
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 26. August 2010 15:16 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
HI !
die Automaten für die Autobahngebühr als
* amenity
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity=*vending_machine*
* vending http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vending=vouchers
* operator=tollcollect
Man kann in JOSM die Wege der Relation zusammenfassen (Werkzeuge- Wege
verbinden) und dann erst als GPX speichern.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Sortieren-von-GPX-Segementen-tp5465381p5466642.html
Sent from the Germany mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 26. August 2010 19:11 schrieb malenki o...@malenki.ch:
André Riedel schrieb:
Verbleites Benzin ist nicht mehr für den PKW-Verkehr zu gelassen
weltweit?
neugierig
Scheinbar nicht ganz:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraethyllead
As of 2007, unleaded automotive gasoline is available
HI !
kann mir einer sagen was bei Mapnik als Anzeigename kommt - name /
operator oder brand ??
Gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 26. August 2010 19:06 schrieb malenki o...@malenki.ch:
Chris66 schrieb:
Nein, da es sich ja im Prinzip nur um eine Steckdose aber keine
richtige Tankstelle handelt.
Was würdest du im Falle eines Falles einen Passanten fragen:
'Tschuldigung, gibts hier in der Nähe eine frei zugängliche
Am 26.08.2010 14:25, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Wenn man sich eine solche Datei ansieht wird man feststellen das diese
immer aus unterschiedlich großen Segementen bestehen.
Will man nun eine Auswertung über diese Daten machen dann müssen diese
auch den Weg fortlaufend beschreiben. Machen diese
André Riedel schrieb:
the only countries in which leaded gasoline is extensively
used are Yemen, Afghanistan and North Korea. Leaded gasoline is still
available in parts of Northwest Africa, Europe, Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS), Iraq, Jordan and the Palestinian
territories.
Danke
Hallo!
Ich bekomme das prog auf meinem PDA nicht in Gang, Fehler: keine
gültige Anwendung für PocketPC
Die ältere Version lief.
Woran kann es liegen?
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Wolfgang Wienke
Hallo,
Am Donnerstag 26 August 2010 12:00:02 schrieb Willi:
Am 26. August 2010 00:27 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
[dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Zitat aus
http://www.business-geomatics.com/online/anwendungen-a-produkte/59-anwend
ungen-a-produkte/317-hobby-kartographen-erfassen-die-welt.html
Hallo,
Am Donnerstag 26 August 2010 10:42:22 schrieb Andreas Neumann:
Am 26.08.2010 03:08, schrieb Johann H. Addicks:
Was jedoch irgendwie völlig übersehen wurde ist die Tatsache, dass die
Hausnummernerfassung bei OSM selbst in Großstädten noch sehr, sehr dünn
gesäht ist und dort auch keine
1 - 100 di 266 matches
Mail list logo
