Re: [Talk-it] Ponte chiuso per lavori

Il gio 9 ago 2018, 01:34 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > +1, questo metodo mi sembra sostenibile e adatto al breve periodo di > chiusura (normalmente per pochi giorni non farei niente), manca l’anno 2018 > però, così com’è vorrebbe dire l’ 8-11 agosto di ogni anno. > Dimenticanza. Quindi

[talk-au] FOSS4G SotM Oceania meeting minutes

Hi all, Another edition of the fortnightly meeting minutes from the FOSS4G SotM organising committee is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Dptq91Z5ZeygiYLhw-APYk5Y_pnYTjdp Key updates: - Welcome to new committee member Vasiti Soko - OSGeo will likely provide financial support for

[Talk-br] Towards Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMap Through a Data Driven Approach

Oi Pessoal artigo sobre deteção de vandalismo no OSM: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2018/9389/pdf/LIPIcs-GISCIENCE-2018-61.pdf fico imaginando se a gente conseguiria implementar algo assim em grande escala abraço Gerald ___ Talk-br mailing

Re: [Talk-br] The social construction of technological stasis: The stagnating data structure in OpenStreetMap

Oi Paulo na verdade a estagnação não é somente tecnológica, mas também social ;) Certamente, o modelo de "todo mundo pode mexer à vontade" foi importante há uns 10 anos quando o mapa era um grande vazio e era necessário criar volume. Mas com a complexidade que temos hoje a lógica já precisava

Re: [Talk-it] Ponte chiuso per lavori

sent from a phone > On 9. Aug 2018, at 00:45, Andrea Albani wrote: > > L'alternativa è l'uso del tag *:conditional documentato qui [1] che io > applicherei a tutti i vehicle mettendo poi un tag esplicito per le > biciclette. Quindi proporrei: > > bicycle=yes > vehicle:conditional=no @ (Aug

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Tagging-fr] Proposition - RFC - Les cordes à linges

Bonsoir à tous, Suite à des observations pertinentes sur la liste internationale tagging, la proposition a évolué. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Proposed_features/Lines_clamps La clé proposée line_clamp est remplacée par line_attachment, plus compréhensible. Également pole:type a été

Re: [Talk-it] Ponte chiuso per lavori

Il giorno mer 8 ago 2018 alle ore 23:29 Giuliano Zamboni < giuli...@zamboni.pro> ha scritto: > Guardando il wiki (1) mi sono fatto l'idea di dover impostare così: > > Tag preesistenti: > Highway: secondary > Bridge: yes > Layer: 1 > Maxspeed: 50 > name: Corso Silvio Trentin > ref: SS14 > > Ho

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet du mois de juillet 2018 : "armoire haute tension" ?

Bonsoir à tous, Le 8 août 2018 à 14:07, Julien Lepiller a écrit : > Merci, c'est fait ! J'en ai profité pour indiqué le matériau des autres > poteaux qui sont similaires. > Merci, le matériau des supports est également une info intéressante pour la sensibilité aux aléas climatiques et les

Re: [Talk-it] Ponte chiuso per lavori

Guardando il wiki (1)  mi sono fatto l'idea di dover impostare così: Tag preesistenti: Highway: secondary Bridge: yes Layer: 1 Maxspeed: 50 name: Corso Silvio Trentin ref: SS14 Ho aggiunto: Access: no

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mise à jour des tuiles carto en rade

Merci. J'ai toujours des erreurs de mise à jour sur les zooms 16,17,18 Bonne soirée Jérôme Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 21:24, a écrit : > Impec' vu d'ici. > > Jean-Yvon > > Le 07/08/2018 à 21:35, Jérôme Seigneuret - jerome.seigneu...@gmail.com a > écrit : > > En voici 2 pour l'exemple. > >

[Talk-it] Aggiornamento mappe su OsmAnd+ e MAPS:ME

Riciao! Ho installato queste due applicazioni sul mio smartphone e non capisco come funziona il discorso aggiornamento mappe su MAPS.ME. Con OsmAnd ad inizio mese mi appare nella sezione "gestione mappe" la richiesta di aggiornamento di quelle installate, oggi ho appunto aggiornato quella del

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Il giorno mer 8 ago 2018 alle ore 21:32 Andrea Albani ha scritto: > C'è ancora una cosa che non torna sul tool. > > Mi rispondo da solo. Prima di marcare come "confirmed issue" bisogna aprire il link di brouter-web, fare 1 simulazione di routing (5 nel caso di falsi positivi) e a questo punto è

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

> > > > > > highway=service > > surface=compacted > > bicycle=permissive > > foot=permissive > > motor_vehicle=private > > > > > https://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/IMG_20180804_185032.small.jpg > > https://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/IMG_20180804_182346.small.jpg >

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

C'è ancora una cosa che non torna sul tool. Se si seleziona uno dei casi segnalati (es. 7.784797,44.535158 che ho corretto poco fa) successivamente è possibile confermare che il problema era effettivamente esistente (e quindi

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/2018 17:05, Stephen Doerr wrote: On 8 August 2018, at 15:50, Sean Blanchflower wrote: >I begin to fear I've caused offence in my recent editing, so apologies if so. I'm just a keen OSM editor trying to add what I see as a valuable omission in its database. I for one am glad to

Re: [Talk-it] Piazzola atterraggio elisoccorso notturno

sent from a phone > On 8. Aug 2018, at 17:19, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > Aggiungendo un nodo e specificando quanto segue? > > aeroway=heliport > emergency=landing_site > (da https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dhelipad) se si tratta del campo di calcio, perché aggiungere un

Re: [Talk-us] State Open Data

I think that this is the data for Iowa that you're looking for: http://data.iowadot.gov/datasets/historical-road-centerline-files On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: > A few months back I made available Washington State Roads background layer > available for use in JOSM and

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] édition mécanique : nettoyage is_in:continent

Le 08/08/2018 à 01:40, marc marc a écrit : Bonsoir, une discussion a lieu ces derniers jours à propos des continents. ceux-ci, hormis l’antarctique, sont pour le moment représenté par un nœud car l'étendue de ceux-ci sont imprécis et parfois conflictuel (parle-t-on d’Europe donc d'un

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

Hallo, aus der Zeit, als ich beim WSA Trier mal war, kann ich berichten, das der WSV entlang der Ufer ca. 2 Meter Land an den Bundeswasserstraßen Eigentum der WSV sind. Somit befürworte ich deine Anpassung des Tagging. Jedoch sollte surface je nach Gegebenheiten gesetzt werden und statt

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

On 08.08.2018 12:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: > Due to our rules, that we shouldn't have 2 active tagging > schemes for the same feature These tagging schemes are for 2 different real-world features: * roads/paths (i.e. linear features with a direction) * plazas/squares (i.e. open areas where people

[Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

Hi, mir ist auf einer Radtour (Römer Lippe Tour) aufgefallen das das tagging der Wege der Wasser und Schiffahrtsverwaltung des Bundes (WSV) entlang der Kanäle sehr unterschiedlich ist. Entlang des Datteln-Hamm-Kanals sind das Cycleways, entlang des Datteln-Weser-Kanals sind das tracks. Es

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

... even though technically, it was not Greater Manchester when I was born, it was in my earliest memories. Nick From: Nick Whitelegg Sent: 08 August 2018 17:03 To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org; co...@thespillers.org.uk Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 8 August 2018, at 15:50, Sean Blanchflower wrote: >I begin to fear I've caused offence in my recent editing, so apologies if so. >I'm just a keen OSM editor trying to add what I see as a valuable omission in >its database. I for one am glad to have the boundaries of the 'real' counties in

Re: [Talk-cz] Neco mezi Vespucci a OsmAnd pro editaci v terenu

Nejnovejsi verze OsmAndu 3.1 mimo jine pridava podporu pro editaci non-point objektu, teda napr hotel/restaurace prirazena k budove, super. mahdi ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Here in Yorkshire, people are very possessive (if that's the right word!) about the old county boundary (i.e. pre 1974). Many people are very aware of the problem (as they see it) that certain parts of Yorkshire have been transferred to (or 'stolen by') Lancashire, or other counties. They

Re: [Talk-in] tasks.openstreetmap.in is down

Thanks Sajjad and Sanjay for fixing it! On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, 8:43 p.m. Sajjad Anwar, wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Sorry about the delay to respond to this issue - we've all been away and > pretty busy. We fixed just now ( > https://github.com/osm-in/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/10). You should now >

Re: [Talk-it] Piazzola atterraggio elisoccorso notturno

Ciao, 2018-08-08 17:10 GMT+02:00 Gianluca Boero : > Ciao a tutti... > > E' stata inaugurata nel comune di Bricherasio (To) una piazzola di > atterraggio notturno per l'elisoccorso. Tale piazzola è il campo di calcio, > il quale tramite un codice di sblocco situato all'ingresso, attivabile da >

Re: [Talk-in] tasks.openstreetmap.in is down

Hi everyone, Sorry about the delay to respond to this issue - we've all been away and pretty busy. We fixed just now ( https://github.com/osm-in/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/10). You should now be able to login and continue mapping http://tasks.openstreetmap.in/ Happy mapping! Cheers, Sajjad On

Re: [Talk-us] State Open Data

Adam, Thanks for adding Vermont. At some point I'd like to do like you did with surfaces. One of the problems I run into is that every agency seems to have a different list of surfaces. We'd should probably try to create a conversion chart to map different names into OSM surface types. For

[Talk-it] Piazzola atterraggio elisoccorso notturno

Ciao a tutti... E' stata inaugurata nel comune di Bricherasio (To) una piazzola di atterraggio notturno per l'elisoccorso. Tale piazzola è il campo di calcio, il quale tramite un codice di sblocco situato all'ingresso, attivabile da personale di terra specializzato nei soccorsi, apre la

Re: [Talk-cz] rychlost

Taky muzes zkusit https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=15/49.4006/15.5908=car_maxspeed Z aplikaci pro telefon pak treba streetcomplete ma maxspeed quest - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete mahdi Jan Martinec wrote on 08/08/2018 04:16 PM: > Tady třeba:

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi all, I'm smb1001 and have been adding the traditional county boundaries recently. DaveF kindly let me know of the discussion thread here so I've joined Talk-GB to add my side of things. I'm not alone in thinking the traditional county boundaries have a place on current maps. It's unfortunate

Re: [Talk-cz] rychlost

...ale co jsem to teď zkoušel, tak je to nějak výrazně pomalejší, než pamatuju. Jednodušší mi připadá v JOSM zapnout filtr na zobrazení jen highway=*, a k němu druhý na skrytí maxspeed=*; případně k tomu tahat z Overpassu jenom way[highway]; tu ITO mapu jsem využil vlastně jen jako přehledku.

Re: [Talk-cz] rychlost

Tady třeba: http://product.itoworld.com/map/125?lon=14.43851=50.08013=14 Zdar, HPM Dne 8. 8. 2018 16:12 napsal uživatel "marek" : Existuje nějaká ulitka, která zobrazí v mapě ulice, kde nejsou ještě zadány rychlostní limity? Marek Polák ___ Talk-cz

[Talk-cz] rychlost

Existuje nějaká ulitka, která zobrazí v mapě ulice, kde nejsou ještě zadány rychlostní limity?   Marek Polák   ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-us] State Open Data

I've added Vermont's center-line info to the spreadsheet. As someone who does a lot of filtering of OSM roads based on surface, exposing surface info to a broader group of editors would be a fabulous win. Thanks for heading in this

Re: [Talk-us] State Open Data

Elliott, Thanks - I've added Maryland into the spreadsheet. Clifford On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:32 PM Elliott Plack wrote: > Maryland’s Transportation Basemap is already availability in iD and JOSM > as an imagery source. We also have a slew of open datasets including > centerline and speed

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

sent from a phone > On 8. Aug 2018, at 14:40, djakk djakk wrote: > > I don’t get why highway=footway + area=yes is considered as wrong tagging ! because an area is not a “way”, a way implies linearity. cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

sent from a phone > On 8. Aug 2018, at 12:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: > > Due to our rules, that we shouldn't have 2 active tagging schemes for the > same feature, so we should discuss this topic. can you point me to this rule? Is it documented somewhere? While I agree it is preferable to

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/18 13:54, Colin Smale wrote: There are plenty of examples of "former" objects in OSM - closed pubs, railway alignments etc. They are only still there because they are perceived to have some kind of relevance in the present day. Can a case be made that these historic counties are still

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

On 08.08.2018 12:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: As highway=footway etc. tags are set to "should not be used on areas" on Wiki, and mapping them in combination with area=yes is not documented at all and considered as wrong tagging by part of users, there is a key "area:highway=*" (133k uses at the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] JOSM preset "Mapping in Belgium" updated (Santens Seppe)

is gebeurd. Ik dacht dat ik dat een tijdje geleden al had aangepast, maar ik had blijkbaar enkel de 2 andere tags vervangen door emergency=life_ring On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 2:17 PM Philippe Casteleyn wrote: > > Ik zou > > > > weg laten. > > ___ >

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/2018 13:54, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-08-08 14:17, Dave F wrote: Hi On 08/08/2018 12:14, Colin Smale wrote: If this (probably completely static) dataset is used as a baseline, at least these relations would have a verifiable source.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/18 12:59, Dave F wrote: How often do you believe people will actually want historic data? Organizations archive for a reason. Consider your house, how things you don't use will get shoved to the back of the cupboard/shed. I live in a Roman city, the editors struggle to display current

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

Then I still don't understand the problem. A closed way tagged with highway=* will by default route. A closed way with area:highway=* will not. You'll have to introduce logic in the router to do so. Regards, Maarten On 2018-08-08 14:49, john whelan wrote: I don’t get why highway=footway +

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Il giorno mer 8 ago 2018 alle ore 12:28 Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: > > L'ho sistemato io poco fa. In tutta l'area le relazioni straight_on erano > errate. > > Concordo che i tempi di aggiornamento sono un po' lunghi. Però piuttosto > che niente, meglio piuttosto ;-) > > Ho messo a posto

Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 119, assunto 4

Parabéns Arlindo excelente iniciativa ! Em Qua, 8 de ago de 2018 09:01, escreveu: > Enviar submissões para a lista de discussão Talk-br para > talk-br@openstreetmap.org > > Para se cadastrar ou descadastrar via WWW, visite o endereço >

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-08-08 14:17, Dave F wrote: >> Hi >> >> On 08/08/2018 12:14, Colin Smale wrote: > >> If this (probably completely static) dataset is used as a baseline, at least >> these relations would have a verifiable source. >> >>

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

> I don’t get why highway=footway + area=yes is considered as wrong tagging ! The problem is consistency. If the renderers and routers don't understand your tagging then it is less visible. Cheerio John On 8 August 2018 at 08:40, djakk djakk wrote: > I don’t get why highway=footway +

Re: [Talk-it] Openrefine export

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:45 PM Cascafico Giovanni wrote: > > Come segnalato da Napo, Openrefine si presta molto bene a pulire i dati, nel > caso specifico gli "operator" delll'anagrafica carburanti nazionale [1]. > > Caricando il file osm [2] candidato all'import posso si può isolare e >

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

I don’t get why highway=footway + area=yes is considered as wrong tagging ! djakk Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 12:52, Tomasz Wójcik a écrit : > As highway=footway etc. tags are set to "should not be used on areas" on > Wiki, and mapping them in combination with area=yes is not documented at > all

[Talk-it] Openrefine export

Come segnalato da Napo, Openrefine si presta molto bene a pulire i dati, nel caso specifico gli "operator" delll'anagrafica carburanti nazionale [1]. Caricando il file osm [2] candidato all'import posso si può isolare e manipolare errori singoli o a gruppi. Il probllema è che non so come

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi On 08/08/2018 12:14, Colin Smale wrote: The OS publish boundaries for historic counties, so one could say these boundaries are the current boundaries for the historic counties. To me that's an oxymoron. If this (probably completely static) dataset is used as a baseline, at least

Re: [Talk-pt] Talk-pt Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2

No inicio do segmento reparei que tinham referenciado a EFFIS. [1] [1] - http://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/static/effis_current_situation/public/index.html Nuno Caldeira escreveu no dia quarta, 8/08/2018 à(s) 13:04: > Bom! Só faltou mesmo a atribuição dos créditos. > > A quarta, 8/08/2018, 13:00,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet du mois de juillet 2018 : "armoire haute tension" ?

Le Wed, 8 Aug 2018 00:09:48 +0200, François Lacombe a écrit : > Le 7 août 2018 à 12:55, Julien Lepiller a écrit : > > > Question similaire je pense, il s'agit là d'une plaque sur un > > poteau : > > > > http://rennes.lepiller.eu/xXHZn4kj--.1.jpg > > > C'est une plaque de remontée

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fusionner ways en une seule track?

Merci beaucoup. Je vais essayer. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France-f5380434.html ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/2018 12:05, Lester Caine wrote: On 08/08/18 10:56, Dave F wrote: On 08/08/2018 09:54, Lester Caine wrote: we are now in a situation where much accurately mapped material is simply dumped when there is a change to the current situation. 1. it's not dumped, it's still in the

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

> > 2018-08-08 12:20 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > >> Il problema con questo genere di QA sono i tempi di riscontro. >> > Concordo che i tempi di aggiornamento sono un po' lunghi. Però piuttosto > che niente, meglio piuttosto ;-) > > Avevo fatto tempo fa un bot telegram [1] che generava al volo

[Talk-it] Una nuova frontiera nello spam?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61449689 Ciao, Andrea ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

The OS publish boundaries for historic counties, so one could say these boundaries are the current boundaries for the historic counties. If this (probably completely static) dataset is used as a baseline, at least these relations would have a verifiable source.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references.

On 08/08/18 11:49, David Woolley wrote: I think people are overlooking the original use case for suppressing C references, which was that they confused satellite navigator users. As I pointed out before, this is really an attribute of the particular turn onto the road, not the road itself. 

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/18 10:56, Dave F wrote: On 08/08/2018 09:54, Lester Caine wrote: we are now in a situation where much accurately mapped material is simply dumped when there is a change to the current situation. 1. it's not dumped, it's still in the database as a historic version. 2. Changes almost

Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references.

On 08/08/18 10:34, Dave F wrote: On 08/08/2018 08:30, Andy Townsend wrote:  The tags "highway_authority_ref" "admin_ref" and "official_ref" are assumed to be unsigned. One of the items on my 'things to do' list was to search for & amalgamate any 'this road is signed' tags. The last

[OSM-talk] highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*

As highway=footway etc. tags are set to "should not be used on areas" on Wiki, and mapping them in combination with area=yes is not documented at all and considered as wrong tagging by part of users, there is a key "area:highway=*" (133k uses at the moment). Part of users still map footway

Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references.

I think people are overlooking the original use case for suppressing C references, which was that they confused satellite navigator users. As I pointed out before, this is really an attribute of the particular turn onto the road, not the road itself. The fact that a road (A, B, or C) may have

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Ciao, 2018-08-08 12:20 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > Il problema con questo genere di QA sono i tempi di riscontro. Ho viste un > paio di anomalie e non trovo il problema. Poi ho provato l'apertura con > remote control JOSM e non mi funziona (Error: 404 Not Found). > Ho già segnalato il

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Il problema con questo genere di QA sono i tempi di riscontro. Ho viste un paio di anomalie e non trovo il problema. Poi ho provato l'apertura con remote control JOSM e non mi funziona (Error: 404 Not Found). Prendo per esempio questo [1] svincolo: il Brouter non mi fa proseguire, mentre il

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 07/08/2018 20:48, Dave F wrote: Hi User smb1001 is currently adding county boundary relations with boundary=historic through out the UK: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ASf (May take a while to run) Changeset discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61410203 From the historic

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi On 08/08/2018 09:54, Lester Caine wrote: we are now in a situation where much accurately mapped material is simply dumped when there is a change to the current situation. 1. it's not dumped, it's still in the database as a historic version. 2. Changes almost always increase the accuracy &

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Nell'About ho trovato "Data: based on OpenStreetMap. It is usually updated once a week when a new Planet file is available, see dates of data files. " Ciao, Andrea 2018-08-08 11:37 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > Approssimativamente, quanto tempo prende l'aggiornamento del grafo su >

Re: [Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Approssimativamente, quanto tempo prende l'aggiornamento del grafo su brouter.de? Il giorno 8 agosto 2018 11:09, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: > Ciao a tutti, > all'ultimo State of the Map, Arndt Brenschede ha fatto una > presentazione su "Energy efficient routing with OSM": >

[Talk-es] Caminos con autorización

Hola. En la lista internacional tagging se ha preguntado recientemente [1] por el valor adecuado para caminos/zonas en los que es necesario solicitar un permiso para acceder para practicar alguna actividad en la naturaleza (senderismo, ciclismo, caza, pesca). No me refiero a una licencia genérica

[Talk-it] BRouter Suspect Scanner

Ciao a tutti, all'ultimo State of the Map, Arndt Brenschede ha fatto una presentazione su "Energy efficient routing with OSM": https://2018.stateofthemap.org/2018/T101-Energy_efficient_routing_with_OSM/ La registrazione è disponibile qui: https://youtu.be/hUkE_fHEoZ8?t=11366 Arndt ha

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 08/08/18 09:54, Lester Caine wrote: They should be moved to OHM but then ANY information that is superseded should be automatically archived to SOMETHING since we are now in a situation where much accurately mapped material is simply dumped when there is a change to the current situation.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 07/08/18 20:48, Dave F wrote: User smb1001 is currently adding county boundary relations with boundary=historic through out the UK: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ASf (May take a while to run) Changeset discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61410203 From the historic wiki page

Re: [Talk-in] tasks.openstreetmap.in is down

Yep, I'm having the same issue at login On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:25 PM Nikhil VJ wrote: > Hello, > > Apologies if this is a repeat post.. I'm not seeing these mailing lists > often. > > The India HOT Tasking Manager site http://tasks.openstreetmap.in is not > working when we try to login.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references.

On 08/08/18 08:30, Andy Townsend wrote: There are combinations that aren't handled perfectly (especially where roads have a mixture of different refs) and I'll look at some of these edge cases later.  Hopefully though as things stand it's useful to people who really want to see these

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] arrêt de bus du réseau Mat

Ici en Belgique, c'est vrai que ce sont les communes qui construisent et maintiennent les arrêts et les abribus et encore un autre opérateur qui y met de la pub. Mais c'est tout de même l'opérateur qui y met un 'drapeau' et les horaires et qui les maintient à jour. Quand moi je parle d'un arrêt

[Talk-GB] BHF et al Creating AED Location Database (news item)

In the 8 am radio 4 news today there was an item about the British Heart Foundation creating a database of AED locations because these are often not known to people. Although not the BBC, this is another article based on the same news release:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] arrêt de bus du réseau Mat

En l'occurence l'exploitant d'une ligne n'est qu'un usager de l'infrastructure utilisée! les arrêts, plateformes ont un opérateur indépendant, la commune ou plus souvent l'EPCI qui est en charge de l'exclusivité de la gestion des transports sur son territoire, parfois un opérateur privé (centre

Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references.

For completeness, I have updated https://map.atownsend.org.uk to show unsigned road names in brackets and unsigned refs in brackets at the end of the name.  The tags "highway_authority_ref" "admin_ref" and "official_ref" are assumed to be unsigned. Examples:

Re: [talk-ph] Advanced imagery alignment with Imagery Offsets DB

Hello All, In further continuation to our earlier message on map enhancements efforts in Metro Manila, we wanted to inform local mappers and community that we started the city this morning. We also used the offset distance as appropriate for the change sets uploaded Here are the change sets we