Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread stevea
TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them. Looking around the country, I notice some areas where they were removed,

Re: [Talk-us] Cycle_greenway

2015-09-28 Thread Harald Kliems
I would map greenways/bike boulevards as lcn=yes or, if they have a name, maybe as a lcn route relation. Other than that, I think it's more important to map physical characteristics such as stop signs, bike-specific infrastructure, diverters, and speed limits on those routes. Harald. On Mon,

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Minh Nguyen
Nate Wessel writes: > > > I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest, > *highfive*!), but I wouldn't say that the accurate ones should be > removed. If they can be identified as private driveways, they could > more easily just not be rendered

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Minh Nguyen
Marc Gemis writes: > > > They can be mapped, especially the long ones and tagged as highway=service, service=driveway, and typically access=private.I don't care for the appearance of the map, it's more important to connect houses that are further away from the main road via the

Re: [Talk-us] Cycle_greenway

2015-09-28 Thread Brad Neuhauser
All occurrences of cycleway=cycle_greenway seem to be in Seattle as of now: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bI5 There are at least a few different accounts adding that tag, but STBrenden included the greenway tag in some changeset comments (ie http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21347401). Have

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Ladner
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM Mike Thompson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Tom Bloom > wrote: > >> TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. >> > I believe TIGER only includes driveways over a certain length. >

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Kevin Broderick
In rural parts of the northeast (particularly Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine) it's actually rather helpful to have driveways mapped. In many cases, it's difficult to tell from the main road (with "main" being a relative term) whether a traveled way is the limited-maintenance public right-of-way

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Toby Murray
I run into this as well. If I don't see anything close to the way on imagery I definitely have very little problem deleting them. I also question the access=private tagging although not because of the rendering. I mean technically it is correct I suppose but if you are trying to route to an

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Nate Wessel
I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest, *highfive*!), but I wouldn't say that the accurate ones should be removed. If they can be identified as private driveways, they could more easily just not be rendered on a map with no loss of accurate data for people who might

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Tom Bloom wrote: > TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are > tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red > squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them.

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Mike Thompson
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Tom Bloom wrote: > TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. > I believe TIGER only includes driveways over a certain length. They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with > little red

[Talk-us] Cycle_greenway

2015-09-28 Thread Natfoot
Hello to the US community, I have found some edits in the Seattle area that have cycleway: cycle_greenway I can find no reference to this tag within the wiki. Can someone please advise on the credibility of this tag. Also comment if someone is using this tag in a rendering or other application.

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Natfoot
I always add driveways to the map when there is more than one house or building on said driveway. Regards, Nathan P email: natf...@gmail.com On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Nate Wessel wrote: > I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest, >

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Tod Fitch
If the driveway is long enough, or if it is shared, I think it is a good idea to have them in the map (highway=service, service=driveway). In many areas that I’ve mapped it would be the only hope for someone to use OSM to navigate to a specific address. And on most map rendering the service

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Kevin Kenny
On 09/28/2015 01:33 AM, Tom Bloom wrote: TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them. Looking around the country, I notice

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Tom Bloom wrote: > TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. > So fix them. > They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with > little red squiggles all over the place. > Don't tag for the

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Mike N
On 9/28/2015 1:33 AM, Tom Bloom wrote: TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them. Looking around the country, I notice some

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Marc Gemis
They can be mapped, especially the long ones and tagged as highway=service, service=driveway, and typically access=private. I don't care for the appearance of the map, it's more important to connect houses that are further away from the main road via the proper driveway to allow navigation to the

[Talk-us] Sock-puppet accounts (was "More strangeness in Baltimore")

2015-09-28 Thread Andy Townsend
On 19/09/2015 22:59, Elliott Plack wrote: Hans: I saw they had been blocked but it expired: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Police%20Department%20Of%20New%20York%20City%20Of%20New%20York/blocks On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM Hans De Kryger

[Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

2015-09-28 Thread Tom Bloom
TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them. Looking around the country, I notice some areas where they were removed, changed