TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They
are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with
little red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found
includes them. Looking around the country, I notice some areas where
they were removed,
I would map greenways/bike boulevards as lcn=yes or, if they have a name,
maybe as a lcn route relation. Other than that, I think it's more important
to map physical characteristics such as stop signs, bike-specific
infrastructure, diverters, and speed limits on those routes.
Harald.
On Mon,
Nate Wessel writes:
>
>
> I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest,
> *highfive*!), but I wouldn't say that the accurate ones should be
> removed. If they can be identified as private driveways, they could
> more easily just not be rendered
Marc Gemis writes:
>
>
> They can be mapped, especially the long ones and tagged as
highway=service, service=driveway, and typically access=private.I don't care
for the appearance of the map, it's more important to connect houses that
are further away from the main road via the
All occurrences of cycleway=cycle_greenway seem to be in Seattle as of now:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bI5
There are at least a few different accounts adding that tag, but STBrenden
included the greenway tag in some changeset comments (ie
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21347401). Have
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM Mike Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Tom Bloom
> wrote:
>
>> TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong.
>>
> I believe TIGER only includes driveways over a certain length.
>
In rural parts of the northeast (particularly Vermont, New Hampshire, and
Maine) it's actually rather helpful to have driveways mapped. In many
cases, it's difficult to tell from the main road (with "main" being a
relative term) whether a traveled way is the limited-maintenance public
right-of-way
I run into this as well. If I don't see anything close to the way on
imagery I definitely have very little problem deleting them.
I also question the access=private tagging although not because of the
rendering. I mean technically it is correct I suppose but if you are
trying to route to an
I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest,
*highfive*!), but I wouldn't say that the accurate ones should be
removed. If they can be identified as private driveways, they could more
easily just not be rendered on a map with no loss of accurate data for
people who might
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Tom Bloom wrote:
> TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are
> tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red
> squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Tom Bloom wrote:
> TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong.
>
I believe TIGER only includes driveways over a certain length.
They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with
> little red
Hello to the US community,
I have found some edits in the Seattle area that have cycleway:
cycle_greenway
I can find no reference to this tag within the wiki. Can someone please
advise on the credibility of this tag. Also comment if someone is using
this tag in a rendering or other application.
I always add driveways to the map when there is more than one house or
building on said driveway.
Regards,
Nathan P
email: natf...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Nate Wessel wrote:
> I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest,
>
If the driveway is long enough, or if it is shared, I think it is a good idea
to have them in the map (highway=service, service=driveway). In many areas that
I’ve mapped it would be the only hope for someone to use OSM to navigate to a
specific address. And on most map rendering the service
On 09/28/2015 01:33 AM, Tom Bloom wrote:
TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They
are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with
little red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found
includes them. Looking around the country, I notice
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Tom Bloom wrote:
> TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong.
>
So fix them.
> They are tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with
> little red squiggles all over the place.
>
Don't tag for the
On 9/28/2015 1:33 AM, Tom Bloom wrote:
TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are
tagged private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little
red squiggles all over the place. No other map I've found includes them.
Looking around the country, I notice some
They can be mapped, especially the long ones and tagged as highway=service,
service=driveway, and typically access=private.
I don't care for the appearance of the map, it's more important to connect
houses that are further away from the main road via the proper driveway to
allow navigation to the
On 19/09/2015 22:59, Elliott Plack wrote:
Hans: I saw they had been blocked but it expired:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Police%20Department%20Of%20New%20York%20City%20Of%20New%20York/blocks
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM Hans De Kryger
TIGER drew thousands of driveways that are often simply wrong. They are tagged
private and in my opinion spoil the map appearance with little red squiggles
all over the place. No other map I've found includes them. Looking around the
country, I notice some areas where they were removed, changed
20 matches
Mail list logo