Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I would then run the script after the weekend if nobody has any
objections. (Anything that is changed by hand between now and then will
not be touched by the script.)
It is after the weekend in Central Europe ;-) and I've started the
automated edit. I deliberately
Re: Bill Ricker's suggestion of flagging the dangling motorway_links,
that is certainly possible and easy for me to do if you want it (I'd
suggest something like FIXME=this motorway_link does not seem to be
connected to a motorway or so).
put bugs where they belong to.
Would it be possible to FLAG the 2k orphan / singleend motorway_links
with an unreview tag?
regarding exceptions that prove the rule
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dave Hansend...@sr71.net wrote:
Yeah, you definitely have to be careful. It's OK for a motorway to
touch:
1. another motorway
I have looked through the changes in my part of the world, and it makes
things much better. I would encourage you to go ahead and run it with
the changes that you have made.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I'm new on this list but I assume that the problem I'm talking about
has been
Dave,
Dave Hansen wrote:
Can you share some of the scripts and methods you used for this?
I can but I had somewhat hoped to keep the ugly bits under the carpet. I
very much followed the ages-old software development method of meddling
through ;-)
So:
1. Create US extract from current
Hi,
Alan Mintz wrote:
In San Bernardino County, CA, all but two of these were cases where the
motorway_link was a ramp that had not been connected to the motorway (which
I fixed).
That's a valid concern (also voiced by Apollinaris Schoell) and I had
not thought about that.
I have now
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'll make the Perl script available for download when it works properly.
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/us-motorway-link-downgrade/fix-motorway-links.pl
Bye
Frederik
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 15:46 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
This brings down the number of proposed changes from 28k to 26k. The new
list is at the same place:
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/us-motorway-link-downgrade/
Some of these at least are from a botched TIGER county that I screwed up
On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'd also like to look into some gluing back together of the TIGER
counties
and I wonder how suitable this would be.
My gut feeling is that this calls for a semi-automated process in
which
a script suggests certain changes but humans
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:10, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
An even more aggressive fix would be to
disconnect everything that isn't a motorway_link. That's probably
correct, but more aggressive than I would choose to implement.
Not a good idea at all, IMO. I can think of numerous
A quick tip for those reviewing this list: on the page for each
way there is a small map zoomed to that way. Many of these small
links at maximum zoom have no tiles prepared to display, but you
can use the mouse scroll wheel to zoom out a bit on the small map.
It is faster than opening the larger
checked the new version and it does a much better job. found one
exception where things get worse but 99% correct fixes will be a great
improvement. and in this case there is no simple rule to filter it
requires checks in the form Russ suggested. But these are to
aggressive for an
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 08:10 -0700, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'd also like to look into some gluing back together of the TIGER
counties
and I wonder how suitable this would be.
My gut feeling is that this calls for a semi-automated process
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:27 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:10, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
An even more aggressive fix would be to
disconnect everything that isn't a motorway_link. That's probably
correct, but more aggressive than I would choose to
On Jul 17, 2009, at 8:27 AM, David Lynch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:10, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
An even more aggressive fix would be to
disconnect everything that isn't a motorway_link. That's probably
correct, but more aggressive than I would choose to implement.
Not
Yeah, you definitely have to be careful. It's OK for a motorway to
touch:
1. another motorway
2. a motorway_link
3. a non-mototorway, but only at its *END* node. Not at its beginning
node
Why? US 101 changes an estimated million times from motorway to trunk/
primary and back to
Yep. I've even got a JOSM validator plugin test to check motorway
intersections. It doesn't do the angles, but just ensures motorways
only touch other way types at their endpoints.
very useful, can you share?
Apollinaris
-- Dave
___
Because I and numerous other mappers have put a hell of a lot of time
and effort into getting things right, and I don't want anyone breaking
it because an algorithm assumes it isn't right.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:15, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2009, at 8:27 AM, David
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:19 -0700, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Yep. I've even got a JOSM validator plugin test to check motorway
intersections. It doesn't do the angles, but just ensures motorways
only touch other way types at their endpoints.
very useful, can you share?
Here are my
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:35 -0700, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:29 AM, David Lynch wrote:
Because I and numerous other mappers have put a hell of a lot of time
and effort into getting things right, and I don't want anyone breaking
it because an algorithm assumes it isn't right.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:35, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Suddenly top-posting we are why?
The day gmail stops putting two blank lines and the cursor at the top
of the message is the day I stop accidentally top-posting because I
hit reply, dash off a message, and send.
On Jul 17,
Heve had a look through some of the listing in Texas (2800 would take a LONG
time...). Here's where a minor concern pops up. So far I'm through Midland
County. The majority of the rural counties changes look to be correct fixes.
The majority of larger city changes are downgrading the
Hi,
Greg Troxel wrote:
Heve had a look through some of the listing in Texas (2800 would take
a LONG time...). Here's where a minor concern pops up. So far I'm
through Midland County. The majority of the rural counties changes
look to be correct fixes. The majority of larger city changes
Hi,
I'm new on this list but I assume that the problem I'm talking about
has been widely discussed. Someone from the US alerted me to the fact
that TIGER only has one type of road link which was imported as
motorway_link, and therefore you have little bits of motorway_link
sprinkled
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
Let me know what you think.
I looked at a few of the ways near me and the changes looked good to me...
--
Jeff Ollie
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
At 2009-07-16 18:41, you wrote:
I propose to run a script that downgrades every motorway_link to the
highest road type to which it is connected.
...
Preliminary analysis shows that there would be roughly 28k changes
across the whole US. I have prepared a full list of all proposed
changes,
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 03:41 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Preliminary analysis shows that there would be roughly 28k changes
across the whole US. I have prepared a full list of all proposed
changes, arranged by state and county, here:
27 matches
Mail list logo
