Re: 3.51

Hi Manuel, On 7/7/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Hello James, First of all, the name is "Jay" or, if you like, "jaywalker". Not James - never James. That's too British for my current incarnation. > On Tuesday, 07 July 2005 at 08:04 AM you (James (Jay) Walker), also known as > Avi, wrote: > > >>

Re: 3.51

Hello James, On Tuesday, 07 July 2005 at 08:04 AM you (James (Jay) Walker), also known as Avi, wrote: >> I'm familiar with it, but TB! doesn't use that system. Never has. Why >> should it now?? > Perhaps to be more clear and hence more user-friendly. Perhaps to > conform with a popular internat

Re: 3.51

On 7/7/05, Allie Martin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 11:57:26 PM [GMT -0500], James (Jay) > Walker wrote: > > > And, FWIW (although only Allie seems to have a block here), in the > > outline numbering system, 3.9 would be followed by 3.10. > > I'm familiar with it, but TB! doesn't use

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Thorvald, haven't seen you for quite a while, where have you been? Thursday, July 7, 2005, 7:44:50 AM, you wrote: > Does anybody know why msiexec.com tried to access the internet three > times while installing the 3.51-MSI? My firewall blocked these attempts > and it installed fine. It tr

Re: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 11:57:26 PM [GMT -0500], James (Jay) Walker wrote: > And, FWIW (although only Allie seems to have a block here), in the > outline numbering system, 3.9 would be followed by 3.10. I'm familiar with it, but TB! doesn't use that system. Never has. Why should it now??

Re: 3.51

Hæ! Does anybody know why msiexec.com tried to access the internet three times while installing the 3.51-MSI? My firewall blocked these attempts and it installed fine. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | | The Bat! v3.51 Professional & K9 v1.28 | Windows XP Pro (v5.1.2600)

Re: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > on 06-Jul-2005 at 20:28 you (Allie Martin) wrote: > > > Version numbering almost always exhibits a natural mathematical > > progression unless, the number defines a date or have some other > > similar meaning, or numbers are separated by non-numeric string. >

Re: 3.51 going off-topic

"Peter Meyns" wrotes on 07/07/2005 at 05:18:15 +1100 subject "3.51 going off-topic" : > But of lately there are so many OT postings in between them. Although > parts of the thread about upside down question marks made me chuckle > too, I'd prefer not to have those in here. Why not use TBOT? :-)

Re: Mod: Moderator's comment (was: Question about helpfile pictures)

On 7/7/05, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Dear Avi, > > Please don't feel singled out Avi. > > )<)))'> > > You are writing to the list using the name Avi Yashar and I haven't > moderated one of your messages for over a week. SCNR :gdr: Did h**l freeze over, or is Mr. P finally developing a sense

Re: 3.51

Greetings BatPeople, Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 9:08:07 AM, Maxim wrote: M> Hello Tbbeta, M> Please download 3.51 which is a replacement of 3.5.xx. M> It fixes charset issues of the latest 3.5.xx M> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-51.msi M> http://www.ritlabs.com/

Re[2]: 3.51

7/6/2005 8:16 PM Hi Ron, On 7/6/2005 Ron Secord wrote: RS> Any chance of getting an .rar file to download? I can't even get the RS> .msi to start. Something might have damaged your MSIexec files. Check the information at: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyI

Re: 3.51

Maxim Masiutin [MM] wrote, > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-51.msi Any chance of getting an .rar file to download? I can't even get the .msi to start. Thanks. -- Regards, Ron Secord Using TB! 3.5.36 Professional Under Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2

Re: Test x-rogue

Hello Bill! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 6:17 PM, you wrote: >> ...did you by chance ever put the picture of the author of the >> monthly reminder in your Address Book for him, or put his v-card in >> your address book? > At a matter of fact his picture is in my address book - > there once was a

Re[2]: Test x-rogue

Hello Bill, A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 18:17:27 GMT -0500 BM> I will try to remember to look for that zip file - the BM> site: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat is currently BM> unavailable. Use this: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip

Re: Test x-rogue

On Wed 6-Jul-05 5:35pm -0500, Mary Bull wrote: > Two questions: > > 1) Is my picture visible to you? No. > 2) Have you downloaded the Rogues.zip from PCWize? Never. > Actually, three questions: > > If you've never downloaded the Rogues.zip, did you by chance ever put > the picture of the autho

Re[2]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello Dwight, A reminder of what Dwight A Corrin typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 16:13:00 GMT -0500 >> Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are >> missing messages? DAC> I just assumed that things were going to spam, because I seem to be DAC> seeing lots less s

Re: Test x-rogue

Hello Bill! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 5:18 PM, you wrote: >> From our Monthly reminder letter. It lets you see a picture of the >> person who sent the e-mail as viewed in the attachment. > OK, I have noticed that the author of the monthly > reminder has his picture in the right hand corner o

Re: Test x-rogue

On Wed 6-Jul-05 3:52pm -0500, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > From our Monthly reminder letter. It lets you see a picture of the > person who sent the e-mail as viewed in the attachment. OK, I have noticed that the author of the monthly reminder has his picture in the right hand corner of the mail - but n

Re: Test x-rogue

Hello Peter! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 4:26 PM, you wrote: BM>> I did see the following line in your header: BM>> X-Rogue: :stuartc: > Hey! You managed to find a bug in TBs header handling! > By typing the line above (the second one) in your message TEXT your > message got displayed with

Re: 3.51

Sigh. Topologically speaking 3.5 is smaller than 3.5.1 (given a left-to-right ordering schema). And this is how, usually, software versions are set. On CVS you may (if you want) re-version to a new PRODUCT version base, but it is not necessary. So you can have a source file at CVS version 1

Re: BT LINK RE IMAP COUNTER [was Re: IMAP account, counterm this should never appear]

On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 4:20:09 PM, Mary Bull wrote: > That's good. I'm not running IMAP. Maybe some of the ones who have > been discussing it at such length will take the time to write a note > of support to your note. I sincerely hope so. Done. Thank you Vili and Mary -- Dwight A. Corrin

Re: BT LINK RE IMAP COUNTER [was Re: IMAP account, counterm this should never appear]

Hello Vili! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 3:47 PM, you wrote: >> So far as I can find, no one has made a BT report on the counter >> issue you describe. > I did one, but I did not have the time to report it here. So: > please support this, too :) > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4880 Th

Re: 3.51

Hello Mike, > ¿Why is it that numlock must be on in order for ¡The Bat! to accept > alt-codes? It is not a TB issue but, AFAIK, a keyboard issue. If you don't set numlock on you don't get numbers but up and down arrows, start, end, etc. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain

Re: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 2:13:03 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are > missing messages? I just assumed that things were going to spam, because I seem to be seeing lots less spam than before. (It didn't take long, though for some spam to

Re[2]: Test x-rogue

Hello Bill, A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 15:45:29 GMT -0500 >> X-rogue test, beware. BM> What is with the x-rogue stuff? I checked the help BM> file for both "rogue" and "x-rogue" - there is no such BM> thing. BM> I did see the following line in

Re: BT LINK RE IMAP COUNTER [was Re: IMAP account, counterm this should never appear]

Hello Mary, > Found only one that relates to the counter: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4868 > You might cite that as a related issue when you write your BT note. So > far as I can find, no one has made a BT report on the counter issue > you describe. I did one, but I did not have the

Re: Test x-rogue

On Wed 6-Jul-05 2:29pm -0500, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > X-rogue test, beware. What is with the x-rogue stuff? I checked the help file for both "rogue" and "x-rogue" - there is no such thing. I did see the following line in your header: X-Rogue: :stuartc: -- Best regards, Bill The Bat 3.51

Re[2]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello Manuel, A reminder of what Manuel Breitfeld typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 22:27:54 GMT +0200 >> You know, since using the service, I'm yet to restore a single message >> from my spam folder and not many spam messages get past their filters. >> I'd say no more than 3 to 4 per day

Re: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Dwight A Corrin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 1:48:18 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > > > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that > > it's not always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did > > point out. CVS's numbering system for instance g

Re: 3.51 (Exchange & MAPI)

On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, at 21:57:34 [UTC+0200] (Wednesday, July 6, 2005 21:57 my local time) Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> First of all, Exchange connection problems are fixed! > I have a great lack of understanding how the Exchange connectivity via MAPI > is supposed to work. > I *have* to us

Re: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello Allie, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005 at 10:16 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote: > You know, since using the service, I'm yet to restore a single message > from my spam folder and not many spam messages get past their filters. > I'd say no more than 3 to 4 per day. I get close to 100 spam messages >

Re: 3.51

Hello Allie Martin & everyone else, on 06-Jul-2005 at 21:23 you (Allie Martin) wrote: > The beta's could follow the old 3.60 beta/xx numbering or the more > recent v3.51.xx numbering. I want to add that, my expectation, when testing a 3.60 beta/xx would be that the upcoming release version is 3.

Re[7]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 03:07 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > This could be what is happening, but I have no way of knowing. AM>> I noted this problem when I had fastmail doing the default prefixing AM>> of the subjects of messages deemed as spam. I had a lot of messages in AM>> my TBBETA folde

Re: 3.51

Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else, on 06-Jul-2005 at 21:53 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote: >> Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that >> it's not always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point >> out. CVS's numbering system for instance goes like thi

Re: 3.51

Hello Allie Martin & everyone else, on 06-Jul-2005 at 20:28 you (Allie Martin) wrote: > Version numbering almost always exhibits a natural mathematical > progression unless, the number defines a date or have some other > similar meaning, or numbers are separated by non-numeric string. Hmmm. 3.5.

Re: Re[8]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:01 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: > > Yes... but do you really think it will get that far before RL hits > > us up for another donation? ;-) > > So is that where you're coming from?? Allie, if that were where I was coming from, would I be

Re[6]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello Allie, A reminder of what Allie Martin typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 15:00:16 GMT -0500 AM> wrote: >> Do you know what your Spam filter is set to do in Fastmail? My freeby >> account has no access. AM> It's set to custom. It's set to delete any message with a spam score AM> gr

BT LINK RE IMAP COUNTER [was Re: IMAP account, counterm this should never appear]

Hello Vili! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 2:12 PM, you wrote: > Counter is faulty... Yes, I know, you said so. :) < ... > > Should I write to BT about it? Told you I thought you should, but got no reply; so, I went to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view_all_bug_page.php and put "IMAP" in the searc

AV when trying to reply

Hit reply button. Instead of reply, got blank edit message window (no test, no address) following av error: 009A5620 in module 'thebat.exe' read of address 00F0. This is a new one for me. No new message template or reply template or anything. I repeated the action 3 times, and got same error

Re[5]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:54 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Do you know what your Spam filter is set to do in Fastmail? My freeby > account has no access. It's set to custom. It's set to delete any message with a spam score greater than 15 and to place messages with a spam score greater than

Re: Re[8]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 14:50:03 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the file put: I'll have a go tomorrow, it's getting late now. -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/the

Re: 3.51 (Exchange & MAPI)

Hello Zygmunt Wereszczynski & everyone else, on 06-Jul-2005 at 20:26 you (Zygmunt Wereszczynski) wrote: > First of all, Exchange connection problems are fixed! I have a great lack of understanding how the Exchange connectivity via MAPI is supposed to work. I *have* to use Outlook at work for th

Re: Re[4]: Race, what race?

--On 6 July 2005 14:45:05 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's *exactly* what I mean. I've totally fixed that problem now though, it doesn't happen anymore. -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' informat

Re[2]: Using TAB key to rotate focus

Hello Michael, Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 11:08:10 AM, you wrote: MH> Hello Dwight! MH> Dwight A Corrin wrote: >> Take a look at the quick search toolbar when you don't know where the >> cursor is. It cycles through there when you are going backwards >> (shift-tab) at least here. MH> Usually my q

Re[4]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello Allie, A reminder of what Allie Martin typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 14:46:05 GMT -0500 AM> wrote: >> Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are >> missing messages? AM> Nope. Not here. This is odd. Yours was the 6th message in this thread and yet I ha

Re: Race, what race?

Hello Tony Boom & everyone else, on 06-Jul-2005 at 21:47 you (Tony Boom) wrote: >> if you're discussing IMAP issues, can you place an "IMAP" in the >> subject? > I'm trying my very hardest not to talk about such depressing subjects and > you go and upset my evening by mentioning it again... I th

Re[6]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:41 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: >> You were the one making the semantic comment. I have to counter it >> with similar semantic commentary. > Allie, you are not obliged to "counter" everything I say. You may have misunderstood 'have to' used the way I did. It could hav

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 22:32:54 +0300 Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's because you already have The Bat! on your hard disk, Why won't you answer me? I've asked a few very on topic, very relevant questions and I get no answer at all. No need to answer that, I already know why. -

Re[8]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:43 PM, Tony Boom wrote: > I'll send them to you... Er, what is it I have to do again? You currently can enable debug logging by creating a file called protocol.ini in your IMAP account folder. In the file put: [IMAP] Logging=1 log= -- -= Allie M.=- Using TB!

Re: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 1:48:18 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that > it's not always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did > point out. CVS's numbering system for instance goes like this 1.1 > ... 1.9 1.10 1

Re: Race, what race?

--On 6 July 2005 21:30:34 +0200 "Alexander S. Kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: can I ask for a small favour... OK, your a Taxi. if you're discussing IMAP issues, can you place an "IMAP" in the subject? I'm trying my very hardest not to talk about such depressing subjects and you go a

Re[3]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:13 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are > missing messages? Nope. Not here. -- -= Allie M.=- Using TB! v3.51 System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Every thing in this world is an idea acted on.

Re: Re[4]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 14:26:07 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You were the one making the semantic comment. I have to counter it with similar semantic commentary. There you go see. If you was to use a Mac you wouldn't need a virus scanner at all. -- Tony. i. _

Re[4]: Race, what race?

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:15 PM, Tony Boom wrote: > Like when I tell it to delete messages off the server and it totally > ignores me, forgets all about it and goes and does something else you mean? That's *exactly* what I mean. -- -= Allie M.=- Using TB! v3.51 System Specs: http://sp

Re[8]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:01 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: > That is not exactly correct. If you recall, 3.5.30 was followed by > 3.5.0.31 (or something like that). And it was not the first time > this has happened. So I am only proposing that a clear and > consistent system be adopted. Again, c

Re: Re[6]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 14:20:45 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't forget to zip it!!! You zip it, I'll talk all I want :) I'll send them to you... Er, what is it I have to do again? -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.51 | '

Re: Re[4]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:15 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: > > > Sorry, Allie, but I just don't follow why you > > are so dogmatic on this point. > > BTW, where did this come from?? > > You were the one making the semantic comment. I have to counter it > with si

Re: Re[2]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

--On 6 July 2005 14:13:03 -0500 Stuart Cuddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are missing messages? Only when I'm using The Bat to read them! -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.51

Re: IMAP account, counterm this should never appear

--On 6 July 2005 15:12:28 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Counter is faulty... Yes, I know, you said so. :) then why keep repeating yourself. It's been reported now talk about something interesting. Tell a joke or something, I'll start. What's the difference between a pregnant woman

Re: Test x-rogue

Hello Stuart! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 2:29 PM, you wrote: > X-rogue test, beware. I C U ! Looking good! :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' informa

Re: Re[4]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:15 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: > > > Again, Allie, that is not entirely true. 3.5.0.31 does not > > mathematically follow 3.5.30. > > That's a famous mistake that was admitted as such. This is why I said, > barring the typos and admitt

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Alexander, Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 18:40:21, you wrote: >>One minor issue - the installer thinks that the core parts of TB require >>357kB on the HDD. That's because you already have The Bat! on your hard disk, it won't need much space to update the files, this is quite normal. -- Best

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:02 PM, Manuel Breitfeld > wrote: > > > The effect that I would recommend the following numbering system doesn't > > change anything, however I just want to write it down. ;) I would recommend > > to have a majo

Re: Race, what race?

Hello Tony Boom & everyone else... can I ask for a small favour... if you're discussing IMAP issues, can you place an "IMAP" in the subject? I'm a bad boy & have a filter that auto-marks anything with "IMAP" (and gmail and bayes and gpg and gnupg... ;-) in the subject as read. If I ever discuss

Test x-rogue

Hello tbbeta, X-rogue test, beware. -- Best regards, Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.51 Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.3 On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' informatio

Re[4]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:15 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: > Sorry, Allie, but I just don't follow why you > are so dogmatic on this point. BTW, where did this come from?? You were the one making the semantic comment. I have to counter it with similar semantic commentary. -- -= Allie M.=- Usi

Re[4]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:15 PM, Avi Yashar wrote: > Again, Allie, that is not entirely true. 3.5.0.31 does not > mathematically follow 3.5.30. That's a famous mistake that was admitted as such. This is why I said, barring the typos and admitted errors, TB!'s versioning has followed a ma

Re[2]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:02 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > The effect that I would recommend the following numbering system doesn't > change anything, however I just want to write it down. ;) I would recommend > to have a major number and two minor numbers separated by a dot. v3.50 ->> v

Re: IMAP account, counterm this should never appear

Hello Vili! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 2:12 PM, you wrote: > Counter is faulty... Yes, I know, you said so. :) > But it should never happen... > I mean, it should be caught by the developers, it is so trivial. > Should I write to BT about it? Indeed, yes. And then post the link on TBBETA, so o

Re[6]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:09 PM, Tony Boom wrote: > Well 9Val has had them for the past month. He might still be correcting the > spelling mistakes though I'm pretty familiar with how the log goes too. You could send me the log for a short problem session. I could have a look as well

Re: Re[8]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 21:00:34 +0200 Cees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Shhh don't say anything, I know that one! ONE CHICKEN! :) No, wrong. It's a trick question, the bus doesn't actually come until 3.15, so the answer can't possibly be a chicken. -- Tony. i. _

Re: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hi Stuart, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005 at 09:13 PM you (Stuart Cuddy) wrote: > Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are > missing messages? No, none. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:48 PM, Manuel Breitfeld > wrote: > > > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's > > not > > always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. > > CVS's numbe

Re: Re[2]: Race, what race?

--On 6 July 2005 13:58:51 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What you're *actually* doing may not be what TB! is actually doing with the server Like when I tell it to delete messages off the server and it totally ignores me, forgets all about it and goes and does something els

Re[2]: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello Clive, A reminder of what Clive Taylor typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 19:52:22 GMT +0100 >> Is there a chance that Fastmail's spam filter is picking them off. If >> so how does one find out. CT> Only by disabling the option to filter for a while, or increasing the spam CT> score

Re: Re[4]: Race, what race?

--On 6 July 2005 13:57:18 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't go up to 10 connections since I've had problems when I tried going above 8 connections. I was just experimenting at the time. Me too, setting it to 10 was an experiment to see if it would help. It didn't. --

IMAP account, counterm this should never appear

Hello tbbeta, Counter is faulty... Yes, I know, you said so. :) But it should never happen... I mean, it should be caught by the developers, it is so trivial. Should I write to BT about it? -- Vili<> Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBET

Re: Re[4]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 13:53:26 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Your problems certainly make for food for thought. The question is how to debug the problem. Your debug logs are likely where the questions will be answered. Well 9Val has had them for the past month. He might still be c

OT: Vili's country [was Re: Question about helpfile pictures]

Hello Tony! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 1:49 PM, you wrote: >> I am still puzzling over >> the connection between Genghis Khan and Magyarország. > Genhis Khan was the Mongolian bowler that bowled Hungary out for 99 in the > 1150 Ashes series. Actually it was his grandson, but Mongol hordes, al

Re: Re[2]: Mathematical Genius

--On 6 July 2005 13:50:22 -0500 Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You heat it until it doubles to about three times its size. Approximately how long in a 750 watt oven? -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: h

Re: 3.51

Hi Allie, On Wednesday, 06 Juli 2005 at 08:54 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote: > TB!'s version numbering has never really followed the CVS numbering > method. It has always been a mathematical progression. ...and should stick to this progression and even make it more understandable. You're right - t

Re: Re[6]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin wrote: > With all the sudden jumps or changes in TB! version numbering that's > intended and not a typo, there has always been a mathematical increase > in the numbers. That is not exactly correct. If you recall, 3.5.30 was followed by 3.5.0.31 (or something like that). And

Re[8]: 3.51

Het was op woensdag 6 juli 2005 om 20:51 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51' : Hallo Tony, >> 3.10 is less than 3.9 >> 3.1 is less than 3.9 TB> So if the bus comes at 3.10 and you get to the bus stop at 3.9 how many TB> oranges will be left in the basket after you ate 1? Shhh don't say

Re: 3.51 going off-topic

--On 6 July 2005 20:18:15 +0200 Peter Meyns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't want to spoil any fun, but please, keep TBBeta to beta issues. But we've already talked about all bugs. All we can do now is sit and talk amongst ourselves while the boys at Rl fix them. -- Tony. i. __

Re[2]: Race, what race?

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:33 PM, Tony Boom wrote: > Which is not what I was trying to do, all I did was click once on an > unread message. TB! works with the IMAP server on a queued basis. What you're *actually* doing may not be what TB! is actually doing with the server in terms of comm

Re[4]: Race, what race?

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:27 PM, Tony Boom wrote: > You keep commenting on my 10 connections, 2, 10 or a 100, there is no > difference in the performance which ever I use. .. since your comment that you've always had it set to 2 connections, I now realize that I've been barking up the wr

Re[2]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:48 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's not > always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. > CVS's numbering system for instance goes like this 1.1 ... 1.9 1.10 >

Re[4]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:14 PM, Tony Boom wrote: > I've given up on it now totally. It works but it's just *so much > effort* trying to keep on top of it, keeping up with it and trying > to understand what it's doing is just too tiring. It's now telling > me half my mailboxes don't exist

Re: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

--On 6/07/2005 13:41 -0500 Stuart wrote: Is there a chance that Fastmail's spam filter is picking them off. If so how does one find out. Only by disabling the option to filter for a while, or increasing the spam score trigger. You can't see which messages have been rejected. -- Clive Taylor

Re: Re[6]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 13:28:12 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 3.10 is less than 3.9 3.1 is less than 3.9 So if the bus comes at 3.10 and you get to the bus stop at 3.9 how many oranges will be left in the basket after you ate 1? -- Tony. i. __

Re: Re[2]: Mathematical Genius

Hi Tony, --On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 7:40 PM +0100 you wrote in part: I would have to start using Haldol, and let the world go by :rofl: OK, own up, which one of you said that? The Register said it was Tony Blair I finally found a solution for IMAP problems and TB! You heat i

Re: Question about helpfile pictures

--On 6 July 2005 21:27:23 +0300 Avi Yashar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am still puzzling over the connection between Genghis Khan and Magyarország. Genhis Khan was the Mongolian bowler that bowled Hungary out for 99 in the 1150 Ashes series. -- Tony. i. ___

Re: 3.51

Hi Allie, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005, at 08:28 PM, you (Allie Martin) wrote: > 3.10 is less than 3.9 > > 3.1 is less than 3.9 Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's not always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. CVS's numbering system

Re: 3.51

Hello all, Wednesday, July 6, 2005, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > Please download 3.51 which is a replacement of 3.5.xx. > It fixes charset issues of the latest 3.5.xx Max, I don't know, what charset isssues were fixed, but main problems persists and final version can't be released yet: 1) Lost n

Re: Re[2]: Race, what race?

--On 6/07/2005 13:30 -0500 Allie wrote: Mulberry works so well with FastMail, that I think they long ago bought shares Ah. I forgot about that. -- Clive Taylor Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.c

Re: Secondary address?

Hello Zygmunt! On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 1:35 PM, you wrote: > There is a bug report about this: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4871 Thanks. I've just added a note. < ... > >> This can be done from the headers, however, with the right-click >> context menu. > Sorry, I cannot do t

Re: 3.51 going off-topic

Hello Peter, On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:18:15 +0200 GMT(7/6/2005, 1:18 PM -0600 GMT), per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Meyns wrote: > But of lately there are so many OT postings in between them. Although > parts of the thread about upside down question marks made me chuckle > too, I'd prefer not to ha

Re: Re[2]: Mathematical Genius

--On 6 July 2005 13:09:37 -0500 Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would have to start using Haldol, and let the world go by :rofl: OK, own up, which one of you said that? -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' informati

IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

Hello tbbeta, I have been redirecting all my main mail to my fastmail account. In the last 20 minutes I have received 21 mails in my main mailbox, but I have only received 10 in my IMAP folder. Anyone have any ideas where the other messages are going. Is there a chance that Fastmail's spam filte

Re: 3.51 going off-topic

Hi Peter, In the message which was apparently written on Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 7:18:15 PM. I believe you wrote: PM> But of lately there are so many OT postings in between them. Although PM> parts of the thread about upside down question marks made me chuckle PM> too,

  1   2   3   >