Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

In reply to : MB> On Saturday, 16 July 2005 at 01:29 PM, Michael Mlinaric wrote: >>> I'm getting "Access Denied" in the Beta page. >>> Anyone else is getting the same? To who should I talk to? >> Yes, still the same for me. MB> Did you try register again? Why should

Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

In reply to : MF> Hello Michael, >> However, I don't know what's wrong but login simply fails with "Access >> denied". MF> did you change settings in your firewall? MF> No problems here (Opera,FF,IE and Netscape). Nope. It's a server side problem. It doesn't have anyt

Re[3]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

In reply to : V> Hello Michael, >>> Very odd, do you use a firewall that strips the referrer tag off? I >>> know that a lot of sites can get fussy over that? >> No it's not a Firewall issue, because I tried with inactive Firewall. >> In the meantime I have changed my

Re: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

On 2005-07-16 (16:22), you wrote: > With selected text F4 is not working. Not confirmed here. Best regards, Krzysztof Kudlacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl | /'.'; `-,`-""-',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Pol

Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

In reply to : L> Hi Cees, L> In the message L> which was L> apparently written on Saturday, July 16, 2005, 6:54:01 PM. I L> believe you wrote: C>> oh boy, another miss Hellfire on the list just what we need L> :P L> Well, 15 years a

Re[4]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

In reply to : GF> Probably our 'dead' accounts are disabled. Some at RL must go to one GF> the Admin console and activate them again :) I wonder if that was my fault or TB's... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Keep

Re: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

Hallo Goncalo, On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:59:40 +0100GMT (17-7-2005, 9:59 +0200, where I live), you wrote: I'm getting "Access Denied" in the Beta page. Anyone else is getting the same? To who should I talk to? >>> Yes, still the same for me. MB>> Did you try register again? GF> Why should

Re[2]: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

In reply to : ASK> H. It seems that this %COMMENT macro is not working at all. ASK> (I inserted the text to be there in the last message with C&P ASK> since the reply was already open, thats why it was there in the ASK> last message) ASK> %Comment="some text"

Re[2]: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

In reply to : MB>> the F-keys on this keyboard won't work. TF> I don't really want to comment on this rather ambiguous statement. ROTFL! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Our OS which art in CPU - UNIX be thy name .

Re: Memory leak?

In reply to  : V> Hello tbbeta, V> When  I  start  TB!,  it  takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and V> sending  one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it V> becomes  slow  to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I V> didnt use V> IMAP 

Re: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

Hello Mary, > Sending you a cup of coffee, if it's not too late to drink it where > you are. :) It's morning here when I'm reading you, so I'll accept the coffee. H! It tastes so good! ;) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.51.4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Se

Re: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

Hello Cees, M>> Guess what I did to reply to you? Yes, select text and F4. So, I can't M>> confirm. > > it works. I find it a really peculiar way of replying to > someone. much > rather use ctrl-r, but it works That's why the different colours were invented, I never use Ctrl+R :)

Re: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

On Sunday, 17 July 2005 at 10:48 MAU wrote: >> Sending you a cup of coffee, if it's not too late to drink it where >> you are. :) > It's morning here when I'm reading you, so I'll accept the coffee. It can't be too late for a cup of coffee. One simply can't live without coffee. ;-) PS: Me quot

Re: Rogue pics

Hi Allie and list, On Sunday, July 17, 2005 at 21:46:15 GMT -0500 (which was 04:46 where I live) -=Curtis=- wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes": > Have I forgotten the shortcut fo

Re[2]: Memory leak?

Hello Goncalo, > I have TB! running for almost an hour, I'm replying to TBBeta and > this it the memory consumption. I sent this to BT, please support it if you think: Summary:Memory leak Description: On TBBETA we had more confirm

Re: Memory leak?

> When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and > sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and > it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt > use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried. This is an old problem that's been discuss

Fwd: [The Bat 0004723]: Invalid RFC822 (2822) mailbox specification error

Hallo MAU, The bug is marked as "resolved" in the BT, but over here, it is not. I received a mail from my friend. His email address "Müller, Jürgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is displayed correctly in the message list, but becomes "\\"Müller, Jürgen"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (with all those quotes)

Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available

Hello 9Val, On Friday, July 15, 2005, 9:49:29 PM, among other things, you wrote: 9> The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available from: A problem still exists with the 'Read' filters not triggering if the read message is the only one in a folder and focus is moved by means of the 'Space' shortcut key. T

problems with logging to beta area

Hello Tbbeta, If you have problems with logging to beta area, please send me your account name and the date of the last successful access to the beta area. Please send this info to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not in list. We hope we will be able to fix the problem and prevent it from occuring ag

Re: Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

Hello -=Curtis=-! On Saturday, July 16, 2005, 9:46 PM, you wrote: > Have I forgotten the shortcut for refreshing the rogues images msl > file on the fly? I think it was Shift-CTRL-Alt-T? Perhaps its functionality went when we got the Customise, in the new user interface, as that of other shortcu

Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)

Hello Peter! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 3:21 AM, you wrote: MB>> Plus, something about CPU--but the View Folder window trails that MB>> off with three little dots. > Uh ... what is the resolution of your screen? It only abbreviates it > here if I resize the window to a *very* small one. I have 12

Re: Missing quote character with Rich-text viewer

Hello Peter Hampf & everyone else, on 17-Jul-2005 at 12:36 you (Peter Hampf) wrote: > I just noticed a message , > which isn't displayed correctly when using the Rich text/HTML viewer. Confirmed. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The commonplace of the sc

Re[3]: Memory leak?

Sunday, July 17, 2005, 6:18:19 AM, (Internet Time - @512) you wrote: Hello Vili, V> Hello Goncalo, >> I have TB! running for almost an hour, I'm replying to TBBeta and >> this it the memory consumption. V> I sent this to BT, please support it if you think: V>

Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available

Hello Thomas Fernandez & everyone else, on 17-Jul-2005 at 06:51 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote: ASK>> The resulting "Windows XP 5.1" like in this macro is redundant. There ASK>> is no other Windows XP than 5.1. :) > Not yet, maybe later. NT4 is just that, NT5 is Windows2000, NT5.1 is Windows XP (

Re: Missing quote character with Rich-text viewer

Hello Peter, Sunday, July 17, 2005, 12:36:27 PM, you wrote: > The URL in Michaels header seems to confuse TB! If a message is > clearly marked to be plain text only, the viewer should not try to > display it interpreted, IMO. Confirmed. -- Best regards, Martin TheBat! 3.51.4 Pro on Windows 98

Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Peter! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 8:45 AM, you wrote: MB>> Nevertheless, these missing characters (above, "tbbeta a fun") are MB>> getting to be a real pain. > Sorry, Mary, I don't really understand what you mean here. Which > character do you think is missing in the above mentioned example

Re: Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Mary! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 9:23 AM, you wrote: > I don't really know, this case. The "a" between "tbbeta" and "fun" > just didn't seem to belong, or to convey any meaning to me. > However, I am getting a lot of 1 or 2 character omissions in my folder > view window lately. And in my o

Re: Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

On Sunday, July 17, 2005 at 7:53:34 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: >> I had to restart to get the new msl file being used. > Probably it's the only way now, unless it's possible to re-enable it > from the Shortcut Editor. I just had a look and it doesn't seem possible. I say that it doesn't s

Re: Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

Hello -=Curtis=-! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 10:20 AM, you wrote: >>> I had to restart to get the new msl file being used. >> Probably it's the only way now, unless it's possible to re-enable it >> from the Shortcut Editor. > I just had a look and it doesn't seem possible. I say that it > doesn'

Re: Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

On Sunday, July 17, 2005 at 10:30:13 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: > Well, the development team *did* tell us that Customise is still a > work in progress. But, I don't see this in the commands, either. > Perhaps a Wish List entry at BT would be in order? Too busy wishing things about IMAP. :)

Re: Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Mary, On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:35:49 -0500 GMT (17/07/2005, 21:35 +0700 GMT), Mary Bull wrote: MB> At this point, I haven't seen anyone write that he/she can really tell MB> for sure what the cause of this unwanted behavior is. Especially since some people (like myself) are not experiencing

Re: Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

Hello -=Curtis=-, On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:20:00 -0500 GMT (17/07/2005, 22:20 +0700 GMT), -=Curtis=- wrote: C> I just had a look and it doesn't seem possible. The shortcut shift-crtl-alt-T was traditionally used by RL for testing new features that weren't even announced yet. So, refreshing the rog

Re: Rogue pics, was: Re[2]: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

Hi Vili, > I did, I used the X-Rogue method. :) Welcome to our show, Vili! Always lurking for fresh people :) Your chemist's look is persuasive :grin: -- kind regards Charlene Ferrara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.51.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Skype: charle

test

Hello all, please ignore -- Charlene Ferrara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.51.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInf

Re: Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Thomas! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 11:41 AM, you wrote: MB>> At this point, I haven't seen anyone write that he/she can really MB>> tell for sure what the cause of this unwanted behavior is. > Especially since some people (like myself) are not experiencing it, > even though I use the same T

Re: Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Mary Bull & everyone else, on 17-Jul-2005 at 22:09 you (Mary Bull) wrote: > I did type "in this case" but it showed up here on tbbeta in my View > Folder window as "know, this case." > How did it show on your screen? How does it show in your Sent Mail folder? Besides that, "what makes tb

Re: test

Hello Charlene Ferrara & everyone else, on 17-Jul-2005 at 22:08 you (Charlene Ferrara) wrote: > please ignore I'd have done that, but now that I've seen this... "Comments: Intel P4 @ 2.66Ghz, 1024 MB RAM, MSI Mainboard powering TB v3.51.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2" ...heyho,

Re: test

Hi Alexander S. Kunz, Sunday, July 17, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : >> please ignore > I'd have done that, but now that I've seen this... > "Comments: Intel P4 @ 2.66Ghz, 1024 MB RAM, MSI Mainboard powering TB > v3.51.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2" > ...heyho, an

Re: Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Peter! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 3:17 PM, you wrote: MB>> Do you mean that you saw something besides an "a" between "tbbeta" and MB>> "fun" in Stuart's phrase, "tbbeta a fun" in his post, MB>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? > Mary!? Hello ... :-) Is' me, and my name is not Stuart! Sorry--a lit

Re: Missing characters bug [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set (was: F4 quoting...)]

Hello Alexander! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 3:12 PM, you wrote: >> I did type "in this case" but it showed up here on tbbeta in my >> View Folder window as "know, this case." >> How did it show on your screen? > How does it show in your Sent Mail folder? Missing there, too. > Besides that, "wh

Test of return to 3.0.2.10

Hello Everyone! Please ignore. Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works as well as I remember it having done in the past. :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Curr

Re: Test of return to 3.0.2.10

Dear Mary, Sunday, July 17, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : > Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works as > well as I remember it having done in the past. :) So glad it does -at least over here. Does it work as well at your place? -- kind regards Charlene Fe

Re: Test of return to 3.0.2.10

Hello Charlene! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 3:46 PM, you wrote: >> Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works as >> well as I remember it having done in the past. :) > So glad it does -at least over here. Does it work as well at your > place? So far, so good. Let's try some

Re: Test of return to 3.0.2.10

Hi Mary Bull, Sunday, July 17, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : >> So glad it does -at least over here. Does it work as well at your >> place? > So far, so good. Nice! > Let's try some PMs. You may fire when ready, Mrs Bull ;) > Those dropped characters in v. 3.51.4 were driving >

Re: Test of return to 3.0.2.10

7/17/2005 5:19 PM Hi Mary, On 7/17/2005 Mary Bull wrote: MB> Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works as MB> well as I remember it having done in the past. :) It sure does!! -- Take Care, Paul The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 _

Re: Test of return to 3.0.2.10

Hello Paul! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 4:20 PM, you wrote: MB>> Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works MB>> as well as I remember it having done in the past. :) > It sure does!! I love it! It's my very favorite beta, for my own personal use. And its MicroEd delivers "wh

Re: RFC Comments header can't be set

Hi Mary > The Bug Report page (4904) asks for Feedback, but I don't know what is wanted > in the way of Feedback there. :woe: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904 What they seem to be looking for - this from a conversation with Alexander Leschinsky - is any observations that might

> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904 [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set]

Hello Natasha! On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 5:26 PM, you wrote: >> The Bug Report page (4904) asks for Feedback, but I don't know what >> is wanted in the way of Feedback there. :woe: > http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904 > What they seem to be looking for - this from a conversation with >

Re: Test of return to 3.0.2.10

On Sun 17-Jul-05 3:38pm -0500, Mary Bull wrote: > Just a test to see if The Bat! beta version 3.0.2.10 still works as > well as I remember it having done in the past. :) I see others have has the same experience. I wish I was one of them. However the 3.0.2.10 beta exe fails here with the MS bo

3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

I don't know about others, but when 3.51 rolled up I thought that RL was just polishing a release to replace the faulty one on their Website - the one that somehow eliminated BayesIt. I had no idea that instead of this ostensible objective RL was going to use me as an alpha tester for a feature or

Re: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

I don't know about others, but when 3.51 rolled up I thought that RL was just polishing a release to replace the faulty one on their Website - the one that somehow eliminated BayesIt. I had no idea that instead of this ostensible objective RL was going to use me as an alpha tester for a feature

Re: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

Jay I'm not intending to speak here for anyone else on the list, the community as a whole, any company with which I may be directly or indirectly associated or any other collection or organisation of people. These are just my opinions, and a couple of quotes where they seemed releva

Re: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

Hi Natasha, In the message which was apparently written on Monday, July 18, 2005, 6:08:59 AM. I believe you wrote: NVP>

Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

Good day, Natasha. NVP> ICAM. You're free to choose whichever level of TB suits your NVP> current needs. To NVP> help you make this decision, RL posts, on a daily basis, NVP> all their fixes at NVP> and in addition NVP> po

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

Hello Thomas, On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 07:47, you wrote: TF> My previous messages should have written in Unicode with MicroEd but TF> arrived as us-ascii. also in the Sent folder it shows us-ascii. So I TF> am trying again whether this arrives in UTF-8. You won't get utf-8 encoding unless us