Hi all!
>> I can confirm this partially, i.e. only for underlining blanks between
>> words with ISO-8859-2 encoded characters. In addition, I observe strange
>> symbol (small square) at the end of such header lines (see attached
>> picture).
> Don't heave the underlining but the cutted subject an
Hallo Gene,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:10:40 -0400GMT (11-10-2005, 23:10 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
GK> virtual folder after it is first created I'm looking for the
GK> "edit" button for VFs
GK>
GK> Current beta is 3.61.11 (Ech
> Time will tell, but the feeling of the more vocal members of the group
> is that Thunderbird might be an acceptable alternative in the long run
> .
I wish Ritlabs would make their program a great IMAP client or at least
state their position so I know if I should go to TBird.
--
Best regards,
J
In all fairness, the company is now in Chapter 7.
My question is aimed at trying to find the real comparison that would
be used. One of my criteria is that the software has be "a going
concern". Not one from a ceased company.
I suspect that Mulberry will continue to be relevant and wante
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 1:25:36 PM, Gleason Pace wrote:
> If a person's concern is to find an example that works well and
> learn from it, the economic status of the producing company seems
> irrelevant. In fact, what is this status relevant to?
Only thing I can see is inability to buy new
> In all fairness, the company is now in Chapter 7.
> My question is aimed at trying to find the real comparison that would
> be used. One of my criteria is that the software has be "a going
> concern". Not one from a ceased company.
If a person's concern is to find an example that works well
Hello Clive,
Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 1:48:13 PM, you wrote:
> Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two
> weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it will continue to function
> as expected.
In all fairness, the company is now in Chapter 7.
My question is
Hi Clive,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:48 PM +0100 you wrote in part:
Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a
comparator for IMAP and the Bat?
Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two
weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it
--On 11/10/2005 13:41 -0400 Ethan wrote:
Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a
comparator for IMAP and the Bat?
Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two
weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it will continue to function
as exp
Hi Tony,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:33:06 +0100 UTC (10/11/2005, 12:33 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Tony Boom wrote:
T> I like The Bat! always have. I'd like to be able to use IMAP but The Bat!
T> don't work with IMAP, it's quite possibly the worse IMAP capable, and I
T> use the word "capable" very lightl
Hello Curtis,
Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 10:15:18 AM, you wrote:
> When I start up Mulberry
Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a
comparator for IMAP and the Bat?
Jerry
--
Ethan J. Mings
Principal,
Curren
Hello Gary,
A reminder of what Gary on TBBETA typed on:
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 at 12:18:58 GMT -0500
G> It is interesting in that you are changing your
G> email methodology to accommodate a client
I like The Bat! always have. I'd like to be able to use IMAP but The Bat!
don't work with I
Hi Tony,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:34 PM +0100 you wrote in part:
Well The Bat in IMAP mode is 100% unusable here, it's worse than useless.
If this was my first experience with it, like most other crap
applications I try, I'd delete it within the hour and wouldn't give it a
second though
Hi Maxim,
on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:04:41 +0300GMT (11.10.2005, 19:04 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM> Hello Dierk,
MM> Please also send the file to "Michal Kosinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Folder template? Or a new bug? ;-)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.61.11 Echo :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build
Hello Dierk,
Please also send the file to "Michal Kosinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.61.11 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www
Hello Gary,
Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 5:03:47 PM, you wrote:
> Clive, is your IMAP server locally on your LAN, or outside?
The two servers I use are outside - the main one being FastMail.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.61.11 Echo (Beta)
Windows XP: Service Pack 2
___
Hello Gary,
A reminder of what Gary on TBBETA typed on:
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 at 10:56:33 GMT -0500
G> seriously, that seems to be a theme here... if you want to run a fully
G> functioning, heavy duty client with all the goodies in the universe
G> available to you, you have to run POP..
Hi Tony,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 8:21 AM +0100 you wrote in part:
G> ROFL... now you sound like my wife...
You mean all butch and manly :)
LOL.. for real... no... Curtis asked a question of was it this or that..
you answered "yes"
I am running TB under windows that is running in a
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Clive Taylor
wrote:
> Not here it doesn't, Curtis. I've set it to download 100 messages
> and it's still infinitely quicker than TB!
That's still far less than thousands or hundreds. :)
> If I chose the entire list, Mulberry would spend an
>> eternity
Hi Clive,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 4:35 PM +0100 you wrote in part:
When I now select a folder in Mulberry, it downloads just the last 20
headers. Only 20!. That folder could have 10,000 or 30,000 messages in
it. Mulberry downloads only the last 20 so that you can get going with
reading.
Clive,
>> Mulberry's speed comes from efficiency. You do far more with much less
>> transfer of data. TB! is doing too much in the background and requires
>> too much data transfer to be productive
> I'd buy that. It's the difference in philosophy between a POP and IMAP
> developed client, I su
Hi Tony,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 8:16 AM +0100 you wrote in part:
I know, I never had any trouble with POP. I'm having to run a mailcheck to
get virtually every message to display otherwise it's "No message loaded"
so I'm really considering POP again.
the horror, the ho
Hi Tony,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 8:25 AM +0100 you wrote in part:
> as IMAP seems to have improved enough where I have some confidence
> in it again
Any chance of a big dummies walk through so I can feel that way again?
I take that back. I don't have confidence given this: In readin
When I now select a folder in Mulberry, it downloads just the last 20
headers. Only 20!. That folder could have 10,000 or 30,000 messages in
it. Mulberry downloads only the last 20 so that you can get going with
reading.
Not here it doesn't, Curtis. I've set it to download 100 messages and it
WIBNI there was an option to have this log its progress to a file
somewhere so you could see what it had done?
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.61.09 Echo (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2 Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.4, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2,
SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros 1.11a.
If
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, at 01:36 AM, Clive Taylor
wrote:
> I know this is a well-discussed topic but I'm afraid this is just
> not true - at least here. My biggest gripe about TB! and its IMAP
> implementation is the sheer turgid feel of the prog while its
> working. Recent betas have become
On 10/10/2005 at 2:15:24 PM [GMT -0500], Curtis wrote:
> I wonder now what has happened with my installation at home!
What has happened is that I'm actually using a server side trash. I'm
using server side trash because when I delete messages to local trash,
the trash folder quite often is shown
Hello NetVicious,
> BT added: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5187
And supporting Note added :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.61.11 Echo (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Curren
martes, 11 oct 2005 at 02:02, it seems you wrote:
> I didn't check with 3.61.10 but I confirm with .11
Thanks.
BT added: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5187
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.61.11 Echo (Beta) Professional
/ \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.26
Hello Clive,
A reminder of what Clive Taylor on TBBETA typed on:
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 at 07:42:10 GMT +0100
CT> If you're depressed now wait until
CT> Ritlabs springs an upgrade charge on to you; it can't be far away!
The words on, your, not and Nelly spring to mind :)
I won' get depr
Hello Gary,
A reminder of what Gary on TBBETA typed on:
Monday, October 10, 2005 at 15:26:17 GMT -0500
G> as IMAP seems to have improved enough
G> where I have some confidence in it again
Any chance of a big dummies walk through so I can feel that way again?
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.61.
Hello Gary,
A reminder of what Gary on TBBETA typed on:
Monday, October 10, 2005 at 14:39:27 GMT -0500
G> ROFL... now you sound like my wife...
You mean all butch and manly :)
I am running TB under windows that is running in an emulator on this mac but
i still shouldn't be having this troub
Hello Paul,
A reminder of what Paul Van Noord on TBBETA typed on:
Monday, October 10, 2005 at 15:33:40 GMT -0400
PVN> One this is that it
PVN> always works.
I know, I never had any trouble with POP. I'm having to run a mailcheck to
get virtually every message to display otherwise it's "No me
33 matches
Mail list logo
