, the tabs reappear.
Confirmation?
Can't confirm. Here tabs are visible upon first opening.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 4.0.18]
[OS: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5 2]
Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA
an upgrade, as you. But I have the Voyager
compass spinning, not TB's icon.
I downloaded Voyager yesterday evening. Would you try to download
again and see if maybe it is a different install? I dont have Voyager
now with me to give you some build number.
--
Vili
[MUA: TB! Voyager 4.0.18]
[OS: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5 2]
Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Would you try to download again and see if maybe it is a different
install?
Done.
Still flapping and have smartbat tabs on opening.
Huhh
Do this please:
- Start, Run, cmd
- navigate to Voyager's dir
- type in:
dir /on 1.txt
- navigate to Voyager's MAIL subdir
- type in:
dir /on 2.txt
Guten Tag Maxim Masiutin,
am Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 um 11:33 schrieben Sie:
But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
that?
We will remove the speller settings from the registry.
Wouldn't it be possible to store all Settings in OTFE INI-File?
--
Mit
Guten Tag Maxim Masiutin,
am Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 um 11:33 schrieben Sie:
in Token activation dialog, first sentence contains %THEBATPRO%, which
returns The Bat! Professional v3
Thank you, we have changed it to The Bat! Professional v3.
I hope you will change it to v4 - because this
room.
What I do is out the USB stick into the laptop, which I use as a host
computer only (as I would in an internet cafe). Copying Voyager to
the laptop and working on the HD rather than the USB stick, would
make it a lot faster! At the end of the trip, I can then move
everthing back
Hi Jens,
on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:21:34 +0100GMT (13.03.2008, 09:21 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
PM [Voyager 4.0.18]
PM Thanks a lot! Seems to work fine so far. :)
But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
JF Yes
But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
JF Yes, a little bit:
JF
[HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-1202660629-2146979555-1343024091-500\Software\RIT\Voyager]
JF etc.
Here there are only entries for the speller, both on WinXP
Guten Tag Peter Meyns,
am Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 um 18:43 schrieben Sie:
Here there are only entries for the speller, both on WinXP and Win2K.
And it is in HKEY_CURRENT_USER - I don't seem to have HKEY_USERS. So
your Win2K seems to be different from mine. hmm
No, this has been exportet by
Am 13.03.2008 19:01 schrieb Vili:
JF
[HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-1202660629-2146979555-1343024091-500\Software\RIT\Voyager]
JF etc.
Here there are only entries for the speller, both on WinXP and Win2K.
And it is in HKEY_CURRENT_USER - I don't seem to have HKEY_USERS. So
your Win2K seems
Am 13.03.2008 11:33 schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 8:06:15 PM, you wrote:
But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
We will remove the speller settings from the registry.
Am 13.03.2008 19:42 schrieb Jens Franik:
And if you have other Keys, i will delete mine (i write a killfile.reg)
and install once more to see which one will set new. Maybe i had a
previous installation? But this will happen tomorrow ;-)
I always exit Voyager by calling a batch file that exits
Guten Tag Peter Meyns,
am Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 um 20:22 schrieben Sie:
Am 13.03.2008 19:42 schrieb Jens Franik:
I always exit Voyager by calling a batch file that exits Voyager and
deletes the reg entry.
Do you use a .reg File for this, or how do you manage to delete the
Keys? (If your
Hi Jens,
on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:50:23 +0100GMT (13.03.2008, 21:50 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
I always exit Voyager by calling a batch file that exits Voyager and
deletes the reg entry.
JF Do you use a .reg File for this, or how do you manage to delete the
JF Keys? (If your Solution is ready
-1202660629-2146979555-1343024091-500\Software\RIT\Voyager\Speller]
Don't forget this:
[HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-1202660629-2146979555-1343024091-500\Software\RIT\SpellCheck\SSCE\Dictionaries]
Count=dword:000f
#01=W:\\Voyager\\Speller\\Ssceam2.clx|314165|944609851|AM|24941
#02=W:\\Voyager\\Speller
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM ,- [ voyager_key_ex.reg ]
PM | REGEDIT4
PM |
PM | [-HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\Voyager]
PM `-
That's a strange message. There's no In-Reply-To header, and the
References header is:
,- [ From mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
|
| References: REGEDIT4
Hello Tbbeta,
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other capabilities and
let us know the results! Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
capabilities and let us know the results! Thanks!
Oh, yes :)
Thank you Maxim!!!
--
Vili
Hello all,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
capabilities and let us know the results! Thanks!
in Token activation
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:24:29 -0400 GMT (12/03/2008, 02:24 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
RG I am a home user and would find it handy but don't want to get
RG involved with all the horror stories. Why don't they make encryption
RG optional?
PVN How many successful stories have you
Hello Mark,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:15:49 +0100 GMT (12/03/2008, 01:15 +0700 GMT),
Mark Partous wrote:
MP BTW: Personally I still haven't tried it out yet because
MP 1. It still leaves traces in the registry
MP 2. It only works with OFTE (1)
The two main shortcomings of Voyager. I'm
Hello Vili,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:38:17 -0400 GMT (12/03/2008, 01:38 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V I believe, one advantage (at least for me) of Voyager is this: I am
V using Voyager on my laptop. If I need, just copy Voyager to my USB
V stick, replace the key file and ready to use. I do
Guten Tag Maxim Masiutin,
am Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 um 14:27 schrieben Sie:
Hello Tbbeta,
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
capabilities and let us know
V I believe, one advantage (at least for me) of Voyager is this: I am
V using Voyager on my laptop. If I need, just copy Voyager to my USB
V stick, replace the key file and ready to use. I do it, when I am on a
V short trip, dont want to take my laptop with me.
Hey this is a good idea
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
capabilities and let us know the results! Thanks!
How do i register the installed Voyager App?!?
http://www.thebat.hu/Download
Guten Tag Vili,
am Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 um 16:09 schrieben Sie:
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
capabilities and let us know the results! Thanks!
How do i
Hello all,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, Christian Grams wrote:
Sorry... i know the actual process but i need the registration key. :)
I was lead to believe that when you have a Key for TB! that it is
also for Voyager. Is this true? Or do i need an extra License?
no, if You have Professional
Guten Tag Marek Mikus,
am Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 um 16:54 schrieben Sie:
Hello all,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, Christian Grams wrote:
Sorry... i know the actual process but i need the registration key. :)
I was lead to believe that when you have a Key for TB! that it is
also for Voyager
Hello all,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, Christian Grams wrote:
Okay, unforunately i don´t the order ID or the KeyBlock lying around
where i am now. :(
I checked in the registry and found a registration block which also
looks like the KeyBlock (as far as my memories go :)) but it does not
work
Voyager 4 Up and Running.
Top of my wish list for Voyager would be an automated Sync routine to
synchronize the USB Client with a traditional PC resident Client.
Best regards,
Hamish
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 4.0.18
Hi Maxim,
on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:27:49 +0200GMT (12.03.2008, 14:27 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM Voyager 4 BETA URL
MM
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
MM Hunspell dictionaries do not work in it yet. Please test other
MM capabilities and let us
Hi,
on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:40:16 +0100GMT I wrote:
PM [Voyager 4.0.18]
PM Thanks a lot! Seems to work fine so far. :)
But it still writes to the registry! Isn't there a way to do without
that? See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! Voyager v4.0.18 :beta
Vili wrote on 13/03/2008 at 02:05:25 +1100
subject Voyager v4 published! :
The idea is that one activation and install corresponds to one
mastrkey.dat file, and this is the only file that you have to keep an
eye on it.
Would it not be easier if the mastrkey.dat had different names
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 1:27:49 PM, you wrote:
Voyager 4 BETA URL
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Installed Voyager Ok
Said I want to restore from a backup taken fro TB
The browse window is behind the main and the main window
The idea is that one activation and install corresponds to one
mastrkey.dat file, and this is the only file that you have to keep an
eye on it.
Would it not be easier if the mastrkey.dat had different names for
each installation location|drive|computer?
No. It is not really intended
So, this is the headline, I would like to read :) When can we expect
that?
Mainly, I would like to have it because of the multiple spellcheck
engine, address history and not to mention the quick shutdown.
--
Vili
Current beta is 4.0.18
the room. Then I opened the post
and put the gun barrel against my temple.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.8]
[OS: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5 2]
Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
Reply to message sent 03/11/2008, @ 10:38:29 (9:38 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Vili,
So, this is the headline, I would like to read
That's just cruel. I glanced at that subject line, my eyes got wide
and my pants started dancing around
Hi Nick,
On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 10:12:37 AM you wrote:
ND my pants started dancing around the room.
Wow, sentient pants.
ND Then I opened the post
ND and put the gun barrel against my temple.
That's DANGERous
--
Regards,
Maggie
“If we don't believe in freedom
not mind this small joke of mine :)
Seriously: I think, we should ask for a Voyager. The slow shutdown
really pisses me off, and I would be grateful for the new improvements
also.
--
Vili
Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information
Reply to message sent 03/11/2008, @ 11:45:41 (10:45 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Vili,
Are you from TX?
As a matter of fact I am!
Seriously: I think, we should ask for a Voyager. The slow shutdown
really pisses me off, and I would
Hello Vili,
Tuesday, March 11, 2008, 4:45:41 PM, you wrote:
V Seriously: I think, we should ask for a Voyager.
Why ask for 4 if 3 hasn't been spotted yet?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_program :-)
BTW: Personally I still haven't tried it out yet because
1. It still leaves
Hello Vili,
Tuesday, March 11, 2008, 4:45:41 PM, you wrote:
V Seriously: I think, we should ask for a Voyager.
Why ask for 4 if 3 hasn't been spotted yet?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_program :-)
BTW: Personally I still haven't tried it out yet because
1. It still
on a soon to die piece
of hardware
Exactly what are you implying here? People that use Voyager are stupid
fools?
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.8]
[OS: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5 2]
Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using
on a soon to die piece
of hardware
Exactly what are you implying here? People that use Voyager are stupid
fools?
He's playing a bit - please take it in stride
--
Rick
Republican Tax Cuts for the wealthy
Look where it has got us so far!
Lets do it some more!
v4.0.18 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Are you from TX?
As a matter of fact I am!
I guessed that from the put the gun barrel against my temple. :))
Seriously: I think, we should ask for a Voyager. The slow shutdown
really pisses me off, and I would be grateful for the new improvements
also.
What file system are you using
(1) The very first stick (128 MB) I bought is still alive and kicking, but
almost half of all the others (price and brand doesn't seem to matter
much) have stopped working.
I believe, one advantage (at least for me) of Voyager is this: I am
using Voyager on my laptop. If I need
and the US.
I never have been able to figure out why those with no experience are
the biggest authorities.
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information
first stick (128 MB) I bought is still alive and kicking, but
MP almost half of all the others (price and brand doesn't seem to matter
MP much) have stopped working.
Interesting you know so much about fools!
I am using the original 512k flash drive that I installed voyager on
almost 28
3/11/2008 3:21 PM
Hi Rick,
RG I am a home user and would find it handy but don't want to get
RG involved with all the horror stories. Why don't they make encryption
RG optional?
How many successful stories have you heard? I can give you some from
Cambodia, Egypt, Dominican Republic, Mexico
that I installed voyager on
PVN almost 28 months ago. It has been in use 24/7 unless I was in an
PVN airplane. All three of my flash drives (3 different brands) still work
PVN after more than 2 years.
PVN One has been washed 3 times.
If that is meant literally I dare to suppose that was not on purpose
3/11/2008 5:23 PM
Hi Mark,
On 3/11/2008 Mark Partous wrote:
PVN One has been washed 3 times.
MP If that is meant literally I dare to suppose that was not on purpose?
True.
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
that use Voyager are stupid
ND fools?
You're being too demanding. Simply fools will do! :-)
As Rick told you, I was merely playing with the acronym (OFTE). Or did you
really think I was taking the chance to end up in a board game filled with
fools in all grades of insanity which you would design
Very, very keen to see Version 4 of Voyager in the hope it will be more
reliable than 3. I use version 3 and find it excellent. The principle of having
a completely portable encrypted Email product is fantastic and so attractive
that I can live with version 3's problems. Alas - it crashes
I noted that by increasing the number of QTs in my TB and Voyager
slows down when I am moving across folders. I mean, the displaying of
message list in a folder took sometimes 1-2 seconds to show. I had ca.
20 QTs, that I normally set to share between all accounts. I cut out
some, ca. 10
2/18/2008 11:36 AM
Hi Vili,
On 2/18/2008 Kertész Vilmos wrote:
KV I noted that by increasing the number of QTs in my TB and Voyager
KV slows down when I am moving across folders. I mean, the displaying of
KV message list in a folder took sometimes 1-2 seconds to show. I had ca.
KV 20
KV I noted that by increasing the number of QTs in my TB and Voyager
KV slows down when I am moving across folders. I mean, the displaying of
KV message list in a folder took sometimes 1-2 seconds to show. I had ca.
KV 20 QTs, that I normally set to share between all accounts. I cut out
KV
of the speed/CPU use of the program?
V Maybe they are loaded each time I switch folders? I had LONG QTs (I
V mean like 50-100 lines of text), but should this matter?
Good questions. I suspect it is a macro as opposed to the volume of
text. Just a gut feeling.
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4
Is it possible that there is a macro in one of the eliminated QTs that
may be causing the problem? I have 15 QTs shared across 4 accounts
with no slowdown.
V The question is, WHY does it matter, what the QTs are containing in
V regard of the speed/CPU use of the program?
V Maybe they are loaded
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
, and my Voyager became much faster :)
--
Vili
Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Dear Max and Stefan,
I believe you will update Voyager after this beta series in finished.
Please introduce the option to use it in plain mode instead of
forcing OTFE only. Pros and cons were discussed earlier, I don't want
to start this discussion agian. I just want to have the option
---
Cancel Try Again Continue
---
I checked the memory stick for errors, but there were none.
Any suggestions?
--
Best regards,
Doug mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
TheBat! Voyager 3.99.4
on Windows XP
Hello Maxim,
is a solution in planning, to integrate portable GnuPG in Voyager
comfortably?
--
Best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
Peter Meyns wrote:
GPGshell for removable devices available, but I haven't tried it yet.
I use the shell but check out the other options:
http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/related_software/frontends.html
--
c.k.
Current beta is 3.99.07 |
Hi folks,
it's not really a beta related questions, but I become still mad.
I would like to run Voyager with GnuPG or PGP. I have tested different
instructions [1], but I cannot bring Voyager to work with PGP/GnuPG -
Voyager doesn't recognize GnuPG.
Does anybody use Voyager together with GnuPG
Hello Peter,
Yes I do. I use GPG2GO - have a look at
http://www.angelfire.com/mb2/mbgpg2go/intro.html
I tried this, but unfortunately Voyager does not recognize the GnuPG
files.
--
Best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Hi Miroslav,
on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:24:32 +0200GMT (23.06.2007, 11:24 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MF it's not really a beta related questions, but I become still mad.
MF I would like to run Voyager with GnuPG or PGP. I have tested different
MF instructions [1], but I cannot bring Voyager
Hello Peter,
It is indeed a bit cumbersome, but it works.
Thunderbird is the simpler option. :(
--
Best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Maxim,
Did you make sure that gnupg executable is in the %PATH% environment
variable?
I thought the batch file takes the entry, but the entry is missing.
Do I have to register it manually?
I didn't want to handle it in this way.
--
Best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Miroslav,
on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:11:44 +0200GMT (23.06.2007, 15:11 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
Yes I do. I use GPG2GO - have a look at
http://www.angelfire.com/mb2/mbgpg2go/intro.html
MF I tried this, but unfortunately Voyager does
Hello Miroslav,
Saturday, June 23, 2007, 16:11:44, you wrote:
I tried this, but unfortunately Voyager does not recognize the GnuPG
files.
Most probably if Voyager doesn't recognize GnuPG then The Bat! won't have
recognized it as well.
Did you make sure that gnupg executable is in the %PATH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Maxim,
on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:55:02 +0300GMT (23.06.2007, 16:55 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
I tried this, but unfortunately Voyager does not recognize the GnuPG
files.
MM Most probably if Voyager doesn't recognize GnuPG then The Bat!
MM
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDK Hello Maxim,
MDK On Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 7:18:52 PM, you wrote the following on the
MDK subject of Voyager 3.99.8 and sent it to
MDK tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
MDK
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat
Hello Goncalo,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:14:35 +0100 GMT (02/06/2007, 19:14 +0700 GMT),
Goncalo Farias wrote:
MDK I used voyager on my desktop as well as my portable flash drive and
MDK never had a problem. Surely they can just have the one that works on both
MDK systems and cut development time
6/2/2007 9:23 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 6/2/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I was thinking about what Mr. D. said, and I couldn't come up with a
TF reason why there should be two versions and not only the Voyager
TF variety (if Voyager allowed the choice of whether to use OTFE or not).
TF He might have
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, May 31, 2007, 1:18:52 PM, you wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe
Working fine here.
--
Best regards,
Raymond Morris
TheBat!3.99.8 Voyager
AntiSpam= AGAVA AntispamServant
mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Maxim,
On Thu, 31 May 2007 21:18:52 +0300 GMT (01/06/2007, 01:18 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe
MM What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4?
Does it still leave entries
Hello Maxim,
On Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 7:18:52 PM, you wrote the following on the
subject of Voyager 3.99.8 and sent it to tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe
What's new in The Bat! Voyager
Reply to message sent 05/31/2007, @ 21:18:52 (1:18 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Maxim,
What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager
3.99.4?
I've not given it a super close inspection but been running it for 24
hours
Hi Thomas,
on Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:14:13 +0700GMT (01.06.2007, 15:14 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MM What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4?
TF Does it still leave entries in the host computer's registry?
Yes, it does. :-(
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! Voyager
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-99-08.exe
What's new in The Bat! Voyager 3.99.8 comparing to The Bat! Voyager 3.99.4?
[-] Voyager didn't support relative paths of protocol logging.
[-] List of files in the pop-up menu in the attachment panel was improperly
Vitalie,
Monday, May 21, 2007, 10:28:42 PM, you wrote:
Vili wrote:
A second factor that really improved my speed was defragmenting my
Voyager drive. I never thought to do this and **wow** was it
fragmented!
and? so what? was the drive formatted with NTFS or FAT? unlike FAT
The one major complaint I've had with using Voyager was that it took
around 15 minutes for it to clear itself from Window's processes after
shutting it down. If I shut it down and suddenly remembered something
I needed it for I had to go in and manually stop it before I could
restart Voyager
The one major complaint I've had with using Voyager was that it took
around 15 minutes for it to clear itself from Window's processes after
shutting it down. If I shut it down and suddenly remembered something
I needed it for I had to go in and manually stop it before I could
restart Voyager
to say I didn't think so as I had defragged the
drive before hoping that would help but it didn't. But before sending
off that post I figured I'd try some actual testing and reformatted
back to FAT to see what would happened. Fired up Voyager, and quit -
and sure enough it just sat there hanging around
I'd try some actual testing and reformatted
back to FAT to see what would happened. Fired up Voyager, and quit -
and sure enough it just sat there hanging around in memory until I
went in and killed it myself.
So I can confidently say that at least in my case the change to NTFS
solved
Vili wrote:
I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when you
reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
obviously, you're too busy enjoying conventional hard drives in an usb
enclosure, so, at the moment, you simply can't figure out that not all
usb
Hello Nick,
Monday, May 21, 2007, 2:25:51 PM, you wrote:
I reformatted my USB drive to NTFS. I'm guessing it came formatted
as FAT as I never bothered to reformat it upon buying it. Running it
as NTFS, I can close Voyager down and it closes and clears memory
faster almost instantaneously
Reply to message sent 05/21/2007, @ 16:27:20 (11:27 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Doug,
How many Voyager lives did you use up in this test? It seems that
every time I reformat my drive, I have to reactivate the key. I
think I am down to one
, but
it is on my office computer and I forget what it is called.
A second factor that really improved my speed was defragmenting my
Voyager drive. I never thought to do this and **wow** was it
fragmented!
Also readthis:
http
Hello Nick,
Monday, May 21, 2007, 4:25:51 PM, you wrote:
ND So if anyone else has had this problem of voyager.exe hanging around
ND in memory for far too long, check to see how your USB drive is
ND formatted - it may make a difference.
Are you talking about a USB HD or a USB memory stick?
--
the hard drive to remove all the
preinstalled stuff I didn't want and then changed the volume ID. When
Voyager needed to be reactivated, that's what caused me to realize I
never formatted my USB stick and it was FAT. So to make it easy to
swap Voyager back and forth I formatted my stick to NTFS
I just had a user who experienced problems with the activation of
Voyager. He did everything okay, but he still got the following error
message in Internet Explorer when he pressed the Fetch key button:
ERROR Text string is too long (should not exceed 250 characters)
I tried with his reg
As we finally figured out, the problem was that he used Internet
Explorer v7, I used IE6. IE7 replaces the final = (equation) character
in the link that points to the secure Ritlabs site when you press the
Fetch key with %3D, the ascii code of the character =.
As it should. Character =
Vili wrote:
A second factor that really improved my speed was defragmenting my
Voyager drive. I never thought to do this and **wow** was it
fragmented!
and? so what? was the drive formatted with NTFS or FAT? unlike FAT,
fragmented NTFS files do take extra structures to be read
Hello Vilius,
As we finally figured out, the problem was that he used Internet
Explorer v7, I used IE6. IE7 replaces the final = (equation) character
in the link that points to the secure Ritlabs site when you press the
Fetch key with %3D, the ascii code of the character =.
As it
Vili wrote:
- if you are pissed off of me because I did not accept the invitation
to your professional network, I am sorry, I just dont have the time
for any extra online activity beside the 4 kids, my job and my
business.
waitaminute. you have 4 kids, and you dare calling *me*
Paul Van Noord wrote:
Also, using an external hard drive is 2-3 times safer regarding lost
data during a power failure simply because of performance.
and because of the filesystem too. still nobody mentioned that.
and because of the compressed attribute if on NTFS: it first writes
as-is,
401 - 500 of 1208 matches
Mail list logo
