Paul Van Noord wrote:
Also, using an external hard drive is 2-3 times safer regarding lost
data during a power failure simply because of performance.
and because of the filesystem too. still nobody mentioned that.
and because of the compressed attribute if on NTFS: it first writes
as-is,
Hello Vili,
Monday, May 14, 2007, 4:28:21 PM, you wrote:
utility to benchmark the hard drive vs the memory stick. I use it to
measure my memory stick's performance, which translates immediately
into increased performance in The Bat!
I dont understand, how _measuring_ translates
Doug Higby wrote:
Even though my lists settings say to receive a copy of my own
messages, they don't appear in the thread.
same for me, by the way.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Current beta is 3.99.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hi Vitalie and fellow beta testers,
Tuesday, May 15, 2007, 7:39:28 AM, you wrote:
Even though my lists settings say to receive a copy of my own
messages, they don't appear in the thread.
vv same for me, by the way.
Both you and Doug are using a Gmail account for your subscription to the
list,
Perry Nelson wrote:
vv same for me, by the way.
Both you and Doug are using a Gmail account for your subscription to the
list, and that explains the dilemma. That's why I use my Comcast account
for this list rather than my customary Gmail account.
argh. it's that dupekilling feature of
Both you and Doug are using a Gmail account for your subscription to the
list, and that explains the dilemma. That's why I use my Comcast account
for this list rather than my customary Gmail account.
argh. it's that dupekilling feature of gmail. thanks for pointing out.
it was there some time
In my experience, every USB memory stick is different. The one I am
using now reads and writes at 16MBits per second, and my previous one was
only 8. There is a free utility on the web to test your speed, but
it is on my office computer and I forget what it is called.
What is the name of
Hallo vitalie,
On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:39:28 +0300GMT (15-5-2007, 13:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Even though my lists settings say to receive a copy of my own
messages, they don't appear in the thread.
VV same for me, by the way.
That's gmail for you.
The reason you don't see them
Hello Vili
On Sunday, May 13, 2007 you wrote:
Hello Rick,
I tried a lot of things, the HDD just outperforms a stick, yet.
Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
all related stuff to earn
Rick Grunwald wrote:
You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
all related stuff to earn some cheap popularity Let me quote those
sentences you forgot to mention that I wrote in the same mail: I did
not want to trash USB sticks. They good for something. Also,
Hello Paul,
Saturday, May 12, 2007, 11:15:22 PM, you wrote:
I totally agree with you Vili. Also, flash drives perform much faster
on Win2K than XP. Often a factor of 2 or 3 to 1. The difference in
performance of USB hard drives is much closer between the 2 OSs and I
am sure it is related to
You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
all related stuff to earn some cheap popularity Let me quote those
sentences you forgot to mention that I wrote in the same mail: I did
not want to trash USB sticks. They good for something. Also, they are
more
I totally agree with you Vili. Also, flash drives perform much faster
on Win2K than XP. Often a factor of 2 or 3 to 1. The difference in
performance of USB hard drives is much closer between the 2 OSs and I
am sure it is related to the performance of the hard drive as opposed
to the
Hello Paul,
V No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
V great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
V USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
V what I tried to say. (Even if you optimize the stick to speed.)
Hello Vili
I tried a lot of things,
the HDD just outperforms a stick, yet.
Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
--
Rick
The Bat Version 3.99.6
Current beta is 3.99.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
sábado, 12 may 2007 at 18:25, it seems you wrote:
typically(!), ANY 'usb-enclosed' hdd outperforms ANY usb flash stick.
flash cards inserted in readers give a slightly different mileage, but
that's a separate story.
There are USB flash sticks with an excelent speed. And they
outperforms some
5/13/2007 7:29 PM
Hi Rick,
On 5/13/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
Mine fits there although heavier than I like. As Vili stated there is
value in flash drives. However, the discussion was on maintaining data
integrity which makes
Hello Rick,
I tried a lot of things, the HDD just outperforms a stick, yet.
Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
all related stuff to earn some cheap popularity ;) Let me quote those
sentences
I wrote a long answer. But I deleted it. Why? I dont want to argue.
I used stick with optimized for performance and use my HDD. Huge
difference. I DID try it. You didnt. End of story for me.
completely wrong. tried both and both work okay. of course, assuming
you don't expect the
Vili wrote:
I wrote a long answer. But I deleted it. Why? I dont want to argue. I
used stick with optimized for performance and use my HDD. Huge
difference. I DID try it. You didnt. End of story for me.
completely wrong. tried both and both work okay. of course, assuming you
don't
Vili wrote:
No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
what I tried to say. (Even if you optimize the stick to speed.)
Are
5/12/2007 7:10 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/12/2007 Vili wrote:
V No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
V great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
V USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
V what I tried to say.
Hello mfas,
Thursday, May 10, 2007, 2:53:03 PM, you wrote:
Hello tbbeta,
Have any of you tried running Voyager within a Private disk file
run from a USB drive.
http://www.dekart.com/products/encryption/private_disk_mf/
or
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/pd/
For me it has solved
Vili wrote:
you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
:)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick,
it takes
Hello tbbeta,
Have any of you tried running Voyager within a Private disk file
run from a USB drive.
http://www.dekart.com/products/encryption/private_disk_mf/
or
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/pd/
For me it has solved the speed and connect/dissconnect issues.
--
Best regards,
mfas
Vili wrote:
you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
:)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick,
it
Vili wrote:
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
let them manage delayed writing :))
you have the exact same
Vili wrote:
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
let them manage delayed writing :))
you have the exact same reasons
I've noticed an appreciable slow down when trying to print out an
email with this latest release. Time from invoking the print command
till the print window appears is 20-25 seconds whereas in previous
versions it was 5 or less.
Anyone else notice this phenomenon?
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB!
I've noticed an appreciable slow down when trying to print out an
email with this latest release. Time from invoking the print command
till the print window appears is 20-25 seconds whereas in previous
versions it was 5 or less. Anyone else notice this phenomenon?
I dont observe
5/7/2007 2:35 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/7/2007 Vili wrote:
V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
V the way to go...)
Unless you use Win2K. 8-]}
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
V the way to go...)
Unless you use Win2K. 8-]}
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power
32 matches
Mail list logo
