Re: NOD32

2002-10-07 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi William, On Tuesday, October 8, 2002 07:34 your local time, which was Monday, October 7, 2002 at 23:34 my local time, William Moore [WM] wrote; CW>> I can't seem to find anything in the manual about POP integration? WM> I've sent you the .pdf separately. Received. I'll take a look. I'm stil

Re[2]: Broken threads.

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Carren, On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at15:45:56[GMT +1300](which was 03:45 where I live) you wrote: CS> It's not just you! I have noticed the same thing, which is kind of CS> weird as I had assumed that most of us were using TB! I guess perhaps CS> some people are posting from work or other places a

Re[4]: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Michael, On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at03:20:06[GMT +0100](which was 03:20 where I live) you wrote: MT> Sometimes mailservers just get clogged, and have loads of work. Maybe MT> that email was stuck in aque, and the second one you sent was MT> re-routed thru other servers to miss the clog Some

Re[4]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at21:29:53[GMT -0500](which was 03:29 where I live) you wrote: RW>> Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me RW>> half way down page one! SM> What are you still having trouble with? I'm trying to figure out SM> regular expressio

Re[2]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at11:43:36[GMT +0700](which was 05:43 where I live) you wrote: TF> I filter mailing lists only at incoming time. Outgoing filters are TF> important for "normal" mail, where your sent message doesn't come back TF> to you. Oh, I thought *all* mail comes back to me

Re: NOD32

2002-10-07 Thread William Moore
Hello Chris Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 6:50:45 AM, in which you wrote: CW> I can't seem to find anything in the manual about POP integration? I've sent you the .pdf separately. CW> It looks a really complicated bit of software to me, so many things CW> running a

Re: what are bat*.tmp files?

2002-10-07 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, October 08, 2002, achdut wrote... > Hi, everyone. Can someone explain to me what the signficance, if > any, is of files that appear in the Local Settings\Temp subdirectory > that are named bat*.tmp, where the "*" represents any two- to >

what are bat*.tmp files?

2002-10-07 Thread achdut
Hi, everyone. Can someone explain to me what the signficance, if any, is of files that appear in the Local Settings\Temp subdirectory that are named bat*.tmp, where the "*" represents any two- to four-character alphanumeric combination? These files appear in the temp subdirectory only on occasion

Re: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, October 08, 2002, Sudip Pokhrel wrote... SM>> If you want to be sure that it got there, request a receipt. Some SM>> software and users don't send receipts, so even that is no SM>> guarantee. > Couple of months ago, I came across an arti

Re: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Scott, On Monday, October 7, 2002 19:58 your local time, (Tuesday, 06:43 my local time), you [SM] wrote: SM> If you want to be sure that it got there, request a receipt. Some SM> software and users don't send receipts, so even that is no SM> guarantee. Couple of months ago, I came across an

Re: NOD32

2002-10-07 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi William, On Tuesday, October 8, 2002 06:21 your local time, which was Monday, October 7, 2002 at 22:21 my local time, William Moore [WM] wrote; CW>> I've decided to give NOD32 a go on the 25 day trial. WM> You've made the right choice, IMHO. I've found nothing to touch it. You WM> can find th

Re: NOD32

2002-10-07 Thread William Moore
Hello Chris Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 5:26:53 AM, in which you wrote: CW> I've decided to give CW> NOD32 a go on the 25 day trial. You've made the right choice, IMHO. I've found nothing to touch it. You can find the manual for POP integration here http://www.nod

Re: Antivirus Programs.

2002-10-07 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Roelof, Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 12:46:01 AM, you wrote: > I'm using Grisoft's AVG, it has a nice plug-in for TB and also for my > mailserver, is easy to maintain over the LAN and till nbow caught > everything that was thrown at it. I use Pc-cillin, but am thinking of getting AVG as well f

Re: Broken threads.

2002-10-07 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Carren, Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 3:45:56 AM, you wrote: > It's not just you! I have noticed the same thing, which is kind of > weird as I had assumed that most of us were using TB! I guess perhaps > some people are posting from work or other places and are therefore > using other email clien

Re: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Richard, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (08/10/02, 04:25 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: TF>> Check whether this is always true. Is "sender" the group? I believe in TF>> this group, it isn't. RW> Now you've got me thinking. As my name is not in the group or the RW> address book

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:06:57 -0500 GMT (08/10/02, 06:06 +0700 GMT), Scott McNay wrote: SM> There *are* a small handful of viruses that simply spread, with SM> minimal other impact. Ironically, this handful isn't prolific, and SM> therefore not well-known. Worms. Yes, there are. I do

Re: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:40:01 -0500 GMT (08/10/02, 07:40 +0700 GMT), Scott McNay wrote: SM> See attached image. Pressing Shift-Ctrl-K makes no difference with SM> this email. It does with others. I moved the Message Source window SM> so that you could see what it shows. OK, this mess

Re: Sent

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:48:31 -0230 GMT (08/10/02, 03:18 +0700 GMT), Adam wrote: A> Just noticed something. Say if you are on a web page, and fill in a A> form, and it says that it is going to send it by email. Then I got a A> Bat dialogue asking to pick the account. And something was

NOD32

2002-10-07 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all, Further to the question about anti-virus programs, I've decided to give NOD32 a go on the 25 day trial. But, how do I configure it? I want to link it in with TB!. I've downloaded the nod32.bav and saved it in the The Bat! folder and added it in the options menu. I've added the 'Account

Re: Antivirus Programs.

2002-10-07 Thread James Senick
Hello Chris, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, at 15:19:58 [GMT -0700] (which was 6:19:58 PM in NY, USA) Chris Weaven wrote: > Hi all, > As the subject suggests, I'm trying to find out what the preferred > anti-virus program is out there. I use two -- Panda AntiVirus Platinum and AVG. I have used and trust

Re[2]: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Scott- I especially like the create date. Those electrons took over a century to get to you! Is it possible that your folder is corrupted? Try copying the message base file and looking at it with a hex editor. I'll bet you'll find some strange header in there. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.

Re: Broken threads.

2002-10-07 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, October 07, 2002, Carren Stuart wrote... > It's not just you! I have noticed the same thing, which is kind of > weird as I had assumed that most of us were using TB! I guess perhaps > some people are posting from work or other places and a

Re: Broken threads.

2002-10-07 Thread Carren Stuart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 8 October 2002 at 3:08 p.m. Chris wrote: CW> Is it me, or are there more and more broken threads appearing in CW> these mailing list? One of the features I really like about TB! is CW> the ability to view threads, but recently, there see

Re[3]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi, Richard! Monday, October 7, 2002, 9:14:28 PM, you wrote: LG>> Just wanted to check. Have you read: LG>> RW> Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me RW> half way down page one! What are you still having trouble

Re[3]: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Ladies and Gents, On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, at 02:04:09 [GMT +0100] (which was 02:04 in my TimeZone) you wrote: RW> OK, it's just that it's never happened before and, as I'm new to TB, I RW> was just wondering if I'd done something wrong but, as it's a one off, RW> it seems not. The Interent i

Re[2]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Leif, On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 at20:00:27[GMT -0600](which was 03:00 where I live) you wrote: LG> Just wanted to check. Have you read: LG> Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me half way down page one! -- Best rega

Broken threads.

2002-10-07 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all, Is it me, or are there more and more broken threads appearing in these mailing list? One of the features I really like about TB! is the ability to view threads, but recently, there seem to be a lot more broken threads. Kinda take away the fluency of threading. Sorry, could just be me an

Re: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Richard, On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 at 16:46:12 [GMT +0100], you wrote: RW> After reading all the FAQ and help files Just wanted to check. Have you read: Cheers, Leif Gregory -- List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user) PCWize Editor

Re: Antivirus Programs.

2002-10-07 Thread ~John & Marjorie~
I use Grisoft AVG. Easy to keep updated and It WORKS! FREE too! - - - Chris Weaven wrote on Monday, October 7, 2002 - - - > Hi all, > As the subject suggests, I'm trying to find out what the preferred > anti-virus program is out there. > I'm currently using Norton, but this wasn't out of choi

Re: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Richard! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:04:09 PM, you wrote: RW> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live) RW> you wrote: RW> OK, it's just that it's never happened before and, as I'm new to TB, I RW> was just

Re[2]: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live) you wrote: SM> Email is not guaranteed to get there. If you want to be sure that it SM> got there, request a receipt. Some software and users don't send SM> receipts, so even that is no guarantee. OK, i

Re: Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Richard! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:52:11 PM, you wrote: RW> I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign RW> of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it RW> with another programme ((Ame

Lost message

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Never had this before. I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it with another programme ((Ameol) and it went instantly and has now also just arrived here too as I'm typing this! Strange. -- Best re

Re: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Thomas! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:51:08 AM, you wrote: TF> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:19:57 -0500 GMT (07/10/02, 19:19 +0700 GMT), TF> Scott McNay wrote: SM>> On this subject, I've seen an occasional corrupted email that SM>> shows Created

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Lars, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62/Beta5) Personal' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002 at 4:19:05 AM. LG> Try MWsnap, a free screen shot utility for Windows: LG> http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html Thanks for this tool! I used

Re: Marking a thread as read

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Peter! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 9:23:14 AM, you wrote: PP> Now tell me the difficulties when having in mind there are four PP> possibilities to visualize threads in TB! with 'select thread' ... And PP> see why it's safer the option ain'

Re: Antivirus Programs.

2002-10-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chris, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:19:58 -0700GMT (8-10-02, 0:19 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: CW> As the subject suggests, I'm trying to find out what the preferred CW> anti-virus program is out there. That's a matter of personal taste. I'm using Grisoft's AVG, it has a nice plug-in for

Re: glyphs

2002-10-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Ron, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:20:35 -0400GMT (8-10-02, 1:20 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: RS> Bear in mind that the site is, I believe, Dutch Make that German. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Marcus, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002 at 10:27:23 AM. MO> But that doesn't solve the problem of pasting images that resides MO> in the clipboard and not as files or other "touchable" objects.

Re: help with first filter please! :)

2002-10-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo alists, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:32:50 -0700GMT (7-10-02, 20:32 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: aw> Catalog request from Valeria Curlee, information entered on 10/6/02 10:53:40 AM Filter on 'Catalog request from' present in text. aw> Name: My Name aw> Company Name: N/A aw> I need to lo

Re[2]: Yet Another Stupid Envelope Question

2002-10-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Lars- Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:25:41 PM, you wrote: LG> These are S/MIME signed messages. You are using a version which had LG> problems with these very messages. You should upgrade to 1.61 to get LG> these messages displayed correctly. (slaps self in head)...thanks...I guess it's time to ba

Re: glyphs

2002-10-07 Thread Ron Secord
Hi Chris, @Saturday, October 05, 2002, 11:33 -0700 (2:33 PM here) Chris Weaven [CW] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Pete Milne: PM>> How about a list of all the possible glyphs that are available PM>> for TB!? CW> I agree! I did a search w/ Google and came up with this link

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Thomas! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:07:51 AM, you wrote: TF> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:37:30 -0500 GMT (07/10/02, 19:37 +0700 GMT), TF> Scott McNay wrote: TF>>> If that were all they do, I'd uninstall my anti-virus programm TF>>> right away

Antivirus Programs.

2002-10-07 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all, As the subject suggests, I'm trying to find out what the preferred anti-virus program is out there. I'm currently using Norton, but this wasn't out of choice, it came free with my PC. But, the subscription expires soon, so I'm looking at what to replace it with, or even if I should repla

Re: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tor, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:18:52 +0200GMT (7-10-02, 14:18 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: TAHK>>> And, is there ANY way to filter mail that does NOT have the same TAHK>>> email-address in "From:" and in "Return-Path:"? Getting to sort out >> I don't think that can be done. Such a filt

Re[2]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at01:35:27[GMT +0700](which was 19:35 where I live) you wrote: TF> Check whether this is always true. Is "sender" the group? I believe in TF> this group, it isn't. Now you've got me thinking. As my name is not in the group or the address book I assumed "sender

Re[2]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:14:54[GMT +0200](which was 18:14 where I live) you wrote: G> - You need to determine a UNIQUE filtering characteristic that does not G> change over time. G> The simplest being the email address a person. I thought I had but I've been told one answer, the fi

Re[2]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mark, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at12:12:36[GMT -0700](which was 20:12 where I live) you wrote: MW> I think one of the main things that people trip over is that the MW> strings in the "Filtering strings" box are treated as AND clauses MW> rather than OR clauses. In other words, if you have more th

Sent

2002-10-07 Thread Adam
Just noticed something. Say if you are on a web page, and fill in a form, and it says that it is going to send it by email. Then I got a Bat dialogue asking to pick the account. And something was sent that way. But, I noticed that all unparked mails in the Out box were sent as well. Only after a

Re: Yet Another Stupid Envelope Question

2002-10-07 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Mark, On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 12:17:03 [GMT -0700], you wrote: MW> once in a while I see a message with an icon of an envelope with a MW> little check mark in the upper right-hand corner. I can't view them MW> so I just end up deleting them. These are S/MIME signed messages. You are usi

Yet Another Stupid Envelope Question

2002-10-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Bats- I'm sure I used to know this one, but those neurons are malfunctioning today...once in a while I see a message with an icon of an envelope with a little check mark in the upper right-hand corner. I can't view them so I just end up deleting them. I can't find a reference to that icon anywher

Re: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- I think one of the main things that people trip over is that the strings in the "Filtering strings" box are treated as AND clauses rather than OR clauses. In other words, if you have more than one line in the Filtering strings box, then *both* of those cases have to be true in order for

Re: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Richard, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:46:12 +0100 GMT (07/10/02, 22:46 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: RW> I set up a filter for a mail group as described earlier and only half RW> the group messages make it to the relevant folder, the rest stay RW> obstinately in the inbox :-( RW> I have the

help with first filter please! :)

2002-10-07 Thread alists - wildpetals
Hello buds! Today I have encountered a reason to do a more complicated filter in TB.. I am receiving emails that look like this.. Catalog request from Valeria Curlee, information entered on 10/6/02 10:53:40 AM Name: My Name Company Name: N/A Address: PO BOX218 City: Georgetown State: GA. Zip

Re: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Peter, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:13:46 +0200 GMT (07/10/02, 21:13 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP> OK ... I think you're going to explain to me were the 'IF' syntax PP> is inserted into TB! _filter_ section?!?!? Let me see... well... OK. Point taken. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderat

Re: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Gerard
ON Monday, October 7, 2002, 5:46:12 PM, you wrote: RW> Well, RW> I set up a filter for a mail group as described earlier and only half RW> the group messages make it to the relevant folder, the rest stay RW> obstinately in the inbox :-( RW> I have the rule adressees are sender to group .

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Dierk, on Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:50:35 +0200GMT (same here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : DH> *BTW, there is a BIG difference between a Trojan and a Trojan Horse. Indeed there is! US Americans will know best... ;-) *SCNR* -- Cheers Peter Common sense is the collecti

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas! On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 3:07:51 PM you wrote: > Viruses *delete and alter files*. That is their main threat. Didn't > you know that? Perhaps he just doesn't know of the various types of malware (i.e. viruses, Trojan Horses*, worms etc.)? *BTW, there is a BIG difference bet

Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Well, I set up a filter for a mail group as described earlier and only half the group messages make it to the relevant folder, the rest stay obstinately in the inbox :-( I have the rule adressees are sender to group . Also how do I get my replies to messages from that group to go into the sa

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Monday, October 7, 2002, 16:07, Tim Musson wrote: > I used to open a new message and drag the pic from the web page (which > works from IE at least), but have found that I can just drag it from > the web page to the main window of TB (doesn't matter where) and it > just pops a new message! B

Re: Marking a thread as read

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:10:48 -0500 Scott McNay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Option only seems to be there if you have messages sorted by >>> thread. >> Which shouldn't matter, as the OP asks: " ... mark an individual >> thread as read?" which implies a threaded (by references, subject, >> wha

Re: Re[2]: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:18:52 +0200 "Tor Atle H.Kleven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> And, is there ANY way to filter mail that does NOT have the same >>> email-address in "From:" and in "Return-Path:"? Getting to sort out >>> these mails would help A LOT in filtering spam and virus. >> I don't t

Re: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:24:01 +0700 "Thomas F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> And, is there ANY way to filter mail that does NOT have the >>> same email-address in "From:" and in "Return-Path:"? Getting to >>> sort out these mails would help A LOT in filtering spam and >>> virus. >> I don't think

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:07:51 +0700 "Thomas F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Viruses *delete and alter files*. That is their main threat. Didn't > you know that? No he didn't. He had set up a filter that refused mail from AV-Vendors containing information about viruses :-) *SCNR* :-))) -- Pit

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Graham, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61)' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002 at 5:52:58 AM. M>>> It would indeed be a nice feature if TB! could accept pasted M>>> images and insert them as attachment 8< snip GC> I agre

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:37:30 -0500 GMT (07/10/02, 19:37 +0700 GMT), Scott McNay wrote: TF>> If that were all they do, I'd uninstall my anti-virus programm TF>> right away. SM> If that were "all" it did, I still would not want to be SM> responsible for someone else's machine getting

Grrrr, $%^$^& filter refuses to work...

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi, all! I'm trying to get a filter to work, and it doesn't seem to want to, no matter what I try. Probably something really stupid. I'm trying to set up a mailing list using Leif Gregory's sample, and I can't get the "Move moderated messages" filter to work, which means that the mess

Re: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:19:57 -0500 GMT (07/10/02, 19:19 +0700 GMT), Scott McNay wrote: SM> On this subject, I've sene an occasional corrupted email that SM> shows Created and Received dates, but the Source screen is SM> completely empty. Obviously, the Created date can't be known if

Re: How do I filter for this?

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Doug, On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:02:30 +0100 GMT (06/10/02, 16:02 +0700 GMT), Doug Weller wrote: DW> Subject: =?Big5?B?qEOt06TruGCs2TMwJS4uuXG2Tw==?= DW> Which I normally see as ³C­õ¤Ì£`¬ý30%..¹q¶O ;-) I probably see that differently, namely as chinese characters (I run a native Big5-Windows

Re: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Benjamin, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:37:36 +0200 GMT (07/10/02, 18:37 +0700 GMT), Benjamin Schulz wrote: BS> but that would only work if i could create a filter which runs the BS> programm and does not send the mail - but i found no option for that BS> :( Create a manual filter to which you as

Re[2]: Stupid Envelope Question.

2002-10-07 Thread myob
Hello Thomas, Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:57:36 PM, you wrote: TF> BTW am I the only one to always ignore the priority settings? No. I do so too. Anyway, most of the bright red messages I get seem to be spam :-( Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Best

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Thomas! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:06:19 AM, you wrote: T>> They use bandwidth in emailing themselves, TF> If that were all they do, I'd uninstall my anti-virus programm right TF> away. I guess the (at least) weekly updates cost me mor

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Tim, On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:13:19 +1000 GMT (06/10/02, 18:13 +0700 GMT), Tim wrote: T> As far as I know the most infectious current viruses do little T> direct damage to a user's system. Except deleting files that the user needs to run the system. Deleting .exe or .dll files is a popular s

Re: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Roelof, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:08:54 +0200 GMT (07/10/02, 16:08 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: TAHK>> And, is there ANY way to filter mail that does NOT have the same TAHK>> email-address in "From:" and in "Return-Path:"? Getting to sort out TAHK>> these mails would help A LOT in filtering

Re: Filter that strikes out messages that have been replied to

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Marck, On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:45:57 +0100 GMT (06/10/02, 17:45 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: T>> Please advise how you can change the font of a message in the T>> message list by filter. MDP> By using the filter to assign a colour group. Colour groups MDP> include font attributes.

Re: TB! for my Mum - several questions

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Tim, On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 08:51:11 +1000 GMT (06/10/02, 05:51 +0700 GMT), Tim wrote: T>Unless someone can tell me how to make these emails display T>correctly in TB! (no complicated workarounds), There is a little tab at the bottom. It says message.htm. Click on it. This shows HTML

Re: Stupid Envelope Question.

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Julian, On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:18:03 +0100 GMT (06/10/02, 18:18 +0700 GMT), Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: JBL> The colour of incoming, unread messages, is very noticeable JBL> (bright red, yellow or blue envelopes). It is only when the JBL> messages have been read that the colours go pale and

Re: Filter that strikes out messages that have been replied to

2002-10-07 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Leif, On Sat, 05 Oct 2002 22:19:49 -0600 GMT (06/10/02, 11:19 +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: TF>> Please advise how you can change the font of a message in the TF>> message list by filter. LG> First create a Color Group by clicking Options -> Message List and LG> Color Groups. Make sure

Re: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Peter! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 4:28:20 AM, you wrote: PP> Have a look at the source () next time. I guess you'll see the PP> correct message text, albeit there might be some very strange characters PP> around. On this subject, I've

Re[3]: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Benjamin Schulz
ok, nevermind - # Outgoing mail - These filters are invoked after messages have been sent to the SMTP server. :( Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Tor Atle H.Kleven
TAHK>> I just subscribed to this mailinglist, > Welcome. Thank you. :-) TAHK>> I've set up a bunch of filters, TRYING to sort out what is really for TAHK>> me, and what's not. One of them deals with viruses. TAHK>> It's set up like this: > Well, it seems to be ok. Yeah. I thought so too. And to

Re: Marking a thread as read

2002-10-07 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Peter! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, October 7, 2002, 1:47:48 AM, you wrote: SM>> Option only seems to be there if you have messages sorted by thread. PP> Which shouldn't matter, as the OP asks: " ... mark an individual thread PP> as read?" which implies

Re[2]: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Benjamin Schulz
Hi Brano, Monday, October 7, 2002, 1:42:22 PM, you wrote: > Benjamin Schulz [BS], on Monday, October 7, 2002 at 13:37 (+0200) > wrote these comments in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : BS>> but that would only work if i could create a filter which runs the BS>> programm and does not s

Re: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Brano
Benjamin Schulz [BS], on Monday, October 7, 2002 at 13:37 (+0200) wrote these comments in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : BS> but that would only work if i could create a filter which runs the BS> programm and does not send the mail - but i found no option for that filter settings - a

Re: Marking a thread as read

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Peter, on Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:47:48 +0200GMT (07.10.02, 08:47 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : SM>> Option only seems to be there if you have messages sorted by thread. PP> Which shouldn't matter, as the OP asks: " ... mark an individual thread PP> as

Re[2]: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Benjamin Schulz
Hi Brano, Monday, October 7, 2002, 1:25:59 PM, you wrote: BS>> at the one hand i want to change some header, right, therefore xray BS>> would be a good solution, but i want to do some textchanges, too - where BS>> thebat's regexp and template features doesn't suffice :/ > you can use every text

Re: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Art Moore
"On Monday, October 7, 2002, 4:28:20 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP> Have a look at the source () next time. I guess you'll see the PP> correct message text, albeit there might be some very strange characters PP> around. PP> Now search for 'Content-Type:' header ... I guess (and bet my ... my .

Re: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Brano
Benjamin Schulz [BS], on Monday, October 7, 2002 at 13:09 (+0200) contributed this to our collective wisdom in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : BS> at the one hand i want to change some header, right, therefore xray BS> would be a good solution, but i want to do some textchanges, too -

Re[2]: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Benjamin Schulz
Hi Peter, > On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:27:29 +0200 > Benjamin Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i need a solution for changing mails before sending using an external >> script, > What part of e-mail you want to 'change'??? at the one hand i want to change some header, right, therefore xray woul

Re: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:27:29 +0200 Benjamin Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i need a solution for changing mails before sending using an external > script, What part of e-mail you want to 'change'??? > because i think theres no better solution (outgoing filter > just copies the mail, instea

Re: external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benjamin, @7-Oct-2002, 12:27 +0200 (11:27 UK time) Benjamin Schulz [BS] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: BS> i need a daemon for windows which just gets the mail from the BS> bat runs the program and sends the changed mail X-Ray

external script/program

2002-10-07 Thread Benjamin Schulz
hi all, i need a solution for changing mails before sending using an external script, because i think theres no better solution (outgoing filter just copies the mail, instead re-getting after running the programm) i need a daemon for windows which just gets the mail from the bat runs the program

Re[2]: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Graham Connolly
M>> It would indeed be a nice feature if TB! could accept pasted M>> images and insert them as attachment, but this is not possible M>> now. Maybe a good idea for v2.0, what do you people out there M>> think about this? I don't need TB! to be able to compose HTML or M>> RTF mails, but such handlin

Re: OT: Strange emails

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:32:37 -0500 Art Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but why would the CONTENTS of the message keep changing when you > review it in the TB! Preview pane? Have a look at the source () next time. I guess you'll see the correct message text, albeit there might be some very stra

Re: Need some help

2002-10-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tor, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 01:41:40 +0200GMT (7-10-02, 1:41 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: TAHK> I just subscribed to this mailinglist, Welcome. TAHK> I've set up a bunch of filters, TRYING to sort out what is really for TAHK> me, and what's not. One of them deals with viruses. TAHK> I

Re: Inbox: The Bat! won't read messages.tbb

2002-10-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Alexander, On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:41:39 +0600GMT (5-10-02, 11:41 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: AAG> Something bad happned, so that The Bat dont' want to show AAG> messages (except parked) in Inbox folder Might be because you ran a filter that deleted all messages in the inbox or

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi achdut, On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 02:12:22 [GMT -0500], you wrote: a> Is it not possible to send captured screenshots using The Bat? Of course it is. a> I tried doing so, but once I captured the screen (actually, it was a> the top open window of the screen) and tried to paste it into the

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Britt Malka
Dear achdut, Monday, October 7, 2002 at 9:12:22 AM you wrote: a> Is it not possible to send captured screenshots using The Bat? Yes, but you cannot paste it into the message. You have to use either a program (not Print Screen) that takes a "photo" of the screen, or to paste it into WordPad o

Re: sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Monday, October 7, 2002, 09:12, achdut wrote: > Is it not possible to send captured screenshots using The Bat? I tried > doing so, but once I captured the screen (actually, it was the top > open window of the screen) and tried to paste it into the message, > nothing would paste into the messa

sending captured screenshots using The Bat

2002-10-07 Thread achdut
Hi, all. Is it not possible to send captured screenshots using The Bat? I tried doing so, but once I captured the screen (actually, it was the top open window of the screen) and tried to paste it into the message, nothing would paste into the message, although it would paste into Word. For exampl

  1   2   >