On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 at 09:48:17 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> ^CC
>> Presence: No
>> Location: Kludges
> I was thinking about that. But, if the address is in the TO field, my
> filter will be triggerd. If it is not in the TO field (i.e. only in
> the CC field), my filter will not recognise the
Simon-
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 6:53:24 PM, you wrote:
S> There's no need to be so sarcastic :-/ If you have an opinion about it,
S> fine, but I didn't design Mailwasher, I use it, and as far as I know no one
Ah, but you did tout the "feature" and recommend its incorporation
into TB, whi
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 7:55:00 AM, you wrote:
> Great.
> So I, as postmaster, would be receiving bounce messages from users who
> have been spoofing my return address and routing? That'll get them
> kicked off the system as fast as I can dig up my logs.
With the number of bounced message
Hello Melissa,
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 1:38:53 AM, you wrote:
MR> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR> Hash: SHA1
MR> On Tuesday, December 03, 2002, at 5:21:44 PM PST, Jim Lanyon wrote:
>> Any easy way to back up the address book without exporting to a
>> file?
MR> - From the "Tools" me
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 3:27:39 AM, you wrote:
> And a bounce is also good for having spambots validate e-mail addresses
> depending on the routing path of the bounce. If The_Bat! was the
> bouncer it shows the mail bounced from The_Bat!'s receiver address,
> back through your ISP's SMTP se
> Try starting The Bat! with an appropriate command line parameter to
> change the folder at startup.
Thank you. I will use that method next time.
Regards, Peter Evans
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.co
Hello Richard,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 22:31:46 + GMT (04/12/02, 05:31 +0700 GMT),
Richard Evans wrote:
MG>> I think the problem might be just the extension. If they are named
MG>> .eml they might be openable. Yet, I don't know how to convince the Bat
MG>> to name the forwarded files .eml, sorry.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Mark,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:25:00 -0800 your time, you said:
MW> Obviously you looked up "feature" in a different dictionary from the one
MW> I use.
There's no need to be so sarcastic :-/ If you have an opinion about it,
fine, but I didn't
Hello Ming-Li,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 06:37:46 +0800 GMT (04/12/02, 05:37 +0700 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
>> ^TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Presence: Yes
>> Location: Kludges
> I'm not sure this does what Joseph wants (if I understand him correctly). It
> tests the presence of the a certain address appearing
Simon-
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 2:35:17 PM, you wrote:
>> How does MailWasher bounce messages? A. MailWasher uses an algorithm to
>> determine the best route to send the bounced message back (from, reply to,
>> return path) and actually sends the bounce back via your ISP's postmaster,
>> so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jos,
@4-Dec-2002, 08:26 +0700 (01:26 UK time) Jos Flachs [JF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TM>> Depends on what it is you want to set up. If just eMail, check
TM>> out the FAQ (http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/howdoi.html).
Hello Tim,
Monday, December 2, 2002, 9:19:38 PM, you wrote:
JF>> How can I set up a Palm connection with TB! ?
TM> Depends on what it is you want to set up. If just eMail, check out the
TM> FAQ (http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/howdoi.html). If you want the
TM> Address Book, well, you will hav
Hello Batters,
Any easy way to back up the address book without exporting to a file?
--
Best regards,
Jim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/the
Hallo Peter,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 00:47:54 +0100GMT (4-12-02, 0:47 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
PF> My point is that even if I change _before_ I start typing the
PF> signature does not always change!
That might have something to do with active AB templates.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Hallo Peter,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 00:47:54 +0100GMT (4-12-02, 0:47 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
PF> Thanks. This will work. Of course this will not send a message to
PF> both the list and the author in one go, but it's a way around the
PF> problem.
Oh yes it will. But only if you define an
Roelof,
On 04-12-2002 00:40, you [R] wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
R> I suppose that while reading your messages, you're having the headers
R> of the message shown too. As the general list setup is such that the
R> messages have the list address as To: address, you can right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, Johannes Posel wrote...
> Dear Dierk,
> On 19:43 24.11.2002, you [Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
>> ... or do I have a server problem?
> It should run smoothely...
I only just realised this... but unless
Hallo Peter,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 23:54:00 +0100GMT (3-12-02, 23:54 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
PF> One aspect of TB is starting to annoy me. On some mailing lists the
PF> sender of the original mail is in the From field. Sometimes I have
PF> this original sender in an address book gr
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 23:30:18 +0100
Peter Palmreuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> On Tuesday, December 3, 2002 at 11:15:59 PM you [JC] wrote (at least
> in part):
>
> >>> I have noticed that messages "cryptographically signed" in MIME
> >>> format show up in TB! with a dinky
Hallo Maurice,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:15:11 +0100GMT (3-12-02, 14:15 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MM> I stopped using Compuserve as an email client about 7 years
MM> ago, but I still have a lot of email on my hard disk. I can
MM> read it with "Quick View Plus" but not with "Mailbag
MM> Assi
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 at 17:06:53 + (GMT) Richard Evans wrote:
> Is it possible to use the Alternative Forward method
> only for selected contacts in my address book ?
By "alternative forward" I guess you mean not to "use MIME standard for
forwarding," right? (From your description, you use MIME
TheBat-users,
One aspect of TB is starting to annoy me. On some mailing lists the
sender of the original mail is in the From field. Sometimes I have
this original sender in an address book group (with an attached AB
template) so on replying I get the AB template of the _sender_ and not
o
Tuesday, 12/3/2002, 2:44 PM
Hi Simon,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 13:59:47 [GMT +] (which was 5:59 AM where I live)
you wrote about: 'HTML mail'
S> Although I have absolutely no wish to use an HTML feature should it be
S> introduced, the addition of such a feature as an option would probabl
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 at 22:06:29 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> Is it correct that there is no way to filter on the cc: field? (For
>> example, to archive mail in which 'A' is in the TO: field and there are
>> no CC: recipients, but not to archive mail in which 'A' is in the CC:
>> field or there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo DG,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:57:39 -0500 your time, you said:
DRS> And a bounce is also good for having spambots validate e-mail addresses
DRS> depending on the routing path of the bounce. This is how you
DRS> plan to stop spam in your inbox? N
Hi TBUDL,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 18:34:50 [GMT +0100] you wrote:
MG> I think the problem might be just the extension. If they are named
MG> .eml they might be openable. Yet, I don't know how to convince the Bat
MG> to name the forwarded files .eml, sorry.
I thought .msg was an internet standard ?
Hello Jonathan,
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002 at 11:15:59 PM you [JC] wrote (at least
in part):
>>> I have noticed that messages "cryptographically signed" in MIME
>>> format show up in TB! with a dinky little Bat inside a circle on
>>> the message glyph when read and unread. Would there be
On Tuesday, December 03, 2002 Kevin stated:
K> I'd like to know what other mailer those who say they would dump TB!
K> if it became capable of creating HTML mail would go to since many
K> other mailers already have this function.
Easy .. keep the last non-html creating version of TB! -- never
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:45:07 +0100
Peter Meyns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> S> I have noticed that messages "cryptographically signed" in MIME
> S> format show up in TB! with a dinky little Bat inside a circle on
> S> the message glyph when read and unread. Would there be any
> S> way to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
4:51:44 PM
RE: "Bounce Mail"
Greetings Mean,
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 1:42:26 PM, you wrote:
MD> Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 11:41:28 PM, you wrote:
>> * Mean Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> One feature I woul
Thomas,
Many thanks. I'll give it a try.
--
JN
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Spike,
On Tuesday, 3. December 2002 at 14:11:00 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
MD>> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do
MD>> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background
MD>> images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-)
> NO! Thank
Hello Mean Drake,
On or about Monday, December 02, 2002 at 02:46:32GMT +0530 (which
was 4:16 PM in the tropics where I live) Mean Drake scribbled;
MD> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do
MD> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background
MD> images...back
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 11:41:28 PM, you wrote:
> * Mean Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> One feature I would like is to have TB bounce my mail.
> Why?
It sometimes helps to have your email removed from spam lists. I agree
a lot of addresses from where spam originates are fake but from
* Mean Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One feature I would like is to have TB bounce my mail.
Why?
--
Best regards, Carsten
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Simon,
on Tue, 3 Dec 2002 17:30:07 +GMT (03.12.02, 18:30 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
gpg: Signature made 12/03/02 18:30:07 (MEZ) Mitteleuropäische Zeit using DSA key ID
5C7E8966
gpg: Good signature
Hi,
Richard Evans wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> My Mother [...] has a friend whom I believe is using Outlook on XP
> who insists she cannot open .msg files.
I think the problem might be just the extension. If they are named
.eml they might be openable. Yet, I don't know how to convince th
Hello Jonathan!
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002 at 10:35:02 AM you wrote:
>>- is my current AV strong enough to handle newer kind of malisious
>> code such as the 'eicar'?
> Ok, I have to laugh about this one line. :-)
To add something.
F-Secure is one of the strongest - if not *the* str
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Chiropter Operators,
I have noticed that messages "cryptographically signed" in MIME format show
up in TB! with a dinky little Bat inside a circle on the message glyph when
read and unread. Would there be any way to do this with PGP encry
One feature I would like is to have TB bounce my mail. Mailwasher does
it effortlessly...generates a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
mails it back to the recipient...TB should be able to handle it
without losing sleep about it.
Anyway to do it using Macros or scripts?
--
Best regards,
Mean
Is it possible to use the Alternative Forward method
only for selected contacts in my address book ?
I ask because my Mother (you may remember her, she
exchanges lots of funnies with her friends HTML
animated Gifs etc. She switched to the Bat and is very
happy but has problems when she forwards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Marck,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:49:07 + your time, you said:
MDP> Yes, and isn't this a matter for TBBETA?
Yes, and no.
The fact that the referenced subject of unscanned fragmented messages drew
71 replies in TBDUL suggested to me that a
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 2:55:07 PM, you wrote:
> I am very glad you didn't write this one here:
> http://ccug.apcug.org/newsApr02.htm ;-)
:-) ... yeah... Imagine the flames it would set up here...rushing for
fireproof clothing.
> Please continue to ask. I encourage you to write one on The B
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Simon wrote:
> TB!b17> [-] Messages restored from parts were not checked for viruses
>
> Does this mean that the problem discussed in thread "antivirus plugin with
> fragmented email" beginning with [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> has now been addressed?
it is v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Simon,
@3-Dec-2002, 16:32 Simon said:
> - From the latest TB! beta text:
TB!b17>> [-] Messages restored from parts were not checked for
TB!b17>> viruses
> Does this mean that the problem discussed in thread "antivirus
> plugin with fragmented
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Chiropter Operators,
- From the latest TB! beta text:
TB!b17> [-] Messages restored from parts were not checked for viruses
Does this mean that the problem discussed in thread "antivirus plugin with
fragmented email" beginning with [EMAIL PRO
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 1:59:47 PM, you wrote:
S> it would be completely foolish IMO to even begin to consider
S> dumping TB! simply because of the inclusion of an option that you
S> don't wish to make use of yourself.
I'd like to know what other mailer those who say they would d
Hello Joseph,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:56:09 -0600 GMT (03/12/02, 21:56 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
> Is it correct that there is no way to filter on the cc: field? (For
> example, to archive mail in which 'A' is in the TO: field and there
> are no CC: recipients, but not to archive mail in which '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Don,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:27:42 -0500 your time, you said:
DZ> The only time I find html mail useful is on certain newsletters I
DZ> receive.
I can't even abide html newsletters Don! Sign up for a text based email, and
recieve an html on
Is it correct that there is no way to filter on the cc: field? (For
example, to archive mail in which 'A' is in the TO: field and there
are no CC: recipients, but not to archive mail in which 'A' is in the
CC: field or there are other CC: recipients.)
--
JN
_
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 08:59 am, Simon wrote:
> Although I have absolutely no wish to use an HTML feature should
> it be introduced, the addition of such a feature as an option would
> probably bring more potential users haring towards TB! for a trial.
> That can only be a good thing,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Marck,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 00:06:27 + your time, you said:
MDP> ... This version of TB is text-centric and many of us appreciate it
MDP> that way.
Indeed, and I personally have no wish to send or receive LookOut style
messages via
Dear Batters,
I stopped using Compuserve as an email client about 7 years
ago, but I still have a lot of email on my hard disk. I can
read it with "Quick View Plus" but not with "Mailbag
Assistant". I have tried importing it into The Bat, but so
far unsuccessfully.
Any ideas anyone?
TIA
Maurice
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:18:11 +0100
Eddie Castelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- is my current AV strong enough to handle newer kind of malisious
> code such as the 'eicar'?
Ok, I have to laugh about this one line. :-)
Eicar is a harmless program which AV manufactures provide as a
test fo
Hello Mean,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:11:56 +0530 GMT (03/12/02, 12:41 +0700 GMT),
Mean Drake wrote:
>> Are your software reviews on the internet, so we can read a bit?
> Thanks to all of those who replied. Indeed amny of the reviews are
> online. I am webmaster and Editor for the Colony Computer Us
55 matches
Mail list logo
