Hello Peter Ouwehand & everyone else
06-Nov-2004 02:55, you wrote:
> here, when forwarding an email, TB creates a msg with a .eml
> attachment. Is this intentional, or some setting in my TB setup?
Could it be that it only happens with HTML mails?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowe
Hello Mica again & everyone else
05-Nov-2004 21:54, you wrote:
>>> One of such ones is AntiVir (Personal Edition, which is free) I use
>> ...OTOH it is very "heavy" on the online updates (I never saw an update
> What is "heavy" for a broadband user? I just downloaded newest version
> of ~4,5 MB
ON Saturday, November 6, 2004, 12:32:18 AM, you wrote:
RO> You're right I mixed them up, as I was in favor of both of them. ;-)
RO> In this thread I meant this:
RO> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4026
Roelof,
That looks more like it although, at the risk of being called a , I need
ON Saturday, November 6, 2004, 2:55:11 AM, you wrote:
PO> Hello TBUDL,
PO> here, when forwarding an email, TB creates a msg with a .eml
PO> attachment. Is this intentional, or some setting in my TB setup?
PO> Ever more, recipents seem to reject emails with .eml attachments.
PO> An .msg extensio
Hallo ,
SCNR
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:27:15 +0100GMT (6-11-2004, 10:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
Z> That looks more like it although, at the risk of being called a , I need to
Z> say that this seems slightly more the we were discussing.
Of course. It had to be consistent.
Z> You wr
Hello MAU,
On Saturday, September 18, 2004, 10:20:16 AM, you wrote:
>> Will this change? I thought it was a nice thing that you could
>> move a folder and the program could still find it.
M> This is due to a bug discovered after 3.0 was released. It was already
M> fixed in one of the post-releas
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + GMT (05/11/2004, 05:05 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> Use %Comment="%Folder" in the Reply template.
M> %SetHeader("Comments","%FolderName") ?
I didn't check. What I suggested is probably based on some old syntax,
so you may be right.
>> In the Outgoing
Hello P.Johnson,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:03:59 -0600 GMT (05/11/2004, 06:03 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
PJ> I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus
PJ> protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin
PJ> Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! u
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 9:22:01 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
> I am using PC-Cillin and TB.
> Problem 1: There is no plug-in. This means that every time a virus
> comes, the email will not be imported into TB, as the initial bat*.tmp
> file will be arrested by the PCC realtim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 6 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 01:33:38 +, when MFPA wrote:
> Hi
> On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 8:54:35 PM, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
>> So, it's good then to keep all attachments sep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 6 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 09:57:05 +0100, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
>> What is "heavy" for a broadband user? I just downloaded newest version
>> of ~4,5 MB, for some 25 minutes on
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 09:54:31 -0500 GMT (06/11/2004, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> Problem 1: There is no plug-in. This means that every time a virus
>> comes, the email will not be imported into TB, as the initial bat*.tmp
>> file will be arrested by the PCC realtime scan,
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 10:29:17 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
> Yes, I could. In fact, I excluded all file extensions by just turning
> off the darned realtime scan. But the question was about TB and PCC,
> and if the solution is to exclude the tmp files and the TB directory
>
Dear TBUDL members,
While checking mail on a number of accounts just before
signing off last night, I got a pop up saying that "Common
Client User Session has encountered a problem and needs to
close." Looking at NIS showed Auto-Protect off and Email
Scanning Error. (NAV 10.0.1.13 is up to date.)
Hello Mica Mijatovic & everyone else
06-Nov-2004 16:20, you wrote:
>> Actually, it would be pretty bad for a virus scanner to not recognize
>> base64 or uu-encoded inline attachments in a message(base). Most do.
> KAV couldn't, NOD-32 couldn't, PC-Sillyn couldn't, F-prot couldn't...
My mistake,
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:03:23 -0500 GMT (06/11/2004, 23:03 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> If you exclude the TB! directory and temp files, then still enabling the
AM> realtime scan wouldn't be a useless combination. Attempting to open or
AM> save an infected attachment to disk wou
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 11:22:52 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
> Agreed. I'll wait for that plug-in for PCC though, because it is a
> very good virus and trojan scanner.
That requires some assistance and commitment from the PC-Cillin
producers. Are they interested in a plugin
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:56:32 -0500 GMT (06/11/2004, 23:56 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> That requires some assistance and commitment from the PC-Cillin
AM> producers. Are they interested in a plugin for TB!?
I have no idea.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Ever notice that PRICE and WORT
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ>> I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus
PJ>> protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin
PJ>> Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this
PJ>>
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 11:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
ASK> Well, if you don't mind - its OK. I wouldn't like it, even though I'm on a
ASK> DSL. :) The whole update process is a bit uncomfortable. You download the
ASK> complete installation archive at least twice a
Hello Pat,
sending this off-list so people won't think I'm advertising. :-)
06-Nov-2004 18:52, you wrote:
> Can I ask what AV program you are using?
Sure. Its the GData AntiVirusKit from http://www.gdatasoftware.com (this is
their english page, the german page is http://www.gdata.de - its more
Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:04:33 +0700 (9:04 AM EST here) Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hello MFPA,
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + GMT (05/11/2004, 05:05 +0700 GMT),
> MFPA wrote:
>>> Use %Comment="%Folder" in the Reply template.
M>> %SetHeader("Comments","%FolderName") ?
> I didn't check. What I sug
Hello TB User Discussion List,
One annoyance of redirect is that it adds a
"Resent-from" header field. In my case, I'm usually
redirecting things, for my wife's attention, to her.
It ends up improperly filtered on her end - because it
looks like it's from me (an X-Sender is generated).
I've trie
Bill McCarthy [BM], wrote:
> One annoyance of redirect is that it adds a
> "Resent-from" header field. In my case, I'm usually
> redirecting things, for my wife's attention, to her.
> It ends up improperly filtered on her end - because it
> looks like it's from me (an X-Sender is generated).
>
Hello TB User Discussion List,
Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker
more user friendly:
(1) Add a `Mail anyway` dialog to `Cancel`. As it is,
when one mails, say source code, with many "spelling
errors" one has to either turn off spell checking or
click on `Ignore all` many times.
On Sat 6-Nov-04 2:48pm -0400, Martin Webster wrote:
Thanks for that totally useless response ;-)
--
Best regards,
Bill
Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
htt
On Sat 6-Nov-04 2:24pm -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> One annoyance of redirect is that it adds a
> "Resent-from" header field.
Here's one way to get around it:
Queue the send. Then open the mail from the Outbox,
invoke the QT from the body, and then send. The
Resent-from header field is remove
Bill McCarthy [BM], wrote:
BM> Thanks for that totally useless response ;-)
I beg you pardon? If you request help don't knock it when received
whether useful to you or not. If I've misunderstood you say so, don't
start TTP!
--
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
"I've learnt more from my failures than
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:24:18 -0600GMT (6-11-2004, 21:24 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
BM> In my case, I'm usually redirecting things, for my wife's
BM> attention, to her. It ends up improperly filtered on her end -
BM> because it looks like it's from me (an X-Sender is generated).
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:53:50 -0600GMT (6-11-2004, 21:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
BM> Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker
BM> more user friendly:
Why not set the spell checker for "automatic checking", it'll give you
some coloured lines, but it won't bother you
Hello P.Johnson,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:49:12 -0600 GMT (07/11/2004, 00:49 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
PJ> Thanks Thomas, your comments have really helped.
You're welcome.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: Most laptop computers
are powerful enough to override
On Sat 6-Nov-04 6:25pm -0400, Roelof Otten wrote:
> Why not set the spell checker for "automatic
> checking", it'll give you
> some coloured lines, but it won't bother you with dialogues.
It is set for automatic checking. That doesn't stop
the dialog OK box. I type fast enough that I often
plan
On Sat 6-Nov-04 5:05pm -0400, Martin Webster wrote:
> Bill McCarthy [BM], wrote:
BM>> Thanks for that totally useless response ;-)
> If you request help don't knock it when received
> whether useful to you or not.
You provided zero assistance. Your "info" was useless
in solving the problem.
33 matches
Mail list logo
