Hello Steve,
On Tuesday, January 11, 2000 you wrote:
Does anyone using Xnews know if and how you can download messages to
read off-line?
No. See its manual.
But you can use Hamster -- local news and mail server. I don't use it
yet, but I've heard it makes a quite powerful tandem with
Hello Claudius,
On Thursday, January 13, 2000 you wrote:
Since Steve wrote that he still stands by everything he said and is
continuing to discuss my arguments with other people it is hard to
believe his apologies to "the list"; especially since his answer to
my mail -- I don't think
Hi Christopher,
On 13 January 2000 at 18:11:58 GMT +0100 (which was 17:11 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
CJT But Claudius, [snip] ...
Whoa Neddy!
I declared this thread a DEAD HORSE two days ago.
Please leave it alone now!
Thank You.
Cheers,
Marck
--
Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:12:07 AM, Marck wrote:
CJT But Claudius, [snip] ...
Whoa Neddy!
I thought it was "Nelly"? :/
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Hi Claudius,
...
I don't think any other expression is more exact -- is simply fascistic.
Please stop this now IMMEDIATELY - enough is enough.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 95 4.0 Build B
in Darmstadt, Germany,
on a
Hello,
Claudius I don't think any other expression is more exact -- is simply fascistic.
I want to apologize for saying that.
Nevertheless, the last two reactions were very dissapointing. And it's
not forgot with one mail.
--
Claudius Regn
--
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 7:38:31 PM, you wrote:
This would mean to add another functionality to filters (date check -
costs processing time). It would be much easier to just add "move to"
as an option what to do with old messages (in additon to delete), as
suggested by
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to George M. Menegakis about
Interview with RITLabs! Finally!:
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
TF You *are* describing Outlook here.
I
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 9:50:36 AM, tracer wrote:
Steve *cough* Uhm, very bad idea. I would rather see RIT put a full
Steve browser into TB! than put in an SMTP server.
why a bad idea?
I would prefer an easy external way to do it but sofar I havent seen
one
Best regards,
Because
Hi Christopher,
CJT I have just reminded myself a question: what about unicode (utf-8)
CJT support?
(Interview continues :-) It will be supported, of course. :-)
Regards,
Stefan
..."Hi-ho, hi-ho, it's hand grenades I throw..."
--
Hi Steve,
Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we
did not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very
useful for mailing list as well...
SL One would think until you try to wrestle with the idea of how to implement
SL it in the email context.
Hi Januk,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:24:32 -0800GMT (12/01/2000, 16:24 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
[...]
JA shouldn't be added. Of course the folders would need to be changed so
JA that instead of having "Delete old messages on exit," they should have
JA "Run Date Filter Set on Exit." Or
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:24:32 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
[..snip..]
Why would you REQUEST something that limiting? If they offered
filtering by date as well, you can achieve everything you and Allie
have suggested _very_ easily.
Not very easily as you put it. Especially if only
Hello tracer all fellow TBUDL members,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 10:14:47 PM, tracer wrote in response to
Alex's saying:
Alexander Therefore I wish to solidarize with those who are
Alexander *against* adding HTML editing, news-reading,
Alexander virus-checking and web-browsing capabilities. I
Hello Alexander,
I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing
than IMAP.
AVK That's only you, please speak for *yourself* only;-)
Alex, do you read what you quote?? ;) "I'd"
~~~
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn
Hello Steve,
SL Sure it does. Let's take, for example, non-conformity to the CUA
SL standard. Open up TB, pick a folder with 10 messages in it. Now, on the list
SL view do this. Select message #1. Hold shift and select message #3. Now,
SL press control and select message #6. Now,
Hello Steve,
SL No, they do not. Do you really want me to get into my rant about how
SL email clients are a shadow of what they could be based on my experience with
SL past software on older hardware?
They serve well for people receiving/sending less than 10 emails/day
and that is why they
Hello Steve,
SL No. The standard convention is to have quotes preceded with the symbol.
There are different ways to communicate, to write emails, to quote. I
quote the way I want to. I exchange emails with enough people from
enough countries with enough experience that I decide how to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 11:50:36 PM, tracer wrote:
why a bad idea?
Because of the current internet climate and the whole design behind the
mail system and how SMTP servers fit into it.
Technically, a lot of ISPs now will not accept port 25 connections from
dynamic IP space. Some
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:37:36 AM, Stefan wrote:
OK, you'll see it :-)
There's much more I'd rather see. However, I've made that abundantly
clear over the past few months.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 7:33:16 AM, Claudius wrote:
They serve well for people receiving/sending less than 10 emails/day
and that is why they are email clients that cover the basics.
That's fine, there are plenty of clients out there that cover it. We
don't need to dumb down another
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 7:45:46 AM, Claudius wrote:
So what? You'd change this, RITLABS doesn't, maybe it is easy to
change, but is it really important?
Yes. Conforming to the standards of the interface is important so people
can effectively use the product without thinking about it.
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 8:09:19 AM, Claudius wrote:
There are different ways to communicate, to write emails, to quote. I
quote the way I want to. I exchange emails with enough people from
enough countries with enough experience that I decide how to quote in
what situation.
Then
Hi there!
On 12 Jan 00, at 9:11, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Interview with RITLabs! Finally":
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 11:50:36 PM, tracer wrote:
why a bad idea?
Because of the current internet climate and the whole design behind the
mail system and how SMTP s
Hello Steve Lamb,
with the email you dare to post here you show your shortcomings. You
are just getting really angry and aggressive; the lack of arguments or
your bad mood is not a reason to become personal insulting in a public
mailing list. With all your net-"culture" you are
breaking
On Wednesday, January 12, 2000 at 16:04:18 ,Claudius scribbled:
CR Steve Lamb, is it time to leave this mailing list??? Do you have any respect
CR for other people in you? Respect for my culture?
Forgive me Claudius, but your response does not help the situation. You should've done
with
this
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:04:18 PM, Claudius wrote:
with the email you dare to post here you show your shortcomings.
Which are far less than yours.
You are just getting really angry and aggressive
No, I am frustrated at yet another newbie trying to change the net world
and
Hi Steve and Claudius,
On 13 January 2000 at 16:29:28 GMT -0800 (which was 00:29 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
It's DEAD HORSE time guys! Angel is quite right - take it off list
please.
Cheers,
Marck
--
Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:38:36 PM, Marck wrote:
On 13 January 2000 at 16:29:28 GMT -0800 (which was 00:29 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
It's DEAD HORSE time guys! Angel is quite right - take it off list
please.
Upon rereading my last message
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:29:28 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..][..snip..][..snip..][..snip..]
Glad to see you're finally quoting correctly. Amazingly, you're learning.
Forte' Agent, Becky, Poco Mail, PMMail, MR2/ICE, Post Road Mailer,
Transoft Mail, and other less worthwhile e-mail
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:04:22 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
Upon rereading my last message I'd like to apologize to the list in
general. At least the last message was a bit too far. While I still agree
with and stand by everything I said my judgement was clouded in the posting of
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 5:15:11 PM, Allie wrote:
Glad to see you're finally quoting correctly. Amazingly, you're learning.
Forte' Agent, Becky, Poco Mail, PMMail, MR2/ICE, Post Road Mailer,
Transoft Mail, and other less worthwhile e-mail clients that I've tried
all support
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:29:28 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:29:28 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Quite frankly, I don't care that someone's opinion is that the sky
Steve is orange with leaf brown polka dots everywhere.
Hello Angel,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:12:12 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:12:12 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Angel wrote:
Angel On Wednesday, January 12, 2000 at 16:04:18 ,Claudius scribbled:
CR Steve Lamb, is it time to leave this mailing list??? Do you have
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 09:34:05 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 12:34:05 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
You want me to spell check or read html-mails with other applications?
Steve Yes. No matter how good the RITLABS
Hi Steve,
you wrote on Monday, January 10, 2000, 23:40:54:
How is it different? I can't see much of a difference between my TBUDL
folder and a news group (I'm using Forté Agent, BTW). Of course, various
commands like "Reply to all" would have a different meaning ("post to all
news groups"
Hi Mark,
you wrote on Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 00:30:32:
[snip]
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
Yes.
SL *VERY* Bad.
MA Gone:-(
Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY* bad"?? That's something very
useful, IMHO.
Ralf.
--
BackMagic: Disaster
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:02:37 AM, Ralf wrote:
More threaded? :-) Doesn't any reply to a news or mail message automatically
create a or add to a thread?
No. There are a lot of email applications which do not use References and
In-Reply-To. Most notably the web based email readers
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:10:21 AM, Ralf wrote:
Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY* bad"?? That's something very
useful, IMHO.
Because it will either be one of two varieties.
1: Click on it and scan.
This is bad because it is an added step that the user could screw up,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:37:59 AM, Thomas wrote:
And here is the stupid question: what is "scoring"?
Scoring is a filtering system (hush and listen, I know TB! has filtering)
whereby the filters assign a score to a newsgroup article based on the rules
provided in the score. You can
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:37:59 AM, you wrote:
And here is the stupid question: what is "scoring"?
Not a stupid question. I just discovered it when I downloaded Xnews
today. It is a way of ranking messages in a newsgroup based upon very
fancy filters. I don't claim to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:00:08 AM, Januk wrote:
Off Topic Question:
Does anyone using Xnews know if and how you can download messages to
read off-line?
No. See its manual.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Hello Steve,
Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did
not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful
for mailing list as well...
Best regards,
Stefan
...Southern DOS: Y'all reckon? (yep/Nope)
--
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:03:46 -0800GMT (11/01/2000, 17:03 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
And here is the stupid question: what is "scoring"?
SL Scoring is a filtering system (hush and listen, I know TB! has filtering)
[...]
SL get per day. That is why I said email and news are
Hello,
SL Doesn't do multiple accounts nor does it have a decent overview of what is
SL in even a single account. Try again.
Outlook would do. Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for fetch/send/store/search mail.
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL
Hello,
ST Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did
ST not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful
ST for mailing list as well...
And I see our new feature rising at the horizon...
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn
Hello Steve,
SL "optional" items to make it comparable to Bat v1.x? You are aware that by
SL virtualizing everything in the manner they have described they are adding in
SL several layers of complexity? Each layer has its own potential for bugs.
Then your conclusion will be: do not try to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:53:51 PM, Claudius Regn wrote:
SL not directly related to the main task at hand, *reading email*.
SL They are doing this without that core application's full
SL potential even being completely realized.
If you just want to *read mail* you can use
Hello Leif,
On Monday, January 10, 2000 you wrote:
We are finally done. I hope you all find it as informative as I did!
Thanks Leif!
I have just reminded myself a question: what about unicode (utf-8)
support?
Best regards,
--
Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello George,
GMM It doesn't go this way my friend.
GMM A mail reader is made for one job. To read mail. As much as your
GMM coffee machine is made to make coffee.
GMM All i want is to read mail.
First: in *your opinion* "it doesn't go this way", my friend.
Obviously you consider a
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 2:34:17 AM, Stefan wrote:
Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did
not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful
for mailing list as well...
One would think until you try to wrestle with the idea of how to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 3:53:51 AM, Claudius wrote:
Then your conclusion will be: do not try to make complex software.
Doesn't work for me.
No. My conclusion is given the bugs and inconsistencies that still
persist in the 1.x series I don't have much faith that RITLABS can move to a
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 3:58:38 AM, Claudius wrote:
Outlook would do. Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for
fetch/send/store/search mail.
No, and that is the problem. An email client should be just for that.
Outlook would not do because it is not an email client by any stretch of the
Hi Ralf,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 8:10:21 AM, you wrote:
RB Hi Mark,
RB you wrote on Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 00:30:32:
RB [snip]
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
Yes.
SL *VERY* Bad.
MA Gone:-(
RB Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY*
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 4:44:16 PM, Claudius Regn wrote:
First: in *your opinion* "it doesn't go this way", my friend.
Obviously you consider a lot of features belonging to '*reading mail*'
- and not just reading mail, that's why you use TheBat! You think this
or that is essential 'mail
Hallo Mark,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:19:20 + GMT (12.01.2000, 02:19 +0800 GMT),
Mark Aston wrote:
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
SL *VERY* Bad.
RB Why the heck (sorry) is that "*VERY* bad"?? That's something very
RB useful, IMHO.
MA Because
Hallo George,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:55:44 +0200 GMT (12.01.2000, 02:55 +0800 GMT),
George M. Menegakis wrote:
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
You *are* describing Outlook here.
GMM All the other things are optional.
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 10:57:24 AM, Thomas wrote:
I agree with this. It will only your system down. Supposing you have
an active virus-scanner running anyway, which you should. :-)
s/only your/only slow your/gi;# :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 10:55:44 AM, George wrote:
Fetching and sending mail could be done using external dedicated program.
For the convinience of users it could be great to implement a way to
communicate with the mail server.
Actually, it is done by external dedicated programs.
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 11:03:57 AM, Thomas wrote:
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
You *are* describing Outlook here.
No. Outlook also has newsreading, a contact list, a to do list, a day
planner, a kitchen
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:09:55 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 03:09 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
I agree with this. It will only your system down. Supposing you have
an active virus-scanner running anyway, which you should. :-)
SL s/only your/only slow your/gi;# :)
LOL! But I'm
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:16:16 -0800 GMT (12.01.2000, 03:16 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
You *are* describing Outlook here.
SL No. Outlook also has newsreading, a contact list, a to do list, a day
SL planner, a kitchen sink
I litterally Laughed Out Loud when I read this.
Hi all,
IMHO, this is mainly loads of discussion about a piece of software
that's supposedly arriving somewhere in the near future. What I
noticed about the interview was mainly that there is no single hard
fact about that piece of software available. There's some "of course
this
Hello George,
GMM Let's draw a line.
GMM In order to read mail you should
I did not mean hairsplitting. You do.
GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to
GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail.
GMM All the other things are optional.
So by that rationality 95% of
Hello Steve,
SL clients have a rotten core. Sure, they look pretty, but bite into it, really
SL sink your teeth into it and you find it is sour inside with no substance.
I don't think so. Almost all mail clients do perfectly offer all the
options you described -- and George described to be
Hello Steve,
Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for
fetch/send/store/search mail.
SL No, and that is the problem. An email client should be just for that.
SL Outlook would not do because it is not an email client by any stretch of the
SL imagination.
Hahaha, Steve -- thank you for your
Hi there!
On 11 Jan 00, at 22:08, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Fina":
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an archiving
Hi there!
On 11 Jan 00, at 22:15, Claudius Regn wrote
about "Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Fina":
SL TB! is good in some areas (database management) than other clients and
SL worse in other areas (IMAP).
I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing
than
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:35:12 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an archiving
capability of sorts.
Seems like a
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:10:22 PM, Claudius wrote:
So by that rationality 95% of TheBat! functions are by now optional.
Yup. And the remaining 5% which is core needs improvement.
It does not, neither does TheBat!
Sure it does. Let's take, for example, non-conformity to the CUA
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:43:31 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
Advanced functionality *should* be supported, as much as possible! This
is the major point for me, personally. Of course, provided that it
doesn't bloat the code heavily and doesn't contradict with how the
program
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:15:51 PM, Claudius wrote:
I don't think so. Almost all mail clients do perfectly offer all the
options you described -- and George described to be besic features.
No, they do not. Do you really want me to get into my rant about how
email clients are a shadow
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:18:39 PM, Claudius wrote:
Hahaha, Steve -- thank you for your serious argumentation...
I am serious. As others have noted Lookout! is a personal information
manager which happens to have email functionality. It would be like calling
Netscape an email client
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:35:12 +0300GMT (12/01/2000, 05:35 +0800GMT),
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:57:24 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:57:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
SL *VERY* Bad.
RB Why the heck
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:43:31 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:43:31 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Alexander Therefore I wish to solidarize with those who are *against* adding HTML
Alexander editing,
Hello Oliver Sturm,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:59:38 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:59:38 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Oliver Sturm wrote:
Oliver Hi all,
Oliver IMHO, this is mainly loads of discussion about a piece of software
Oliver that's supposedly
Hello Claudius Regn,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:15:51 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:15:51 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Claudius Regn wrote:
Claudius Hello Steve,
SL clients have a rotten core. Sure, they look pretty, but bite into it, really
SL sink your teeth
Hi tracer,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:43:06 +0700GMT (12/01/2000, 11:43 +0800GMT),
tracer wrote:
Fetching and sending mail could be done using external dedicated program.
For the convinience of users it could be great to implement a way to
communicate with the mail server.
Steve Actually,
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:45:51 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 12:45:51 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi tracer,
Thomas On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:43:06 +0700GMT (12/01/2000, 11:43 +0800GMT),
Thomas tracer wrote:
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 7:43:06 PM, tracer wrote:
Actually I would like the bat to do it with a buildin or addon locally
running SMTP server, ie not involving the isp.
*cough* Uhm, very bad idea. I would rather see RIT put a full browser
into TB! than put in an SMTP server.
--
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:12:50 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 2:12:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 7:43:06 PM, tracer wrote:
Actually I would like the bat to do it with a buildin or addon
Monday, January 10, 2000, 1:13:39 PM, Leif wrote:
LG - Is there a planned port to Linux?
We are planning to make the Linux version when Delphi for Linux will
be available (this year, as promised by Inprise, Inc).
One good thing to hear.
[regarding a built-in news reader]
LG Why did you
Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:51:08 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
Oh, this is bad. This speaks very badly for TB! production if this is
true. Effective newsreading is completely different than effective email
reading. Why they share common technical specifications and appear, on the
surface,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 3:24:32 PM, George wrote:
I can't disagree with that. Newsreading is a VERY VERY different thing than
mailreading. Other headers, other protocols, other specifications, other
rfcs etc etc.
Well, not quite true. IIRC, a "proper" news message is one that can
Hi Steve,
Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:45:12 PM, you wrote:
SL Monday, January 10, 2000, 3:30:32 PM, Mark wrote:
Gone:-(
SL And this is supposed to mean, what, exactly?
Basically I got more depressed with every item of that interview, I
really like The Bat! as it is and would
Hello Steve and Bat Buddies,
I feel I should put in my two cents here, because most of the opinions
that are posted to this list are negative ones, critical to one aspect
of TB or another.
I support TB's growth into areas such as usenet and HTML because the
developers have so far proved to me
Hello Mark Worsham,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:47:47 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 4:47:47 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Mark Worsham wrote:
Mark Hi Leif -
Mark Monday, January 10, 2000, 3:13:39 PM, you wrote:
LG - How many of the items on the wish list are going
Monday, January 10, 2000, 3:59:11 PM, Mark wrote:
SL And this is supposed to mean, what, exactly?
Ah, ok. Your message could have been taken one of two ways so I wasn't
sure. :)
I suppose there is the option of staying with a version 1.xx?
There is, but I'm not partial to
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 1:42:02 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
Conversely, PMMail stores each folder as a directory on the file system.
Each subfolder is a subdirectory, each message is an individual file. Just
like INN's file storage system. Does that make PMMail a news reader? ;)
No but
Hi tracer -
Monday, January 10, 2000, 6:20:08 PM, you wrote:
Mark Wow. Can't wait until they get it out for testing.
t reading the interview and the gmama testing stage and that of many
t things they seemingly donot know what or how it will do things, I
t wonder how much of the code is
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 4:24:45 PM, George wrote:
No but it is better approach to news reading. Forte's aproach is completely
wrong, news are not supposed to be grouped in a gigantic file, rather in
separate files. In the other hand, Unix doesn't have fragmentation problems
:))). Newsgroup
Hello Mark Aston,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:59:11 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 6:59:11 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Mark Aston wrote:
Mark Hi Steve,
Mark Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:45:12 PM, you wrote:
SL Monday, January 10, 2000, 3:30:32 PM, Mark wrote:
Monday, January 10, 2000, 4:16:51 PM, Jason wrote:
mind, The Bat's wings let it fly far above all the other email clients,
and somehow the download package is always kept a fraction of other
clients.
And Opera sails above its competition. I don't want to see RITLABS spend
time competing
Monday, January 10, 2000, 4:37:15 PM, Mark wrote:
We need to keep in mind that Ritlabs is marketing this product to a wide
audience. This is not their hobby, it's their livelihood. They are trying to
create a product that a lot of people will want to purchase and use.
This is the problem.
Hi Steve,
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:28:21 AM, you wrote:
but that does not really appeal. Any suggestions for another Windows MUA
that come close to TB, as it is now?
SL PMMail? *shrug*
Yes ,exactly a choice of one, TB really cannot compete with the "all
in one " no-brainer
Hello George,
GMM The only thing I want from my mailer to do is to
GMM fetch/send/store/search mail.
There'S a pretty nifty onehm, well, I think it was called PINE ;)
!!
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!
Hello Steve,
SL And Opera sails above its competition. I don't want to see RITLABS spend
SL time competing with Opera Software when they still have a LOT of work to do on
SL TB!. I don't want to see Opera Software compete with RITLABS, either.
RITLABS software IMHO is evolving and
Hello Steve and Bat Buddies,
I don't want to see RITLABS spend time competing with Opera Software
when they still have a LOT of work to do on TB!. I don't want to see
Opera Software compete with RITLABS, either.
I agree with you concerning the web browser RITLabs is planning. There
are three
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 06:25:00PM -0800, Jason Thompson wrote:
Usenet, on the other hand...Well, I know none of the technical aspects
of Usenet, but I've seen that MS Outlook smoothly integrates news and
mail into one client. I've always liked Outlook for that, although
that's the only
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
